mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

April 17, 2006

Pulitzer Gives Award For Treason

Forbes Via Mike Hampton at The Department of Home Land Stupidity :
The jurors awarded the 2006 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting Â“to James Risen and Eric Lichtblau of The New York Times for their carefully sourced stories on secret domestic eavesdropping that stirred a national debate on the boundary line between fighting terrorism and protecting civil liberty.Â” While the Times sat on the story for over a year and ultimately edited it due to national security concerns, many called the revelation of the programÂ’s existence a threat to national security. President Bush himself called its publication Â“a shameful act.Â”

Pullitzer Prize my....who are these "jurors" anyway?

Oh wait we have them right here on comments via Mike again., eh eh ah-hem....

Narda Zacchino, deputy editor, San Francisco Chronicle (Chair)
Mike Connelly, executive editor, Sarasota Herald-Tribune
Kenneth Paulson, editor, USA Today
Delia Rios, national correspondent, Newhouse News Service, Washington, DC
*George Rodrigue, vice president/managing editor, The Dallas Morning News
*past Pulitzer Prize winner

more...

Posted by: Howie at 08:30 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Narda Zacchino, deputy editor, San Francisco Chronicle (Chair) Mike Connelly, executive editor, Sarasota Herald-Tribune Kenneth Paulson, editor, USA Today Delia Rios, national correspondent, Newhouse News Service, Washington, DC *George Rodrigue, vice president/managing editor, The Dallas Morning News *past Pulitzer Prize winner

Posted by: Michael Hampton at April 17, 2006 08:46 PM (FVbj6)

2 Is there an echo in here? Is there an echo in here?

Posted by: West1 at April 18, 2006 01:35 AM (OkonL)

3 Um. Thats not treason.

Posted by: actus at April 18, 2006 02:40 AM (CqheE)

4 Libs hate monitoring of Al Queda contacts in the US.

Posted by: mrclark at April 18, 2006 06:42 AM (IMrft)

5 But I don't read any of these publications, and they are all going out of business. Ah, the beauty of it all.......

Posted by: n.a. palm at April 18, 2006 08:04 AM (gx67A)

6 I fail to see how this damages our security one iota. Like Al Qaeda suddenly says--wait, I'll stop phoning Ahmed in Arizona, for fear of the warrantless wiretapping, even though it was well known that the US had broad FISA wiretapping powers prior to 9-11, that were expanded by the Patriot Act. If the program is necessary, and exposure ends it, then you might have a case. So far, exposure hasn't ended it. All it has done is raise the question--why didn't the president ask Congress for this power? Or why didn't the president go through FISA? For my part, I'm glad that the NYT published this, and it is eminently worthy of a Pulitzer. The press must function as the watchdog on our liberties. As Hamilton said in the 8th federalist--"Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will, after a time, give way to its dictates...will compel nations the most attached to liberty to resort for repose and security to institutions which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political rights. To be more safe, they at length become willing to run the risk of being less free..."

Posted by: jd at April 18, 2006 02:50 PM (aqTJB)

7 It wasn't known that there was an efficient program in place, or how that program operated. Now terrorists have been alerted to take extra precautions. That means that the first direct evidence you, jd, see of the damage done by the traitors at the Gray Lady will probably be the next major terror attack on this country. The NYT has a history of lying and treason; google Walter Duranty. We didn't need for the NYT to issue a direct warning to jihadi terrorists in order to help Risen sell books. This is like saying that publishing convoy sailing dates during WWII wouldn't have been treasonous because it was well known that convoys would be sailing. Perhaps if you took off your Democrat partisan hat and put on your American thinking cap the issue would be clearer for you, jd.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at April 18, 2006 05:26 PM (RHG+K)

8 Did anyone get arrested for droppping this dime? I know the Old York Times was looked at until the news died down. The MSM seem to be connected to the New World Order (NWO). I guess Mr. Bush did not go alone with something the NWO wanted, and there lies the reason perhaps. That U.N. tax of ten cents a barrel of oil for world peace has not happened. Why? I don't know folks, I'm just thinking out loud. Will the U.S. bypass the U.N. again? The NWO does not like countries acting alone. They are all part of the team, and Bush on at least one subject did not go along, and caused France, Germany, Russia to lose a lot of money. It has been a few years now, will they all make nice, and play for the same team? Terrorists, whom Iran loves to support, were alerted. Iran may become part of the Nuke club due to contracts. Contracts in Iran give the same above mention countries money. Just like Iraq. I'm just bringing up topics because I do not like the NWO, the U.N., and the MSM; Also, I am at work and have to much time to think.

