October 25, 2005
Battle of the Sexes Status Report
A patriarchal court system probably won't allow this type of lawsuit to get too far.
A Brazilian woman is suing her partner for not giving her orgasms.
According to Terra Noticias Populares reports, the unnamed 31-year-old filled (sic) a complaint at Chacar Urbana Police station in Jundiai, in the state of Sao Paulo.
She complained that her 38-year-old partner reached an orgasm and then simply stopped the sexual intercourse.
Police chief Jose Roberto Ferraz is investigating the case.
A police spokesperson said: "We will look into it, we will treat it as an ordinary complaint and let the judge decide." (Source)
It's interesting that she's not suing her husband, rather, her partner. Just imagine the hilarity if society were to reward women who filed denied-orgasm lawsuits against partners
and husbands. Nevertheless, it's a she-said he-said situation since there's no way to prove a woman didn't have an orgasm. Just like there's no way to prove a woman did.
Uh ... Right?
On the other side of the world in a somewhat related report from Xinhua, a nation-wide poll of Chinese women this past weekend found that "nearly one-in-eight women, 12.4 per cent, said they rarely or never experienced sexual pleasure." Furthermore, the poll also found that about "25 per cent of wives are disappointed with service between the sheets."
Jeez! Twenty-five percent of the married women in a country of 1.2 billion people has got to be at least tens of millions of desperate housewives. To put the number in perspective, it appears that there may be more frustrated women in China than the entire population of France.
In all candor, I'm flummoxed by reports of unsatisfied women. Even though my personal sample size is statistically insignificant, I've heard not a single complaint.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
11:28 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 307 words, total size 2 kb.
1
She complained that her 38-year-old partner reached an orgasm and then simply stopped the sexual intercourse.
Well, duh... he was done!
;-)
Posted by: V the K at October 25, 2005 12:53 PM (sPO/s)
2
Does she have a contract with her partner saying he must reciprocate all orgasms? I can't see how she can sue him without that.
How long have your personal samples hung around? why bother to complain when there are plenty more fish.....
Honestly though, I think this is man thing - they do not understand how you can have sex without having an orgasm & so spend many hours trying to prove to themselves that either we do all the time, or that we don't & it's someones fault.
sometimes sex can just be good, without being great. Sometimes there are more important things in a relationship. Sometimes we just can't be bothered.
Posted by: Mrs Aginoth at October 25, 2005 12:54 PM (cZrVc)
3
Reminds me of the old joke about the old couple who lived next door to a young Neil Armstrong. Men have complaints too! - but you don't see us pouring our hearts out in some stupid survey!
Posted by: hondo at October 25, 2005 01:36 PM (ymtSt)
4
The trial lawyers cant sue gun companies or fastfood so their going down to BRAZIL to file frivlous lawsuits so thats where the vultures have migrated to
Posted by: sandpiper at October 25, 2005 02:30 PM (6rkkO)
5
Mrs. Aginoth,
You are a keeper. A voice crying in the wilderness, perhaps the only calming influence on this blog. And your pretty smart, too.
So keep commenting, no matter what is said, and in an aside, grow a thick skin. Just in case one of those liberals takes issue with one of your comments.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 25, 2005 03:57 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Limo Barbie at October 25, 2005 04:36 PM (6mUkl)
7
No wonder, Barbie, get outa that car. A guy can't do his best work in a car, well, at least after he exits his teenage years. HaHa!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 25, 2005 05:06 PM (rUyw4)
8
and Brazil becomes a little like America....its citizens filing trivial and wastefull lawsuits...whats next for Brazil i wonder????.....do they have a branch of the ACLU down there????...they may try and sue to cancel the Carnivale
Posted by: THANOS35 at October 25, 2005 05:26 PM (IgomX)
9
She was probably thinking about a dead cat or somthing that's what I do.
Posted by: Howie at October 25, 2005 09:21 PM (D3+20)
10
This is why all men should be gay. Only another man can truly appreciate the male sexuality.
Posted by: red pecker at October 26, 2005 03:17 AM (4ROTg)
11
Based on the responses to this post, it seems that there are not a lot of female readers of Jawa.
Posted by: Mike at October 26, 2005 06:20 AM (ywZa8)
12
Mike, I think they're just taking the 5th on this one... the first thing that popped into my mind was her being on the witness stand and the defendant's lawyer asking her if she ever lied about it. Cross-ex over in two seconds.
As for the studies - is anyone here surprised that a majority of Chinese women aren't satisfied? Why stop at sex? Let's ask them about the control they have over reproduction and family, how they're doing in the economy, perhaps throw in some questions about their educational opportunities... Aside from being alive and in relative health, what is there to be happy about?
