October 15, 2004
Team America: World Police Review
No, I haven't seen it yet, but my friend Prof. Chaos has.
He says:
... this movie offers a more sophisticated understanding of US foreign policy than you find even in academic journals. I will likely require this film in my IR courses once the DVD is out.
Lucky jerk. I'll see it in a month, if I'm lucky.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:13 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The reviewer from MCNBC seemed shocked that it took digs at the left! And said it wasn't that funny because it was too balanced-ie, it wasn't a Bush bash.
Posted by: Jane at October 15, 2004 02:32 PM (hoo48)
2
Saw it this afternoon and am already singing Team America theme while walking the streets of Toronto!
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at October 15, 2004 04:27 PM (jhoo2)
3
Definitely worth seeing. But using it as a teaching aid is sure to attract litigation from thin-skinned, PC-ified wretches. Lawyer up before bringing it into the classroom.
And I do agree that there is more foreign policy reality in that film than in most courses ostensibly teaching the subject. More truth than in most newspapers, too.
Posted by: John at October 15, 2004 06:42 PM (OmbAg)
4
John: yeah, I was being a bit over the top in saying that I'd show it in the classroom, but what professors like Rusty and I are constantly fighting are our liberal colleagues who think in terms of liberal "nuance."
What this movie says is that there are three types of people/nations, and our type is not perfect but it is superior.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 15, 2004 07:16 PM (kqFJC)
5
WOW!!! Hurrah!!! Where were you Guys when I went to school?
Posted by: greyrooster at October 15, 2004 07:47 PM (CBNGy)
6
greyrooster: We've been hiding out in a secret undisclosed
University in
Southern
California, eating ramen and 49 cent BK burgers, hoping that some day rational people could one day take over our higher education system.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 15, 2004 08:29 PM (kqFJC)
7
Leopold Stotch: Got a kick out of your post. I'm almost 63 and grew up in northern California. Brought back memories. Yes, I went to that school across the bay in the early sixties. Talk about hiding out. I shaved, I bathed, wore clean clothes, had short hair, played football and did'nt think Fidel Castro was the robin hood of the carribean. Nothing rational then. Hard to study engineering when the professor was out leading a pro Castro rally. What made it bad was the football coaches made us go beat them up. Had to hide my face like a terrorist to keep from flunking out of Engeering school. They're now serious about football. I wonder if they're as serious about education? I guess anything can change.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 15, 2004 11:17 PM (CBNGy)
8
I was at a Jesuit university in DC in the late 60s. I got extremely ass-chapped by the way students got jerked around by faculty. Half the faculty would flunk you if you attended a particular demonstration; the other half would flunk you if you didn't.
It was there, though, that I became acutely aware of the potential for fascism from the left, a concept that truly shocked me though its mere existence. Who'da thunk?
Posted by: John at October 16, 2004 11:08 AM (OmbAg)
9
Prof Chaos,
You are absolutely right about the foreign policy relevancy. I'm not sure I've heard it explained any better. And I'm being quite serious about it. Saddly, I cannot recommend this movie to anyone I know because most of us are... hmm, how do I say it? I certainly could have done without the "prove your loyalty to the team" scene.
Yet, the film had one of the best messages I've ever seen in a film. Seems Parker and Stone get it.
Posted by: Editor at October 16, 2004 11:51 AM (uurD1)
10
Can anyone let me know if there's any sexual content in the movie? I want to bring my kids to see it, if there's any sex in it, I'll pass. Of course, that won't stop me from seeing the movie myself..hehehe.
thanks.
Posted by: Laura at October 17, 2004 05:02 PM (ptOpl)
11
Don't take your kids anywhere near this movie.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 17, 2004 06:25 PM (mv6K5)
12
I second the last comment. This is not even remotely appropriate for children.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at October 17, 2004 06:32 PM (utBsI)
13
Oh brother, that bad, huh? In what way? Worse than South Park parodies?
Posted by: Laura at October 17, 2004 06:41 PM (ptOpl)
14
Let's just say they use the word C**K about 146 times in this movie.
Posted by: Buffjason at October 18, 2004 11:48 AM (Y1JLC)
15
This is one of the funniest movies I've seen in a _very_ long time.
Parker and Stone once again manage to wrap some rather insightful political and social commentary in a visual onslaught of thair own unique brand of ridiculous, irreverent, and downright hilarious satire.
In much the same way as "Southpark: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut", this movie is filled with the sort of stuff that has you dropping your jaw on the floor in utter shock, then laughing yourself to tears.
Damn funny if approached with an open mind, but like the posters above, I could never in good conscience allow a child to see it.
Posted by: Athaclena at October 20, 2004 11:49 AM (FFJkW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mrs. Shackleford's Birthday
Today is my lovely wifes birthday. Let me just say one thing:
she still has a fine can--for a woman of any age--let alone one with three kids.
No more blogging today. If there is a blog emergency just e-mail me.
Posted by: Rusty at
09:08 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Take her to see Team America: World Police.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at October 15, 2004 02:01 PM (kqFJC)
2
she still has a fine can
Pics.
Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer at October 15, 2004 07:44 PM (DHwcf)
Posted by: rumcrook at October 16, 2004 03:42 AM (s6c4t)
4
heheheh! You wouldn't believe how many rednecks here in TX have never hoyd of that woyd! Haven't heard that since Archie Bunker said it once!
Happy BD, Mrs. S.!
