September 13, 2004
Monday Morning Blogs: The Breakfast of Champions
The best way to start a work week, especially after the Blog Sabbath, is with a hearty breakfast. Remember,
remove pajamas before eating. Here's what I'm having today:
-Toast. Damn! Why'd you have to burn it? No problem, just spread the denial jelly on real thick.
--Mushroom omelette (South Korean style), covered with Feta cheese.
--Pepsi. For breakfast? That's crazy talk, Al. (Al-"We think it would be in your best interest.....")
--Ginkgo Biloba tablets
--Kosher bacon.
And that's all the breakfast that's fit to blog. I'll be in class. Page me if the fit hits the shan.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:58 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll be in class.
It seems like you're taking this whole "education" and "career" thing a bit too seriously.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 13, 2004 11:57 AM (UJmxc)
2
I just got this memo where Bush FORGOT the Alamo. Where do I send a copy?
Posted by: Walter E. Wallis at September 13, 2004 12:10 PM (7XPVo)
Posted by: Jane at September 13, 2004 02:12 PM (Pbs6a)
4
What Jane said. But I mean it.
Posted by: Gordon at September 13, 2004 02:51 PM (7sq4M)
5
I'm with Leopold - is this what we expect every Monday?
:-)
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 13, 2004 10:55 PM (D39Vm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 10, 2004
I'm Dan Rather, Bitch!
---
Posted by: Rusty at
04:19 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dan Rather is done. He's elected to go down with the ship. I just saw his "report" in which he basically defended the forged documents without addressing any of the fisking they've undergone. More importantly, he's staying with the angle that the validity of the documents is secondary to the charges contained therein. An asinine justification at best.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 10, 2004 05:45 PM (dal9S)
2
I loved it when one of the CBS "experts" claimed the White House was relying on "the blogosphere" to attack the documents. The fact nobody had to be told what the blogosphere might be suggests the VRWC blog swarm is winning this thing no matter what CBS has to say.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at September 10, 2004 05:48 PM (E9LCW)
3
Dan: "I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast!"
Blogosphere: "You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?"
Posted by: See-Dubya at September 10, 2004 06:18 PM (5LJua)
4
I updated my investigation into this tonight. I cannot believe the arrogance of the media (especially CBS) on this issue. They are totally acting as though these documents might be real. Heck, the DNC is sending out mail alerts to its supporters and creating strategy based on these forged doucuments.
Check out my analysis:
http://rupertzone.net
I am surprised more people aren't creating their own forgeries of the forgery to help prove the facts.
Posted by: Rupert at September 10, 2004 08:22 PM (pOTP4)
5
One thing you'll never hear anyone at Fox News say:
"The reputation and integrity of the entire news division is at stake, if we are in error, it will be corrected," a top CBS source explained late Thursday.
Posted by: The Gov at September 11, 2004 01:29 AM (Hv/iO)
6
What are people doing here? Dan Rather is one of the more insightful and respected anchors around. Maybe he screwed up here, maybe not, but why is that when news organizations question the government these days -- which IS their job in a free democracy, after all -- some people seem to think they are being unpatriotic. Fox News led us into this war barely even batting a questioning glance at any of the issues. In a country where the people have the power, that's the most dangerous.
Posted by: heq at September 15, 2004 01:04 AM (qOy+A)
7
Fox news led us into a war? That's news to me!
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 15, 2004 03:43 PM (D39Vm)
8
A: Fox News has more credibility (and more viewers) than CBS, ABC, CNN, and MSNBC combined. All your news are belong to Fox.
B: QUOTE:
Dan Rather is one of the more insightful and respected anchors around. Maybe he screwed up here, maybe not, but why is that when news organizations question the government these days -- which IS their job in a free democracy, after all -- some people seem to think they are being unpatriotic.
END-QUOTE
So...does that mean news organizations can LIE and FABRICATE stories as long as they're questioning the government? Dissen't isn't unpatriotic. Dishonesty, dishonor, and Dan Rather is.
Posted by: Che Castro at September 18, 2004 01:33 PM (0oTuw)
Posted by: Net-Cop at February 15, 2005 04:21 AM (0kgcI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Podhoretz: The Revolution has begun and thy name is Blogging
Jane's NY Post column was cut for
this one from John Podhoretz which describes yesterday's big blog event: the Fisking of CBS:
THE populist revolu tion against the so- called mainstream media continues. Yesterday, the citizen journalists who produce blogs on the Internet — and their engaged readers — engaged in the wholesale exposure of what appears to be a presidential-year dirty trick against George W. Bush.