Posted by: tee bee at October 26, 2005 04:10 PM (q1JHF)
13
Why dont the just play a freindly game of tennis just like BILLIE JEAN KING and BOBBY RIGGS did
Posted by: sandpiper at October 26, 2005 08:57 PM (uPdgJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2005
Blog Sabbath Caption Contest: It's Howie's Fault Edition
Caption this photo of me (Vinnie), Howie, See-Dubya, and Mike Pechar at the last Jawa Report Contributor's meeting.
Fatwas will be issued sometime before Monday Night Football.
(I can't remember who's standing on the left, just barely in the picture, could be Demosophist, maybe Bluto. Then again, I don't remember much about that meeting...who would?)
We have fatwas
Graeme for "Rusty Shackelford had always wanted to be like Hugh Hefner, but high operating costs prevented him from realising his dream. That is, until he found four contributors who weren't inclined to read their contracts properly."
Filthy Allah for "Dear Sweet Christ. This is better than Scott Baio hopped up on Goofballs and half naked! I have not seen so many sexy seniors in ages! Are those scars from Oatmeal burns?"
Jesusland Joe for "It's burqa time, baby!"
Honorable Mention:
Rodney Dill for "Even though he's been out of office for a while, Internship wannabe's line up daily at 15 Old House Lane in Chappaqua, NY."
Sorta Dishonorable Mention, But Would Have Been A Winner If He Had Read The Rules, Which I Email Out Every Saturday Without Fail, I Swear:
Matt, for "OK, can't use image tags, but here's my entry" (dude, you can't answer a question with a question, and you can't caption a picture with a picture even if it is hilarious).
Only mentioning it because he frightens me Mention:
Mr. Venom, for "While still searching for the elusive weapons of mass destruction, U.N. weapons inspectors announce the discovery of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass disgust."
Dishonorable Mention:
I couldn't decide between the two, but they know who they are.
Posted by: Vinnie at
07:29 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
1
We're not just gay Republicans, we're SHE-MALE Republicans.
(I hope I win the contest!)
Posted by: Kick the Retardlican Scroat at October 23, 2005 04:42 AM (CX9+v)
2
OK, I'm convinced. I now believe the terrorists really do hate our freedom.
Posted by: Kick the Retardlican Scroat at October 23, 2005 04:59 AM (CX9+v)
3
Several Flew Under the Cucu's Nest ...
or
The Great Escape .. from Gitmo
or
Hey Bubba, can you spare a dime?
or
What I "contribute" is personal, very, very personal.
Posted by: Bubbe at October 23, 2005 05:10 AM (cbAi4)
4
Rusty Shackelford had always wanted to be like Hugh Hefner, but high operating costs prevented him from realising his dream. That is, until he found four contributors who weren't inclined to read their contracts properly.
Posted by: Graeme at October 23, 2005 06:37 AM (Z9doT)
5
What's this? A Karl Rove look-alike competition?
Posted by: Wizard at October 23, 2005 07:15 AM (CX9+v)
6
Anticipating being out of work due to hurricane damage, these guys get ready for their new service jobs.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 23, 2005 07:33 AM (8ZzO5)
7
And God had finished on the seventh day his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
-Genesis 2:2
Posted by: resident at October 23, 2005 08:26 AM (sOiyv)
8
“If you turn away your legs, because of the Sabbath, from doing your desire on My holy day; and if you call the Sabbath a delight, to the holy day of the Eternal honored, and you honor it from going about your ways, from tending to your affairs and form speaking of the matter,
- Isaiah 58, 13
Posted by: resident at October 23, 2005 08:29 AM (sOiyv)
9
"Wail; for the DAY OF THE LORD is at hand; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty."
- Isaiah 13:6
"And we shall mock THE LORD with invocations of THE SABBATH and exposeth our bared breasts in mockery of the honor of HIS day."
- Paraphrase, in response to Conservative Christian mockery of the Sabbath
Posted by: resident at October 23, 2005 08:37 AM (sOiyv)
10
What would Jesus do? Yes. He'd show us his tits too.
Posted by: resident at October 23, 2005 08:46 AM (sOiyv)
11
Hooters new, more relaxed hiring standards show company in crisis.
Posted by: testprogram at October 23, 2005 08:52 AM (IOXJA)
12
My nipples are so sensitive right now. And I'm about to have a completely understandable breakdown.
Posted by: Howie at October 23, 2005 08:55 AM (D3+20)
13
Howie, you are about as funny as a suicide bomber.
Zzzzzzzzzzz....
Posted by: El Mariachi at October 23, 2005 09:05 AM (CX9+v)
Posted by: Matt at October 23, 2005 11:03 AM (jAQRx)
15
Definately check out Matt's response.
Posted by: Oyster at October 23, 2005 11:36 AM (YudAC)
16
It's burqa time, baby!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 23, 2005 01:24 PM (rUyw4)
17
Matt wins. Seriously, nobody else should even bother.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 23, 2005 02:43 PM (0yYS2)
18
Even though he's been out of office for a while, Internship wannabe's line up daily at 15 Old House Lane in Chappaqua, NY.