Posted by: Laura at October 16, 2004 10:04 AM (ptOpl)
5
Happy birhday Mrs, Rusty
Posted by: kev at October 16, 2004 10:22 AM (bWdWa)
6
Ayup, Happy Birthday to Mrs Rusty; hope you showed her what you wrote - that's a hell of a compliment any woman of any age likes to hear.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at October 16, 2004 01:39 PM (D39Vm)
7
Happy Birthday She-Jawa. Keep him away from the computer.
Posted by: gordon at October 18, 2004 08:02 AM (dEFhD)
8
I'm telling you, Jan 15th must be a chilly day each year. I know more people with my birthday, now to include your wife. Heck there's 3 people I work with have Oct 15th as their birthdate, and 2 others whose spouses have it.
Posted by: Sharp as a Marble at October 18, 2004 02:44 PM (VxPRK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 14, 2004
Lucas, I am your father!
Who's your daddy George?
You biyatch.
On a related note Jeff Quinton pisses me off this morning with this post: After initially indicating there might be a Star Wars-themed television show in the future, George Lucas has backed off reports that a Skywalker-centered television show was in development, according to T.V. Guide (can't find an article online yet to any report of this.)
Ok, so the first few seconds of the post I'm thinking, "Awesome, there's going to be a Star Wars TV show!! Something better than those lame-o shorts on Cartoon Network, I hope."
Then you get to the second part of the sentence, and I'm thinking, "What?!? I get all excited only to be told that Lucas is not going to do a Star Wars TV show!!!!"
Two immediate analogies come to mind:
1) Draft-gate. You know, a story about a non-story. "After 25 years Lucas still has no plans for TV show despite the buzz from Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) that with the present dearth in network programming production of the show was inevitable and, after all, weren't all these Sci Fi reruns and Buck Rogers remakes just a back-door way of making the Tatooine Chronicles a reality without letting the American viewing audience understand the full extent of the ratings war?"
2) "Can I come up to your room and use the bathroom." Then, it turns out she really has to use the bathroom. "Could there be a Star Wars themed TV show?" Come on into the room baby. Bathroom is right over there. Let me just slip into something more comfortable. Go on into the bathroom. That's right, make yourself at home. Viagra kicking in. Toilet flushing. Viagra working. Water running, wash up good baby. Anticipation. Come on out baby. I'm ready to go. "Star Wars themed movie? No. Thanks for the toilet. Toodles." Aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!
We have a name for a post like that: C*ck tease!!!
Posted by: Rusty at
09:59 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 331 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Indeed Rusty is insane.
The rumours are true.
Posted by: qpr jon at October 14, 2004 02:02 PM (uqcQs)
2
I am not insane! And neither am I.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 14, 2004 03:50 PM (JQjhA)
3
I thought that after dealing with your snake tongued politicians you might be able to get this one.
"George Lucas has backed off reports that a Skywalker-centered television show was in development."
Ok, there is no "Skywalker-centered" show, that does not mean there isn't going to be a Star Wars TV show centered on other characters.
Posted by: LMAO at October 15, 2004 11:51 AM (p5xDI)
4
Rusty, don't get that down over the apparent false hope...
Here is why:
AP: After “Episode III,” will you ever revisit “Star Wars”?
Lucas: Ultimately, I’m going to probably move it into television and let other people take it. I’m sort of preserving the feature film part for what has happened and never go there again, but I can go off into various offshoots and things. You know, I’ve got offshoot novels, I’ve got offshoot comics. So it’s very easy to say, “Well, OK, that’s that genre, and I’ll find a really talented person to take it and create it.” Just like the comic books and the novels are somebody else’s way of doing it. I don’t mind that. Some of it might turn out to be pretty good. If I get the right people involved, it could be interesting.
I think that a bunch of people blew that first sentence out of proportion... The possibility is out there, and this statement verifies it. But we will have to wait longer for any "new" Star Wars stuff in that direction...
Posted by: Tremor at October 17, 2004 10:26 PM (Bw51J)
Posted by: weeping at June 21, 2005 10:10 AM (0bqs+)
6
http://visacards.acholipeace.org/pdf/ buckledemergedjose
Posted by: appearing at September 01, 2005 07:40 PM (rSJZM)
7
http://my.homewithgod.com/runo/fat/fx8npbjxxs/ads.html http://my.homewithgod.com/runo/long/1405979/wholesale.html http://my.homewithgod.com/runo/mature/ytivtfamh/dom.html faintlyheavilysignaled
Posted by: abundant at June 24, 2006 06:04 PM (o5L7W)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 13, 2004
Forget an Instalanche, I want an Instant Lunch!!
Well, my little Pet Jawa has been amongst the top 100 blogs for months now. I'm getting a lot more traffic than I ever dreamed of. A lot of that traffic is by repeat customers and I'm getting so many comments that a number of people have suggested opening a Jawa discussion forum.
So, why am I still so blue? All this and still no Instalanche!! Validation in the blogosphere, we all know, comes from one source alone.
Well, I'm through with you Glenn Reynolds. No more will I seek the much coveted Instalanche. Instead, I'm going after the much yummier Instant Lunch.
How do the two compare?
Instalanche-immediate spike in traffic, lasting up to 48 hours.
Instant Lunch-immediate spike in sodium level, MSG headache up to 12 hours.
Instalanche-expect at least two or three bloggers to get a kick out of your post and add you to the blogroll.
Insant Lunch-expect at least two or three co-workers to get a kick out of you eating the sh*t they swore they'd never touch again their first day out of college.
