March 30, 2006
Fake Breasts Banned in Space
(United Kingdom) Virgin Galactic is booking reservations for its inaugural flight into space -- scheduled for 2008. Consequently, measures have been established to assure safety including a ban on individuals with artificially augmented breasts.
From Sky.com:
Bosses fear the implants may expand and burst due to cabin pressure, according to The Sun.
More than 157 people have paid 115,000 British Pounds [about $200,000] each to travel into space on the Virgin Galactic space "shuttle."
Spokesman Will Whitehorn said: "We've discovered there may well be issues with breast augmentation.
"We're not sure whether they could stand the trip - they could well explode."
People with heart or circulation problems may also be ruled out.
It's not clear whether artificial penile augmentation will also be banned. However,
one has to assume that any rejections of prospective passengers will be based entirely on the honor system. There must be a law that prevents spaceport screeners from searching for evidence of cosmetic surgery.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
05:48 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 167 words, total size 2 kb.
1
No way. We need a law REQUIRING female space travelers to be screened for breast enhancements. In the open. In front of a web cam. So that more experienced, uh, screeners can observe remotely and comment, er, say something if they spot fake breasts.
Posted by: Homeland Stupidity at March 30, 2006 05:56 AM (FVbj6)
2
Of course, the prohibition will prevent some of the rich and famous celebrities from being space cadets actually in space.
Posted by: Mike at March 30, 2006 06:10 AM (KCwGv)
3
How low is the cabin pressure in this thing going to go? If fluid filled implants are likely to explode, what about the person's organs?
Posted by: Graeme at March 30, 2006 06:41 AM (kQpJt)
4
Mythbusters did this, and I think the result was that implants aren't a problem. The problem came from inflatable bra inserts...
Posted by: Robert Crawford at March 30, 2006 06:42 AM (n5eDP)
5
Well, the story did generate a couple of days of publicity - didn't it?
Posted by: hondo at March 30, 2006 08:51 AM (StM4D)
6
Mythbusters did this, and I think the result was that implants aren't a problem. The problem came from inflatable bra inserts...
I think they found that death would come long before the small inflation of the implant became a problem.
Posted by: Apesnake at March 30, 2006 12:57 PM (scKzN)
7
Exploding boobs in hyperspace?........"Spock get up here on the flight deck immediately, something's bad wrong!".
Posted by: n.a. palm at March 30, 2006 12:58 PM (RwcIA)
8
Perhaps there will be some adaptive technology. If one can afford $200,000 for the suborbital ride on the Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo, then perhaps, some space medicine could come into 'play' prior to liftoff. After all, this is the 2nd Space Age.
Posted by: JackKennedy at March 30, 2006 07:11 PM (UHMzg)
9
The breast implants expand and then explode? Here's a solution, make implants that are more durable that don't explode. That way there are bigger fake boobies in space!
Posted by: LC CanForce 101 at March 31, 2006 12:27 AM (3smJS)
Posted by: Jo Blo at April 05, 2006 10:22 AM (VlmM+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 29, 2006
Morrissey: Canada = Hitler
Former
The Smiths frontman, Morrissey,
equates Canada to Hitler. Killing baby seals, killing Jews....six of one, half a dozen of the other.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:51 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who in the hell is Morrissey, and who are The Smiths? I've heard of The Whites, but The Smiths, nah!
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 29, 2006 02:02 PM (rUyw4)
2
Joe, you never heard of the Smiths? Yeesh, dude.
Looks like no one is safe from the Hitler label. Excuse me if the definition seems watered down these days.
Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 02:27 PM (rGS2g)
3
I do not understand why the world loves to kill those Jewish folks. Is it because they brought morality to the world? Perhaps, it is because they will not worship any false gods. Whatever it is, the world just can't seem to get enough of blowing up Jews. What a world.
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 29, 2006 02:45 PM (D2g/j)
4
HaHa The Pogues were the best band of the 80s and everyone knows it. Morrisey is a f'in freak.
Posted by: joey jojo at March 29, 2006 04:51 PM (aBQ9h)
5
I didn't know baby seals were kosher.
Posted by: hondo at March 29, 2006 05:12 PM (StM4D)
6
hondo!!!!!! Where have you been? And I didn't either.
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 29, 2006 05:39 PM (rUyw4)
7
JJ - Busy
Submitting retirement papers in a month - have 2 disability claims to prepare for DA/VA.
Posted by: hondo at March 29, 2006 05:43 PM (StM4D)
8
Well, busy or not, I missed ya! And I don't think you saw that apology I made to you a few days ago. You sure do know those Euros, hondo. Haha!
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 29, 2006 06:32 PM (rUyw4)
9
joey jojo: The Pogues best song EVER was "Dirty Old Town". I
love that song.
Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 07:43 PM (YudAC)
10
Morrissey is Galic for sea shell. I thought you might want to know.
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 29, 2006 10:12 PM (D2g/j)
11
Letherneck: My head is already crammed with enough useless information. Thanx a lot. Now I have to discard some other useless tidbit to fit that one in. ;-)
Posted by: Oyster at March 30, 2006 08:11 AM (rGS2g)
12
Morresy is a idiot why dont he just get lost and SCREW GREENPEACE
Posted by: sandpiper at April 01, 2006 09:02 AM (uo3LX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 28, 2006
Man Divorces Wife While Sleeping
(West Bengal, India) Using all
my imagination, I couldn't come up with this scenario.
From Aljazeera.net:
A Muslim couple in India have been told by local Islamic leaders that they must separate after the husband "divorced" his wife in his sleep.
The Press Trust of India said in a report published on Monday that Sohela Ansari had told friends that her husband Aftab had uttered the word "talaq" or divorce, three times in his sleep.
When local Islamic leaders heard about the incident, they said Aftab's words constituted a divorce under an Islamic procedure known as "triple talaq."
The couple, married for 11 years with three children, were told that they had to split.
The religious leaders ruled that if the couple wanted to remarry they would have to wait at least 100 days. Sohela would also have to marry another man, spend at least a night with him and be divorced by him.
So, in a nutshell, Aftab accidentally divorces his wife because he talks in his sleep,
OR she made it up to get rid of him. Either way, I'm bewildered by the screwiness of the religion of peace.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:43 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Don't you have to have two witnesses to it? Or have the rules changed again?
Posted by: Oyster at March 28, 2006 07:29 AM (YudAC)
2
Oh those wacky, silly, nutty muslims. It's a good thing they are strictly peaceful, and not a threat to destroy the civilized world........
Posted by: n.a. palm at March 28, 2006 07:41 AM (EWjTF)
3
I thought there had to be wittnesses for that. And the clerics won't let him take back his supposed words? Jerks.
Posted by: Palm boy at March 28, 2006 07:42 AM (mdXP5)
4
That's what he gets for even uttering the divorce word. Shame be upon him. Next time, it's his head.
Posted by: thirdee at March 28, 2006 08:01 AM (UsDrv)
5
So if they want to remarry, she first has to marry and be divorced by some other guy. I guess that's a convenient "c'mon dude, share the weatlth" rule that's been added on.