Posted by: Rodney Dill at October 23, 2005 04:31 PM (tGTSA)
19
Line for the "Defy Gravity" Ride at Dollywood.
Posted by: Rodney Dill at October 23, 2005 04:40 PM (tGTSA)
Posted by: Man Mountain Molehill at October 23, 2005 05:37 PM (u20JP)
21
The Usual Suspects 2
Will the real Karl Rove please step forward?!
Posted by: Ernie at October 23, 2005 06:03 PM (CX9+v)
22
The latest cover of the African edition of National Geographic Magazine.
Posted by: D. Carter at October 23, 2005 07:10 PM (xT77+)
23
Dear Sweet Christ. This is better than Scott Baio hopped up on Goofballs and half naked! I have not seen so many sexy seniors in ages! Are those scars from Oatmeal burns?
Posted by: Filthy Allah at October 23, 2005 07:58 PM (bikuR)
24
With the Redskins on the road this weekend, the Hogettes decide to try their luck at the weekly anti-war rally. None have be located since this picture was taken. We would ask for help, but there appears to be no concern that they have gone missing.
Posted by: KG at October 23, 2005 10:01 PM (YPmsQ)
25
While still searching for the elusive weapons of mass destruction, U.N. weapons inspectors announce the discovery of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass disgust.
or
"They're fake, and unspectacular!"
Posted by: Venom at October 24, 2005 10:28 AM (dbxVM)
26
Ha, thatÂ’s that old queen Henry Waxman and his posse trying to cross the velvet ropes to get into the Halloween party at my Georgetown whorehouse last year.
NICE TRY BIOCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Barney Frank at October 24, 2005 12:29 PM (3OPZt)
27
Sometimes, life is just too confusing for words. Droopers indeed.
Posted by: RepJ at October 24, 2005 03:01 PM (6mUkl)
Posted by: Rodney Dill at October 25, 2005 05:48 PM (tGTSA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 20, 2005
Wild Pussies Squeeze Statehouse Rats
(Columbus, Ohio) In 1861, the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus was
officially completed and President Abraham Lincoln spoke before a joint session of the Ohio Legislature in the House Chamber. Since that time, the venerable and historic building has been the enduring center of law for the people of the State of Ohio.
Unfortunately, during the same time period, the Ohio Statehouse also became home to an enduring infestation of rats. For well over a century, Ohio's elected lawmakers have lived in uncompromised harmony with buck-toothed, omnivorous, and disease-carrying rats.
That is, until about a year ago, when a dozen or so stray pussycats started making themselves at home on the Statehouse grounds. Despite their cozy coexistence with the legislators, the rats could not get along with feral felines. So, the rats moved. According to spokeswoman Pat Groseck, of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Commission,
"The cats have done a yeoman's job. There have been no rat-sighting reports since the cats have been there."
Consequently, the Statehouse strays are now being fed, sheltered, and given health care by state employees and volunteers. The rats are gone and everything is hunky-dory.
Or, is it? There are no reports of how the influx of feral cats has affected the songbird population. Typically, a vigorous feral cat population will eradicate all songbirds in the area. Gone are the sweet chirps and calls of cardinals, robins, and chickadees. Call it an unintended consequence.
In closing, I'm skeptical of the assertion that all of the rats have left the Statehouse. If true, how come my taxes keep going up?
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
05:16 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
1
For well over a century, Ohio's elected lawmakers have lived in uncompromised harmony with buck-toothed, omnivorous, and disease-carrying rats.
The people of Cleveland keep electing them, so what can you do?
Posted by: Robert Crawford at October 20, 2005 06:44 AM (1j9aH)
2
So let me see, Cats rid building, politicians from rat infestation, now the problem is over, they now want to get rid of the cats, that got rid of the rats, that got rid of the birds (and the need to pay people $10/hr to scrub bird crap off state building / sidewalks / statues) it's almost like two for one!
Moral of the story, don't ever stop being useful to a politician, they'll f*ck you over, for the Greenpeace vote?
Posted by: dave at October 20, 2005 07:32 AM (CcXvt)
3
And then a few years ago those idiots at PETA were saying RATS HAVE RIGHTS they even had one memeber in a dopey rat costume hah now the kitties come and eat the rats well its all part of nature cats eat rats and PETA has no brains
Posted by: sandpiper at October 20, 2005 07:39 AM (S97cI)
4
Hey!
I have an idea. Have a hunting season on the cats!
My Grandma fed the feral cats on her farm, and the farm became overrun with feral cats. You would go into the barns and you could hardly help stumbling over a cat dead with some unknown feline disease. When my Grandma broker a leg we "took care" of the cat problem. I tried to rescue one but all it would do is to hiss & have nothing to do with me.