Instalanche-a sudden feeling of self-satisfaction knowing that somehow your post drew the attention of the right-blogosphere's top blogger.
Instant Lunch-a sudden feeling of stomach-satisfaction, with the caveat that the empty calories you just scarfed down will leave you lethargic for the rest of the day.
Instalanche-with the sudden spike in traffic you can now up your Blog Ad rate to just under covering your total monthly ISP and blog host bill.
Instant Lunch-with the money you saved by eating cheap MSG laden quasi-Asian food you can now afford to run to the video store and rent the latest Adam Sandler film--only to find that you remember neither the food nor the film in the morning.
*UPDATE: Flea tells me it's an 'Instalanche'. What the h*ll is a lanche anyway? Sounds French.....or Canadian....either way, it does have a very Thurston Howell III air about it. Anyway, I've corrected it.
*the truth is I really did eat ramen-in-a-cup for lunch today. Not kidding. Three words: dee-li-cious!!
Posted by: Rusty at
02:41 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hey Rusty, maybe you're getting all this traffic on your blog because of the recent spats since I've joined!...hehehe.
Seems I'm under attack by every UK blogger on here for my support of Bush and Blair on Iraq and for my nuke em attitude. Unfortunately, anger(as usual) got the best of me, and everyone thought I really meant blow them all up....I meant the terrorists, not everyone...however, if some innocents get caught up in the crossfire, oh well...
I better stop...there I go again! LOL.
Take care,
Laura
Posted by: Laura at October 13, 2004 02:47 PM (ptOpl)
2
Dr.,
Instalaunch is overrated (I didn't mean that, Glenn, if you are reading.) Seriously, I was given my first on last Friday during the debates. Yeah, my traffic spiked to 1000 for the day, but dropped back to the normal 150-200 a couple days later; hardly a helping hand (Again, Lord Reynolds, the devil made me do it. It is not as it seems). Top 100 without a 'launch? That is something to behold. Congrats Rusty! Screw Instapundit and his cat blogging and puppy blending (Blogfather, please don't misunderstand. I worship the bandwidth you UPDATED on.)! Who needs 'im anyway?! (I do, your Highness Glenn. Please send traffic to http://...)
Posted by: Editor at October 13, 2004 03:14 PM (adpJH)
3
I thought it was an Instalanche... maybe this is one of those Genghis Khan things.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at October 13, 2004 03:19 PM (A/nX4)
4
Well since I doubt he reads a lefty Blog like mine, screw em. You have a great Blog, and you are Blog Uncle to one of the greatest Lefty Blogs ever. So who the hell cares about His Highness.
David Scott Anderson
Posted by: David Anderson at October 13, 2004 03:24 PM (g23uN)
5
Rusty, I got mine a few weeks after I started blogging. Got 4000 hits in one day. Guess how many hits/day I get now. That's right, 40/day avg. Lame-o. Instalaunch doesn't do crap. Take the InstaLunch.
Posted by: SparseMatrix at October 13, 2004 03:34 PM (935pb)
6
Hey, I heard that Bill from INDC Journal's had like 50 Instalanches ... why don't you ask if you can have one of his?
Posted by: Bill (NOT INDC JOURNAL) at October 13, 2004 05:03 PM (ALCT2)
7
Lanche? "Instalanche" as in "avalanche" (. . .from the French:
avalanche, from Romansch
avalantze "descent," altered (by metathesis of -l- and -v-, probably influenced by O.Fr.
avaler "to descend, go down") from Prov.
lavanca "avalanche," perhaps from a pre-L. Alpine language (the suffix -anca suggests Ligurian) --
See The Online Etymology Dictionary).
And I really like the Shrimp-flavored Instant Lunches, but you need to put in about three shakes of Tabasco and six of soy sauce to get just the right flavor.
Posted by: JohnL at October 13, 2004 05:27 PM (Hs4rn)
8
I have been told that getting an Instalanche entails 1) writing about something Glenn likes; 2) getting out front of the blogcrowd and being one of the first to write about it; and 3) emailing Glenn to notify him. For my blog,
DOUBLE TOOTHPICKS, our first (and only)
Instalanche involved all three.
I think all things must be aligned juuuuust right to make it happen...
Steve Bragg
Posted by: Steve Bragg at October 13, 2004 06:16 PM (X/W9E)
9
Yeah, it's 'lanche because Instalance is a pun on avalanche, only you get crushed with transient traffic rather than snow.
Posted by: Jay Solo at October 13, 2004 10:23 PM (wZQAO)
10
MMmmmm Maruchan!
At least you didn't get that crappy, fake Top Ramen stuff.
And chicken is the best. Biatch!
Posted by: Digger at October 14, 2004 12:37 AM (FYEx6)
11
Paypal related death threats?
Posted by: Simon at October 14, 2004 05:51 AM (FUPxT)
12
Thats what I was wondering.
Posted by: Jane at October 14, 2004 08:14 AM (PcgQk)
13
Hello folks nice blog youre running
Posted by: lolita at January 19, 2005 07:45 PM (yM4u5)
14
That woman deserves her revenge and we deserve to die
Posted by: magna rx at April 04, 2005 05:27 PM (hO8X+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dean Esmay Swiftie Interview
Check it out:
DW: Would you use the word "treason" to describe [Kerry's activities]?
GE: No I wouldn't go that far, but in my own mind it comes damned close....