Posted by: Graeme at March 28, 2006 08:08 AM (+8oZx)
6
I think the two witnesses thing is limited to rape - and victims and participants don't count.
Posted by: Insomniac at March 28, 2006 08:09 AM (IEpte)
7
I guess it really is a matter of what rules one wants to apply. It appears that the Shia forbid it and the Sunni's say it's okey dokey. Some Sunnis even go so far as to say that you have to say it at different times, not all at once. Oh, and here's the big one; you're not allowed to do it while the wife is menstruating. WTF? Most countries have banned it, but India still allows it and much like fatwas you just go by whatever rule your Imam applies.
Sonds like the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Oyster at March 28, 2006 08:26 AM (V9juS)
Posted by: Oyster at March 28, 2006 08:27 AM (V9juS)
9
This is insane. You should publish and read the whole article from aljazeera.net before misleading others. . Here is a copy from the article that no Muslim disagrees with.
"The law clearly says any action under compulsion or in a state of intoxication has no effect. The case of someone uttering something while asleep falls under this category and will have no impact whatsoever"
Zafarul-Islam Khan, Islamic scholar
Posted by: Mkahiel at March 28, 2006 08:42 AM (dTqnp)
10
Mkahial,
Maybe you should learn to read. Clearly, Islamic scholars differ. It's so nice when Muslims drop by to inform us of what 'real' Islam is as opposed to Islam as it is practiced by others. How do we know which Islam is the 'real' Islam?
Anyway, I had a dream last night. First, I converted to Islam. Then, I became a Hindu. Then, I pissed on the Koran and burned it. Am I eligible for the death penalty or what?
Posted by: Rusty at March 28, 2006 09:04 AM (JQjhA)
11
Ooooh. That one
screams fatwa!
Posted by: Oyster at March 28, 2006 11:26 AM (rGS2g)
12
That pretending to be asleep and muttering “Divorce, Divorce, and Divorce” works ok in the Muslim world overseas. Here in the Ole USA it’s going to turn out different.
After throwing his wife and daughters out of the house, Iqbal wakes up the next morning to find a lawyer on his doorstep and an order for child support from the State. That night after the family moves back in, his wife smirks behind her birka as he once again talks in his sleep….”Yes dear” “Yes dear” “Yes dear.”
Posted by: Brad at March 28, 2006 12:01 PM (3OPZt)
13
Anyone here old enough to remember way back in the old days of life in the United Syayes when one would have to move to Nevada for one month to establish residency to get a divorce ? Or when Catholics just did not get a divorce ? In my suburban grade school there were always one or 2 kids in each class that came from what were then called "broken homes"
Posted by: john Ryan at March 28, 2006 12:30 PM (GzwSF)
14
Mkahial, did you know you guys worship a false moon god, and your boy Mo likes to get it on with little girls, cut peoples heads off, and steal things from folks?
ROPMA!
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 28, 2006 03:11 PM (D2g/j)
15
Pretty cheap way to do it though...my divorce cost me a fortune. This 3 talaq thing could catch on.
Posted by: Jester at March 29, 2006 06:31 PM (TuAMG)
16
LOL
It finally sank in. Women cannot get divorces, but the courts will take their word for it that their husbands talk in their sleep, and divorced them.
Posted by: Phillep at March 31, 2006 07:21 PM (Xg00m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 25, 2006
Google Chumming Pays Off
From
this, comes this comment:
What a magnificent body and beautiful flat stomach. If her breasts weren't so tiny, I'd "cross the street" and become bi-sexual in a heartbeat.
Take that, punks!
In other news, I'm taking a leave of absence. Cya in the funny papers.
Posted by: Vinnie at
08:25 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
March 24, 2006
Chirac Outraged by Speech in English
Sacre bleu!
From Telegraph.co.uk:
President Jacques Chirac of France stormed out of a European Union summit last night after a French employers' leader said that English was "the language of European business."
The walk-out, seen by Tony Blair, prompted a sheepish exit by the French foreign, finance and Europe ministers and threatened to derail the summit before it had begun.
The officials were meeting to resolve growing concerns regarding several EU countries erecting trade barriers to inhibit cross-border competition.
As I recall, not too long ago the French passed some sort of resolution which outlawed the term "email" in Internet communications because it was English. Chirac's display yesterday is consistent with the email resolution and indicative of French arrogant nationalism and rejection of homogeneity, diversity and integration.
Chirac subsequently defended his walkout.
"I have to say I was profoundly shocked to see a Frenchman express himself in English at the (EU) Council table. That's why the French delegation and myself walked out rather than listen to that," Chirac told reporters.
So, it comes down to profound shock that a Frenchman spoke English at an EU meeting. I'd guess Spanish and Arabic would also have been out of the question. Or, maybe not. It could be that he only has a boner for the English language.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
11:55 AM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 225 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm just trying to remember the last time the French actually did anything constructive for the EU or the world in general ?
Childish arrogance along with constant bitchin and moaning seem to be the norm with the frogs.
Posted by: rob at March 24, 2006 12:11 PM (QpkBe)
2
Didn't the French sink a Greenpeace ship?
Posted by: Mike at March 24, 2006 12:29 PM (g7eZx)
3
Maybe Chirac was just trying to distract attention away from the riots back home....
Posted by: WM at March 24, 2006 12:55 PM (3aCNQ)
4
This story and Olbermann story got me suspicious people are warming up for April 1.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at March 24, 2006 01:34 PM (ffPYG)
5
Caption:
Forgot to put in my teeth this morning and who put that banana in front this mic?
Posted by: Dan at March 24, 2006 01:46 PM (Z2OsI)
6
Chiraq looks like a jerk and stupid as ever why dont they just vote to remove that idiot he is a jerk
Posted by: sandpiper at March 24, 2006 08:58 PM (162Hn)
7
That picture looks like the Simpson episode where the French are gloating about showing the world that they are not a bunch of frogs and then laughing like frogs with their necks bulging.
HON-HON-HON!
Posted by: Apesnake at March 24, 2006 09:56 PM (scKzN)
8
Hi, Chirac did not walked away because M.Seilliere spoke english (Chirac is fluent in english and has certainly no problem with the language!), but because M.Seilliere, who started his speech in french, suddendly turned to english because he said "english is the language for business". English is no more the language of business than french is the language of poetry, or italian the language of arts. Any speech can be given in any language, in other words, a language is not used according to the content of a speech but according to your audience. In this case, the audience was the european council and as far as I know, the very vast majority of attendants don't have english as their mother tongue. All speeches are translated anyway and english was absolutely not necessary. M. Chirac was right to point out this anomaly, but wrong to walk out, he should have said to the audience "Et maintenant, mesdames et messieurs, we are going to hear M.Seilliere speech". That would have had much more impact...
Posted by: Patrick EMIN at March 25, 2006 04:17 AM (BBrfi)
9
Well, I for one like hearing about Chuck "THE HAMMER" Martel. Still seems petty what happened.
