April 28, 2006
Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt to do Ayn Rand
Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt in
Atlas Shrugged? That's what the Hollywood insiders are saying. I guess anything with Angelina Jolie is bound to attract some attention from me--on top of the fact that she is going to star in the screen adaptation of one of the Right's most beloved works of fiction.
Personally, I'm not a big fan. Hang around with enough libertarians (like I do) and you realize that there is a kind of cult of Ayn Rand among certain circles. So what I'm about to say is bound to offend.
In addition to being bad gay, I don't think Ayn Rand was that great of a theorist. I don't really get Objectivism--Ayn Rand's philosophy. I find it tired and boring in the same way that I do Marxism. I just don't have a lot of patience for any theory of absolutes--which is why I describe myself as a 'Burkean libertarian' when asked.
In my dealings with Obectivists, I always got the feeling that they were the Right's version of Scientologists. You know, like they couldn't let an hour go by without dropping Ayn Rand's name into a conversation, and that every time they walked into a book store they had to buy a copy of Atlas Shrugged. No wonder Allen Greenspan dropped out of their ranks years ago!
And it's not like I hated the books, I just didn't love them either. No epiphemy for me--but maybe that's because I've always had libertarian leanings? Just a good read. No big deal.
So, will I go see Atlas Shrugged? Sure will. The last time an Ayn Rand novel was put on to the silver screen it turned into an instant classic. But then again, we had Gary Cooper to convince us that one man could stand alone against the world. I just don't see Brad Pitt pulling the same thing off as tycoon John Galt.
But Angelina Jolie as Dagny Taggart? I'm so there.
And for my Objectivist friends, on a note of redemption, they will be glad that I passed on this news: Angelina Jolie is said to be a big Ayn Rand fan---and anything Angelina is into can't be all that bad, can it?.
Except Brad Pitt. And it turns out, Brad Pitt is into Ayn Rand, too. Go figure.
Posted by: Rusty at
03:48 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 400 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Brad Pitt as a philosophically influenced physicist... sorry don't see it. He should stick to sitting on a couch smoking pot out of an empty honey container or simply not bathing.
Posted by: PMain at April 28, 2006 04:12 PM (Wi32/)
2
Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt to do Ayn Rand
You said "
do Ayn Rand."
Your readers aren't the same as they used to be. They're like all serious and stuff.
Posted by: Leopold Stotch at April 28, 2006 07:25 PM (uvZMh)
3
Who wants to bet they spin this story into "Socialism is the solution" instead of "Socialism is the problem", or otherwise get the message completely spun into something the book did not intend?
This was one of my favourite books, unfortunately I do not think this movie will do it justice. Not just because books that are turned into movies tend to lose things in translation but because the message the book was trying to convey seems to be the antithesis to the ideology that is dominant in Hollywood these days.
Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at April 28, 2006 08:24 PM (3smJS)
4
You are clearly an idiot, but maybe you'll have an EPIPHANY and figure that out.
Posted by: RR at April 28, 2006 08:29 PM (vxjLo)
Posted by: Brad at April 28, 2006 10:08 PM (BJYNn)
6
I'd bet a thousand on this: they're going to make a pass at keeping the plot intact, and they're going to rip the guts out of the philosophy. This movie will have as much of Rand's thought in it as the Starship Troopers movie kept of Heinlein's ideas (which I like better than Rand's.)
Posted by: ShannonKW at April 29, 2006 02:14 AM (dT1MB)
7
seni seviyorum abgelina jolie
Posted by: kadir at April 29, 2006 04:59 AM (9xsGY)
8
I really dread the thought of having the biggest leftist in Hollywood produce a remake of the antithesis of leftism. I mean really, after
Munich what can we possibly expect?
As I've said elsewhere, it's absolutely sacreligious (not to mention the hypocrisy) that someone like Pitt and Jolie would rail against "corporate greed" yet, find comfort in Rand's philosophy to justify their own greed and sense of entitlement. This is just a Hollywood fad.
Most people who follow Rand believe that capitalism is good for everyone, not just themselves.
Posted by: Oyster at April 29, 2006 05:34 AM (YudAC)
9
Only time will reveal these two's real "motive". They are so self-involved it's sickening. To take advice and follow the lead of two such insensitive people would be the equivalent of listening to moral advice from Madonna. To viciously break up relationships and then justify it as it was already in trouble just fits right into their huge sense of entitlement, doesn't it? Anything with these two in it will end up in my rubbish bin where it belongs. I wouldn't let that woman anywhere near my kids.