What the bloggers and their audiences did was call into profound question the authenticity of four documents proudly trumpeted by CBS News in a much-heralded investigative report on Wednesday night's edition of "60 Minutes" about the president's National Guard service in the early 1970s.
Er, can I just add that I was the blogger who called for some foot to brake action on yesterday's events. Sorry. My bad.
The Minneapolis lawyers who run powerlineblog.com were on the case early. Two of the blog's readers directed their attention to a note left on an Internet bulletin board on the freerepublic.com Web site — the 47th posting on the topic there.
Post No. 47 pointed out that there was something off about these documents from the 1970s: The spacing between the letters and the words was proportional, and only a few IBM electric typewriters could achieve that effect back then.
From there it was off to the races. Once anyone who had had experience writing and typing in the 1970s began examining the documents, it was impossible not to see some weird anachronisms that suggested they had been crafted not on a 1970s typewriter, but using Microsoft Word.
Charles Johnson, who runs the wonderful littlegreenfootballs.com, simply typed one of the memos over using Microsoft Word's New Times Roman font and, lo and behold, the document came out exactly identical to the one on the CBS site, down to the letter spacing.
What was awesome about Charles' simple experiment was that I heard Brit Hume say one of his producers replicated it with the same result. The power of LGF knows know bounds. All hail Charles Johnson and his bicycle which made it all possible!
By 3 o'clock, the very careful and honest Jim Geraghty, who produces invaluable material every day on nationalreview.com's Kerry Spot, was saying flatly, "CBS had better have one heck of a defense for this."
Where are th props for
Bill? Yo, Bill is in da house too yo. Dissed.
Ok, so the Rupert Murdoch lackeys over at the Post dissed him, but not the Chicago Sun-Times.
Another blogger, Bill Ardolino at INDC Journal, who had read Powerline, said, "I decided to find a top typeface expert and ran his analysis on my Web site."
Awesome, but why no
linky-love in the text of the article? Old media meet new citation method: the URL.
Still reeling from yesterday. Stayed up late to see how the old media covered it. Some good roundups out there of yesterday's happening. Pixy Misa is a good place to start. Possible light posting day.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:15 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 510 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Thanks Rusty.
I did give preferential treatment to Munuvians, but I made sure I hit the most important players so far - Powerline, INDC and LGF.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 10, 2004 10:31 AM (+S1Ft)
2
Thanks bro.
The WT advises Tony Blankley is looking at my new article "Bloggers Give the Media Back a Story." But there's going to be a lot of submissions on this I think. See how calm I am. The waiting gets easier with experience.
Posted by: Jane at September 10, 2004 03:18 PM (PcgQk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 09, 2004
So, I married a Wonkette?
This is a photo of Wonkette with
Steve the Llama Beetcher (must be said in faux Scottish accent) at the American Political Science Association meeting in Chicago last week. If you look closely, though, you might notice Steve wearing a name tag that says
Dr. Rusty Shackleford . The thing is, Wonkette looks a lot like my wife. Seriously. I'm happy to report, though, that they don't share the same penchant for using the phrase 'anal sex'.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
03:51 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
September 06, 2004
Sabbath Blogging, Part Deux
Ask and ye shall receive. Thanks everyone for such insightful advice (except Rick James). The general consensus seems to be that bloggers like me, who write ten or more posts a day, ought to take a day off devoted to other activities. I know Mrs. Shackleford sure appreciated the fact that the computer stayed off all day. For lighter bloggers this might not be the case. The risk of course is that the sitemeter plunges when you do not post. I guess I'll live with that.
Just to clear up some confusion out there, I am a believer. On top of that I attend church regularly--every week in fact. And to add insult to injury I actually have some position of authority in the church--frightening, isn't it? So if I ever sound blasphemous you can be sure it's tongue in cheek. Besides, I think God doesn't mind people poking fun at all the dumbasses out there. Errr, well, at least I hope he doesn't.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
September 04, 2004
Sabbath Blogging
I've been feeling pretty guilty about blogging on Sundays. As a Sabbath observer, I'm thinking that blogging isn't the most spiritual activity nor does it add to my overall day of rest experience. I'm not going to blog tomorrow and I'll see how I feel. Any other Sabbath observers out there who want to chime in? Do you think it's something I ought to think about giving up one day a week? I'm looking for both the religious/spiritual angle and the strictly rational argument. Anyway, I'll check back in on Monday and see what the masses think.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:41 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think it's a good idea. This is something a person puts their whole heart and soul into and things are not always pretty. Sometimes you just have to take a break from it, not even read others, not even turn on the computer, take a nap, spend time with the family, watch nascar and just let the day take care of itself. One day a week is not too much to ask from oneself. That's spiritual, emotional, and a restful, relaxing idea - Sabbath or no Sabbath. One day just to yourself. It should be a given, Rusty. Take the day. Hope it's a good one.