Posted by: Leatherneck at April 18, 2006 08:28 PM (D2g/j)

9 Before 9-11, any attentive person knew that over 17K warrants had been issued under FISA, and after 9-11 this was expanded and made even more user friendly. What did Al Qaeda learn from the NYT disclosure? That there were more warrants. We didn't learn how this program "operates" did we? I've seen speculation about data mining, but no usuable intel. Nothing remotely comparable to troop ship sailing time, which is just inflammatory rhetoric. All Al Qaeda learned from the NYT disclosure is that the president was wiretapping without Congress' knowledge, in direct contradiction to Congress' intent as expressed in law, and without a warrant, as required under the 4th amendment. Maybe if you took off your Republican partisan helmet, and put on your freedom-cherishing, liberty-loving American hat, maybe you'd see this correctly. JD

Posted by: jd at April 18, 2006 09:49 PM (uT71O)

10 Look jd, I understand that the MSM serves a purpose. But they've assigned themselves various titles like 'objective', 'unbiased' and 'equitable'. Instead, they play word games and use improper terms like 'domestic wiretapping'. They imply more than they say by acts of ommission, misleading and sometimes employing flat out falsifications. If we need watcdogs like this then we wouldn't need watchdogs like blogs to keep an eye on the MSM. So far we have had many indications that there are those in Congress, the FBI, the CIA, the DIA and every other acronym out there that no one can be trusted to keep certain national security issues secret. It's absolutely no surprise that those members of Congress who were involved were few. We've never had an enemy quite like this. I would think it calls for stronger or more secretive measures. The NYT writers, Risen and Lichtblau, had an awful lot more information than was printed and it took the NYT a year, a year!, to decide that they might have to edit the story. You say that "Before 9-11, any attentive person knew that over 17K warrants had been issued under FISA, and after 9-11 this was expanded and made even more user friendly." If this is the case, then why was the story so worthy of a Pulitzer? Hell, any attentive person knew. Right? The NYT is in the sensationalism business. Listening in on phone calls made to terrorists is nothing new or exciting. But put the label 'domestic wiretapping' on it, provide an air of indignation and make the story reminiscent of a past President's transgressions and POW! you've got a story. This whole thing is horsesh*t. Prove to me it hasn't been done by every President during times of war AND peace, but in this case - it's the evil Bush regime. Meh.

Posted by: Oyster at April 19, 2006 04:56 AM (YudAC)

11 Oyster--the 17K warrants were FISA warrants. FISA was established in 1978 in response to two things--the rampant abuse of wiretaps by the FBI and by presidents, Dem and Repub, in the 35 years studied by the Church commission, AND the need to have a fast, sub-4th amendment procedure to monitor spies and, an afterthought, terrorists. FISA set up a rapid approval process, in which a federal judge was permanently in Washington (on a rotating basis) to approve these warrants. It was so easy to get one that prior to 2001, only one had been turned down! And while the turnaround time was 24 hrs for approval, the FBI and AG could, if they felt it necessary, conduct the wiretap in advance for 72 hours while waiting for approval. So no waiting was necessary. This IS a real issue because the Constitution forbids searches without a warrant. I'm someone who believes that the Constitution means what it says (yes, I'm against Roe). Why did the president need to go around FISA? Why did the president not ask COngress for a new law (he would have gotten it. Hell, he'd get it today. Just ask. That's what checks and balances are all about). Yes, in wartime, presidents have taken broad powers. Lincoln closed newspapers, etc. But this is a war that will last our lifetimes and beyond. We must not have an executive out of control. And it IS domestic wiretapping--in the sense that I only care about it when one of the people being monitored is in this country. The president's right to surveill abroad is not checked by any constitutional limit. His power to do so at home is--or should be. We would be safer if we didn't have a constitution. We would have less crime if the police could search any home, any time they wanted to. We'd be a lot safer if the cops could confiscate everyone's guns. But because of the constitution, they can't. Thank God.