BTW, I do like cats. My last cat was named--Yoda (unfortunately a little more than a year ago he went out on eternal prowl).
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 20, 2005 11:22 AM (1h2bp)
5
Yes. that is why you should leave the care of a feral cat population to the animal protection leagues, a lot of feral cat populations are taken care of by animal care groups, that not only feed them but also but neuter/spay the population to ensure it does not get un-managable, so over time it will eventually die out.
Posted by: dave at October 20, 2005 11:50 AM (CcXvt)
6
In normal circumstances I agree with you.
My father trapped a cat took it in to the Humane society which promptly euthanized the cat and extended their palm. So we took matters into our own hands. There were hundreds of the cats I am NOT exagerating.
Most farms I have been to have a a smallish population of cats around. I have no problem with them and am willing to leave them be. The moral of the story is not to feed them.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at October 20, 2005 12:17 PM (1h2bp)
7
Stray cats are as harmful to the enviroment as muslims. Both sneak around and kill things smaller and weaker than they. Turn the dogs and Marines and loose.
Posted by: BigAl at October 23, 2005 05:36 PM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 19, 2005
Who Doesn't Like 'Em?
Stupid criminals, that is....
OMAHA, Neb. -- An Omaha police lieutenant and an officer said they were working at the front desk of police headquarters Monday night when they noticed people sitting a car parked in a handicap parking space.
When the pair walked up to the car, they smelled what they believed to be methamphetamine.
A search proved them right.
The suspect was taken to Creighton University Medical Center, where he agreed to have two small plastic bags of meth removed from his stomach, according to a police report.
Hey, at least they were parked in the right spot....
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Why do you think they call it DOPE?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 20, 2005 01:46 PM (ba9dN)
2
Now where did you all hide my trackback?
Posted by: IO ERROR at October 20, 2005 01:52 PM (vhWf1)
3
Hm, you could try sending it through Kalsey's standalone t/b or Wizbang's manual t/b.
Posted by: Vinnie at October 20, 2005 02:14 PM (Kr6/f)
4
Any libertarian views on this ?
Posted by: john Ryan at October 21, 2005 12:35 PM (ads7K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 18, 2005
World To End Tomorrow, Russell Stover's, Pamprin Hardest Hit
Great news, men (and our
good gay counterparts)!
The opposite gender's most feared weapon of mass destruction has been disarmed!
We now can control the remote all four weeks of the month!
Arise, O men of the West!
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:26 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I can tell you this Mr. Vinnie, you come down to Our Lady of the Meadowlands and spout this type of rubbish and IÂ’ll open up a can of CORNED BEEF WOOP ASS on your heretic behind.
I don’t watch many of today’s movies, but I’ll tell you when I saw Monte Python go into that musical number “Every Sperm Is Sacred” I wanted to call my mum in county cork and just say thanks. You be sure to go to 3pm reconciliation this Saturday and take your penitence like a man.
Imagine a good Italian Catholic boy passing out birth control to get his filthy hands on a channel clicker. Why, IÂ’m inclined to search you out and teach you the catechism of the Church the hard way. I have half a mind to call that Greyrooster fella and have him show you his farm implements.
The road to heaven is narrow and rarely does a man enter it with a channel clicker.
You reflect on that you Protestant sounding poster of filth.
I expect better from ya tomorrow.
Posted by: Fr. Seamus O'Malley at October 18, 2005 11:15 PM (6mUkl)
2
Father Seamus, is that really you?
GET AWAY FROM ME YOU SICK BASTARD, HAVEN'T YOU DONE ENOUGH???
Posted by: Altar Boy at October 18, 2005 11:22 PM (Kr6/f)
3
hate to break it to you, Vin, but I've been on this for years and I still own the remote......
Posted by: caltechgirl at October 19, 2005 12:28 AM (X81mG)
4
A man's obsession with the remote is merely an extension of his penis and represents his hostility toward his mother. Here, take these pills. You'll forget you even have a penis.
Posted by: Dr. Freud at October 19, 2005 05:51 AM (YudAC)
5
Not bleed for a week, when would my poor body get any rest at night!! That's the part I look forward to once a month!
Men are dominating the world..auk!!!
Posted by: Deb at October 19, 2005 09:53 AM (JaMdb)
6
Deb,
You can move to Britain. The latest research released by someone in Britain and posted last week here at the Jawa reported that men in Britain think about sex more often than women, but only perform the act half as much. I'll let you do the arithmetic, but something just ain't right. Anyhow, away to the old country you may go if you get any tireder(is that a word?).
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 19, 2005 10:06 AM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Quick Sandcrawler PSA
I has just been revealed to me that now is the time for the Jawa Report to issue its unofficially official opinion concerning the vacant Supreme Court seat.