Posted by: REMF at March 25, 2006 05:55 AM (7RMSi)
10
I could be wrong, but it's my understanding that more Europeans use English as a second language than other languages. And I think that is the point Seilliere was making. The truth is Chirac has a particular disdain for that very fact. Chirac's behavior implies he is concerned with his own country losing its French identity by adopting idioms not French in origin (as demonstrated with his displeasure over the term "email"), but he must understand that some things are beyond his control. If English does become more widely used as a universal business language anywhere, it's not due to some evil machinations by the US, the Brits or the Aussies. It just simply happened that way. If Seilliere stood up and claimed that German was the language of business, Cirac would have been just as upset.
I would venture to guess that Chirac's "nationalist mood" stems from the same problem we have ourselves here in the US with the wave of Hispanics who don't learn English which threatens our own identity. France is being overrun with the Muslim culture, as well as others, and the lack of assimilation of these into the French culture is what has him riled up. I agree with Patrick that if he's upset over Seilliere's statement that's fine, I don't blame him for wanting to preserve the French identity, but walking out was just another of his tantrums. I think he's even more angry because it was a fellow Frenchman that said it. I don't think Cirac knows what to do about the problems facing his own country culturally and he's just lashing out.
And I just love that picture of him.
Posted by: Oyster at March 25, 2006 06:24 AM (YudAC)
11
"Any speech can be given in any language"
You don't really mean you can talk about decent food in English?
Posted by: Luke at March 25, 2006 06:54 AM (cRuHr)
12
Not just in Europe Oyster, but all over the world, English is generally the
de facto language of business among those who do not understand each others' first languages, except in backward places that are still trying to get camel caravans past bandits in the mountains.
In every nation on this planet, someone who speaks English can be found, and this cannot be said of any other language, so English wins. Patrick is just trying to be a multiculti apologist.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 25, 2006 07:10 AM (0yYS2)
13
Such a childish attitude. Not surprising for a 'leader' that pays much more attention to words than to actions....
Posted by: Filou at March 25, 2006 01:16 PM (iO7Nv)
14
"email" isn't the only technical term the French won't use. I used to build systems and do limited Tech Support at a neighbor's computer business that built network systems for neurosurgeons.
One of our customers had just come over from France and could speak english, but he absolutely refused to use 'english' terms that everyone else in the world uses for computer equipment. I can't remember any terms specifically...it's been 8 or so years. I don't know what was worse though, him assuming everyone should use the 'superior' French terms or listening to him whining about how long it took to get anything done.
I think they're just mentally stuck in the 1700's, when french was the equivalent for business and politics as english is today.
Posted by: Ranba Ral at March 25, 2006 01:54 PM (GyNTD)
15
Language is communication. Duh!!! As times and needs change, the sign of a healthy society is one that allows its language to flow with those changes. The french have earned their reputation for being behind the times and impotent in world concerns. (Did anyone else learn in world history class how they lost the homeland to germany during WWII because they cemented their guns into turrets facing the border? Problem was, the germans snuck up from behind! The gunners couldn't defend their position because they couldn't pivot the guns to cover their own backs! And who had to fight and die to liberate them? Well, let's just say, it was a joint effort by people who mostly spoke english. Cemented in! Their brilliance is blinding!!) Their continuing refusal to allow the french vocabulary to expand, even when it means having a stronger position in the world market, is just one more example of their national genius. Maybe the french language will finally lie down and die, living on in other, stronger languages in countries that have maintained enough sense of selfworth to adopt "foreign" phrases into their verbage. Latin anyone?
Posted by: SaphFire at March 26, 2006 10:04 AM (/7O4c)
16
Ha! That picture is practically a fisk in itself.
Don't know why you're complaining, Jack. Arabic will be the official language of Paristine before long. I give it 10 years.
Posted by: MegaTroopX at March 26, 2006 11:53 AM (yT/Rw)
17
Posted by: Oyster at March 25, 2006 06:24 AM
"Any speech can be given in any language"
You don't really mean you can talk about decent food in English?
-----
Whatever the language I'd rather talk about the food in england than the obesity statistics in other places
Posted by: rob at March 26, 2006 03:53 PM (jaQRE)
18
Chrirac would never walk out if the speech was in Arabic, the crazy jihadists will be waiting outside for him with sharpened blades and heavy jackets.
Posted by: MathewK at March 26, 2006 05:55 PM (pVHqF)
19
Chirac would never walk out if the speech was in Arabic, the crazy jihadists will be waiting outside for him with sharpened blades and heavy jackets.
Posted by: MathewK at March 26, 2006 05:55 PM (pVHqF)
20
Chirac is just lose, france is the biggest money money spender in EU. If they want to quit from EU many people will be very happy..
Posted by: Jaxk at June 11, 2006 02:28 PM (Varme)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
South Park vs. Mission Impossible vs. the Catholic Church
First, Tom Cruise
threatened not to promote his new
Mission Impossible movie unless
Comedy Central (which is owned by
Viacom, a sister company to
Paramount, which produced
Mission Impossible III) agreed not to rerun a
South Park episode mocking Scientology.
more...
Posted by: Bluto at
01:10 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This week's south park spoofs the whole Isaac Hayes/South Park/Scientology controversy.
Posted by: h0mi at March 24, 2006 09:49 AM (YQFEd)
2
I 2nd your "Shenanigans" and raise you a "JewBillie".
I watch South Park on a hit and miss basis. Some episodes are completely stupid, some are offensive, but there are others that are Jewels.
Mecha-Striesand, Rosie O'Donell(sp) and Starvin' Marvin are good examples.
Posted by: Joatmoaf at March 24, 2006 10:15 AM (Vlk3K)
3
Oh NO!
You mean that Tom Cruise won't promote another crappy Hollywood sequel that will never come close to the fantastic workings of the original? Whatever shall we do?! Hollywood might not benefit from its cheap methods of money making, and learn that they have to *gasp* come up with new ideas?
Sure South Park bashed on Scientology, but what religion hasn't it mocked? Matt and Trey have made it clear that they don't oppose any single religion or belief, they just want to harass them all. And the more Scientologists are outraged, the happier Matt and Trey will be, and scientology will find more mockery in store for them.
Posted by: Lee Witt at March 24, 2006 02:01 PM (cWv1e)
4
By refusing to promote his own film, which cost the studio millions, Cruise has put a gun in his mouth and is threatening to pull the trigger. No studio should ever hire him again for such a stupendously stupid act.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 25, 2006 07:17 AM (0yYS2)
5
"No studio should ever hire him again for such a stupendously stupid act."
One can only hope...
Posted by: Darth Chef at March 25, 2006 01:14 PM (uedbm)
6
DANG YOU MAVRIC YOU HAVE BECOME ABSOLUTLY IMPOSSIBLE SINCE YOU GOT YOURSELF INVOLVED WITH THOSE SCIENTOLOGY FREAKS AND JESTERS GOING TO GROUND YOU SUCKER
Posted by: sandpiper at March 25, 2006 02:31 PM (zj1n9)
7
I am Catholic and my brother is a Catholic Priest and we both watch the show with a grain of salt. People like tom cruise is just a person with influence and he wields it very recklessly. Remember mr. cruise what goes around comes around....
