October 29, 2004
Tin Foil Comments: Jews Control The World
Sometimes comments are so funny, they just have to be shared. From my
Video Shows American Terrorist post:
For the last few hours this tape has been credited by the
zionist/neocon media as being the work of the "dangerous" "Al Qaieda" (read -
Al Mossad / Al CIAda) "media-relations agent" Pearlman. Then all of a sudden
the CIA say it might not be authentic and no mention of Pearlman! ...
What?! Did that little diversion fu*k up you muppets ...
There is no "Al Qaieda" ... ONLY AL MOSSAD AND AL CIAda ...
Posted by: Rusty at
11:07 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Now, that fine comment is only halfway true. The true method of influence for al-CIAda is obviously the cicada (you see! only one letter difference!). Note how cicadas spread throughout the country last summer (as they did in previous election years, at one point or another!), infesting traditionally liberal areas in an attempt to steal the election from John Kerry. For if only people were smart and paid attention, they would recognize him as the Holy Savior. Blessed be, Senator! Blessed be!
Posted by: TV's Frank at October 29, 2004 12:01 PM (Wsn+K)
2
I'm still worried about Al Cicada. They were supposed to swarm us back in the spring and only a few showed up. They must still be lurking out there waiting to pounce.
Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at October 29, 2004 12:21 PM (WsZ4F)
3
Are you sure he didn't mean Al CYAda? Or is that only if CBS runs the story?
Posted by: Brian B at October 29, 2004 12:57 PM (CouWh)
4
thank god that Kerry questioned Bush's handling of terrorism. If he had taken the "real line" that the terrorism is largeley a neocon cocotion to scare to submnission to the leader, whoever he is in the moment of crisis, Al CIAcada would have been killing a few Americans during this weekend. The camp is in tatters. Another tErrorist attack will just merely show that Bush has failed, and hence we will live away without it; happily. Victor Ostrovsky's books - search "Victor Ostrovsky" - is still the single biggest eye opener. "Operation Northwoods" the second.
Have a nice terror free day!
S.
Posted by: stenb at October 29, 2004 03:39 PM (T8XcM)
5
stanb,
Once more, this time in English? Or better yet, consider listening to the doctors when they tell you the yummy pills are good for you.
Posted by: Brian B at October 29, 2004 03:51 PM (CouWh)
6
To brianb:
I read it again. Sorry about the spell error.
The word is meant to be "concoction".
Pls accept apologies. S.
Posted by: stenb at October 29, 2004 04:05 PM (T8XcM)
7
O...K......
So, Rusty, See you on Monday.
Posted by: Brian B at October 29, 2004 05:52 PM (CouWh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Kerry Anti-Logic: The Timing Doesn't Matter (by Demosophist)
As though the public would regard as seamless a shift in rhetoric as monumental as the Great African Rift, the Kerry team now holds that the actual date at which the Qaqaa explosives went missing is of no importance whatever. Which, of course, is like saying that the US was responsible for Saddam's weapons (all of them, not just WMD)
before it wasn't responsible for them.
more...
Posted by: Demosophist at
09:45 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This is absolutely consistent with the logic of a man who expects us to believe him sane when he tells us "I actually voted FOR the 87 billion dollars... BEFORE I voted AGAINST it."
It is consistent with the philosophy of the Anti-American Left (which styles itself "Anti-Imperialist/Anti-Capitalist" but it's just plain hostile to the entirety of the American experiment.
Of course: America is busy raping the world, particularly third-world non-Christian Non-White Islamic countries. We've already been telling you that for decades. Iraq is all those things, so anything it does in its own defense is justifiable, and AMERICA IS RESPONSIBLE.
Q.E.D.
The alleged missing explosives were AMERICA's responsibility from the moment they were manufactured.
I hope the idiots have a chance of enlightenment before some Islamic Fundamentalist who doesn't after all give a shit about their insane pretzel logic, comes along and saws their heads off.
"But wait! I embrace your right to your fanatical interpretation of the Prophet! I've ALWAYS voted Democratic! I am a TRANSNATIONAL PROGRESSIVE! See? I Still have my ticket stub from Fahrenheit 9-11!"
"So What?" sneers the terrorist."Allahu Akhbar! Quit struggling while I saw..."