The officially unofficial opinion is thus:
We, the squeaky voiced short guys in the brown robes and cheap flashlights for eyes, do hereby vehemently oppose the nomination of John Roberts to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court.
We now return you to your current psychosis, already in progress.
Posted by: Vinnie at
03:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
October 17, 2005
New Orleans Thug Becomes Katrina Hero
The
Times-Picayune devoted Sunday's front page to the story of 20-year-old Jabar Gibson who was kicked out of high school and has been committing felonies ever since. In his own words, Gibson says, "I was in the wrong place at the wrong time, a lot of times." A prudent observer would have predicted that his future had been pretty well set. But Jabar Gibson's life changed dramatically because of Hurricane Katrina.
Gibson stole a school bus, loaded it with 60 of New Orleans' poorest residents, the youngest a week-old infant and the oldest 59, and drove to Houston. Gibson was the driver of what has become known as "the renegade bus" that was the first to arrive in Houston with Hurricane Katrina evacuees.
From NOLA.com:
Gibson acknowledges he stole the bus, although in what has become Katrina lingo, he "commandeered" it to rescue himself and his neighbors. While the storm's floodwaters ultimately did not advance into Algiers, there was no way of knowing that in the chaotic Tuesday morning after the storm. Water was filling up the east bank, Mayor Ray Nagin was on the radio that afternoon predicting several feet on St. Charles Avenue, and panicked residents crossed the bridge to the West Bank, telling tales of impending doom.
"The police was leaving people behind. I had to pick up people on the bus. The police didn't want to do nothing. We stepped up and did what we had to do," said Gibson, who declined to say more because he since has agreed to a movie deal that prohibits interviews.
So, one day Gibson is a street criminal with a regularly revised rap sheet and, the next day, he's under contract in the movie business.
I foresee also probably a book deal, a television movie, and appearances on daytime and late-night talk shows. Who knows? Gibson may well end up being a motivational speaker.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
02:48 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 329 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Well, this is America, after all, where even the dreams of young felons come true.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 17, 2005 08:03 AM (rUyw4)
2
This just goes to show something I've known for a long time; people don't have to be intrinsically bad to commit crimes. Much criminal behavior is simply the result of a large number of people in society who don't fit into the mainstream and are regularly punished by society for it. I don't know the man's history, but from the sound of it, he's not a sociopath, and I'm guessing that his felony convictions are probably mostly drug related or other types of non-violent offenses.
We have created a society which is so rigidly structured and so highly intolerant of aberrant behavior that we have criminalized many things which do not really fit the classical definition of a crime. A crime, simply defined, is any deliberate act that directly causes harm or loss to another person, or to society at large. Notice the use of "deliberate", and "direct". But today, there are so many laws that every person alive in America, (and in many other countries), commits a crime every day whether they know it or not.
Ever smoke pot? Ever drive home from the bar after a couple or three beers? Ever drive without your seatbelt? Ever look at porn on the internet? Et cetera ad infinitum. We are all criminals, though not because we as members of society spend our days in rapine, pillage, arson, and murder, but because someone doesn't like something we're doing, though it harms none and damages nothing.
Here is some wisdom from the Tao of Lao Tzu:
Do not control the people with laws,
Nor violence, nor espionage,
But conquer them with inaction.
...
The more morals and taboos there are,
The more cruelty afflicts people;
...
The more laws and taxes there are,
The more theft corrupts people.
Yet take no action, and the people nurture each other;
Make no laws, and the people deal fairly with each other;
Own no interest, and the people cooperate with each other;
Express no desire, and the people harmonize with each other.
What was true two and a half millenia ago is true today, and one of the worst problems facing our society is that we have criminalized entire segments of our population just because we don't like what they do and how they live. That, fellow citizens, is why I am a libertarian.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 17, 2005 09:55 AM (0yYS2)
3
IM I am SHCOCKED TYPELESS !!
Posted by: john Ryan at October 17, 2005 11:27 AM (ads7K)
4
Maximus: Do you even know what crimes the guy committed?
That said, his former bad acts do not erase his current good act. Also, it is not uncommon that among the criminal class are some folks with daring, intelligence, and initiative, just like any other group.
Posted by: slickdpdx at October 17, 2005 11:29 AM (MjGRu)
5
No, I don't know his record, but like I said, he clearly isn't a sociopath, because sociopaths don't commit selfless acts like he did. And yes, many criminals are daring, intelligent, and possess initiative, but if he were truly of the "criminal class", meaning a habitual criminal, wouldn't he have filled the bus with looted goods rather than people in need of help?
Let me bore you with an anecdote. When I was very small I became deathly ill, and my dad's old '55 Chevy truck wouldn't start because of the freezing weather, and if it did, it wouldn't make it down the frozen mountain roads to take me to the hospital. He called all of the people in our community who had four wheel drive vehicles, starting with the people who went to our church.
