1 Lee Greenwald did an excellent job of describing why Willis, and those like him, used one disingenuous sentence as a ploy to end discussion rather than encourage it and to paint a majority with a broad brush. I thought Greenwald was fair and concise. The comment section gave further proof of why some refuse to admit that they may have to adjust their opinions if they actually listen. Yet, they'll make excuses when unfettered immigration threatens to undermine the social fabric in other countries. For example; if an American moves to, say, France and refuses to learn the language, won't adapt to social norms and expects special treatment economically, they would quickly criticize that American. As well should be. All in the same breath they have a different opinion on the recent turmoil in France involving a large number of immigrants and their children who have not adapted or assimilated. They say France hasn't help them to assimilate. Here, they demand a different standard. We shouldn't force them to assimilate and should just let them stream across the border and off the planes and boats. It usually boils down to whether Americans are involved on either side of the issue as to what standard is applied. Sometimes I think we should just hand half the country over to them, let them screw everything up (which they'll inevitably do) and then invade them, straighten it out and ensure their marginalization permanently.

2 Agent Jones, in a "Frenchman Moment" says, Vive Laissez-faire!"