Posted by: Paul Labbe at March 25, 2006 03:06 PM (LA1N6)
8
rabble rabble,,.. RABBLE RABBLE!!
Posted by: The Other Dave at March 27, 2006 04:57 PM (o03mE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 19, 2006
Laugh Your A** Off At My Expense
(emphasis mine)
Winter storm warning now in effect until 6 am cst Tuesday.
The winter storm warning is now in effect until 6 am cst Tuesday.
Expect a mixture of sleet and snow this evening, but changing to all snow after midnight. Early this evening, patchy rain may also occur across extreme southeast nebraska. Snow will continue Monday and Monday night before tapering to flurries early Tuesday. Additional snowfall will range from 8 to 14 inches during this time. The omaha metro area will likely see an additional 8 to 11 inches of snow while the lincoln metro area may receive an additional 10 to 13 inches of accumulation. Northeast winds will also increase to 20 to 30 mph which may produce areas of blowing snow.
A winter storm warning means significant amounts of snow, sleet, and ice are expected or occurring. Strong winds are also possible. This will make travel very hazardous or impossible.
Would one of you kind people please e-mail God and tell him that THE FIRST DAY OF SPRING IS TOMORROW!!!
I'm a little verklempt right now, I may say something I'll regret and end up roasting marshmallows with Mohammed.
Posted by: Vinnie at
06:38 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 208 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am totally upset. Tomorrow is the vernal equinox and my birthday to boot. Grrr!
Posted by: miriam at March 19, 2006 06:57 PM (kHqLn)
2
Here in South-central PA, we are scheduled to get just under an inch of snow on Tuesday. Normally, our temps are about 55 degrees this time of year.
Where is my global warming, Mr. Gore???
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at March 19, 2006 08:30 PM (WOQ34)
3
Don't worry fellas, eventually global warming will take care of snow....
Posted by: Fred Fry at March 19, 2006 09:06 PM (HJnrm)
4
Just returned from walking the pooch, wearing a t-shirt, shorts, and flip flops. Summer has arrived! NA NA NA NA NA NA!
/Damn dog has taken to carrying a rubber chicken in his mouth on his potty walks. I'm so embarrassed. :/
Posted by: Princess Kimberley at March 19, 2006 09:17 PM (9xjdU)
5
Snow squalls here in Upstate NY as well. *sigh* I had such high hopes for that Global Warming dealie.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 19, 2006 11:15 PM (RHG+K)
6
I suppose the wild fires will be on hold for a few months now with all this snow, and rain. I am worried about my garden.
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 19, 2006 11:59 PM (UC6hS)
7
I've been running the air conditioning for almost a month now.
Posted by: Oyster at March 20, 2006 05:43 AM (YudAC)
8
Damn, it must suck to not be lucky enough to live in the South. It's a little cool today, but I've spent most of the last couple weeks in a T-shirt. American by birth, Southern by the Grace of God.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 20, 2006 05:50 AM (0yYS2)
9
Aw. Its about 68F right now, should be in the 80s by noon. I'll be thinking about ya Vin.
Posted by: LindaSoG at March 20, 2006 06:13 AM (FKfry)
10
I was too quick to gloat; it snowed and sleeted a bit this morning, and has been raining all day, but should be almost 60 by tomorrow.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 20, 2006 02:28 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 18, 2006
Google Sued for Downgrading Website's Search Ranking
(San Jose, California) In the 21st Century equivalent to the smoky back room, Google evaluates websites and assigns a page rank which determines the order of Internet search results.
I believe this lawsuit seeks to open the doors to the back room and clear the smoke.
From MercuryNews.com:
Google has mysteriously downgraded the search ranking of a Web site geared to help parents care for young children, causing a "cataclysmic fall" in advertising revenue and the number of monthly page views, according to a class-action lawsuit filed Friday.
The civil suit by KinderStart.com of Norwalk seeks financial damages and more information about Google's secret method for ranking sites. The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, seeks class-action status for other sites that have seen their rankings drop without warning or explanation from the Mountain View search giant.
A Google spokesman told the Associated Press that the company hadn't seen the suit and had no immediate comment.
Since it launched in May 2000, KinderStart.com had built up its traffic to more than 10 million page views a month, the suit says, with much of the traffic coming from Google search users. But in March 2005, page views plunged 70 percent and advertising revenue fell 80 percent and hasn't recovered. KinderStart.com suspects that Google erected invisible barriers that divert consumers elsewhere when they type in a search but says Google will not explain what happened.
The drop-off was so sudden that the Web site suspects Google has a flawed method or blocks sites subjectively despite Google's pledge to provide objective search results.
It will be interesting to see how this case develops. I'd suspect that Google will act to prevent class-action status.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
11:16 PM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
Post contains 297 words, total size 2 kb.
1
There is no basis for this lawsuit. Google can do whatever they want with their servers.
Posted by: tt@tt.com at March 19, 2006 08:47 AM (YiOKT)
2
Google is a publicly traded company and is bound by the laws of the SEC and is liable for any changes they make that aren't made known to their customers. They can't just 'do whatever they want' without being subjected to scrutiny by shareholders as well as their customers. This is what happens when a far-left company tries to establish itself in the corporate world that they despise.
Posted by: slug at March 19, 2006 10:29 AM (USunv)
3
Google's not the only fishy company.
See this for technorati weirdness.
Posted by: rightwingprof at March 19, 2006 11:09 AM (hj1Wx)
4
Google indexes web site without any fee, so web sites in google index are NOT CUSTOMERS. If they index for a fee then you can assert that they have customers.
Posted by: phreaseology at March 19, 2006 12:07 PM (adiYH)
5
Whoa, there! What you are talking about is contract rights. A company (or person) that provides a service for some consideration creates implied contract rights. Obviously, there is no specific contract between Google and KinderStart, or the latter would be alleging actual contract violation. But to say that there is an implied contract — that KinderStart has some kind of right or privilege to the way that they are listed on Google's web site — is to say that Google obtained some consideration in exchange for that listing. Otherwise, there is no cause that would support the suit. From what I can see, this should be thrown out without proceeding to trial.
Posted by: Jeff Medcalf at March 20, 2006 09:10 PM (4pYF5)
6
Search engines arbitrarily outright censor (completely suppress) access by their users to web sites they don't like. This is not a “ranking” issue. They also refuse to provide any explanation or describe how a particular “offending” site can be reinstated. Search engine arguments regarding their need for secrecy are largely spurious and allow them to conceal the real reasons behind their censoring of any particular site.
Legally, the issue is whether a search engine is a “publisher” or a “common carrier”. Currently they enjoy the advantages of both and the responsibilities of neither.