Posted by: jd at April 19, 2006 07:39 AM (uT71O)

12 And they also gave the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE to a known terrorists leader YASSIR ARAFAT and our fomer jerk in the whitehouse JIMMY CARTER

Posted by: sandpiper at April 19, 2006 08:31 AM (bzZNq)

13 I agree giving it to Arafat was a huge mistake. And of course, they also gave it to former terrorist Menachem Begin, right? The Irgun wasn't planting flowers, it was planting bombs. Bombs that killed innocent and guilty alike. Read some of Jablonsky's own words to know how deeply the underground embraced the slaughter of civilians as a necessary strategy in achieving nationhood. One could say that Begin deserved it for choosing peace after a lifetime of war. That would also depend on how one sees the settlements, Sabra and Shatila, and the ugly Lebanon war as a whole. Michael Deaver threatened to resign if Reagan didn't stop the shelling of civilians in Beirut by the Israelis. RR picked up the phone, called Begin, shouted at him, and thirty minutes later, halfway around the world, the guns that had killed so many innocents suddenly were silenced. It's a riveting moment in Deaver's biography but it also raises the question-Begin gets the peace prize, and then does this?

Posted by: jd at April 19, 2006 08:42 AM (uT71O)

14 jd, the arguments I've heard are not about being able surveille for 72 hours while waiting for approval, nor that it only generally takes 24 hours to gain approval. These are things that can't be argued. The issue is that the process of getting to that point where the wait is so short and so favorable and so streamlined is cumbersome and demanding. Understandably so, but only to a degree. Even if it was so good and so efficient it was also obstructed by others in disallowing communication between organizations - one who might apply for the FISA warrant and the other who might not. But even so, you're operating under the impression that what was being done was illegal. There are far smarter people than you or I, constitutional scholars and lawyers, who can't agree on the lawfulness or constitutionality of the program. The arguments from both sides are quite good, but we only hear the arguments that the media agrees with unless we're willing to dig for information ourselves. Personally, I'd err on the side of our safety. However, that's my personal opinion.

Posted by: Oyster at April 19, 2006 08:49 AM (xmFw3)

15 Oh, and for Carter, who has been justly criticized on a number of points, I think the peace prize was mostly about Camp David, as well as his postpresidency work on disease and disorder. What he has done with the guinea worm is truly amazing. Compare his post presidency activities with those of any other president, except perhaps Hoover, and they have been remarkably selfless. Habitat for Humanity? Election monitoring? While many presidents simply retire, or travel the world making millions, this guy, love or hate his presidency, has done a world of good. Also--Camp David was his finest hour. He brought a lasting (if cold) peace between Egypt and Israel, nations that had fought major wars in 47-8, 56, 67, and 73, along with numerous border fights. Nobel prizes have been given for a lot less. the world is a better place because of Camp David. Even Carter's opponents acknowledged that.

Posted by: jd at April 19, 2006 08:49 AM (uT71O)

16 Fore!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 19, 2006 09:13 AM (FCC6c)

17 Oyster--good points. The process for getting the warrant needed to be streamlined--and it was, by the Patriot Act revisions. If further change was needed, why not do it the legal way--by asking Congress? Moussaoui's case showed that there were problems with the interp of FISA by FBI/Justice lawyers (they turned down the field office request for a FISA warrant to look in his computers--it MIGHT have stopped 9-11)--not the federal judge. We still don't know who did that--they should have been fired. But we haven't held anyone accountable for 9-11 failures or Iraq intel failures. Maybe we never will. But the difficulty of agencies communicating was CREATED by the president's warrantless wiretapping. The FISA court, when told of the illegal (ok, questionably legal) wiretapping, said, hey, you can't have any of that crap in our courtroom, because we are following the law. So no evidence obtained without a warrant can be used to get a warrant. This does create difficulties, I agree--but the difficulties were created by the president's decision to, at best, dodge the law. Again, we would all be safer, against terrorism and against crime, if we didn't have that pesky constitution. If we strip searched everyone within 10 miles of the president, we could almost guarantee we'd never have another assassination. Thank God we don't. Balancing liberty and security is never easy--and should never be done by one branch, without the knowledge and usually the consent of the others. That's the way the constitution works.