Posted by: David March at October 29, 2004 09:00 PM (kfs8u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 28, 2004
October 27, 2004
Rusty's Blog Law
Anything that can go wrong on Rusty's blog will go wrong on Rusty's blog. Not only did this site go down, but
my backup site here was down too.
And it came back up, literally, minutes before I was walking out the door! It's all George Bush's fault!!!!
Posted by: Rusty at
05:02 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 27, 2004 05:57 PM (62QDG)
2
Your site was down? I didn't notice.
Posted by: Chad Evans at October 27, 2004 10:59 PM (8uDxS)
3
Bush lied, bloggers died. Vote Konos.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 27, 2004 11:51 PM (35fAD)
4
er, I mean, vote Turd Sandwich. Butters' support made the difference.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 27, 2004 11:52 PM (35fAD)
5
Rusty, I am writing this here because I didn't want to email you directly so that you would read this message and not delete it. I DID NOT send that email to you. I haven't written anything to you or on this website for over a week. Been to busy working..lol I am glad that you did not open it, since someone has a way of sending emails from my email on AOL.... grrrrr I will have to look into this... Freaking lil email pirates. If you have any suggestions let me know.
Andrea
Posted by: Andrea at October 28, 2004 08:54 AM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2004
Note to Karl Rove: Use the Death Penalty Card--it's a litmus test
Did you know that John F. Kerry opposes the death penalty? I didn't until a few days ago. It's true. Check it out at the
NY Times. Now, I may not know much about how to run an election and all that, but will somebody please tell Karl "Goebbels" Rove about this. Cause where I'm sitting, not a single one of my 'moderate' friends would vote for a guy who opposed the death penalty. NONE. This is the a litmus test for most people. A guy who doesn't support the death penalty is a liberal to us here in flyover country. More than that, soccer-moms, housewives, blue-collar workers, every one but a bunch of coastal elites all think the same thing. THIS IS THE ISSUE YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN HAMMERING ON FOR THE PAST MONTH. It's not too late Mr. Rove. Please come up with one more ad. You could have won 45 states had you done so earlier.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:30 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Don't get me started about the absence of political skills demonstrated by this supposedly "politically savvy" administration. We're still waiting for him to respond appropriately to the Kerry allegations about al Qaqaa and the Kerry exaggerations regarding his secret UN meetings. As usual he leaves it entirely to his supporters to respond and come to his practical defense. Which is just fine I guess, if he wins. But I'm gonna be very very pissed if he loses... because this has been a pattern for four long years, and I'd like to see him pick up the cudgel in his own defense a little more often. Not to mention that he hasn't done diddly to defend US actions in the Arab media world... again leaving the job of winning hearts and minds to volunteers. And again, I'll forgive him if we win... because that really takes precedence. But if we don't, and things start going south in terms of popular opposition from Iraqis in a broad swath of the country (and not just the Baghdad region), then again I'm gonna be really really pissed.
Sorry, but I'm not at all impressed by Rove and Company. To me, they seem pretty amateurish.
Sorry, I just had to get that off my chest. Carry on.
Posted by: Demosophist at October 27, 2004 01:15 AM (OtR16)
2
PS: I'd post something about the game, but that was the worst job of base running I've ever seen in my live, and I'm just too disgusted to say anything more. Good insight about the death penalty issue, though.
Posted by: Demosophist at October 27, 2004 01:25 AM (OtR16)
3
Being from the Boston area I remember very well the Kerry v. Weld debates for the US Senate. The most famous exchange, one that many say turned the election Kerry's way had to do with the death penalty. Weld basically asked Kerry how he could be so out of line with the rest of the country and not support the death penalty? Kerry response was something along the lines, "I know something about killing. I don't like killing"
It was a great rhetorical flourish and the uber-liberals in Cambridge ate it up. The quote doesnÂ’t do it justice you need to see video of the exchange to get a feel for what happened.
They then used it as a hammer to remind people Weld sat out Vietnam with a bad back.
I agree more should have been made of this issue, but then again when I look at what happened to Weld (who I am a huge fan of) I understand Rove's reluctance to put the issue in play.
