February 19, 2005

WaPo: Gannon/Guckert Is a Gay Prostitute

Here is the scorecard:

Number of times 'gay' appears in the article: 10
Number of times 'escort' appears in the article: 3

The man that sent the left into the frenzied hope that they, like we in the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, could have some influence in affecting the MSM has spoken out in his own defense at the Washington Post. Unfortunately for the left, Gannon/Guckert is no Dan Rather or Eason Jordan. Here are a few nuggets from the story. Notice how the very first sentence in the WaPo article mentions Gannon's sexuality? Just remember, this is not about the sex you wingnuts!!

Jeff Gannon, the former White House reporter whose naked pictures have appeared on a number of gay escort sites, says that he has "regrets" about his past but that White House officials knew nothing about his salacious activities.
Howard Kurtz does a poor job of defending Guckert-Gannon, if that was his intent. Why does he feel the need to put that front-and-center in the article? I'd expect that in a blog to show the irony of it all, but not in the WaPo. Oops, my bad. I was assuming for a second that there was a difference between a hack like me and Howard Kurtz. Bad assumption.
Gannon chastised his critics, breaking a silence that began last week when liberal bloggers disclosed his real name, James Dale Guckert, and a Web page, which he paid for, featuring X-rated photos of himself. "Why would they be looking into a person's sexual history? Is that what we're going to do to reporters now? Is there some kind of litmus test for reporters? Is it right to hold someone's sexuality against them?"
Sorry if I don't feel too bad for you Gannon, because you are a slime-ball. But Gannon is right, are reporters lives to be scrutinized as if they were public officials.

The WaPo piece seems to be doing little more than rehashing of a press release issued yesterday and published here. Sure they got Gannon to respond to allegations, but some of the allegations are so preposterous that the very fact that they would be taken seriously by a legitimate member of the MSM is telling. Like the press release, it recounts Gannon's sordid past, paints Gannon out to be a self-hating gay hypocrite, and then attempts to link him to the Valerie Plame.

The WaPo article even recounts an accusation that Gannon-Guckert was such an important member of the media with access at the highest levels, that he was privy to Top Secret information:

Aravosis wrote yesterday on his blog that an unnamed television producer says Gannon told him the Iraq war was going to begin four hours before Bush announced it.
If Kurtz was trying to simply refute the moonbat accusations coming out of left-wing sites he could have done some research other than a proven liar's word. The Gannon story was blown way out of proportion in the left-wing blogosphere, but let's not forget that in the end Gannon-Guckert is not the most credible source of information.

I just have to disagree with Paul at Wizbang on this one and find myself in the frightening position of agreeing with the Americablog (in spirit, not on the 'facts'). The article does nothing to refute any allegations made--even the tin-foil ones! Worse, it emphasizes exactly those things which the moonbats have been barking about: gay sex, prostitution, lying, and hidden connections between Gannon and the White House.

Brilliant work Kurtz.

UPDATE: Charles Johnson has more.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:56 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 596 words, total size 4 kb.

1 There is no possibility that this execrescence could be "blown out of proportion": it is the essential confirmation of the position taken by all those "moonbat" accusations of the notorious "left-wing sites" that evil is merely the beginning word of the definition of all things Republican since the first Bush lied himself into extinction. The fury of those who were discomfitted by Bungle I's defeat has transformed them into the cast of the Evil Dead - Politics, and the true mystery is why MSM is not hourly reporting the dismay of those "swing voters" who voted for the current occupant of the throne of Evil.

Posted by: Conley T. Gwinn at February 20, 2005 10:44 AM (NLv8B)

2 Can someone here explain to me how you can call something anyone publishes on the World Wide Web part of their "private" life? If Ted Koppel had a blog, would that blog be off limits? (One may also wonder what is private anymore in the life of someone who inserts a dick shot of himself into a United States Marine Corps seal and publishes that on the web?) More to the point is to ask why Gannon/Guckert's sexuality is relevant, as it certainly was to Talon (or do you suppose that it was the revelation that Gannon/Guckert has a conservative bias that got him shitcanned from Talon?) Kofman, the reporter that the White House attacked for being gay and Canadian at the beginning of the war didn't lose his job over that. Nah, it's Gannon/Guckert's former conservative friends who are all up in arms about the buttfucking. The liberals are upset - with good reason - about somebody plucking a whore with blackmail potential out of absolute obscurity and giving him better access than other, serious reporters are getting from this White House and using him as a clearinghouse for oppo research during the last election. And by upset, I mean 'jumping up and down with glee' because boy did the WH ever put their foot in it with this one. Schaedenfreude, baby. Schae-den-freud-E!

Posted by: jenniebee at February 20, 2005 11:00 AM (PqlgI)

3 why do you insist on trying to assign ideological motivies to Howie Kurtz, when you yourself admit the case for that is weak? Do you think it's possible - just possible - that he was just trying to write a story, and had no ulterior motivation?

Posted by: derek rose at February 20, 2005 05:20 PM (RTLaK)

4 It doesn't suprise me that a bunch of Republican slimeballs would plant a whore in the White House press corps.. I really think this is just the beginning. How many "reporters" have been found to have been paid off now?

Posted by: Dennis at February 20, 2005 07:07 PM (fvZPD)

5 Can't believe some of the election cry babies are still crying.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 21, 2005 07:35 PM (CBNGy)

6 What? ANOTHER whore in the White House? Gettin crowded over there, have to get a few roll-away beds. Hope the lipstick supply holds out! An anxious nation waits.

Posted by: M. Douglas Wray at February 28, 2005 12:37 PM (FqPc6)

7 hello. i just wanted to give a quick greeting and tell you i enjoyed reading your material.

online casinos

Posted by: online casinos at April 05, 2005 02:02 PM (rHvOH)

8 as

Posted by: inuyasha hentai porn at November 07, 2005 10:23 AM (/pdyw)

9 aaa

Posted by: hustler pics at November 08, 2005 06:24 AM (/pdyw)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0927, elapsed 0.1844 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1716 seconds, 253 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.