~C
Posted by: firstbrokenangel at September 04, 2004 11:06 PM (D39Vm)
2
The appropriateness of whether or not you blog o the sabbath, to my mind, would depend entirely on why you blog at all.
If your blogging is based upon a passion to be perhaps the only Bible someone reads on a given day, through your example, then I believe your bloggin on Sabbath is appropriate. I would say it doen't matter what you blog about as much as who you blog as - if that makes any sense.
If you blog purely as a hobby or as a mundane work of some sort, I would refrain from blogging on the Sabbath.
A good example of another option is the Good News Saturday that Winds of Change runs for Shabbat.
Posted by: Joel (No Pundit Intended) at September 04, 2004 11:09 PM (DU9+H)
3
Lemme tell where I stand, Rusty:
I will not blog on Sundays. I have in the past, but I'm supposed to be a Sabbath observor myself, so no more of that, especially with tomorrow being a fasting day.
But neither can I blog from work anymore unless I'm willing to squeeze it into short breaks and a 30 minute lunch, which, frankly, I'm not. There's this word called "honesty" that's been pricking my conscience.
Thus I'm reduced to blogging, briefly, in the evenings and on weekends.
But I fell much less stressed for the change.
I'm with ya, bro.
Posted by: ccwbass at September 05, 2004 01:02 AM (xsXcU)
4
Despite my general confusion and support of war and killing and such (aimed in the right direction, of course) I am still a Quaker and do not generally hold with the idea that one day is any more sacred than the rest of Creation. So, technically, I am writing this on First Day rather than the Day of the Sun.
I observe the Sunday Sabbath anyway. Partially out of social convention and partially because it seems a reasonable way to make sense of being a small part of a big world and born (and yes, born again) into an inexplicable gift. So, no, unless there is something exceptional going on I do not blog on Sunday.
Sometimes I leave comments at other people's blog though.
Posted by: Ghost of a flea at September 05, 2004 02:43 AM (8/xNM)
5
If you're feeeling uneasy then listen to your gut. I think you should try it for a while and see if you feel better. Taking a day off will also give you more perspective and possibly a better blog when you do. The blogosphere is always quieter on the weekends anyway.
Posted by: Jane at September 05, 2004 01:19 PM (PcgQk)
6
Well, far be it for me to get preachy, but knowing your situation I can say that Sundays are not yours alone -- they belong to Mrs. Shackleford and the little beta versions running around the house. You spend enough time in the office, so I think that Sunday you owe to them.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 05, 2004 01:34 PM (HIg68)
7
Just some thoughts on *Sabbath blogging* - I try to observe Sunday as the Lord's Day, but often end up doing things around the place that could be considered *working*, writing e-mails to family and friends, catching up on things - not very spiritual activities. Is Sunday the sabbath? Are we bound to observe the sabbath, or is that a commandment for Israel? Or is it a day to observe Christ's resurrection from the dead? Doctors and nurses work on Sunday... breaking news stories, wars, catastrophes need to be covered and they often happen on a Sunday. It's all down to what you feel the Lord would prefer you to do to best observe His day with reverence.
I do know that it's a slippery slope and you can end up not observing the day at all if you don't hold fast to observing the Lord's Day and start working on Sundays. It's an incremental process and has a tendency to de-sanctify or nullify the day. A day of rest and spiritual renewal is a great way to prepare for the battles of the week ahead. There's no commandment that I'm aware of in the Bible to the New Tetsament Church to keep the sabbath, although the early Church did indeed observe the sabbath (and other Jewish feast days). There are some early Church documents on the spiritual resoning behind Sunday observance, but I'm at a loss to find them as I write - I can post at a later date. The Byzantine (Orthodox) Church has numerous beautiful Sunday prayers (Troparia) connceting God's creation, Adam's resurrection through Christ, and The Second Coming, which are helpful in understanding the signifigance of Sunday in the liturgical scheme.