....Where are his discharge papers? He has not put up a copy of his discharge from the naval reserve. That should have taken place in 1978 when his service in all forms was completed.
The press seems to have no interest in this.
Speaking of Kerry's discharge papers....and here, here, here, here, here, and here.
Posted by: Rusty at
12:07 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
Saint Edward's Healing Magic
Image via
Cranky Neocon
John Edwards yesterday: "We will stop juvenile diabetes, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and other debilitating diseases. ... People like Chris Reeve will get out of their wheelchairs and walk again."
Posted by: Rusty at
08:59 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey Rusty... on a some what off topic issue could you post your thoughts about Project for the New American Century. Just wondered what you thought about these NeoCon ideas.
Posted by: LMAO at October 13, 2004 10:52 AM (p5xDI)
2
Sure. Wait. What? I'm not familiar with it other than in the abstract.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 13, 2004 11:16 AM (JQjhA)
3
other than in the abstract? Whoa dude, can I have some of that acid you just dropped? I speak blue collar english here, can you slearify that?
Posted by: LMAO at October 13, 2004 08:13 PM (eAnrJ)
4
slearify = clearify. Oooohhh! the irony.
As long as i can keep myself laughing I'm good.
Posted by: LMAO at October 13, 2004 08:15 PM (eAnrJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
When Spam Goes Bad
I thought you guys might get a kick out of this spam e-mail I got. Note to self: If you dont want people to stereotype you it's probably not a good idea to act exactly like the stereotype. Also, from my good friend Bill Dauterive, "The only reason stereotypes last so long is 'cause their
mostly true."
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
08:10 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.
October 12, 2004
No Blood for Oil: Mordor invaded for Aragorn-Haliburton contracts
Go check out
Fellowship 9/11 over at IFILMS:
Michael Moore's searing examination of the Aragorn administration's actions in the wake of the tragic events at Helms Deep. With his characteristic humor and dogged commitment to uncovering - or if necessary fabricating - the facts, Moore considers the reign of the son of Arathorn and where it has led us. He looks at how - and why - Aragorn and his inner circle avoided pursuing the Saruman connection to Helms Deep, despite the fact that 9 out of every 10 Orcs that attacked the castle were actually Uruk-hai who were spawned in and financed by Isengard.
TC Leather Penguin dubs his link to the film
Strider Lied, Orcs Died while Rob at Say Anything wants to
blame Gandalf. Who do I think is to blame for Middle Earth's
illegal invasion of the sovereign country of Mordor? It was all a conspiracy started by Bilbo Baggins, the well known war-profiteer.
UPDATE: Treebeard, man. It's all Treebeard!
Posted by: Rusty at
03:51 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Juliette at October 13, 2004 03:02 AM (6xvAR)
2
cee's up b's down killin bloods in our town thas how we crips get down leave em 6 feet under ground x tw an me we'll throw ur slob body over the gwb
X TW C-DOP AND RKILLA
Posted by: RKILA at March 09, 2005 04:18 PM (dKc7L)
3
x tw and rKILLA cuz's 4 life i love my baby girl jamie 4 ever!!! NOTHING is gunna come between us she gunna b my wife.....cause thas just how i want it 2 be so thas how it gunna b i love u so much jamie
Posted by: rKILLA at March 10, 2005 11:56 AM (9yoJI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Welcome to the Dark-Side: Paleo-Con Endorses Bush
Long-time friend
Professor Chaos has endorsed Bush. I think it was the sheer brilliant weight of my arguments for Bush that overpowered his puny objections. Either that or he is finally seeing Kerry for the warmed over hippie that he really is. Either way, I'm happy. Welcome aboard!! Expect your Rove/Haliburton checks to be deposited in your Swiss account ASAP.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:32 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
Irrelevant Question
Not that anybody except
Gordo the Cranky Neocon cares, but is
paypal down across the blogosphere or are they just screwing with me? Oh, FYI--MPJ has collected almost $8 in total contributions this year!!
Posted by: Rusty at
12:18 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No, it's pretty much screwing with everyone who has the same style button, at least. I took my down last night.
Posted by: Editor at October 12, 2004 12:53 PM (adpJH)
2
Yup, lots of problems, not just you.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at October 12, 2004 01:46 PM (D39Vm)
Posted by: SparseMatrix at October 12, 2004 02:22 PM (935pb)
4
I'll see your $8 and raise you another $8!
Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at October 12, 2004 04:28 PM (w74Ft)
5
Tip Jars are shit. I don't think I've ever gotten even $1. You're lucky to have gotten $8. While I don't expect to make a killing, just a token amount to cover all the time spent would be nice.
Seems that advertising is still where it's at even with the dot com collapse.
Posted by: Digger at October 13, 2004 11:36 PM (FYEx6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Troll Hunting
I've
already mentioned that I forwarded some e-mails to various law enforcement agencies, including one that threatened the President's life. I also e-mailed several host companies in the UK letting them know some of their subscribers are violating terms of usage. I really didn't expect to get anything back, but the webmaster over at NTL got back to me within hours and is busy hunting down one of the culprits. Thanks for everyone's input and advice.