Posted by: James at October 28, 2004 09:25 AM (rP4OC)
4
To all my conservatives out there I fill very sorry for you. However, I am not conservative, but despite being liberal I do support the death penalty. And I ask you in the case of Karl Rove, should one who in a time of war (War on Terror, (which is not winnable, sorry conservatives), should one in a time of war, a person of influence in the highest levels of our government, who willingly betrayed and leaked the identity of a CIA operative, not receive the death penalty? I ask you? In a conservative system treason I believe is defined by "A betrayal of trust or confidence." Is this not the case? But if it is treason, a betrayal of the state, does it therefore deserve the death penalty?
I'm curious to see how conservatives respond.
Steve
Posted by: Steven at July 13, 2005 10:45 PM (K9EZ2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
STOP THE PRESS: Jawa Report now on Google News
It's true.
The Jawa Report is now a source for
Google News.
Rob at Fine? Why Fine? dropped a comment notifying me. I laughed as I typed in "oil for food", ha-ha, funny Rob. *Astonishment* Go look for yourself!! It links to this post.
***Thanks everyone!!!
Posted by: Rusty at
08:15 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I thought that you'd be surprised. I actually get emailed via GoogleNewsAlert everytime "oil for food" pops up in a news story and I was surprised to see The Jawa Report in my latest email.
Hey, if Atrois can be listed there why can't you?
Posted by: Rob A. at October 26, 2004 08:51 PM (8APPC)
2
That's too good. I'm going to launch a similar campaign.
Posted by: Simon at October 26, 2004 09:16 PM (FUPxT)
3
and the "NO FUCKIN SHIT" award goes to:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000685127
Posted by: Mr. K at October 26, 2004 09:41 PM (y/Bac)
4
Aljazeerah is listed as a news source, too. Go figure.
Posted by: Editor at October 26, 2004 09:43 PM (uurD1)
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 26, 2004 09:47 PM (plokx)
6
Oh yeah,and how long 'til you move away from Raney St.,and off to McMaynerbury you'll go.Snob!
Can I have your Wagner Char-King?
Posted by: mikeatSE at October 27, 2004 12:58 AM (Y4RiX)
Posted by: Froggy at October 27, 2004 01:11 AM (4M6d6)
Posted by: Dick at October 27, 2004 06:02 AM (hu9UN)
9
There goes google news as a source of reliable information
Posted by: Digger at October 28, 2004 05:02 AM (FYEx6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Best Bonfire Ever
And it's 69.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:30 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thank God! I thought you were offended by my disdainful treatment of your post.
Posted by: Matt at October 26, 2004 04:32 PM (3TuFG)
2
No dude, I was under the impression that you were supposed to send your worst post in for the bonfire--hence, my post really did suck ass!!
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 26, 2004 04:41 PM (JQjhA)
3
Oh, well you certainly succeeded then...
Thanks for the link and the compliment.
Posted by: Matt at October 26, 2004 04:46 PM (3TuFG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
George Bush Gets Crucial Jawa Endorsement
George W. Bush for President: The endorsement I once never thought I'd write.
* * * * *
Posted by: Rusty at
02:17 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a scumbag. Sullivan never once mentions that the
real reason (as he himself has previously stated) is Bush's stance on same-sex marriage.
And he thinks his readers are to stupid to recognize his smoke-and-mirrors act, or remember what he wrote earlier this year. Sheesh! Stupid Limey!
Posted by: Boyd at October 26, 2004 02:44 PM (VeBwJ)
2
Ahem. Exercising my right to revise and extend my remarks, that should be "...too stupid..."
Posted by: Boyd at October 26, 2004 02:46 PM (VeBwJ)
3
Sullivan is just priceless. He betrays virtually all of his so-called "principles" for the sake of a romantic ideal, and then skedaddles to an "undisclosed location." I'm betting it's somewhere on the Eastern Shore, where he can wander the tidal pools and eat crab cakes.
Posted by: Demosophist at October 26, 2004 02:46 PM (OtR16)
4
That was the first time I've visted A****w's site for 4 months and it only reminded me why.
Posted by: Editor at October 26, 2004 02:51 PM (adpJH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 25, 2004
Dean Esmay, aliens, bioduplication, nude conspiracy....
...oh my G*d, Lyndon LaRouche was right!!!
***
As both Professor Chaos and Bill Dauterive can attest, I came this close to punching a few LaRouchies in the face back in the day. I suggest Dean Esmay ought to do the same. Eric at Classical Values has a few thoughts too.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:12 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Me: Dude, what's up?