Posted by: Diane Gillan at April 29, 2006 07:17 AM (/yM4k)
10
I predict Hollywood will massacre this book, not from any particular ideological reason but simply because that´s what they do to books of great length about ideas. There isn´t all that much action in it, and there´s a speech that lasts almost 100 pages out of about 1000. Also, the narcissism of the author is extraordinary: all men desire the lead female, and are willing to sacrifice anything (except capitalism) to have her. She goes from Cisco to Hank to Galt as each proves himself to be a better thinker. Everyone good is smart and beautiful. Everyone bad is dumber and ugly (except Robert Stadler).
Hollywood will be able to handle the narcissism, methinks, but have real trouble with the ideas. Any guesses to how long this movie will be?
Rusty--Are you sure Ayn Rand was bad gay? Nothing about it in the biography of hers I read, which was very critical (written by a former follower, who was married to Rand´s adulterous lover, Nathaniel Branden--great read, incidentally, The Passion of Ayn Rand).
Posted by: jd at April 29, 2006 08:57 AM (e2/tI)
11
No idea what they'll do with the philosophy of the book, but Brad Pitt is more than capable of pulling off a brilliant John Galt. If I had the choice, I'd almost rather see him as Howard Roark in a remake of The Fountainhead. He's already pulled off the "genius vandal" role in 12 Monkeys and Fight Club, and done an exceptional job in both. (Christian Bale is another actor I could definitely see knocking that role out of the park.)
If the standard for Brad Pitt to beat is Gary Cooper's role as Howard Roark, that's pretty much a walk. Cooper put in some great performances in his day, but his role as Howard Roark definitely wasn't one of them. Cooper's passionless closing argument at Roark's trial was nothing short of painful to watch.
I'm not the biggest fan of Angelina Jolie, but she could do a good job as Dagny.
I'm much more concerned with the storyline & philosophy than the actors, but the fact that there is a push to do this story tells me someone who understands the philosophy wants this movie to be made. There's definitely room for playing up an anti-corporate angle to the story, but I'm not sure that would necessarily be objectionable. The story of one group of industrialists teaming up with the government to squeeze out their competitors would play well across the political spectrum. Whatever the particular angle, it would seem to be impossible to tell anything even remotely resembling the story without including the message that the people should be very wary of government power in all its forms. If that message makes it through, I'll probably be pretty happy with the movie.
Posted by: Ragnar Danneskjold at April 29, 2006 02:37 PM (Gj4c3)
12
I'd much rather see the Fountainhead made, although didn't the Italian fascists do that one during the war? In any case, Fountainhead would be a much more compelling story, because it has the Nietzschean newspaper publisher, who is that rare thing in Randian fiction--a mixed type. Usually, people are either all good, or all bad, and the only time a good person is bad is when they are confused or misled. (Dagny when she struggles against Galt's plan until she sees the light, or Dagny's sister in law).
I wonder how they'll handle her strange attitude towards violence and sex? Should hit Hollywood's sweet spot.
Posted by: jd at April 30, 2006 03:31 PM (uT71O)
13
JD,
I always thought she was bad gay, but maybe I've just seen too many pics of her (shudder).
Posted by: Rusty at April 30, 2006 05:30 PM (JQjhA)
14
Your Comments Here
Big Secret
yes i know
she be pregnancy in the married
and living in
San Francisco
Fell/clay
she tell after three month
is dont be option for abortion
good friend
Posted by: s at May 10, 2006 01:46 AM (XPFxU)
15
Brad Pitt could do a good Ragnar Danneskjöld, but Galt needs to be a no name actor as not to destroy the mystery of the book.
Posted by: Me at May 22, 2006 12:18 AM (lNikn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 21, 2006
Cologne Killing Young Saudi Men
(Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) Social science experts are calling for a national awareness campaign after a rash of deaths of young Saudi men who drank cologne containing methyl alcohol. Although alcohol is prohibited in the Kingdom, 17 young Saudis have died in the recent past believing anything that lists alcohol as an ingredient is safe to drink.
From ArabNews.com:
Al-Nadwa daily recently launched an investigation into the practice in an effort to warn young people and hopefully save lives.
