September 10, 2004
I'm Dan Rather, Bitch!
---
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:19 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dan Rather is done. He's elected to go down with the ship. I just saw his "report" in which he basically defended the forged documents without addressing any of the fisking they've undergone. More importantly, he's staying with the angle that the validity of the documents is secondary to the charges contained therein. An asinine justification at best.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 10, 2004 05:45 PM (dal9S)
2
I loved it when one of the CBS "experts" claimed the White House was relying on "the blogosphere" to attack the documents. The fact nobody had to be told what the blogosphere might be suggests the VRWC blog swarm is winning this thing no matter what CBS has to say.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at September 10, 2004 05:48 PM (E9LCW)
3
Dan: "I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast!"
Blogosphere: "You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?"
Posted by: See-Dubya at September 10, 2004 06:18 PM (5LJua)
4
I updated my investigation into this tonight. I cannot believe the arrogance of the media (especially CBS) on this issue. They are totally acting as though these documents might be real. Heck, the DNC is sending out mail alerts to its supporters and creating strategy based on these forged doucuments.
Check out my analysis:
http://rupertzone.net
I am surprised more people aren't creating their own forgeries of the forgery to help prove the facts.
Posted by: Rupert at September 10, 2004 08:22 PM (pOTP4)
5
One thing you'll never hear anyone at Fox News say:
"The reputation and integrity of the entire news division is at stake, if we are in error, it will be corrected," a top CBS source explained late Thursday.
Posted by: The Gov at September 11, 2004 01:29 AM (Hv/iO)
6
What are people doing here? Dan Rather is one of the more insightful and respected anchors around. Maybe he screwed up here, maybe not, but why is that when news organizations question the government these days -- which IS their job in a free democracy, after all -- some people seem to think they are being unpatriotic. Fox News led us into this war barely even batting a questioning glance at any of the issues. In a country where the people have the power, that's the most dangerous.
Posted by: heq at September 15, 2004 01:04 AM (qOy+A)
7
Fox news led us into a war? That's news to me!
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 15, 2004 03:43 PM (D39Vm)
8
A: Fox News has more credibility (and more viewers) than CBS, ABC, CNN, and MSNBC combined. All your news are belong to Fox.
B: QUOTE:
Dan Rather is one of the more insightful and respected anchors around. Maybe he screwed up here, maybe not, but why is that when news organizations question the government these days -- which IS their job in a free democracy, after all -- some people seem to think they are being unpatriotic.
END-QUOTE
So...does that mean news organizations can LIE and FABRICATE stories as long as they're questioning the government? Dissen't isn't unpatriotic. Dishonesty, dishonor, and Dan Rather is.
Posted by: Che Castro at September 18, 2004 01:33 PM (0oTuw)
Posted by: Net-Cop at February 15, 2005 04:21 AM (0kgcI)
19kb generated in CPU 0.0187, elapsed 0.1431 seconds.
118 queries taking 0.1334 seconds, 253 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
118 queries taking 0.1334 seconds, 253 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.