Rusty: Not much. I almost got in a fight right now.
Me: With who?
Rusty: The people at the LaRouche table.
Me: Why?
Rusty: Because I told them they were Nazis.
Me: Sweet.
Dauterive: Super Sweet.
Rusty: Seriously.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 25, 2004 06:49 PM (W/VYl)
2
Why, I can remember back when Lyndon LaRouche ran a Communist organization called the NCLC (National Caucus of Labor Committees). Ah nostalgia!
BTW, there's more Neiwert stuff
here and
here.
Thanks for the link!
Posted by: Eric Scheie at October 28, 2004 09:03 PM (vxaRo)
3
How apt that you should be advocating violence towards people who disagree with you.
Posted by: antifascist at October 31, 2004 11:51 PM (JzwxE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2004
Commissar Turns One!!!
My wife is having a girls-only party at the house-- presumably all her gal pals are pillow fighting in their see-through nighties right now (that's how I imagine it at least)--so she kicked me out of the house for the evening. I've been pretty busy lately and haven't checked any other blogs in a couple of days let alone my e-mail. If you've e-mailed me in the past couple of days, sorry, but this is what it's like around here (gentle reminder, new address is mypetjawa[at]gmail[dot]com):
Does anyone know how to turn off the comment forwarding for MT?
Anyhoo, where was I? Let's see--nighties, e-mail, oh right, blogs. Haven't read any blogs lately. So, I finally had a minute to check what is going on in the blogosphere and lo and behold what do you know? It's the Commissar's blog anniversary and here I am worrying about stupid e-mails going unanswered!!!
Let me just say the Politburo Diktat is one of the finest blogs out there. The Commissar not only encouraged me in the early days of my blogging career, he took the time to give me pointers and has kept me out of trouble when a few of my gimmicks went bad. And truth be known, it was my time as a guest-blogger over at his site that really put my blog on the map [even though Captain Ed. has stopped returning my e-mails--what up with that?].
If I have a blog-father, than the Commissar is it. So let me just say to him:
Ya zhelaiou bac bcevo xoroshovo c dnem rozhdenya!!!
Posted by: Rusty at
08:06 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 258 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Spasibo, Comrade Rusty!
Posted by: The Commissar at October 24, 2004 08:30 PM (WRROs)
2
When I moved to munu, my comments were no longer forwarded. ...I thought it was a munu thing.
Regardless, I'm loving it.
Posted by: Key at October 25, 2004 11:03 AM (waMhq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 22, 2004
NYTimes Gets Bitch Slapped
Paul at Wizbang catches the NY Times making up quotes.
Posted by: Rusty at
12:28 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Uh, no. The NYT got a quote SLIGHTLY wrong, but there was absolutely NO misrepresentation. Again, you guys are missing the forrest for the trees... on purpose.
Here's the mistake: "No collaborative relationship."
Here's the quote from the 9/11 Report: "But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship."
Honestly, what is the scandal here, the fact that a reporter got a quote slightly wrong, or going to war based on a lie!!!
You guys are playing fast and loose with the truth while at the same time claiming as a primary strategy against Democrats and the Media that THEY are the unethical ones.
Joseph Goebbels would be proud.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 22, 2004 12:45 PM (62QDG)
2
So, wait, they weren't making up quotes? Or becaue you believe that since the TRUTH is higher than the facts that it was ok to ascribe a quote that is not there?
Collaborative OPERATIONAL relationship is different than a 'collaborative relationship' since the former suggests that Iraq helped plan specific terrorst acts while the latter suggest that while Iraq had a relationship with al Qaeda that the relationship had not developed to this point.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 22, 2004 01:09 PM (JQjhA)
3
Didn't know what this was all about until the wife told me that the NY times has come out for Bush. Now I understand.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 23, 2004 12:29 AM (CBNGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 21, 2004
Black in the Saddle!!
Hey, my site is back up!! Thanks for all of you who visited my backup site. Yes, I do have a backup. You can
SEE IT HERE. Bookmark it. If this site ever goes down again you can always check to see what I'm up to over there. I actually posted over there today, even if it was mostly moaning and bitching and a whole lotta link whoring. Back to my regular routine tomorrow.
UPDATE: I just checked the sitemeter--OUCH!!