"This problem started four years ago when a number of university and high school students fell victim to it," said Dr. Saleh Awad Al-Garni, an expert in Islamic studies. "At that time, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry withdrew all the cologne from the market where ethyl alcohol exceeded 90 percent and methyl alcohol exceeded 50 percent."
Unfortunately, a typical result of banning a product is the creation of a black market.
"It's very sad that these people are buying the cologne to drink it," said Dr. Muayad Al-Hashmi, a general practitioner. "The Ministry of Commerce warned us about these colognes and limited sales to spray bottles. Smugglers, on the other hand, import the dangerous colognes into the Kingdom caring only about making fast money -- not about people's health.
Experts blame a variety of causes for the behavior of the young men. These include personality disorders, social and family troubles, and satellite television. I don't know, but if I lived in a hot, desert environment, I'd want a cold beer. You could blame it on my . . . uh . . . personality disorder . . . or anything you'd like. And despite flowery-pleasant breath,
I'll pass on the foo-foo.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
11:00 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Howie at April 21, 2006 11:25 AM (D3+20)
2
A better headline would be gross stupidity killing young saudi men.
Posted by: Jones at April 21, 2006 11:30 AM (SJ35d)
3
At least our smugglers and black market durring our prohibition tried to make something somewhat drinkable...
Posted by: Ranba Ral at April 21, 2006 11:49 AM (GyNTD)
4
It just shows that stupidity is international. In the West it's glues and solvents. In Africa it's cow manure and gasoline. In Asia it's methylated spirits. It won't be long before we hear that this was part of yet another evil zionist conspiracy to subjugate muslims.
Posted by: Graeme at April 21, 2006 12:13 PM (csTil)
5
Natural selection, survival of the fittest (mentally).
Posted by: memphis761 at April 21, 2006 12:38 PM (D3+20)
6
What are the jihadis preparing for their meeting with their 72 virgins supposed to do now without cologne?
Posted by: Oyster at April 21, 2006 12:45 PM (okCpP)
7
And that's just one more example of why we don't give guns to monkeys.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 21, 2006 03:08 PM (0yYS2)
8
It is a culture crying out in desperation for a Hooters franchise
Posted by: john Ryan at April 21, 2006 04:35 PM (TcoRJ)
9
Damn, John, methinks you are on to something.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 21, 2006 08:34 PM (rUyw4)
10
We should start an email campaign sending them recipes for homebrew beer and various assorted hard liquors. I brew my own beer and quite enjoy it, its not hard to make, and I'm sure they could figure it out! Might bring them a step closer to the 21st century too!
Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at April 21, 2006 10:44 PM (3smJS)
11
Everyone bookmark this page and keep it forever, because John finally said something that made sense.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 22, 2006 05:07 AM (0yYS2)
12
lol, Maxie! Make that
three keyboards.
Posted by: Oyster at April 22, 2006 07:19 AM (YudAC)
13
Put warning labels in aribic DO NOT DRINK
Posted by: sandpiper at April 22, 2006 07:41 AM (uo3LX)
14
This parallels the war on drugs in the U.S. Legal highs can be regulated and safe. Street stuff may be hazardous to your health. During alcohol prohibition, plenty of folks died or went blind drinking bathtub gin that was improperly distilled.
Posted by: Paul Moore at April 25, 2006 03:31 AM (mw+rq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 20, 2006
Free Breast Exams
(Lauderdale Lakes, Florida) A 76-year-old door-to-door illegal breast examiner, Philip Winikoff, was arrested for playing doctor and sexually assaulting women.
From Local10.com:
The man found at least two Lauderdale Lakes women who took him up on his offer.
One 36-year-old woman said she let Winikoff into her apartment. She (sic) after he touched her breasts, he moved his hand to her genitals. She said one (sic) she realized that Winikoff was not a real doctor and she called the Broward Sheriff's Office.
Investigators said by that time, Winikoff had already found another victim; a 33-year-old woman who lives in the same complex. That woman told deputies that Winikoff also sexually assaulted her.
Obviously, Winikoff didn't read the rule book which specifies that a person must quit playing doctor after promotion from grade school. Winikoff instead might want to consider playing a congressman. By his picture, there's a remarkable resemblance to Rep. Jack Murtha of Pennsylvania who has
recently shown that he would help the country more by being a breast examiner. Okay, that was a cheap shot.