Anyway, I'm interested in reading other's thoughts on the matter. I'd like to return to observing Sunday with greater reverence than I now do... a little backsliding here. Thanks for the opportunity to post.
All the best,
robsta
:-)
Posted by: robsta at September 05, 2004 01:52 PM (etIyN)
8
"One man considers one day more sacred than another; another man consideres every day alike. Each one should be fully ocnvinced in his own mind."
Translation: do what your conscience tells you. I think God honors your decision.
Just my two cents.
ps. I like Leopold's advice too.
Posted by: gordon at September 05, 2004 04:21 PM (dEFhD)
9
First of all, I have to say, for some reason, I always assumed you were an agnostic, so the fact that you're concerned about the Sabbath threw me for a loop.
Second, I have to agree with Gordon. Also, if you are usin the word "Sabbath" in a Christian and not a Jewish sense, remember Jesus' comment, "Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath". If you are adhering to some sort of Sabbath schedule out of adherence to tradition or the Law, you're missing the point. Don't let rules of conduct established by man embellish on the truth of scripture -- remember to understand why we observe a Sabbath, not just WHEN.
Having said that, if your conscience tells you that your blogging is causing you to negelct your family, or your opportunity to rest, or worship, or fellowship with other believers, then follow what your conscience, guided by the Spirit tells you.
Posted by: Brian B at September 05, 2004 11:16 PM (HcPOX)
10
Bloggers set their own schedules, albeit other aspects of life must and do take place which help set those schedules.
I'll make a deal with you Rusty. You blog on my Shabbos and I'll read it on yours. ;-)
Posted by: bj at September 06, 2004 06:38 AM (kFyZF)
11
Certainly, you should cut down on the blogging about porn, booze, and sodomy on Sundays.
Posted by: James Joyner at September 06, 2004 11:01 AM (eDs6L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I'm a Playful Primate, Hell Freezes Over
Something is truly wrong with the blogosphere.
Thank you everyone for linking me!!!! If you're not on my blogroll too, I apologize. Just send me an e-mail saying, "Hey, dorkwad, where's my link?"

PS-Don't expect this to last. These things have a tendency to change rapidly.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:00 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I can only vouch for the primate part ...
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at September 04, 2004 08:03 PM (i5DPf)
Posted by: The Commissar at September 04, 2004 08:07 PM (YWbMt)
3
Congrats!
I, on the other hand, am losing links so rapidly that by next week I should be (don't ask me how) carrying an actual negative number.
I wonder of there's a category for outer darkness?
Posted by: ccwbass at September 04, 2004 08:33 PM (PTMVh)
4
Not unless you commit blasphemy against the Instapundit. That is unpardonable.
Posted by: RS at September 04, 2004 08:35 PM (JQjhA)
5
Well, it HAS been a while since I offered alms to Allah. Maybe I can buy some linkitude.
Posted by: ccwbass at September 04, 2004 08:39 PM (PTMVh)
6
Right on Bro, I am behind ya (literaly and figuratively), congrats.
Posted by: David Anderson at September 04, 2004 09:19 PM (VCVxu)
7
Thanks. But when behind me please be sure to keep a safe distance from my arse...for your own protection.
Posted by: RS at September 04, 2004 09:21 PM (JQjhA)
8
Nice work. Couldn't happen to a nicer Primate.
Posted by: Gordon at September 04, 2004 10:32 PM (dEFhD)
9
Woo-hoo! Cue "Monkey Man" by the Rolling Stones, and crack open a celebratory PBR. Congratulations, Shack.
Posted by: Johnny Walker Red at September 05, 2004 12:26 PM (6Kr48)
10
Damn, I'm still a flappy fish or something. I need to take some lessons from you, guy. Start promoting m'self, or something. Write a book, maybe. Have sex with somebody famous (besides Eleanor Holmes Norton).
Posted by: Demosophist at September 05, 2004 01:29 PM (turqZ)
11
Its got to be the lime green color that everybody is attracted to.
Congrats dude.
Posted by: Jane at September 05, 2004 07:55 PM (PcgQk)
12
BTW what is the difference or why is there a difference between the average daily hits and the eco-ranking? Anybody?
Posted by: Jane at September 05, 2004 08:12 PM (PcgQk)
13
*Sniff*, and I knew you when you were only an insect.
Posted by: Simon at September 07, 2004 10:28 PM (GWTmv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 03, 2004
54kb generated in CPU 0.0287, elapsed 0.1185 seconds.
124 queries taking 0.1015 seconds, 305 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.