December 10, 2005

On Blog Rankings

I just received the following letter from the President of Blogniscient explaining how The Jawa Report became the Top Conservative Blog for a day. Those interested in the methodology of ranking blogs might be interested in how Blogniscient differs from other ranking systems. Begin letter
-----------------

Congratulations on making the #1 Conservative Political blog yesterday on
Blogniscient and thank you for posting about Blognisceint on "The Jawa Report".

As the president of Blogniscient, I wanted to give you a little insight on the
blog rankings presented by Blogniscient. Most blog rankings you see through
Technorati or Feedster are basically static rankings which are only updated
every few months. Blogniscient's rankings, however, are updated continuously
to represent the state of the Blogosphere at the current time.

Blogniscient's algorithms work by examining blog content (i.e. blog posts).
Each blog post is indexed and continually re-evaluated and scored to capture
how the information in a particular post is propagating and affecting discourse
throughout the Blogosphere.

In ranking the actual blogs (as opposed to the blog post scoring discussed
above), Blogniscient takes the position that a blog is basically the sum of its
content. Therefore, Blogniscient aggregates the scores of all of the blog posts
from a particular blog as the score for the blog. The scores are then compared
to create the rankings on a category-by-category basis.

This approach has the advantage that it is extremely dynamic and more accurately represents the true state of the Blogosphere. Consider the case where a particular blog is not even in the top 10. Now assume that the blogger breaks a particularly important story which everyone is talking about. It is quite
possible that that blog may reach the #1 spot. Conversely, if one of the top
bloggers goes on vacation for a week and doesn't keep up with their blog, it is
unlikely that they will stay in the top 10 for very long.

Thank you again for posting about Blogniscient. I hope that this explanation
gives you some insight into how our rankings are created and maintained.......

Thanks,
Ben Ruedlinger, PhD
President, Blogniscient, Inc.
http://www.blogniscient.com

Posted by: Rusty at 01:11 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 357 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Wow, way to go. I've followed this site for a long time and I've enjoyed its well-deserved march to the top. :-)

Posted by: Cynical Nation at December 10, 2005 03:01 PM (1yzGh)

2 Having been featured in 2 different magazines, and two more in the near future . . I can tell you one thing, Rusty . . That distinction and $5 may get you a Happy Meal at your local Mac's lounge . . if you play your cards right! Heh, heh . . but it's always good Ego Salve . . . Congrats . . .

Posted by: large at December 10, 2005 06:03 PM (fEUSs)

3 Oh, the inaccuracies! While Feedster does a manual ranking, technorati's rankings are fully automated and updated at least daily, sometimes more frequently.

Posted by: IO ERROR at December 10, 2005 07:18 PM (iQUq8)

4 Rusty: There's a classic paper on the propagation of ideas, by Derek deSola Price, that uses citations as the primary variable. The significance and importance of a particular author or article is determined by the number of times his peers cite his article. Using this metric deSola Price built the argument that the diffusion of new ideas follows a predictable functional progression corresponding to an "S-curve" or "sigmoid," with a distinct beginning, middle and end. It would appear that the metric used by Blogniscient is similar to the one used by deSola Price, and suggests a whole range of research based on that metric, such as: the decline of MSM, the progress of the "we-can't-win" meme propagated by MSM as a last-ditch attempt to save the franchise, and the comparative resonance of conservative versus liberal ideas within the US population. It also suggests a metric for determining how polarized the political debate has become, by meausing the extent to which liberal sources cite conservatives, and visa versa. Great stuff!

Posted by: Demosophist at December 11, 2005 01:39 PM (+1wmb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.0135, elapsed 0.1031 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.0949 seconds, 248 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.