I apologize.
Winikoff has been booked into the Broward County Jail on sexual assault charges.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
08:15 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 198 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Looks more like Henry Hyde to me, but then, I don't do cheap shots...
Posted by: jd at April 20, 2006 08:18 AM (uT71O)
2
Hmmmmmm.......I never thought of that.....But who is to be pitied more; Dr. Winikoff Wannabe, or the women he duped.
Posted by: n.a. palm at April 20, 2006 08:34 AM (NGBpE)
3
Truth is stranger than fiction. LOL
Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2006 08:42 AM (D3+20)
4
There's a man who knows what he wants and goes for it!
Posted by: dcb at April 20, 2006 08:43 AM (8e/V4)
5
So now you need a license to be a "breast examiner?"
Sheesh!
Posted by: mrclark at April 20, 2006 09:13 AM (S76hi)
6
Door to door breast inspector? Why did I waste my time attending university?
Posted by: Graeme at April 20, 2006 09:16 AM (xnfHT)
7
Me and a buddy actually did this in college. There were a lot of booths set up for something the student union was doing and we set up one with a sign that read 'Free Breast and Pelvic Exams By Pre-Med and Computer Science Students.' We were flashed a couple of times and got dates for that weekend but didn't get to perform any exams. The only difference is that we didn't pass ourselves off as doctors and we had the girls come to us.
Posted by: slug at April 20, 2006 12:27 PM (wYW63)
8
What ever happen to not opening your door to strangers. Did those women not learn that early in life?
Besides, you can tell that man has crazy eye.
Posted by: Leatherneck at April 20, 2006 03:53 PM (D2g/j)
9
Well, you certainly can't fault the old bastard for trying.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 20, 2006 09:07 PM (0yYS2)
10
Woman are so whiny. I'd be a little mad if a woman gave me a free prostate exam, but I wouldn't call the cops. Well, maybe, if she made me cough.
Posted by: Inigo Montoya at April 20, 2006 09:16 PM (RHG+K)
11
It's nice to see an elderly man who takes up a hobby in his golden years.
Posted by: nuthin2seehere at April 21, 2006 02:22 AM (blNMI)
12
I hadn't seen his picture! I don't think he was capable of finding the breasts, do you?
Let's face it. This was his only hope.
;-)
Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at April 21, 2006 07:25 AM (MuIif)
13
ALL YOU PEOPLE NEED TO SHUT YOUR MOUTHS! THIS MAN IS MY GRANDFATHER AND I DONT WANT TO HEAR ABOUT YOU GUYS MAKING FUN OF HIM ABOUT HIS EYES OR WHATEVER! HE'S AN ELDERLY MAN AND IF YA'LL HAVE HALF A BRAIN YOUD REALIZE THAT AS YOU GROW OLDERS YOUR EYES GET BAD AND YOU NEED GLASSES. I DONT WANT TO HEAR ALL THIS SHIT FROM YOU. HE'S A WONDERFUL LOVING MAN. AND ANYONE WHO'S MET HIM KNOWS THAT. THIS IS ALL BULL SHIT. PEOPLE THESSE DAYS DISGUIST ME. I CANT BELIEVE PEOPLE WOULD MAKE UP CRAP LIKE THIS. I KNOW HE DIDNT DO IT SO WHY DONT YOU ALL JUST SHUT YOUR FRIGGIN MOUTHS AND LEAVE THIS MAN ALONE!!??
Posted by: Jill at April 24, 2006 06:42 PM (kJMyI)
14
i agree with jill she is my best friend and i kno that man never would have done nething like that and all you people who believe he did need a serious and embracing reality check!if that man is anything like his grandaugter he si a very loving man who is caring and nice to everyone no matter what neone says or does towards him I DO NOT BELIEVE HE WOULDVE DONE ANYTHING LIKE THAT AND THAT WOMEN IS JUST IN IT FOR THE ATTENTION AND MONEY SO SCREW HER LEAVE THIS MAN ALONE!! JILL IS MY BEST FRIEND AND I KNOW NEONE RELATED TO HER WOULD NEVER EVER DO NETHING LIKE THIS EVR EVR EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Brandi at April 24, 2006 06:54 PM (Ffvoi)
15
Dammit,
That old fart is making us legitimate door
to door breast examiners look like a bunch
of perverts. What a chump!