On a related note, Jane pointed me to this great article by American Warmonger on how to hunt trolls the right way. The good news is that no dogs, tree stands, or orange vests are required! One advantage of MT over Blogger is that it records IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:46 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Point #1: What if I
like hunting from a tree stand, wearing an orange vest? (Actually, it's a blaze orange camo anorak, or parka)
Point #2: As a Blogger blogger (as opposed to a Blogspot blogger, which is a different beast entirely), I don't use Blogger comments because they're still substandard to Haloscan, which also provides Trackbacks and has been around for a relatively long time. And with Haloscan, I have your IP address, Rusty. [evil grin here]
Posted by: Boyd at October 12, 2004 11:11 AM (VeBwJ)
2
Hi Rusty,
Some of the UK bloggers seem to have a personal investment in flaming me....see the blogs on Kenneth Bigly...the one with over 300+ posts.
Seems they are all attacking me for my views on the war in Iraq. That's okay, I'm from NYC originally, and can defend myself. Where it gets scarey though, is one poster who calls himself "Satan" and says that I am HIS.
Maybe I should watch what I say, since you said that ISP's, email addy's are easy to obtain. Not that I have anything to hide, I just don't want to get a threat from any of these wackos.
What if any of them are from the Mid East and are reading our comments?
Scarey, huh?
Posted by: Laura at October 12, 2004 11:55 AM (ptOpl)
3
Yeah, pretty scary stuff Laura. I saw some of the comments about you, but they mostly centered on your crack about nuking them all or something. Personally, I've never minded when some caring Christian folk tell me I'm not forgiving enough or whatever.
Boyd, yeah I know about the haloscan IP thingy. I guess it's just the risk I take when I comment at people's site. I trust in their decency not to out me.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 12, 2004 12:01 PM (JQjhA)
4
Yeah, I'm a big girl and I don't mind being attacked or flamed, but when they start saying shit like "I am Satan, and your soul is mine"....stuff like that, it begins to worry me, that maybe I have gone over the threshold.
Surely, there are others with the "nuke em mentality" that have said much worse than I have, but have disappeared from the blog, only to make their presence known once or twice. I, however, have managed to stick around, thus their attempts at making me leave the blog are futile, making them even more pissed off!
I don't see anyone saying what they would've done about the war on terrorism, only attacking every word I've typed. Others now, have read the comments and are joining the bandwagon, even if they agree, I seem to be the easy target lately...hmmm...because I have identified myself as a female, so I'm "easy pickins"??
Who knows, who cares....well I do, if it turns out that someone really is out to "get me".
Thanks for listening.
Posted by: Laura at October 12, 2004 12:50 PM (ptOpl)
5
Actually I was Jeremy's first commenter. He wrote a post called "She Popped My Cherry" and I've had a special fondness for him since then.
Posted by: Jane at October 12, 2004 12:53 PM (hoo48)
6
Jane,
You never forget your first. Love ya' babe.
Rusty,
I've got a good suspicion that some of these guys are of arab decent. Not many non-arab or islamic types use the word "halal" in regular conversation frequently. So when we beat them back, the terrorists lose!...just a thought.
Thanks for the shout out. And remember, the offer still stands for any and all who need a hand. (Network security is actually my day job.)
Posted by: Jeremy at October 12, 2004 02:41 PM (farnf)
7
Hey Jeremy, who has used "halal"? Most of the obnoxious people who have attacked me seem to be from the UK, and they are hell bent on trashing their Blair for joining forces with Bush in his invasion of Iraq.
I just received a very nice email from a British gal, apologizing for those guys, and says they're not really representative of the folks in UK. She said she was very enraged at their attacks of me, even though she may disagree on some of my views, she wanted to let me know she respected me, praised me for hanging in there and speaking my mind without fear of reprisal, and wanted to let me know the people in the UK aren't all that bad, just that some are idiots.
Nice lady. I've received a few others too. Too bad they are being scared off by the likes of COOgarUK and Cas, to name a few.
Good night.
Posted by: Laura at October 12, 2004 09:12 PM (ptOpl)
8
Laura,
I doubt very much you have received such emails, who are you trying to kid?
when us over in the UK are mostly all thinking the same way!!!
People always the use the old trick of 'I have support' people are sending me supportive emails.
The problem is that you talk out of your backside and it enrages people.
You are typical of the Americans that have been blinded by their government and made to believe what you want to believe.
No I am not a what you call that racist comment people keep making,...oh yea 'Raghead' and not I am not male I am very much female and I am white and one of the ones that are sick of your 'nuke' mentality which you still do not deny or take back.
Nuke em...
Posted by: Law_Raw at October 13, 2004 03:43 AM (4YWe7)
9
Just look how that sounds...
Such a controversial blog is going to attract people from all places.. and you shouldn't let them think that Americans have this NUKE mentality it is far too dangerous!!
You are saying this to the ordinary Iraqi people who could be reading this and thinking.. They don't give two shits for us really do they!!
Then get all scared and start making little Osamas!
Posted by: Law_Raw at October 13, 2004 03:47 AM (4YWe7)
10
Laura,
Mine was from some college in Japan it appears. However, it turns out it's an international college. The guy made reference to polish kielbasa not being "halal". Sounded like an arab student in Japan to me.
I think your breed of troll more closely resembles what some call the "soccer hooligan". Mosly just a bunch of pompus asses and not limited to Europe. They usually run in packs.
Law_Raw,
...blinded by their government and made to believe what you want to believe.
I'm sure you just mistyped this but, how exactly does the government FORCE free will? Perhaps you meant to say "made to believe what they want you to believe? (I'm not trying to insult you but some extra time on grammar could have done you some good.)