Posted by: jd at April 19, 2006 10:13 AM (aqTJB)

18 Give him enough rope .... Fore!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 19, 2006 11:01 AM (FCC6c)

19 They dont gove prizes or awards for those who have earned them they only give them to the ones who show how left-wing they can be after all they gave the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE to terrorist leader YASSIR ARAFAT and to that idiot JIMMY CARTER and they gave a oscar to that idiot MICHEAL MOORE for his junk film BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE and they ignore the real good films to award trash like CHICAGO,AMERICAN BUETY,SIDEWAYS,and MILLOIN DOLLAR BABY

Posted by: sandpiper at April 20, 2006 02:47 PM (4v/PL)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

April 14, 2006

Surely Not

IÂ’m speechless. At the risk of making people feel unsafe I recommend people read the Dune series if you wonder what human culture could devolve into if Islamic ideals alone shape our future.

Allied Defense Fund :COLUMBUS, Ohio Â— Officials at the Ohio State University are investigating an OSU Mansfield librarian for Â“sexual harassmentÂ” after he recommended four conservative books for a freshman reading program. ADF has demanded that OSU cease its frivolous investigation, yet the university is pressing forward, claiming that it takes the charges Â“seriously.Â”
Â“Universities are one of the most hostile places for Christians and conservatives in America,Â” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel David French, who heads ADFÂ’s Center for Academic Freedom. Â“It is shameful that OSU would investigate a Christian librarian for simply recommending books that are at odds with the prevailing politics of the university.Â”

Ace of Spades HQ adds

Given the fact that these charges come from adult f*&!ing women claiming to feel "unsafe" based on book recommendations, I retract all skepticism. This is unbelievable.

Eugene Volokh reports that these women were upset that one of the books, Â“The marketing of EvilÂ” may be anti-gay. I suspect these women may be Â“Bad GayÂ”.

Northern Kentucky University professor Sally Jacobsen tears the "Cemetery of Innocents" sign on Wednesday evening.

Sheesh these Â“tolerantÂ” liberals arenÂ’t very tolerant of others opinions and hard work. What's the word for that oh yeah hypocrit. And yes I would file charges too if all my hard work was ripped up. She wonÂ’t need the abortion she is fighting for because well look at her. Going to be tough to get some man toÂ…Â….never mind, itÂ’s Good Friday.

Posted by: Howie at 03:23 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.

1 This shit is out of control. We must start hanging liberals soon.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 14, 2006 06:01 PM (0yYS2)

2 I followed this through four different links and I still can't find a connection between conservative reading material and sexual harassment. I am truly confused. How do they do it? How the hell do they justify half the crap they come up with? It's mind boggling. "...claiming that it takes the charges "seriously."" They can't be serious! Can they?

Posted by: Oyster at April 14, 2006 07:31 PM (YudAC)

3 I think this stuff comes from a your-not-the-boss-of-me mentality. It's like these people got older but never grew up. They're still rebelling against their parents. But their parents are probably dead! We have a whole generation of aging boomers who are still fighting authority. It's actually pretty funny because they just get sooooo pissed off. LOL.

Posted by: Richard at April 14, 2006 07:32 PM (7KF8r)

4 Gee! Not to offend anyone but look how fat those people are wrecking the right to life crosses! We sure don't need those kind of people throwing their weight around! If there is an upside maybe they burned off a few calories in doing so! And, I think I will cancel my registration for classes at Northern Kentucky University! What a gaggle of Fat Hicks!

Posted by: Hailus at April 14, 2006 09:06 PM (FCC6c)

5 Sorry I should have been a little more sensitive and said a gaggle of calorically challenged hicks! These must be people who live without love and force-feed themselves out of anguish! Feel sorry for them in a way. But not too much! A ghastly thought occured to me. Which side might benefit exercising their freedom of speech by placing aborted fetuses ( or toys, for the faint of heart and the lawful ) at each cross?

Posted by: Hailus at April 14, 2006 10:19 PM (FCC6c)

6 Yep! That would no doubt bring the issue to a head! Yup!

Posted by: Hailus at April 14, 2006 10:23 PM (FCC6c)

7 Hailus, you're an idiot, so please shut up and move on, because nobody here wants to waste time reading your incoherent drivel.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 15, 2006 06:48 AM (0yYS2)

8 Improbulus Maximus, if you are threatened by my wisdom then I suggest you skip over my discourses or go to another blog where everyone agrees with you. Maybe I touched a nerve talking about fat people or maybe you are of the kind who has nothing better to do than pump yourself up by deflating others. That goes for Oyster too!