Posted by: Dr Boobie at April 25, 2006 10:16 PM (UC0in)
16
Breast sex ever! Now that's a retirement hobby I can get behind, or in front of. Good clean sex.
Posted by: sex machine at May 03, 2006 11:12 AM (xYcC2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 12, 2006
Scientists Smell Cow Manure
(Hays, Kansas) Researchers at Fort Hays State University are
studying cow manure to determine what makes it stink. To determine the cause of the odor, Professor Ed Olmstead, cattle scientist John Jaeger and two students plan to sample manure deposits at a variety of feedlots and analyze the constituents.
It's believed that specific unpleasant elements can be identified and possibly eliminated to make cow flop smell as enjoyable as Irish Spring. Notably, Jaeger said it might be something in what the cows eat. I'm not a scientist, but I think Jaeger may be on to something.
Presumably, the researchers will incorporate results from studies of animals known not to produce foul smells. For example, the in-depth statistical data derived by mainstream media analyses of people who produce no foul-smelling effluent could be most beneficial. Consequently, a close examination of the manure from Cindy Sheehan and Hillary Clinton could likely yield important results. The consensus of the media is that their stuff doesn't stink.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:48 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah if they can just get the poop part out should be fine.
Posted by: Howie at April 12, 2006 08:37 PM (D3+20)
2
Wow, this makes me so proud to say I went to Fort Hays State. The place is so boring all you do is drink and I guess now play with cow pies. Hey I guess if they get it right they can say "Come to Fort Hays State our sh*t don't stink!"
Posted by: bags75 at April 12, 2006 08:47 PM (1/GRb)
3
No doubt millions of our tax dollars are going toward this effort.
And in other news, Congress has just approved a one billion dollar grant to reasearchers working to discover why water is wet...
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 13, 2006 06:30 AM (0yYS2)
4
I love the smell of manure in the morning! it smells like ...
Posted by: hondo at April 13, 2006 08:45 AM (4mgfY)
5
Yes Hondo? It smells like .... well let us know when you come up for air!
Posted by: Last word Larry at April 15, 2006 07:19 PM (FCC6c)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 08, 2006
"Divorce Court" Judge Plays Race Card
It seems that playing the race card is just as popular as always. This week we had Cynthia McKinney and now Mablean.
Mablean Ephriam, television's "Divorce Court" judge, claims her firing by FOX was because of racial and ethnic issues. FOX stated that Ephriam wanted too much money and reportedly turned down a contract for $2 million a year.
Since FOX replaced Ephriam with ex-Ohio Judge Lynn Toler, also an African-American, her racism charge seems baseless. I suggest that she try claiming FOX is sexist.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:46 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nobody believes these bogus racism charges anymore. Ignore the stupid biatches. People like them is why I'm not a Liberal anymore.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 09, 2006 12:17 AM (8e/V4)
2
A**holes, idiots and fools come in all colors, but you sure can't convince some people of that. Makes you wonder if it's self-loathing or an unusually high regard for themselves that makes them think others can't see past their skin color.
She'll find a lawyer who'll gleefully use it to sue on her behalf. Anything for a buck.
Posted by: Oyster at April 09, 2006 04:07 AM (YudAC)
3
I think they've played this hand plumb out. It's time for a new deal.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 09, 2006 06:55 AM (0yYS2)
4
Once again, the free market systen has spoken. Ephraim thought her services to Fox were worth more than 2 million a year. She was mistaken.
Posted by: Nightfighter at April 09, 2006 11:28 AM (k/2Hv)
5
More of the usial lies by the liberal minority fools i guess their loking for JESSIE JACKASSON to get involved
Posted by: sandpiper at April 09, 2006 12:44 PM (XGDTE)
6
As a presumed impartial, objective judge in the legal system, Mablean sure whipped out the race card with lightning speed. As such, one might believe that some of her judicial opinions were biased.
Posted by: Mike at April 09, 2006 05:17 PM (Kjxf6)
7
Mike, that's probably why she's just a TV judge.