One last thing: the beauty of a "blog" is that you don't have to be politically correct. In fact, the opposite is implied in many cases. Although "nuke em" may be a highly unpopular solution, it is one that would be successful: No more people, no more problem. But what would I know about what "blowing up ragheads" would really do? After all, I'm just another stupid American Warmonger. You on the other hand have information sources that are so much better, right? (sarcasm implied)
Posted by: Jeremy at October 13, 2004 07:28 AM (farnf)
11
Rusty, is there a prob with posting? I'm getting error messages again.
Posted by: Laura at October 13, 2004 11:32 AM (ptOpl)
12
Law Raw, don't have to prove anything to you really, but I have several emails I can forward to you if you don't believe me. MissBrit is one of them, who formerly posted on here, but unfortunately, she is afraid of being attacked for her views.
She said not everyone in the UK is like that and she is ashamed that people would gang up on me for my views, instead of discussing it intelligently.
She's actually Scottish descent but is tired of people representing the whole bunch as "UK". She says that a lot of Brits think Americans and stupid and being misled by our govt.
I would like to know who the British feel is capable of running their country, if they don't like Blair? If Blair didn't enter Iraq with us, would they still like him or would they find another reason to attack him?
Wait till the terrorists hit your soil, Law Raw. You may think differently. So far, I am the only one who is personally involved in 9/11, knowing victims in the attacks and having friends that lost loved ones there as well.
You all can say and think what you want, because you have not personally been involved and are talking out of your "arses", easy to do when you can sit back in your English gardens, drink tea and eat crumpets and dare to come on here and attack us Americans.
Shame this has turned into a UK vs US debate, and for the ones that aren't from the UK but agree with them, I put you in their group as well.
Posted by: Laura at October 13, 2004 11:37 AM (ptOpl)
13
Rusty..... I know you must have thought of this and maybe I missed it... Why didn't you ad a CHAT room to this enormous site you have here. Would save you email overflow. You could do it as a sign up in order to chat... With confirmation email addy as to collect ISP's. I KNOW there would be chaos sometimes.. do to issues of discussion, but also give those of us with big ideas and big mouths room to do so... C'mon wut do ya think????
Andrea Let me be room monitor hehehe
Posted by: Andrea at October 13, 2004 11:53 AM (AaBEz)
14
A chat room would be great! But then, we'd never get anything else done, now would we? You can be the monitor Andrea, and when the UK bloggers get too insulting, we can "toss" them out just like they do in the AOL chats!
hehe.
Posted by: Laura at October 13, 2004 12:03 PM (ptOpl)
15
LAWRAW: You're not fooling anyone. Now adjust your veil and shut up.
Posted by: greyrooster at October 15, 2004 09:13 PM (CBNGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Game On! TTLB Ecosystem Back Up
NZ Bear is now declared Sith Lord and Imperial Undesecratary! Have you guys seen the
new ecosystem design? It is truly amazing, awesome, cool, neet-o, etc.
The Commissar describes the enhancements this way:
- a graph showing your rank and # unique links over time
- an expandable tree menu showing the links which the blog has received from other blogs
- an expandable tree menu showing the blog's ten most-linked-to posts and who linked to them
Posted by: Rusty at
09:49 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I noticed! I went from Microbe to Large Mammal in one day! Now, I just wish I had the traffic to warrant such an illustrious title. LOL
Posted by: Ricky V at October 12, 2004 10:52 AM (9BReq)
2
It Rocks Rusty. I commented on it yesterday.
Posted by: David Anderson at October 12, 2004 11:50 AM (g23uN)
3
Not to rain on your parade, 'cause I was able to check out some of the upgrades and your excitement is most certianly warranted, but it definitely seems to be having issues at the moment. I'm sure N.Z. is on top of it.
Posted by: Editor at October 12, 2004 12:56 PM (adpJH)
4
I'm actually kind of bummed about it, I went from an adorable little rodent to a slithering reptile and my chart looks more like a sine wave than an ever increasing popularity chart.
Posted by: Jeremy at October 13, 2004 07:31 AM (farnf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Too Hot for the UK: Steyn's Censored Column
Mark Steyn's publishers at the Telegraph thought that readers in the UK couldn't handle this piece of solidly British advice.
Here's a tidbit.
I’d written about Kenneth Bigley, seized with two American colleagues but unlike them not beheaded immediately. Instead, sensing that they could exploit potential differences within “the coalition of the willing”, for three weeks the Islamists played a cat-and-mouse game with Mr Bigley’s life, in which Fleet Street, the British public, governments in London and Dublin and Islamic lobby groups in the United Kingdom were far too willing to participate. As I always say, in this war the point is not whether you’re sad about the dead people, but what you’re prepared to do about it. What “Britain” – from Ken Bigley’s brother to the Foreign Secretary – did was make it more likely that other infidels will meet his fate.
It gets better from there. I echo his sentiments that we do not honor the memory of Kenneth Bigly by mourning for him, we honor his memory by hunting down and killing those that murdered him in cold blood. (Hat tip:
James Joyner)
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
09:32 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 213 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm a Telegraph reader. Not a bad paper, probably the best broadsheet in the UK. Pundits such as Steyn are nothing but self publicists. Even though Barbara Amiel, excuse Lady Black is no longer there, Steyn still carries her torch. At the risk of being banned I will state Steyns hatred of anything Arabic or Muslim is comparable to Hitler's hatred of the Jews. And of course he is also never wrong, has an opinion on everything, in other words, he's a loud mouthed shmuck.