It was the middle of the night and freezing cold, and all these good Christians couldn't be bothered with saving the life of a child, so my dad called the last man he could think of, who lived pretty far away. This man was a moonshiner and general scoundrel of the lowest type, but when my dad called him, he said he'd be right out. He took us to the hospital and stayed until I was released the next day, and refused to even accept gas money.
Just because someone is unlawful doesn't make them a bad person, it just makes them a social outcast. Hypocrisy is the engine that drives our society, and until we learn that we can't criminalize everything that we don't like, we will keep missing opportunies to let people be truly good.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 17, 2005 12:42 PM (0yYS2)
6
Well, IM, if I had been your daddy, I would have left whatever so-called church that was, and changed to the real church jesusland joe attended. Because people in jj's church helped his family many times, and anybody else who showed up with a need, whether a member of that church or not. I feel bad about your family's experience, and have said many times that actions always speak louder than words, and that especially goes for Christians, who are in a unique position to make a good or bad impression.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 17, 2005 03:08 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 13, 2005
Open Sandcrawler Hatch
All the other big blogs do it, why not this one?
Open thread, go ahead and beat each other up in the comments.
One caveat.
Comments containing the words "Harriet" and/or "Miers" will be summarily deep-sixed. So will any comments containing the words "Scott Baio" and "goat."
Have at you!
Posted by: Vinnie at
02:44 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, that doesn't really leave us with much now, does it?
Um...
How soon before someone says we had rescue equipment and supplies in Pakistan in less time than it took to get them to NO/LA?
If we start a pool, I'll pick Jesse as the one to bring it up.
Anyone else have a pick?
Posted by: mychimo at October 13, 2005 03:06 AM (Lt0l3)
2
High political value, that deed has. More positive view, the Kashimirians got of you. At expence of domestic policy, it happened. But masses are cowed, no need to care. A+ I give you, for wisely you played your cards.
(AaaarGH! I hate it when my head gets messed up by obligatory artistic crap from school...)
Posted by: A Finn on poetic brainstorm... at October 13, 2005 03:17 AM (cWMi4)
3
Well, anyways, after thorough research, I have found out the following: this is the worst way to waste time, even worse than Runescape, and that is a difficult one to beat. I must find something else to do in the Internet or otherwise, since there's really nothing at all to gain from this. Not even entertaining powerful emotional outbursts, since people seem to have learnt how to behave on very public forums.
Posted by: A Finn at October 13, 2005 05:15 AM (cWMi4)
4
Well, then I have nothing to say.
SCOTT BAIO SCOTT BAIO SCOTT BAIO!
Posted by: Filthy Allah at October 13, 2005 05:29 AM (bikuR)
5
My guess is that it will be Al Sharpton that will bring up the "Pakistan received aid quicker" thing.
Posted by: JackAssFestival at October 13, 2005 05:30 AM (AHkcz)
6
Vinnie just brought it up ... he beat both jesse and al
Posted by: Jonathan at October 13, 2005 05:47 AM (3ir/I)
7
How about Charlie Rangel? You know he wants to say it or have a congressional investigation about it.
But then I'm betting that Ted Kennedy is the first one to bring it up during a certain SCOTUS confirmation hearing. But that may be a hard one to meet, considering the knee jerking that will be happening in that big room.
Posted by: Nylarthotep at October 13, 2005 06:14 AM (+EuZv)
8
My money's on Howard Dean.
Posted by: Oyster at October 13, 2005 06:40 AM (YudAC)
9
I can't believe you'd even consider censoring one of the greatest political minds of our time.
Chachi is genius I tell you!
Genius!
Posted by: dick at October 13, 2005 07:03 AM (XlQVK)
10
Cool porn pics of Harriet, Scott Baio having a three way with a goat, while Joey Lawrence sits by in a very onanistic mood!
http://indcjournal.com
XO
Bill
Posted by: Steve the LLamabutchers at October 13, 2005 07:45 AM (eVpBU)
11
How great a contribution do you think the aid to Pakistan is compared to the thousands that are suffering from that disaster? My guess is that the total help offered by the international community might come close to what we put into aiding Katrina, late or not. It's just a show of solidarity in the face of many recent disasters, rather than anything that puts a major dent in the way of fully reconstructing these people's lives. We didn't exactly fly the superdome down there to house anyone.
Posted by: Ernie Oporto at October 13, 2005 08:27 AM (/lpvu)
12
Well, you guys must have missed my post. I brought up the quickness of our response to the earthquake in a thread right here on the Jawa. I was complementing the military on how quick they can respond to a disaster compared to the local, state, and federal authorities.
Hmm..now I know that nobody cares what I have to say and they don't bother to read my comments. So what!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 13, 2005 10:02 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Howie at October 13, 2005 10:15 AM (D3+20)
14
And where is that Finn guy? I never had the chance to agree with his comment about the hundreds of years of disruption and misery caused by that Christian sect.