Posted by: Oyster at April 10, 2006 05:40 AM (YudAC)
8
While I agree that the race card is used as the trump far too often, in this case I have to agree. Check out this article< http://eurweb.com/story/eur25782.cfm, for the complete story of what she said at the press conference. Often times, editorial "decisions” don’t allow for the full story to be told. I have searched the net and seen way to many versions of the same story where only one part of what the judge said during her conference was quoted. Her complete explanation, which breaks down her reasoning behind the accusation, was left out in almost every article I found.
In regard to Judge Toler being black, I wonder if she is fair skinned with good hair. Like it or not racism and intra-racism in the black community still exists. In our history, you once had the brown paper bag test. If you were darker that the paper bag and had curly - "nappy"- hair, you were considered less than other members of your race. And, although Jim Crow law refered to everyone with a drop of black blood as a n***a, if a choice was to be made of selecting one black over the other, the one with the fairer skin would be selected, unless of course it was field work.
I wrote all this to point out that the racism Judge Ephram described is still alive today and it is reflected in the unequal pay and ridiculous requests made by Fox as described by the judge in an article reporting the full story.
Ayana
Posted by: Ayana at April 10, 2006 06:33 AM (p2vSu)
9
If you've never been discriminated against you certainly would feel that the race card no longer has basis. Although some may abuse it please know that racism in America is still alive.
Posted by: Jay at May 03, 2006 10:09 AM (Qa0Pn)
10
If you have never been a victim of racism, if you you are not a "person of color," certainly you find it difficult to believe in the existence or reality of racism. If you could only walk in "our" shoes, you WOULD understand.
Posted by: ME at May 10, 2006 03:05 PM (b7xxK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 06, 2006
Italian Elections
(Rome) This weekend, the Italians will be voting on a new Prime Minister. Consequently, the current officeholder, Silvio Berlusconi, has been colorfully campaigning for re-election.
From TimesOnline.co.uk:
[Berlusconi] has vowed to give up sex for the election, compared himself to Jesus and Napoleon, and admitted phoning late-night erotic chat lines. Nothing, it seems, is out of bounds for Silvio Berlusconi.
But yesterday the Italian Prime Minister, trailing in opinion polls before Sunday's vote, perhaps went a step too far when he suggested that left-wing voters were "dickheads."
Note that left-wing dickheads are not unique to Italian politics. They are
known to reside throughout Europe and all other continents with a particularly prominent distribution on the seaboards of the Americas.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:01 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Berlusconi is hedonistic? I never would have guessed.
Posted by: Oyster at April 07, 2006 06:52 AM (YudAC)
2
The man's a swinger baby!
Posted by: Rusty at April 07, 2006 09:52 AM (JQjhA)
3
that's the most absurd comments i have ever heard
Posted by: adult toys at April 07, 2006 12:21 PM (j1p7F)
4
Another warning that should be on clonazepam: Don't post while stupid.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 08, 2006 03:43 PM (0yYS2)
Posted by: Mike at April 08, 2006 06:36 PM (Kjxf6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 01, 2006
She Never Was All That Hot Anyway
I just don't admire Angelina Jolie anymore. Really, she's just doesn't
do it for me any longer.
Besides, she's not really good gay, she's only part-time good gay.
It's time to get past superficial things and admire the true champions of good gay.
Mmm....Rosie O'Donnell....
Posted by: Vinnie at
06:00 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 01, 2006 08:54 AM (rUyw4)
2
Check today's date, probably has something to do with it.
Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at April 01, 2006 10:39 AM (3smJS)
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 01, 2006 11:03 AM (rUyw4)
4
You are SO on crack, Rusty. I'm straight, and I'd go for Angelina if the opportunity arose.
;-)
Posted by: sadie at April 01, 2006 04:01 PM (xV63t)
5
Hey, pranks are all well and good until someone disses Angelina. Don't make me come over there...
Posted by: reverse_vampyr at April 02, 2006 01:00 AM (P8ALb)
6
It's April 2nd and this is no joke:
This bed hopping tramp has kooties.
Every time I see a picture of Brad Pitt, heÂ’s scratching his privets.
As Patrick Henry once said “Price check on Vagisil…Vagisil”
Posted by: Brad at April 02, 2006 08:05 AM (BJYNn)
7
Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!! I think you're right, Brad.
Posted by: jesusland joe at April 02, 2006 01:09 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
58kb generated in CPU 0.0243, elapsed 0.1282 seconds.
123 queries taking 0.1133 seconds, 322 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.