See much more extensive discussion of these issues at: http://www.searchenginehonesty.com/
Posted by: Ted at March 26, 2006 02:02 PM (yiL5Y)
Posted by: Patrick at June 23, 2006 10:45 PM (mhGbV)
Posted by: Janice at June 23, 2006 10:48 PM (yEQ3O)
Posted by: Don at June 23, 2006 10:54 PM (iK93d)
Posted by: Naomi at June 24, 2006 10:15 PM (0Drfi)
Posted by: Zane at June 24, 2006 10:21 PM (xakOF)
Posted by: Angie at June 24, 2006 10:24 PM (uTr73)
Posted by: Ben at June 25, 2006 10:24 PM (94EEG)
Posted by: Ron at June 25, 2006 10:39 PM (2xoLT)
Posted by: Julie at June 25, 2006 10:39 PM (o5L7W)
Posted by: Luke at June 27, 2006 10:53 PM (xE8Pk)
Posted by: Ethan at June 28, 2006 01:05 PM (wYrS6)
Posted by: Adam at June 28, 2006 08:46 PM (d7x2T)
Posted by: William at June 30, 2006 02:29 AM (aMtTL)
Posted by: Jody at June 30, 2006 02:36 AM (6xEGd)
Posted by: Gloria at June 30, 2006 10:24 PM (cuozG)
Posted by: Timothy at June 30, 2006 10:29 PM (vAyAl)
Posted by: Alice at June 30, 2006 10:31 PM (4LLGj)
Posted by: Sabrina at July 02, 2006 03:40 AM (ZunY4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 17, 2006
Cock Praises Allah (Audio)
A rooster in the former Soviet republic of Kyrgistan has begun crying out the name of Allah. No doubt a St. Patty's day miracle on par with the latest sighting of the Holy Mother in a tortilla and the oil stain on my driveway in the shape of St. Christopher. This avian miracle is
proof that there is no God but Allah, and Muhammed is his Prophet.
Listen to the miracle cock crowing for Allah here.
Chad Evans has the backstory.
PS-I'm in department meetings all day. What a great way to kick off Spring Break....meetings.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:36 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
1
WTF? sounds like someone is choking his chicken.
Posted by: Howie at March 17, 2006 08:52 AM (D3+20)
2
Time to wring its neck and make chicken soup WE,LL KILL THE OLD RED ROOSTER WHEN SHE COMES
Posted by: sandpiper at March 17, 2006 09:43 AM (D9h75)
3
Does that mean suicide bombers will now come in chicken flavor rather than just the usual pork?
Posted by: Ernie Oporto at March 17, 2006 09:47 AM (/lpvu)
4
And you all wondered what the connection was between chicken shit and Allah. Now you know.
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 17, 2006 09:58 AM (rUyw4)
5
Kyrgistan is the home of Bridenapping... No wonder in that country it takes a COCK to praise ALLAH.
Posted by: Steve Sharon at March 17, 2006 10:42 AM (u59WG)
6
Rusty had posted about the Satanic worship of Mulock.
Did you know that our leaders go to Bohemian Grove in California to devil worship?
http://www.infowars.com/video/previews/grove/ood7min_qt.htm
Posted by: Greg at March 17, 2006 12:06 PM (q5wwn)
7
What is the bet, that the rooster will now be treated, and respected better than any women living in their community?
Posted by: davec at March 17, 2006 01:13 PM (CcXvt)
8
Give me a break! And give the rooster a break too. Sounds to me like the rooster is being tortured and those are crys of distress. I heard the rooster call out for Allah, God, Jesus, Krishna or whoever will listen! Poor rooster. Typical, the Muslim scum are compelled to torture something!
Posted by: Hailus at March 17, 2006 01:22 PM (Y2ILH)
9
My cat made the same sounds while coughing up a hairball.
Posted by: CUS at March 17, 2006 01:29 PM (bbXZq)
10
Let me know when a pig starts squealing about Allah. I'd want front frow seats to THAT crisis of faith.
Posted by: Graeme at March 17, 2006 01:49 PM (vmNuO)
11
Let me know when a pig starts squealing about Allah. I'd want front row seats to THAT crisis of faith.
Posted by: Graeme at March 17, 2006 02:08 PM (vmNuO)
12
I always said Mohammed was a cock sucker. *drum roll*
/Oh, Allah! Oh Allah! Oh Allah!
Posted by: Princess Kimberley at March 17, 2006 02:27 PM (9xjdU)
Posted by: Oyster at March 17, 2006 02:28 PM (g9UJq)
14
*tee hee* KILL THE OLD RED ROOSTER WHEN SHE COMES
Oh, that's sick! Ofcourse they don't chop the clitoris off their live stock, like their women, so it is possible. I guess.
Posted by: Princess Kimberley at March 17, 2006 02:51 PM (9xjdU)
15
Thats from SHE,LL BE COMMIN AROUND THE MOUNTIAN WHEN SHE COMES
Posted by: sandpiper at March 17, 2006 10:39 PM (4pkrX)
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 17, 2006 11:33 PM (0yYS2)
17
DID YOU KNOW THAT THE CHICKEN IS THE ONLY ANIMAL THAT EATS WITH ITS PECKER??????????
Posted by: Steve Sharon at March 18, 2006 05:16 AM (Led6O)
Posted by: Oyster at March 18, 2006 06:12 AM (YudAC)
19
Very funny, Rusty, but Bill and Hillary want their sextape back.
Posted by: Inigo Montoya at March 18, 2006 09:56 PM (RHG+K)
20
Thats excellent news...any idea if we can see the VIDEO too!!!!!
Posted by: muslimah at March 26, 2006 11:39 AM (99vv8)
21
SUBHAN ALLAH!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE WANT THE VIDEO TOO PLEASEEEEEEEEE....INSHALLAH.
Posted by: India at March 26, 2006 11:47 AM (99vv8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 16, 2006
No Honor for Hanoi Jane
(Atlanta, Georgia) The Georgia State Senate took up the issue of honoring Jane Fonda.
From WSBTV.com:
A resolution honoring Fonda's volunteer work cruised through yesterday. But many senators failed to realize it was part of a stack of non-controversial efforts all approved with a single vote.
The chairman of the chamber's veterans affairs committee objected, setting up a reconsideration of the honor for the Atlanta resident this morning.
Senator Steen Miles of Decatur says the resolution was one of several Women's History Month measures she has introduced to honor Georgia women. The resolution cites Fonda's work as founder of the Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention, donations to Atlanta-area universities and charities and role as goodwill ambassador with the United Nations.
more...
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
01:01 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 267 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So uh, if someone did something you disagree with politically 40 years ago, that negates the value of their community service in the past decade?
Seems like a rather unamerican standard to appply.
Posted by: Outlandish Josh at March 16, 2006 01:05 PM (iy7v+)
2
Treason isn't politics. perhaps we should have let Tookie pen some more children's books to Josh, eh?
Posted by: davec at March 16, 2006 01:20 PM (CcXvt)
3
Wonder who quietly submitted her name in the state senate?
Posted by: hondo at March 16, 2006 01:58 PM (9pQ6D)
4
Outlandish Josh:
You say:
...if someone did something you disagree with politically 40 years ago, that negates the value of their community service in the past decade?