I couldn't help but think about these Jesus freaks who caused so much pain, murder, debauchery, and genocide during the past 2000 years: Pol Pot, Idi Imin, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Mao Tse-Tung, Attaturk, Mahmet, Sulieman, Tamarlane, Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun, and Nero. Given a little more time, I probably could think of a few more, but I'm sure you get the picture Finn.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 13, 2005 10:17 AM (rUyw4)
15
Gee, Joe, I read your comments too. ;-( What am I? Chopped liver?
And you don't count for the mention of earthquake aid. The award can only go to those who guess the right lefty. Sheesh.
By the way, what IS the award anyway, mychimo?
Posted by: Oyster at October 13, 2005 02:53 PM (fl6E1)
16
Hey, thanks guys, I was just checking to see! To be read on the Jawa, now that's what I call Cadillac living!
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 13, 2005 03:18 PM (rUyw4)
17
Who knew Vinnie had a thing for ttocS oiaB??
Posted by: Scott T at October 13, 2005 04:09 PM (aRgTx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 12, 2005
British Sex Survey
A
survey of British men found that they thought about having sex 20 times daily. Unfortunately, the same survey found that they had sex approximately once a week. So, there are 140 simulations for every actual performance. With so many rehearsals, one would imagine that each performance is a classic.
On the other hand, the survey found women thinking of having sex a mere six times daily, 42 times per week. Nevertheless, they are twice as busy as men in actual performance, with two actual love-making sessions per week.
As a simple math problem, I haven't figured it out. Assuming essentially equal numbers of men and women in Britain, how in the world can men average having sex once a week while the women average twice a week?
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:41 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 138 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Assuming essentially equal numbers of men and women in Britain, how in the world can men average having sex once a week while the women average twice a week?
1) Different definitions of "having sex".
2)
Average leaves room for lots of variation, including some guys with more than one partner and some with none.
3) They're all lying.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at October 12, 2005 07:07 AM (1j9aH)
2
It's statistically impossible. Yes, some women will have 2 or more sexual encounters per week, and some women fewer. But unless British chics are all dykes, the average of the group will always be the same for that of men.
Posted by: Carlos at October 12, 2005 07:36 AM (8e/V4)
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 12, 2005 08:05 AM (JQjhA)
4
They think about it 20 times a day? That hardly leaves much time for actually doing it. Maybe that's where the problem is.
Posted by: Oyster at October 12, 2005 08:22 AM (fl6E1)
5
Rusty beat me to it... lots of good gay in England.
On a related note, I am moving to England. With a camera.
Posted by: Wine-aholic at October 12, 2005 10:13 AM (Wsn+K)
6
No, it means a few guys are getting the majority of the action.
Posted by: slickdpdx at October 12, 2005 11:05 AM (MjGRu)
7
>>>No, it means a few guys are getting the majority of the action.
Then that would assume that the survey only interviewed the women giving the action, and the men not getting the action.
Posted by: Carlos at October 12, 2005 02:16 PM (8e/V4)
8
Define sex. This could all be a form of British Solitaire.
Posted by: hondo at October 12, 2005 04:18 PM (/jH/1)
9
You know, when I was in college, we had a euphemism for sex so we could talk about without people knowing what we were talking about. We called it "brushing our teeth."
Yeah, I can believe the survey.
Posted by: Bohemian at October 12, 2005 07:59 PM (z7WO1)
10
It's obvious what is going on here ... desperate housewives!
Simple logic ... If the men perform once per week so do the ladies with them. We will call the men (M) and the women (W).
Men = 1 time per week / Women = 2 times per week
M2=W
BUT ...
then if 50% of those ladies swing both ways and meet up with each other (they can't be alone so there's another one there)another day that week ...
L=(W/2)2
The 2's cancel each other out so you have ...
L=W
Add that to the original ...
M2=W+L
We know that L=W so you have ...
M2=W2
The 2's again cancel each other out and you have ...
M=W
This proves that the men and women are doing it exactly the same ... WITH EACH OTHER ... The additional sex the women have is with each other ...
England ... where cigarettes are "f a g s"
If your brain hurts ... go have a f a g
Posted by: Jonathan at October 12, 2005 08:30 PM (3ir/I)
11
Nah...it's quite simple:
The guys exaggerate and the women do the opposite. It's the same thing with American sex studies...men end up claiming to have had twice as many sex partners as women and you know they aren't all having butt-sex like Gayrooster.
Posted by: osamabinhiding at October 14, 2005 04:17 PM (1JC96)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 11, 2005
40 Year Old Virgin Reviews The 40 Year Old Virgin
"C" at Way Off Bass admits the un-admittable in the process of reviewing
The 40 Year Old Virgin:
he is a 40 year old virgin. No, I haven't seen the movie yet, but after reading his review I think I sort of
have to.