Posted by: Hailus at April 15, 2006 11:28 AM (FCC6c)

9 Fat people? What's that got to do with me? I'm 185 lbs of fairly solid muscle. And not that I mind deflating idiots, I just normally prefer to do it with a rifle or K-Bar.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 15, 2006 02:46 PM (0yYS2)

10 Stupid is as stupid does! I weighed 185 3 years ago. Now I'm maintaining 160 lbs. so there! If you are shorter than 5' 11" then you are fat just like I was! Max, your violent shoot anyone who doesn't agree with you puts you on the same level as the enemy we are fighting...

Posted by: Hailus at April 15, 2006 04:01 PM (FCC6c)

11 I am officially changing my handle to Last word Larry instead of Hailus. It has a nice ring to it. I hope that flys and I don't get booted! I hereby repent from my trolling, spoofing ways! Nothin' but the truth as I see it!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 15, 2006 05:13 PM (FCC6c)

12 Now it's not a little extra girl that's a problem hallius er uh larry. It's those mean steamy sweaty ones with the pissed off jowles and permanent red cheeks carved into an immutable frowning scowl coming at you with a skillet! Usually but not always with red hair and if it is red be extra scared. If lady who's a bit over the norm and still cute might be just the ticket. Might rock your world you never know. Hot chicks don't have to try quite so hard. Live a little learn a little. Now I will say in my opinion the lady in the post probably doesn't qualify in personality or cuteness to grant her a pardon on the well you know. Good luck on that, How about New Leaf Larry. Naw whatever.

Posted by: Howie at April 15, 2006 08:25 PM (D3+20)

13 Not to mention the relentless pounding of the sweaty fat globules up and down and on and on with increasing fervor! Thanks, but no thanks. I think I'll stick with Last word Larry for now!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 15, 2006 09:10 PM (FCC6c)

14 Never mind me I'm just screwing over larry so he has to type more.

Posted by: Howie at April 16, 2006 07:44 PM (p/kW4)

15 Not to worry! Hard to compete with me. I got all day everyday since my job was outsourced. That's why I have an advantage overall except for the illegal immigrants and drug dealers to get in the last word. But then again most of those 2 groups of people are computer illiterate anyway and can't speak english. That's why I am that I am Last word Larry! Trouble is I am hooked on this silly blogging sure as any drug and I spend all day everyday scrolling up and down and long into the night searching for fresh input or responses to my drabble when I should get a life and a job!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 16, 2006 09:27 PM (FCC6c)

16 160 lbs? How tall are you, about 5'5"?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 17, 2006 05:45 AM (0yYS2)

17 Welcome to the hooked on blogging club larry so. We have two openings here for energetic computer nuts probably more. Or jhey direct that energy and start a blog. Heck I'll even give you one free linky linky.

Posted by: Howie at April 17, 2006 07:50 AM (D3+20)

18 Nice trick Maximus. If I told you I was 5' 10" and a half it would be easier for you to pick me out of the crowd and line me up in the scope of your rifle. Anyhow I lost 25 lbs. by exercise, changing to a healthier diet with less cholestoral and consequently my blood pressure and hypertension, heartburn and constant tissue inflammation went away! Try it. It might help. Little or no dairy for me, thanks! Been there and done that and barely lived to talk about it!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 17, 2006 01:59 PM (FCC6c)

19 Howie: If it pays better than what I'm making now ( $00.00 ) I might be interested!

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 17, 2006 02:05 PM (FCC6c)

20 It does pay not all that good but benefits are damn good. Puts food on the tabble. And you can make money blogging i've made 20 bucks in three months. Keep looking may there are jobs if you beat around for them. If you get really interested email me. Always some kind work in DP. right time of year to start mowing too. Old ladies need the help and you are your own boss.

Posted by: Howie at April 17, 2006 02:13 PM (vXSuL)

21 Oooooh! That is soooo tempting! To think it might be that easy to make more than the average American worker.

Posted by: Last word Larry at April 17, 2006 05:18 PM (FCC6c)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

April 10, 2006

Make Your Own Taco Day

Today is supposedly when millions of illegal Mexican squatters are being told to stay home from work and not buy anything to show the omnipotent power they have over the U.S. economy.