I say:
Today's community service does not erase yesterday's treasonous acts. Only a child could think like that. I'll bet you don't even know what she did, do you?? I'm right, aren't I? You have no idea what you're talking about...
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at March 16, 2006 04:47 PM (aH6Zf)
5
That's right, Hondo. Tried to sneak it in? Someone actually tried to slide that one by like pork in the budget. If anyone thought that Fonda had widespread support, then why was it "slipped in"? If Jane Fonda had atoned for what she did or had actually apologized, it might be different. But the only thing she ever apologized for was having her picture taken with the enemy. She was sorry that there was enduring evidence, thats all.
We, as a people, are quite forgiving. People get second chances all the time. We are a country full of second chances, but they have to be sorry first.
Posted by: Oyster at March 16, 2006 08:46 PM (YudAC)
6
No honors for traitors no honors for HANOI JANE the one who sponsored the bill should be censured
Posted by: sandpiper at March 17, 2006 09:57 AM (D9h75)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
V for Vendetta Reviewed
Imperial Minister of Pop-Culture, Flea, gets a
sneak preview of V for Vendetta after performing certain umentionable acts upon a high-ranking British official to get the ticket. The gist is that Flea may have overlooked the pro-terror plotline if his London neighborhood hadn't been bombed by the ROP, a phone-booth outside a bar he frequents hadn't been bombed by the IRA, and if Natalie Portman would have revealed a little more skin. A million sins forgiven for nude Natalie Portman is our motto du jour.
Posted by: Rusty at
11:30 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Let's play a little game. How bout instead of paying for V, we all buy tickets to "She's the Man" (the new Amanda Bynes movie) so that gets a better opening weekend than V! You can still walk into V and watch it if you like. But why give them your money.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 16, 2006 11:58 AM (8e/V4)
2
I'm thinking this "V" thing is going to get the moonbats going bigtime. They'll see it as their call to arms to overthrow the "Bush Regime". It also might give terror apologists more ammo. It's going to be a real pain in the ass.
Posted by: Richard at March 16, 2006 12:50 PM (7KF8r)
3
The moonbats think leaving the toothpaste cap off, is a call to arms to overthrow Bush, luckily for us their 'arms' consist of saggy hag breasts, badly spelt signs, inflated testicles and crudely constructed Bush effigies.
Posted by: davec at March 16, 2006 12:55 PM (CcXvt)
4
I should have made clear that Natalie Portman made the whole experience worthwhile despite any pesky disagreements about the future of civilization. Though I still think she should never have started calling herself "Portman". Natalie Hershlag is so much hotter.
Posted by: Flea at March 16, 2006 01:10 PM (euhBr)
5
davec,
don't forget their pink tanks!
http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/pink-tank-london.jpg
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 16, 2006 01:31 PM (8e/V4)
6
I saw the movie tonight. Save your money.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 17, 2006 01:32 AM (8e/V4)
7
Natalie doesn't get nekkid?!
Guess I'll wait for the DVD.
Posted by: Paul Moore at March 17, 2006 04:35 PM (9i141)
8
While hollywoods leftist support gun control they still support terrorists i say we should boycott the damn movie
Posted by: sandpiper at March 18, 2006 09:12 AM (zj1n9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bush is Hitler
Definitive proof.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:37 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We learn that some people are really obsessed!
Whoa!
(But definitely a talented and gifted obsession!)
Posted by: hondo at March 16, 2006 04:46 PM (9pQ6D)
2
If BUSH IS HITLER then BILL CLINTON IS JOE STALIN
Posted by: sandpiper at March 18, 2006 09:13 AM (zj1n9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2006
Inside the Mind of an Evil Blogger--"Blog", the movie
I'd say Joseph Duncan qualifies as 'evil' under even the most narrow of definitions. In addition to being a convicted child molester who advocated for the rights of sex-offenders, Joseph Duncan was a blogger who recorded his fight with what he believed were demonic powers online. Duncan would eventually become a mass-murderer.
I-Film has a short preview of an upcoming independent film which uses Duncan's blog entries as its basis. The unfortunate title of the movie is Blog. The clip is demented, choppy, twisted, and left me slightly nauseated. I'd say the director pretty much nailed Duncan's character with it.
I wonder what the socially useful value of the movie is? After learning what Joseph Duncan did to Shasta Groene and others, there is only one conclusion to draw about him: he is evil.
Evil does not need to be understood, only disposed of. Call me up when the sequel comes out: Blog II: Joseph Duncan Execution Video. I'd pay to see that.
So, the first movie about bloggers turns out to be about this piece of human filth? Maybe someone should crank out a treatment for Army of Davids as a reply.....
Related: Joseph Duncan III: Diary of a blogger who kills and molests.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:24 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I would watch it. People are horrified and I am
surprised that vile scum like duncan (it) are around and that we don,t deal with them. the justice system is a joke that is evil itself.
Posted by: ronn armstrong at March 16, 2006 11:14 AM (PPmlF)
2
Based on the trailer, this will be an indy movie for the masses. The director is from Fargo!
Rock ON!
Posted by: Insight at March 18, 2006 12:02 AM (+dKon)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 13, 2006
Buzz Aldrin Punches Conspiracy Nutjob (Video)
I just wish it was Cindy Sheehan that had confronted Buzz.
Buzz Aldrin punches tin-foil brigade member.
Posted by: Rusty at
01:31 PM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
damn rusty I got websensed for Nudity. Is Buzz nekkid in this one.
Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2006 01:33 PM (D3+20)
2
Talk about a sucker punch, in more ways than one. Good Lord, I'm laughing my butt off here! Hooray for Buzz!
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 01:43 PM (rUyw4)
3
That was stunningly beautiful. That's what happens when you hang around in the basement reading conspiracy websites for a long time and then walk out into the world with a skewed sense of reality. This kid will undoubtedly sue and Buzz will walk proudly into a courtroom among cheers and pats on the back while the snot-nosed brat scowls next to his weasel lawyer.
Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 01:43 PM (g9UJq)
4
someone download and send to me please.
Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2006 01:44 PM (D3+20)
5
Oh that was awesome! The Eagle landed alright.....hard!
Posted by: Graeme at March 13, 2006 01:47 PM (7Jsmx)
6
That's old. It's from 2002. Buzz Aldrin originally faced charges for punching that man. Thankfully, the charges were eventually dismissed.
Posted by: Derek Falkan at March 13, 2006 01:53 PM (CnDtU)
7
I was going to say, if that didn't meet the interpretation of 'fighting words' I don't know what would.
Posted by: davec at March 13, 2006 01:55 PM (CcXvt)
8
Sorry I made a mistake. It's been four years since the incident. The police decided not to press charges after conducting an investigation. Which is good since Buzz was defending himself.
Posted by: Derek Falkan at March 13, 2006 01:56 PM (CnDtU)
9
No man will punch Cindy Sheehan. Buzz would consider it ungentleman like. My parents have also told me never hit a lady. Buzz would however punch Al Franken.