PS-Today is the third anniversary of the release of Rusty Shackleford v. 2.0. He's three years old today and Papa Shackleford couldn't be more proud. I love you son. Happy birthday!!
Posted by: Rusty at
08:43 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Does he have a blog yet?
I can hear you in your proudest voice: "he was a link whore before he could walk."
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 21, 2004 10:23 PM (fjoYK)
2
the hip hop debate, from Froggyruminations
http://www.miniclip.com/hiphopdebate.htm
Posted by: Mr. K at October 22, 2004 06:32 AM (r83Rn)
3
The way I figure it, if you don't blog your a 'tard. So I better get him set up. Blogspot? Sure, it's like using training wheels on a bike.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 22, 2004 07:58 AM (JQjhA)
4
Happy birthday to the little guy. That's great. Just please, please don't buy him any
Team America dolls, OK?
Posted by: Gordon at October 22, 2004 08:11 AM (dEFhD)
5
man, I been screwing off with this blog crap too much. I am still struggling with a needed website for my livelihood.
but, that was some funny shit...and for now I can live with being a tard.
Posted by: Mr. K at October 22, 2004 09:46 AM (VlgxW)
6
Hey, thanks for the plug on the old site. My traffic's been in the tank lately, mostly because training keeps me from blogging as prolifically as I used to.
Posted by: Brian B at October 22, 2004 11:45 AM (CouWh)
7
Yep, October's a good month for sons. My firstborn entered the world Oct. 6th.
Happy Birthday to you..
Posted by: Laura at October 22, 2004 08:22 PM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2004
The Petition No One On My Floor Will Sign
The Crack Young Staff are at it again. Here's a petition you'll never see signed by any of my colleagues:
“The Hatemonger’s Quarterly” Official Academics Against Remote Oppression that in No Way Affects Them Manifesto (THMQOAAROTINWATM):
We, the undersigned, are deeply troubled by manifold injustices: Capitalism, democracy, &c. Yet we wish to announce that we are untroubled by various issues that would normally trouble such beacons of “social justice” as ourselves.
We hereby declare that the following things do not in any way bother us:
1. The fact that numerous professors at our universities are offered starvation wages and no health-care. As long as they teach the classes we donÂ’t want to bother with, thatÂ’s fine by us. [ed. Note: Stotch, you reading this?]
2. The fact that our graduate students live in abject poverty. As long as they teach the classes we donÂ’t want to bother with, thatÂ’s fine by us.
3. The fact that our parking spots are far, far better than those held by lowly service employees. Sure, we’re Marxists and all, but we don’t want to take this “fairness” stuff too far.
4. The fact that some students want a balanced liberal arts education, instead of four years of left-wing agitprop. [ed note: don't let the Social Work department get a hold of this!]
HT:
Llama Bitchers
PS-I would pay to see Steve put this up on his office door!
Posted by: Rusty at
04:00 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Just like your comments on professional journalism, you are unable to acknowledge that the vast majority of professors approach their jobs with professionalism and the intent to be as objective as possible. I had maybe one professor in my life that tried to brainwash me. And again, we need to have better than a sophomoric understanding of "objectivity" to even begin a discussion about this.
Based on the logic of your post, you indoctrinate your students with right-wing agitprop. I bet you're better than that. I wish you thought the same of the rest of us.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 20, 2004 04:26 PM (62QDG)
2
Just to give you an idea of what I'm talking about, here is a cast of characters who made it into my lectures on the media this none other than one Dr. Rusty Shackleford...
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 20, 2004 04:33 PM (62QDG)
3
Sorry... my comment got cut off... let me try that again... to let you know how objective some of us are willing to be, the following cast of characters made it into my lectures on the media this semester: Bernard Goldberg, Ann Coulter, Eric Alterman, Noam Chomsky, and none other than one Dr. Rusty Shackleford. There.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 20, 2004 04:35 PM (62QDG)
4
Holy schneike I'm in somebody's lecture!
It's the end of the world, I tells ya!!
We are all doomed! Doomed!! DOOMED!!!!
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 20, 2004 05:04 PM (JQjhA)
5
A student of mine wrote the following in an essay I'm grading right now: "... the US government should be involved with supplying homes or shelters to the homeless. I would rather know that somebody has a bed and shelter to sleep in than to accidentally trip over them on a sidewalk."