No word yet on whether illegal Chinese, Saudi, or Haitians (or any other nationality) have been invited to take part.

Racism has nothing to do with it. Since the illegals agitating for attention are Hispanic, then it's the illegal Hispanics who will get the attention. And the mocking that goes along with it.

Here where I live, some businesses, mainly Mexican restaurants, are closing for the day in solidarity with the insurgents. Therefore, if your situation is similar, I'm marking this as Make Your Own Taco Day.

Just trot down to your favorite still-open market, purchase the delicious fresh ingredients (no box crap allowed! That's too easy) and make your own scrumptious Mexican-style meal. If you want a nice frozen adult beverage to go with it, swap the tequila for rum and have a Daquiri instead of a Margarita.

Or, if you are just lousy in the kitchen, find an authentic Mexican restaurant that is open and offer them your patronage and hard earned cash.

Our current open-border policy is a bona fide national security threat. Anyone can sneak over our border, nobody's sitting there qualifying Mexicans over Muslims to creep in.

Seal the damned border, we can figure out what to do about those already here later.

And fly your American flag proudly today, if you aren't already.

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:12 AM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.

April 07, 2006

South Park Muhammed Cartoon Episode

This week's South Park featured a censored Muhammed cartoon. You can watch the relevant part of it below and an image of Muhammed I captured from it is to the right.

It is supposed to be part 1 of a 2 part series in which they promise to show a cartoon of Muhamme drinking tea with Peter Griffin, of Family Guy, which they buy from Mr. T. I pity the fool who dares censor next week's episode. At the very end of the show Trey Parker and Matt Stone literally dared Comedy Central to cenosr them

Best. South. Park. Ever. Period.

If you didn't see it, just don't miss the reruns of it. Send the kids to bed, and then watch it. You won't regret it.

I've been sort of out of the loop for the past week. ~~If any one has any images of Muhammed from this week's South Park, please let me know.~~ Professor Chaos forwards this link. You can actually watch the segment of the video below. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 12:59 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 180 words, total size 2 kb.

1 This is getting interesting! Wonder how the suits at Viacom will handle this?

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at April 07, 2006 03:52 PM (WOQ34)

2 Forget the suits, I want to know how the American people will handle it. My money is on burying their heads in the sand but we can still hope. I don't think that Comedy Central has the nuts to play it.

Posted by: Roy Bettencourt at April 07, 2006 04:23 PM (ApLW9)

3 So, what happens? Does Cartman leave, burn down the school, throw bombs at the Rhode Island embassy in South Park, and murder Catholic priests?

Posted by: The Gentle Cricket at April 07, 2006 04:38 PM (USZUJ)

4 If he stays in the Muslim mode, he does just that, Cricket.

Posted by: jesusland joe at April 07, 2006 04:40 PM (rUyw4)

5 The video has been removed from YouTube for a terms of service violation.

Posted by: Ed Minchau at April 07, 2006 06:00 PM (pPVQ0)

6 This isn't really a big deal. South Park already aired images of Mohammed like 50 times in the David Blaine Episode called Super Best Friends.

Posted by: Hey at April 07, 2006 07:10 PM (ga6Sw)

7 amazing episode. taking shots at family guy, which I think is great regardless, and then starting more controversy with Mohammed. They deserved that Peabody Award.

Posted by: i love it at April 07, 2006 07:34 PM (yymB8)

8 Hey, I forgot about the Super Best Freinds episode. What was Muhammed's super power again? I remember Jesus had super carpentry skills and Joseph Smith had freezing breath, but I can't rememember Muhammed's.