Posted by: Derek Falkan at March 13, 2006 01:58 PM (CnDtU)
10
Perfect form, strait ahead punch. I note the immediate silence. Cool to be fair Buzz did warn him. The old man packs quite a punch, still. Remind me never to call a former test pilot a coward to his face.
Thanks Graeme.
Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2006 02:00 PM (D3+20)
Posted by: Graeme at March 13, 2006 02:04 PM (7Jsmx)
12
hahaha! that made my entire week!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 02:09 PM (8e/V4)
13
Derek, true enough. But maybe Mrs. Buzz Aldrin....
Posted by: Rusty at March 13, 2006 02:10 PM (JQjhA)
Posted by: Derek Falkan at March 13, 2006 02:16 PM (CnDtU)
15
Derek, I didn't know it was that old, but it goes to prove - some things are timeless!
Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 02:39 PM (g9UJq)
16
HA! It looked like Buzz got a roll of quarters out of his pocket or something; and I loved the way the little punk's last word was shoved back in his mouth.
Wah wah wah travis, go tell mommy to make you some hot coco you little bitch.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 13, 2006 05:57 PM (0yYS2)
17
I expect less from a group racist, homophobic, just plain fuck nuts dumb, group of Star"
shorter Travis: waaaaaaa! waaaaaa!!!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 06:10 PM (8e/V4)
18
Maybe Travis needs a trip to the shed with Buzz? His mother must be proud.
Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 06:28 PM (YudAC)
19
So, according to Travis it's lame to be discussing something that's four years old. Well Travis, do you know what topic happens to be more than FIVE years old? Bush trouncing Gore for the Presidency.
Posted by: Graeme at March 13, 2006 06:31 PM (KeWDX)
20
do you know what topic happens to be more than FIVE years old? Bush trouncing Gore for the Presidency.
lol!
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 06:39 PM (8e/V4)
21
Even after four years, Travis just hates to see his friend get clocked. As far as I'm concerned, the defeat of ignorance is timeless. So Travis, here's one for you. Cram it!
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 08:06 PM (rUyw4)
22
JJ he's on the top thread too check it out.
Posted by: Howie at March 13, 2006 08:14 PM (D3+20)
23
THE EAGLE HAS LANDED and its squashed a turkey
Posted by: sandpiper at March 14, 2006 03:40 PM (O2c+K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 08, 2006
Would That
we had more like him today.
Posted by: Vinnie at
02:31 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
1
He was truly a man of singular genius, and a magnificent bastard.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 08, 2006 05:00 AM (0yYS2)
2
Even with his faults, he still has more to offer today.
Posted by: 8ackgr0und N015e at March 08, 2006 07:08 AM (lukak)
Posted by: Howie at March 08, 2006 08:21 AM (D3+20)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2006
Schoolgirls Forced to Go Braless
(Singapore) When I was going to high school, there weren't any titillating controversies of this nature.
Malaysia Star:
Students of a secondary school in Singapore, who were recently found to be wearing coloured bras to school, were forced to go braless, reported China Press.
According to the daily, the school only allowed students to wear white, beige and light grey bras.
The daily said most of the affected students were caught wearing coloured bras during a Physical Education class
They were forced to remove the bras in the bathroom, which were then confiscated.
It appears that all the Singaporean schools have confronted the colored bra issue, but other schools handle the "problem" differently. Examples are: one school sells new bras and one school sends the girls home to get a new bra.
I'm at a loss to understand why colored bras are prohibited, however, school officials must feel strongly about the issue. Nonetheless, I do believe that a classroom full of braless high school girls would probably be a greater distraction than a room full of girls wearing colored bras. And, naturally, the whole subject makes one wonder if there are restrictions on other undergarments.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:08 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 205 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Sorry Mike - guess no one's interested in braless asian teen schoolgirls. I suggest your re-post this on a Japanese blog - should get oh say 350000 comments - at least!
Posted by: hondo at March 07, 2006 03:34 AM (fyKFC)
2
And these are the people that liberals love.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 07, 2006 05:10 AM (0yYS2)
3
Hondo - Are you saying that I should delete the post?
Posted by: Mike at March 07, 2006 06:41 AM (8BTfn)
4
The reason they have a problem with colored bra's is that a lot of girls, here in the west, once they get a decent set of juggs on them start to hilight those juggs by wearing brightly colored bra's under white T's which draws additional attention to the TT's because the brightly colored bra can be made out faintly through the white T.
Posted by: wickedpinto at March 07, 2006 08:33 AM (QTv8u)
5
As an official 'bra inspector', I would suggest I go look into this situation and report back first hand.
Posted by: Rusty at March 07, 2006 08:38 AM (JQjhA)
6
Rusty, how does one get to be an "official" bra inspector? Because I am never too old to learn.
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 07, 2006 10:11 AM (rUyw4)
7
Those poor Muslim men being driven so wild with lust by these wily young women that they simply can't be held responsible for their own actions. It's all the fault of these devil women. Let's pray that once they are forced to go braless that the men don't crank up the air-conditioning!
Posted by: Oyster at March 07, 2006 10:20 AM (n/nt4)
Posted by: Max at March 07, 2006 10:25 AM (Ol+Ma)
9
Rusty, not just first hand...please be thorough and use both hands.
Posted by: Ernie Oporto at March 07, 2006 03:14 PM (/lpvu)
Posted by: Steve Sharon at March 08, 2006 10:13 AM (A2m8s)
11
http://news18.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/news4plus/1143608374/
>>Hondo
I guess your opinion, but this news is getting only 263 comments at 2-channel news headlines(the most biggest news-headline BBS in Japan) now.
Could not you think all of Japanese love braless asian teen schoolgirls please?
Posted by: 2-channeler at March 30, 2006 04:19 AM (OGhuC)
12
You can't be 77466 serious?!?
Posted by: Mary Box at July 07, 2006 02:43 PM (UfXFF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
How To Defeat Global Warming And Islamofascism At The Same Time
This comment on
this post has all the answers:
It would have been wonderful if the car had stopped and they had dragged the poor misguided youth and beaten the crap out of the SUV with his head till it was crushed. But hey, my son was only there 15 minutes before, so perhaps I'm a tad biased against the mooslem that hates my son.
Biased? Not at all, Mr. Walsh. You have unwittingly swerved into a solution to a couple of our most vexing problems!
Instead of remanding terrorist captives to some remote CIA-run Caribbean resort, take them to the nearest automobile dealership, grab them by the ankles, and use their heads to smash every pollution spewing, death dealing SUV in sight.
Brilliant!
Posted by: Vinnie at
08:49 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Government is already being accussed of torture, so might as well make the best use of it.
Posted by: Fred Fry at March 06, 2006 09:10 PM (HJnrm)
2
It would have been great to see that Muslim being taken from that bad SUV, and beat by a few fellow students. Perhaps, next time.
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 06, 2006 10:12 PM (D2g/j)
3
You would think that this would be something the Right and Left could agree on. Beat his ass for being a terrorist and for driving a SUV...