Now, I'm guessing you'll assume that I'd write "Good!" after this comment like a good liberal college professor. Uh, no. More like "You need better justification for this position than that!"
You'd never know it from your post, but it is possible to be objective, Rusty.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 20, 2004 05:21 PM (62QDG)
6
Well there you have it. Prof Pete has proved you wrong.
And, in other news, Pauline Kael still doesn't know anyone who voted for Nixon.
Posted by: Jim in Chicago at October 20, 2004 06:06 PM (4W4+i)
7
Rusty, can I have your autograph and say that I read you before you were famous?
Posted by: Dick at October 20, 2004 06:20 PM (hu9UN)
8
Should anyone be proud of voting for Nixon?
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 20, 2004 06:25 PM (62QDG)
9
I mighta found this on your website but this seems like a good place to post it: Brainwashing 101. Back when I was an impressionable kid in college, when Reagan was president (hats off, moment of silence...ok) I thought that these college professors must "know" and everything Reagan and his administration did was wrong...the deficit was "crowding out" private investment...all those billions for weapons that will give us no return on our investment...plus, all the PC bullshit on top of that...
Now, as I look back, having made my way in the business world, I realize that those professors are just what I suspected they were: weenie, whiney, pencil-necked dipshits who probably had no idea what real work was...I mean the kind where you sweat and get dirty, and your hours are dark thirty to dark thirty...
but anyway, here it is:
http://academicbias.com/bw101.html
Posted by: Mr. K at October 20, 2004 08:08 PM (G0suo)
10
I was recently informed a tenured Marxist that my sessional teaching was about "paying my dues". How does that go? Oh yes, each according to their ability and each according to their need.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at October 20, 2004 08:15 PM (bhsI/)
11
I realize that I'm coming to this party a bit late, but...
Hey Prof., that's kinda like asking if anyone should be proud of voting for Clinton (which I did once and am still ashamed).
I'm just saying...
Posted by: Matt Hurley at October 22, 2004 10:52 AM (vQcWL)
12
I'm proud to have voted for Nixon. He got us out of Viet Nam. Remember that one? The liberal weanies Kennedy and Johnson got us into. Bush had the balls to send us into the middle east. But the stage was set by the vulgar young lady molesting Clinton. Clinton the liberal sent our military into more foreign contries than any president in history.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 23, 2004 01:52 PM (CBNGy)
13
Hey, I'm one of those un-Tenured, "Starvation Pay', No-Benefit, Part-Timers that 99% of the Universities, Colleges and Community Colleges can't do without. If we didn't offer our time and expertise, most of the teaching that goes on in the "Halls of Higher Learning" wouldn't happen!
Most of the Tenured Docs are too busy chasing their own Leftist agendas to be bothered with anything remotely close to the description of what they were hired for, providing knowledge to the paying students! Anyway that's how it seems to be at the two Instutions that I teach in!
Posted by: large at October 24, 2004 11:15 AM (VRK2g)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
When Spam Goes Bad II
Here is some spam I got today. Funny that they would send it to moi? Yes. A scam? Probably. But the fact that people will probably send in money to these guys is scary on so many different levels. Just what we need in this world, more followers of the Religion of Peas.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
03:25 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The sad part is its the fastest growing religion in the world.
Posted by: Salamander at October 20, 2004 03:39 PM (F26eZ)
2
I got an email today asking me to confirm or deny that my credit card was being used in Florida to purchase jewelery worth 947.52. Pretty pathetic.
Posted by: Jane at October 20, 2004 10:09 PM (Olxnt)
3
THANKS FOR GENEOUS DONATION
I am not donating anything to his "gene-ous" pool.
And sorry Jane, that was me.
