(Oberlin, Ohio) With pom-poms and other props, the women's rugby team at Oberlin has
for a 2006 calendar to "challenge the way people think about women playing a traditionally male sport." Even bruised and sweaty, they're provocative.
) and then think seriously about the statements.
You know, when I look at men's magazines, I'm initially drawn by the pictures of the centerfold. But I become much more engaged when I read about her favorite foods and how she plans to stop world hunger.
1
I think you misspelled "engorged."
And you apparently missed this
hot chick in GQ.
Posted by: IO ERROR at December 23, 2005 08:53 AM (FVbj6)
Posted by: hondo at December 23, 2005 09:02 AM (3aakz)
3
From what I've heard that calendar is less than stellar. Here is a link to another sample picture:
Ugly Broads
I don't know about you, but I'd rather look at naked dudes.
Posted by: Mark at December 23, 2005 10:05 AM (ga+7P)
4
This calendar is not going to make the top ten, that's for sure. Ugh!
Posted by: jesusland joe at December 23, 2005 10:11 AM (rUyw4)
5
That calendar isn't challenging thinking about women playing traditionally male sports. It's just challenging to the eyes.
Posted by: Graeme at December 23, 2005 10:15 AM (NV2f4)
6
Four words: Playboy. Brazilian. Women. Soccer.
Google it.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 23, 2005 11:23 AM (0yYS2)
7
Agent Brown says that there is nothing to fear.. but the Architect.
Posted by: Agent Smith at December 24, 2005 06:35 AM (AovCV)
8
I think it is great finally women are coming out of their shells. Nothing wrong in it at all. Burn them bra's too.
Posted by: Paul at December 25, 2005 10:00 AM (M7kiy)
9
What's funny is that those girls you think are ugly are probably getting quadruple the amount of action you guys got in college. I think they're pretty cute.
Posted by: Patricia at December 25, 2005 10:36 PM (jsTQ2)
10
Good for you Patricia, but I'm guessing you're a lesbian, and therefore still a girl, which means you really have no idea what men find attractive.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at December 26, 2005 04:22 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Oyster at December 27, 2005 05:03 PM (YudAC)
12
Improbulus Maximus- Slight correction, I'm a Woman and bisexual. There is a very important difference between knowing what men find attractive (which I do) and *caring* what men find attractive(which I don't). It's attractive to see women redefine it for themselves without worrying about what men on the street or men on a message board think about it. To me and probably a lot of other women, that's attractive. Shows strength; plus they've got hot little bodies which doesn't hurt! More men should take notes.
Posted by: Patricia at December 28, 2005 01:18 PM (jsTQ2)
13
In my opinion this was nothing more than a fundraising publicity stunt. The claims that it is a statement of feminist equality lost all its credibility when they took off their clothes. I thought feminists were opposed to women being looked at like sex objects? I would appreciate the intent if I believed it.
Posted by: George at February 02, 2006 07:47 PM (lCaqq)
14
George,
Feminists are not against women's sexuality. They are against the idea that women's sexuality is subserviant and assumed to be so (i.e. she's a slut - he's a hero). If I woman decides to be sexual, then they should not have to answer to man for that choice.
Bob
prop
tmr rfc
Posted by: bob at June 14, 2006 10:55 AM (oDi5T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