So, why am I writing this post after I swore off blogging for the time being? Because such self-revealing, brave, and honest writing is rare in the blogosphere. Go give it a look.
Ok, yes I'm blogging but this kind of post takes seconds.
And if you're a single-gal, in the Los Angeles area, Mormon, who is into poetry, doesn't mind geeks, and looking to get married, I can recommend no one better than "C" to ask out on a date. It's a start.
And once the two of you do get hitched, for the love of all that is holy, please help "C" out with his, er, problem....
Posted by: Rusty at
09:07 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Aren't single Mormon males over 25 considered a "menace to society"?
Posted by: Bill Dautrive at October 11, 2005 11:20 AM (G95Uf)
2
Rusty's always looking out for his fellow bloggers to get some a**.
Posted by: Wittysexkitten at October 11, 2005 02:33 PM (jm3oX)
3
Bill,
Yes. Case in point: Steve Young
Witty,
What can I say, I'm a humanitarian.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 11, 2005 03:03 PM (JQjhA)
4
Two things give me hope:
[1] One anagram of my name is "Romance"
[2] You can't spell "Consumation" without "C"
So, you know, I'm feelin' pretty good right now.
Thanks for the link, hermano.
Posted by: ccwbass at October 11, 2005 03:26 PM (PuHU/)
5
Can't help but wonder if possibly Rusty is having a flashback to his own lengthy period of virginity as a long time ago Los Angeles based geek himself?
The ladies love a confident man. We don't care if he has a little man boobs if he shows us some expertise at something. Which is why professors get laid.
Posted by: GirlGoneMil at October 12, 2005 02:14 AM (15WwU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 10, 2005
The Evolution of News
The New York Times, then and now. Click on the thumbnails for a larger image.
Posted by: Drew at
07:38 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Carlos at October 10, 2005 07:50 AM (GbzDT)
Posted by: Howie at October 10, 2005 08:50 AM (D3+20)
3
OMG! I had no idea that DSM was related to Rumsfeld.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 10, 2005 09:36 AM (rUyw4)
4
Wait, wasn't Batboy abducted by Satanist aliens who forced him to become Bigfoot's love slave in order to fulfill one of Nostradamus' prophesies about Hitler? Dammit, they never can get a story straight.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 10, 2005 09:56 AM (0yYS2)
5
The invasion may have been great and all that, but Batboy and Bigfoot are in your neighborhoods! This is what happens when justice fails, and Courtney Love is free to prowl the opium dens of D.C. It's clearly a sign of the apocalypse, which is far worse than a world war.
/sarcasm.
I could tell right away it was fake. The Times generally isn't that creative in their storytelling.
Posted by: tee bee at October 10, 2005 12:30 PM (q1JHF)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 10, 2005 01:45 PM (0yYS2)
7
Your right the New York Times is no different then a tabloid only you can use the NYT for toilet paper and flush it just like with NEWSWEEK
Posted by: sandpiper at October 10, 2005 02:07 PM (U+eLg)
8
I would never flush the Times, my toilet deserves better than that.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 10, 2005 09:27 PM (0yYS2)
9
Acually after we both dissed em they had a good investigation of euroislamobomberheads but I could not diss em and plug em the same day.
Posted by: Howie at October 10, 2005 10:01 PM (D3+20)
10
The batboy is the cousen to bigfoot who are waiting for the UFO to come and pick them up before the eco-freaks at SIERRA CLUB find them?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 11, 2005 01:51 PM (JyNSh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 04, 2005
Is Harriet Miers Really SNL's Rachel Dratch?
You be the judge:
Is this Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers or is it Rachel Dratch in an SNL skit?
Is this Rachel Dratch or is this Harriet Miers guest hosting on SNL with Andy Richter and Lindsay Lohan?
Tough call, but this would explain a lot......
Posted by: Rusty at
10:13 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I heard she might be a stealth candidate. I just didn't realize it was true.
Posted by: a4g at October 04, 2005 10:20 AM (2GSc/)
2
Personally I think Lindsay Lohan would have been a better choice....
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at October 04, 2005 10:49 AM (JQjhA)
3
Rusty, you know you just want to ogle Lindsay Lohan, and she wouldn't look nearly as hot in those robes the Supremes wear. My advice to you, go to google and ogle.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 04, 2005 11:03 AM (rUyw4)
4
Lindsay Lohan was injured in a car accident Tuesday night as she was fleeing paparazzi in West Hollywood (really), so she's out of the running...
Posted by: blogster at October 05, 2005 01:48 AM (lP9fy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
85kb generated in CPU 0.0363, elapsed 0.1344 seconds.
127 queries taking 0.1143 seconds, 371 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.