Posted by: Jeremy at October 21, 2004 02:47 AM (JYeBJ)
4
Dear,Sir
I here by requetin an aid from all islamic patriot.I live in (burkina faso)a small country that shares is boder with togo,ivory coast.the problem is that am in a community where islam is not recognise,i tried my best in promoting islam there but to lach of prayer item and many more the main presently is that i have a manuscript where i indicates how topray,tings to do,and every type of guslu and in which condiction must it be praticalised.but i dont have enogh money to print it in out burkina ethnic.Please ineed your hep.i do my busness in abidjan in (ivory coast)igoes every month to burkina because of that.
i will be greatful and godwill be at you sides if you do someting to it this is my phone number +22505880406.in abidjan there is no network coverage that why i took that internatinal number as for every brither in islam reaches me easily.
thanks
Posted by: imran mukadas at March 08, 2005 07:42 AM (GOhjR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2004
Team America: World Police in 2 Hours
I've got tickets for the 7 p. m. show. To say I'm excited would be an understatement. I haven't been this giddy with anticipation since my wedding night. I have an
updated roundup of the blogosphere's reaction to the movie here.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:01 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Rusty,
From what I know about you, you're going to love it. You're not dragging Mrs. Shackleford to it, are you?
Posted by: gordon at October 19, 2004 05:03 PM (dEFhD)
2
Dude, my apologies for trackbacking on a post that had nothing to do with your "Kerry's worst lie" report, but I do think it is important to give your readers the opportunity to critically review your work, and to do so with the same emphasis that you gave your initial report (which was at the top of your blog for several days).
You can do what you want. Obviously it's your blog, but I do think I've offered quite a compelling challenge to your claim regarding "Kerry's worst lie."
Out.
Posted by: Professor Peter Von Nostrand at October 19, 2004 05:55 PM (1miw1)
3
Rusty,
Puppet Love!? ... I can dig it!
Posted by: Sergeant America at October 19, 2004 07:06 PM (d//26)
4
All I'm saying is when you see Peter Jennings come on, make sure you've swallowed any popcorn candy or coke.
Posted by: Jeff at October 19, 2004 07:30 PM (VxoRA)
5
The suspense is killing me. Are you seriously?
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 19, 2004 09:03 PM (/kjEv)
6
I so hope your wife doesn't read this blog.
Posted by: Simon at October 20, 2004 05:07 AM (UKqGy)
7
Mrs. Shackeleford doesn't even know what a blog is, and no she isn't going!!
I'm seriously.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 20, 2004 07:55 AM (JQjhA)
8
it's cool. i love the korean guy when he says, "oh hellwro!". there should be a team america 2.
Posted by: bob dylan at April 12, 2005 12:40 PM (Gr7FE)
9
i am gary johnston. it was hard hurling for such a long time and also sucking that guys' dick but it was worth it to save the world. i love you ppl.
Posted by: gary johnston at April 12, 2005 12:44 PM (Gr7FE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Welcome Aboard Bravo Romeo Delta and the Demosophist
Bravo Romeo Delta, the
Domosophist and yours truly, Dr. Rusty Shackleford, have decided to do something
never before done in the history of the blogosphere:
cross-posting. Yeah, I know it's a radically
new concept, and something sure to generate a lot of
copycatting, but I own the patent on this one and I know a
good attorney.
So why did we do this? I dunno. Seems pretty fun-kay, and after all isn't the funk all that matters?
Just to clarify, these guys aren't 'guest bloggers' or whatever, these guys are now part of Team Sancrawler, and vice versa---er, I guess I'm part of Team Nuk-em and Team Dead Greek Philosophers or something??
Posted by: Rusty at
10:01 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You couldn't have picked better partners.
Posted by: Jane at October 19, 2004 10:54 AM (AaBEz)
2
I enjoyed this, thought I'd share it...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1329858,00.html
by the way, who are you guys, what kind of Dr are you?
Posted by: Mr. K at October 19, 2004 11:05 AM (V/FDE)
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 19, 2004 11:07 AM (JQjhA)
4
That's what I figured. I have a sample of Funk I will send you to study...your buddy Von Nerdstrum is into Toromerdology.
Posted by: Mr. K at October 19, 2004 11:20 AM (V/FDE)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 19, 2004 06:19 PM (CBNGy)
6
Cross dressing is OK if done with taste ... er, sorry! I misunderstood and misunderstated...
Cheers! ... yellow teeth = no pussy?
Posted by: Sergeant America at October 19, 2004 07:13 PM (d//26)
7
What, posting prolifically on one blog is not enough?
Posted by: Simon at October 20, 2004 05:09 AM (UKqGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2004
Team America Blog Reviews (UPDATED)
I saw
Team America: World Police last night with the only other Bush supporter on the floor and a Chomsky loving lesbo (the real kind, not the hot ones on TV)--what better way to spend a night out on the town with the guys? No small task for a guy with three kids, but Mrs. Shackleford was so impressed by my birthday gift that she yielded to my endless whining about the movie. As I've already noted so
many times, I've been
waiting for this movie
for months.