Never the less, I read his piece with interest. Nothing there really, it's what you would expect from the man. I would suggest that the next time another person is taken hostage (God forbid) Steyn offers to take his place and show's us how he would face such a grizzly end.
Posted by: James at October 12, 2004 10:06 AM (4PPsx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
J-Dawg's Lost Dog
Any readers in the Plano, Texas area?
Jeff Quinton has lost his dog.
UPDATE: Slapping forehead!! Jeff lives in South Carolina. Trust me, I knew that. We've had many a discussion on who the real 'SC' is!!! It was actually Chad Evan's dog. Chad was just guest blogging over at Backcountry Conservative. The good news is that Chad found his dog!!
Posted by: Rusty at
09:19 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It was actually my dog that was missing and Jeff let me cross-post the information. Anywho, good news. I found Vedder this morning and she is safe, sound and asleep next to me at this moment. Thank you for your concern.
Posted by: Chad Evans at October 12, 2004 12:48 PM (monhK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 11, 2004
Hey Rusty, why the light blogging today?
Sorry, I had to clean out my inbox. I probably read like 100 messages, banned at least 5 readers, and deleted about 30 or so comments. I'll blog more tomorrow, I promise. Also, if you sent me an e-mail and I didn't respond I apologize--another victim of the collateral damage of a Google bomb. Traffic seems to be getting back to normal so I'll respond to any new e-mails you send my way.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
Reader Love Mail and Help
I've been getting a lot of 'love mail' as of late, and thought I'd share one of the comments with you. Some of it is too sick to pass along, some predictable, and one that I forwarded to the FBI. Maybe a techie out there could help me figure something out: is there an easy way to locate a person through their IP address?? Not necessarily their physical address, but maybe their ISP? How do I do that?
Ok, here's some reader mail:
Ahmad: We will kill more and more of you american pigs. Die all western pigs in the land of Allah.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:24 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Try entering the IP address at
Sam Spade. Some sites will give you more info than others, but it's a very good start.
Posted by: Boyd at October 11, 2004 04:55 PM (VeBwJ)
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 11, 2004 05:00 PM (JQjhA)
3
Sam Spade is good, generally speaking. Keep in mind that if the person is a wizard, they will be masking the actual IP address. If you trust the information you have, by all means, report them to their ISP. Good luck!
Posted by: Ricky V at October 11, 2004 05:12 PM (9BReq)
4
Hmm... After you have forwarded the email to the Feds and if SamSpade has been helpful, be sure to forward this link (which I found at JYB and have been abusing) to the next "Ahmed".
http://www.junkyardblog.net/video/helicopterkills.mpg
Posted by: Editor at October 11, 2004 05:54 PM (adpJH)
5
Islam is the worship of a sacred pig. That is why Muslims won't eat pork they don't want to eat allah.
Posted by: Andre at October 11, 2004 06:23 PM (hD5mx)
6
I think
Jeremy gives us a step by step analysis here. I'll see if he can stop by.
Posted by: Jane at October 11, 2004 07:30 PM (hoo48)
7
I know people in IT who can help you with that if you'd like - just let me know and I'll pass on the information.
~C
A
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at October 11, 2004 09:16 PM (D39Vm)
Posted by: greyrooster at October 12, 2004 12:55 AM (pSK/I)
9
Go find "geektools" and then download a trial version of "traceroute" (you'll find a program link available or just go goole that last name)...then purchase the program if you find it as handy as I do.
You can't find a person by the actual physical address (a good thing, when you think about it) but you can locate the I.S.P. for an I.P.A. and then complain to the I.P. Administrator.
I've had a few of the more ugly, upsetting sort of comments and took that course of action, and in one case, telephoned the I.P. Admiministrator when I didn't get a response and made a very stern verbal complaint -- was asked to quote some of the most abnormal of the comments, did, and the Administrator became concerned at that point...in one case, the I.P. identified the actual user of a business network on an I.P., so it was clear who wrote what.
I also have site logs (you may also, from your own hosting service) and those have made it possible to track the actual time of the visit to my site compared with the time posted of the corresponding comments, and, the site logs remain with my own hosting service on their server (as all do, meaning, it's server based log content until you download a copy but the originals remain on the server unless someone with server access deletes them), so the content is incontestible within a reasonable deliberation.
So, all this means: you complain to the I.P. that is providing service to the creepy commentor, and then you complain next or mutually to your local police if the comments are threatening. Someone threatening another person's life is something I'd consider should be reported to your local police.
Then give them what they need to determine who made the threat.
I've had one of those already, too, so it's not a pleasant thing to experience, I realize.
Posted by: -S- at October 12, 2004 04:41 AM (u48hb)
10
"geektools" is a site that lists all sorts of trace helps and things to use to better understand information over the internet.
"Traceroute" is a program...offers a trail download and then you purchase a copy if you find it's helping you. I recommend "traceroute" because it not only traces an I.P.A., but it locates the area where the message originated and also shows you all the hops it can "trace" that the message took to reach your site, or you. A very good program.
Posted by: -S- at October 12, 2004 04:44 AM (u48hb)
11
Just to let you guys know, I used some of the aforementioned tools. Some of the most vile comments were coming from the UK. So what? The good thing side (of mostly bad) hate speech laws is that this kind of activity is illegal in Mother England. So I sent off a nasty letter to the guys ISP asking them to revoke the guys service and forward to authorities. (Not from the letter I showed, but from even more vile stuff)
Will it work? No idea.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 12, 2004 08:52 AM (JQjhA)
12
I've been using http://geektools.com/ for the same thing...