Posted by: MKL at March 07, 2006 01:36 AM (h/T6d)
4
ohh yes we can do it hand in hand.we shall shut all industries in america and draw same cartoons on christianity on jesus.
Posted by: fenne at March 07, 2006 02:50 AM (g9Amy)
5
Why has the head of Homeland Security not put out a directive telling all Americans to start doing this. Is he again sleeping at the switch? Maybe he saw Larry King say not to rush to judgement and call this terrorism. What do you call it? And if this is not terrorism what is?
Posted by: Rod Stanton at March 07, 2006 04:19 AM (+RcwV)
6
Too bad we stopped raising Men in this country some time ago, and now just produce a generic, feminized variety of bitch-boy, because if there were any Men at the scence, they would have stomped this muslim scum's guts out.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 07, 2006 05:13 AM (0yYS2)
7
I would hate to see the innocent punished.
So you better make sure the SUVÂ’s do not run on bio-diesel or E85.
Posted by: Cindy not sheehan at March 07, 2006 06:06 AM (piu+6)
8
How to fight global warming put duct tape over the mouths of all the envromentalist wackos and liberal politicians like AL GORE and all memebers of GREENPEACE then you will contain all that HOT AIR and as for the TELEBAN how about quit buying all those rotten left-wing news papers and quit listening to the liars on TV and the RADIO
Posted by: sandpiper at March 07, 2006 09:41 AM (QtdTZ)
9
WE MUST DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO CUT DOWN ON GLOBAL WARMING. SUV ARE ONE OF THE MAIN CAUSES. BUT I LOVE SUV BUT THEY ARE KILLING US ALL
Posted by: zee at March 07, 2006 02:56 PM (sIyL5)
10
Uh, IM, remember where they were. UNC-Chapel Hill is possibly the most liberal university in the South. All the guys there are probably trying to get in touch with their feminine side.
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 07, 2006 03:39 PM (rUyw4)
11
Oh, please. My SUV ain't killin' anyone. My emissions are less than most cars. But my neighbor's 1989 rattle-trap, smoke-billowing Grand Am is choking the whole neighborhood. And the guy down the street with the gas efficient Civic is spewing all kinds crap.
Posted by: Oyster at March 07, 2006 03:40 PM (rf0W8)
12
Oyster, you're SUV, a Tahoe, isn't it, gets better gas milage than my GMC Sierra, so don't worry about it. If you can afford the gas, and you keep your vehicle tuned up, then what you choose to drive should be up to you. You know a hell of a lot better than anyone else.
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 07, 2006 04:42 PM (rUyw4)
13
I regularly try to get in touch with my feminine side; she's my better half of thirteen years as of last Friday.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 07, 2006 07:40 PM (0yYS2)
14
How alarming to stumble accross this website while searchig for some worthwhile comment. Saddly the posts that I have read here only serve to reinforce my pesimistic understanding of American world outlook. Racism, sexism and macho bravado used to express what I can only assume is a total lack of understading about Islam and the envronmental problems facing our planet. If you guys are scared because you don't understand whats going on in the world why not go and read some books or endever to acctually disscuss whats goig on here.
Posted by: ewan at March 20, 2006 06:44 AM (8u9Am)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Smiling Bob Enzyte
(Kansas City, MO) Cincinnati entrepreneur Steve Warshak, the brains behind the "natural male enhancement" product Enzyte, has
agreed to stop making unsupportable health claims and to refund money to thousands of customers who believe they were defrauded.
The primary complaint was that customers only agreed to a "free" 30-day trial of pills but were automatically billed for additional shipments. Customers also had great difficulty canceling shipments and getting refunds.
Warshak's companies include Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Lifekey Inc., Boland Naturals Inc., Warner Health Care and Wagner Nutraceuticals.
From Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
06:04 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Bad news. What poor sod did't want to be like Bob?
Posted by: Javapuke at March 06, 2006 06:51 AM (35qS+)
2
A disreputable businessman? Say it isn't so!
Posted by: Oyster at March 06, 2006 07:38 AM (YudAC)
3
If guys believed that a little pill could give them each a bigger wang in 30 days and hence improve their lives in magical ways, they deserved to get ripped off. We all know that the only way to get a bigger wang is to eat one boiled tiger paw, two pig testicles and a shot of cobra blood.
Posted by: Graeme at March 06, 2006 08:34 AM (XeUJr)
4
LOL, Graeme! Oh, by the way, do you have any tiger paws lying around?
Posted by: jesusland joe at March 06, 2006 09:04 AM (rUyw4)
5
Bob dives into the swimming pool and leave his swimming trunks in the pool whoops
Posted by: sandpiper at March 06, 2006 09:40 AM (UwJcR)
6
You go Bob! Ever since I started using your product my typing speed has improved! Just bangin' away on that keyboard!
A paid testimonial
Posted by: hondo at March 06, 2006 12:38 PM (fyKFC)
7
Yeah, Hondo, but what are you bangin' on the keyboard with?
Posted by: Oyster at March 06, 2006 02:46 PM (n/nt4)
Posted by: hondo at March 06, 2006 10:26 PM (fyKFC)
9
Everyone knows that the only way you can get "enhancement" is by responding to an e-mail. You can also MAKE MONEY and LOSE WEIGHT while you ENLARGE YOUR BREASTS while browsing FREE PORN.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 07, 2006 05:22 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 03, 2006
Lent: Day 3
I've managed to avoid watching any
porn featuring Ted Turner taking it up the wazoo from a Jane Fonda strap-on for 3 days now.
Pray that I can make it to Easter.
Posted by: Rusty at
03:54 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I dunno Rusty - I conceptual idea of Ted Turner getting fucked is somewhat appealing - though this particular case was not what I had in mind.
Posted by: hondo at March 03, 2006 04:32 PM (fyKFC)
2
I will pray for your soul Hondo.
Posted by: Rusty at March 03, 2006 04:44 PM (JQjhA)
3
Hmm. I kinda figured that was a gimme that one could make it through life without hunting that sort of thing down. Now Jessica Alba, however...
Posted by: Ernie Oporto at March 03, 2006 05:37 PM (/lpvu)
4
Er, I was being ironical.
Posted by: Rusty at March 03, 2006 05:51 PM (JQjhA)
5
Of course you were being ironical, because you didn't want to reveal the truth that you'd really like to see Scott Baio take it up the wazoo with a Jane Fonda strap-on.
Or is that Filthy? I get confused sometimes.
Posted by: Vinnie at March 03, 2006 06:23 PM (f289O)
6
Having James Earl Jones do voice work would probably do wonders for the tape. For instance, just before Ted gets assaulted with Jane's mail order manhood, Jones could say in that deep voice of his: "This is Ted Turner's bunghole".
Posted by: Graeme at March 03, 2006 06:55 PM (cjDPX)
7
Ah Graeme, you certainly know how to lend a touch of class.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 05, 2006 06:39 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
126kb generated in CPU 0.0387, elapsed 0.1349 seconds.
135 queries taking 0.1094 seconds, 485 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