What did I think of Team America: World Police? One of the funniest movies ever made. The funniest movie ever.
I laughed so often and so hard that today I have a laughing hangover. I'm being totally seriously here. My body is literally--physically-- sore this morning. I don't think I'll be able to smile for a week.
I'm not much of a list maker, but I've been axing myself how Team America: World Police compares to other movies? Here's my top five list of all time funniest movies:
1) Team America: World Police "F**k yeah!"
2) Blazing Saddles "The sherrif is a ni--"
3) Animal Crackers "How the elephant got in my pajamas I'll never know."
4) The Jerk "I was born a poor black child."
5) Pearl Harbor "I think World War II just started."
Here's what the right blogosphere is saying about Team America: World Police:
Sullie-"Parker and Stone are now indisputably the comic geniuses of their generation. The point of the movie is not nihilism - it's sanity. Sanity against the moronic ra-ra pro-Americanism of many in the Bush camp...."
-Demosophist-"It's like [Sullie] saw a different movie than I did."
-Roger L. Simon-"...loved the film."
-Russell Wardlow-"High art, it ain't, but I've never laughed so hard in a movie theater before."
-Charles Johnson-"I highly recommend Team America. ItÂ’s a technical tour-de-force, with deliberately retro-cheesy puppets and incredible sets, and a decidedly anti-idiotarian take on the major issues."
-John Hawkins-"I can tell you that this is a dream movie for South Park Republicans who support fighting the war on terrorism & love to watch liberals being mocked mercilessly"
-Fritz Schranck-I havenÂ’t laughed that hard in a good while....Go see this movie--for America.
-Leopold Stotch-"Trey Parker and Matt Stone have done it again in what I say without hyperbole is one of the finest films ever made. I'm seriously."
-Flea-"You know you are in the right place when the first words to scroll across the screen are "Paris, France" and everybody starts laughing. "
-Jon of Aaargh!-"Now, if you haven't already, go see the movie.
-Pink Kitty-"The Empress gives it all paws up (but not in that French surrender kind of way.) Funniest movie of 2004. "
-Lord Floppington- "I thought it was great....Unlike Micheal Moore, you get the feeling Parker and Stone actually love this country, even when they take jabs at our foreign policy."
-Dean Esmay-"Team America: F*** Yeah! Can't. Stop. Laughing."
-Sean Hackbarth-"The Michael Moore antidote...hysterical..."
-Ian S.-"In terms of raw laughs per minute itÂ’s easily the funniest movie IÂ’ve ever seen."
-Citizen Smash-"Even funnier than Pearl Harbor!"
-Leftorium-"...unbelievably hilarious."
-BummerDietz-"It's funny. A Hollywood crowd guffawed throughout."
-Cigarette Smoking Man from the X-Files-"I made the mistake of bringing a large coke in there with me and couldn't drink a drop for fear of it coming out my nose, I was laughing so hard."
-Pennywit-"Go see Team America."
-Peter at SFSignal-"After watching this movie, it was some time before I stop saying my Ls as Rs..."
-Kate at Texas Gary-"The whole shebang was beyond awesome..."
-SondraK- "I recovered quickly from my shock and proceeded to laugh my ass off."
-Matt at Overtaken by Events-"Funny as hell."
-Rita at Res Ipsa Loquitur-"Oh. My. God. I laughed so much my face hurts."
-Laurence Simon-"Three word movie review: America, f*ck yeah!"
-Sissy Willis-"Four paws for 'Team America'"
-Bloodspite-"anything that makes Mikey Moore to be a hot dog cramming fat blob can't be all bad!"
PS-When I first started this roundup I didn't know Smash and Bloodspite over at Techography were also doing roundups. Thanks to both of them for providing some of the links.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:39 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 701 words, total size 7 kb.
1
Like um, what did you get Mrs. S. for her BD that she agreed to go along with you to the movie?
hehe,
Posted by: Laura at October 19, 2004 08:24 PM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
92kb generated in CPU 0.0393, elapsed 0.1481 seconds.
135 queries taking 0.1215 seconds, 367 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