Posted by: Michael at October 12, 2004 11:21 AM (bJ0qq)
13
RUSTY,
Gawd I hope I wasn't one of those folks you turned over for ISP trace. When I told CAS for me and her to go out into the parking lot and only one of us was going to come back in... ME ... was my attempt to let her know that I had had enough of her attack's in a FUNNY kinda way. Unlike some I have a sense of HUMOR... Having been a cop, and Navy officer I tend to let my COP mentalilty over run... jeeeeesh
Andrea
Posted by: Andrea at October 13, 2004 12:05 PM (AaBEz)
14
Rusty, I've scrolled all the way down, looking for the Bigley blog we've all been debating on, and cannot find it...is there a second page?
Posted by: Laura at October 14, 2004 08:37 AM (ptOpl)
15
Shit. Never mind,Rusty, I had to "click here" to go to the page...can't scroll down anymore, too many articles now to be contained on the first page.
Found it, thanks anyway.
Posted by: Laura at October 14, 2004 08:54 AM (ptOpl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Note to Readers/Friends: G-mail vs. Yahoo
As you can see, My Pet Jawa is growing up. Most of the 374 e-mails that I found in my mailbox today are the comments you leave which are forwarded to my old Yahoo account. I've asked friends to start e-mailing me on my G-mail account because at some point it just becomes unmanagable to sort through 300+ e-mails. Here's the dilema: since I use Yahoo messenger I am alerted whenever a message comes into the Inbox--I love this feature of Yahoo mail. On the other hand, last Friday I got slammed with well overn 45k hits and 100k page views--this translates into a lot of comments and a lot of e-mails. After awhile I just tune out and ignore e-mails in my Yahoo box. On normal days it's not that big of a problem, but when the Google bomb goes off my Yahoo account becomes a graveyard of unread messages (which is why sometimes I get right back to readers/blog friends and other times I never reply).
My G-mail account is much more managable. Only people I have e-mailed or who take the time to look up my e-mail account on this page write me there. The disadvantage? No way to let me know when I get a new e-mail--I have to refresh the page just to check. When a blog friend or reader e-mails me with a breaking news tip I sometimes don't get the message for awhile.
So, here's the question: does any one know of a G-mail plug in that will notify you when a new message is received? That feature would be very helpful.
Posted by: Rusty at
03:25 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I haven't heard of anything for IE, but Firefox has the Gmail Notifier extension. I now run both IE and Firefox, and while I don't get much email in my Gmail account (Thank God!), I would use Firefox just for that purpose.
Posted by: Boyd at October 11, 2004 04:11 PM (VeBwJ)
2
And for the record, I believe that after posting the above comment, I noticed that the resulting page had your Yahoo! address instead of the Gmail one. Just so you'll know.
Posted by: Boyd at October 11, 2004 04:14 PM (VeBwJ)
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 11, 2004 04:25 PM (JQjhA)
4
Yup, I confirmed it after posting the second comment.
Posted by: Boyd at October 11, 2004 04:56 PM (VeBwJ)
5
Gmail notifier works with IE as well.
Posted by: Jeff at October 11, 2004 05:33 PM (VxoRA)
6
Actually, we're talking about two different things, Jeff. I was talking about a Firefox extension, but it appears you're talking about a Google-created Gmail notifier that sits in the system tray on Win2K or WinXP (and presumably Win2K3 Server, but they don't list it explictly).
And the reason I wasn't talking about the same one as you, Jeff, was because I wasn't aware it existed! Thanks for mentioning it. It can be found at toolbar dot google dot com slash gmail-helper. I tried including a link, but apparently google dot com is considered questionable content.
Go figger.
Posted by: Boyd at October 11, 2004 05:52 PM (VeBwJ)
7
In your g-mail accout screen, click on "new features" near the top of the screen....there is a client for your startbar for download....
Posted by: Mark E. at October 11, 2004 05:57 PM (Mrti1)
8
There is now a yahoo mail notifier extension for firefox at http://www.latitudezero.org/ext/index.html
Posted by: Simon at December 22, 2004 11:41 AM (hwndY)
9
Good,
I already using a GMail Notifier.
It notifies me by a popup window whenever i receive a new mail.
Here is the link to download
Gmail Notifier v1.0.24.0
http://toolbar.google.com/gmail-helper/
Cheers,
P.Marimuthu
Posted by: Marimuthu at December 31, 2004 01:17 AM (t+tkd)
10
Hello folks nice blog youre running
Posted by: lolita at January 19, 2005 07:45 PM (yM4u5)
11
How dare you attack YAHOO! Gmail, what is that?
Posted by: Antonio at March 11, 2005 08:00 PM (9WeZp)
12
get the e-mail address
Posted by: adegoke at March 24, 2005 03:54 AM (T0ylP)
13
That woman deserves her revenge and we deserve to die
Posted by: magna rx at April 04, 2005 10:34 AM (hO8X+)
14
hello all male
i will like to meet you all on my yahoo id for chat am single at the moment and am looking for a nice caring person to hold me all night if you will be the one live me an offline message if am not online at my yahoo id ok
like to meet men only
Posted by: princess mulana at June 30, 2005 12:17 PM (2h5dS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
99kb generated in CPU 0.0372, elapsed 0.1863 seconds.
132 queries taking 0.1633 seconds, 389 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.