Posted by: Rusty at April 08, 2006 08:30 AM (JQjhA)

9 He makes fire from his arms.

Posted by: Jens at April 08, 2006 01:34 PM (byt+0)

10 Have they blown up KENNY yet

Posted by: sandpiper at April 08, 2006 01:52 PM (qMAo+)

11 I watched this episode, and it was f***ing funny. But I felt like it wasn't mocking Muslims so much, as making fun of the reaction of America and other Western nations to the whole Denmark Muhammed cartoons. oh, and of course it took the piss out of family guy. Yeah, Muslims were portrayed as over reacting, but the real target was the pussy TV execs who pander to certain groups demands. http://celebrityreligion.typepad.com

Posted by: charlotte at April 09, 2006 08:27 PM (l8gSf)

12 I wonder if they will show Muhamhead (pigs piss upon him) chugging down "Allah's Swine Sperm Beer"?

Posted by: Pagan Piggy Goddess Allah at April 10, 2006 09:25 AM (q78EV)

13 They wimped out. They censored the cartoon just like they've pulled the Scientology episode from rotation. I know it's just a commedy network but sadly they are the only dissitant(sp?) voice on television (e.g. Daily Show) What we were taught in school about the bill of right and the fourth estate isn't so true anymore... Anyone who thinks this is about Muslims is wrong. This is about freedom of speech.

Posted by: Ken at April 12, 2006 09:26 PM (07yKX)

14 did YouTube pull the video?

Posted by: tyler at April 13, 2006 01:00 PM (RNtG2)

15 That's the great thing about South Park, they don't care if they offend anyone, Carlos Mencia is the same way. Comedy Central pussed out on this issue, but they did it worse with the whole Tom Cruise/Scatology, uh... I mean Scientology bit. These guys just say all of the things that most of us think but would get in trouble for saying. (Just look up the lyrics for The Clash's song "Know Your Rights")

Posted by: memphis761 at April 13, 2006 03:43 PM (D3+20)

16 yea, that was rediculous that they cencored it, and even with trey and matt so blatantly daring them not to! "if comedy central doesnt puss out" haha. well it was still a good episode even without seeing muhamed. the bart simpson charicter cracked me up! and the whole family guy thing was sweet!

Posted by: Brandyn at April 16, 2006 03:12 PM (NypUT)

17 This episode wasn't just about the muhammed cartoons, it was also about the scientology episode getting pulled. Stan actually says in the episode that if one episode (of family guy) gets pulled then it'll just make it easier the next time.This is what Comedy Central are doing to Southpark. They should of left the scientology episode, I mean you can't deny that is an evil orginisation. They just went for the muhammed Cartoon to prove a point. I think Comedy central played right into Trey & Matts hands personally

Posted by: Gareth at April 17, 2006 07:35 PM (YbeBt)

18 i just want to reiterate the Super best friends episode where Muhammed shot fire out of his hands trying to stop evil statue lincoln

Posted by: dizzle at April 19, 2006 03:21 PM (/W5u5)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

April 05, 2006

Cindy Sheehan Speak to SF HS Students Friday

California Conservative tips us to CindyÂ’s new gig.

SF Examiner SheehanÂ’s visit was arranged by students in the schoolÂ’s Revolution Youth group, an after-school clubÂ… ..When parent Matt Mitguard, who has two children at Lowell, heard about the visit, he contacted Cheng to express concernÂ…

Well yeah.

Posted by: Howie at 09:03 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Revolution Youth group is an after-school club? Only in such places as San Francisco and Seattle do high school children have parents stupid enough to endorse this kind of behavior. You could just build a fence around SF and there would be the asylum. What a fricking bunch of moonbat lunatics!

Posted by: jesusland joe at April 05, 2006 09:15 PM (rUyw4)

2 Comrade, you know not which you speak. We have many such groups in Havana, so, no, it is not just San Francisco and Seattle. Viva la revoluci*cough cough cough hack spit* cion. Excuse, please.

Posted by: jesusland fidel at April 05, 2006 09:44 PM (/qy9A)

3 A lot of people nowadays feel the need to preach about 'revolution' whenever they can. Yet they never have any specifics about what's supposed to happen after they get their revolution - when the work really begins.

Posted by: Graeme at April 06, 2006 06:34 AM (CFQ2m)

4 'Zactly, Graeme.

Posted by: Oyster at April 06, 2006 08:22 AM (uZPWy)

5 A good place for her to live right there in HANOI ON THE BAY

Posted by: sandpiper at April 06, 2006 08:24 AM (e/auS)

6 Graeme, The real problem we have here is if these people had a "revolution" and were successful, who would do any work? Who in this group would know how to keep the city utilities going, such as electricity and water? These people are just plain stupid. They know nothing and can do nothing. They expect things to be done just because they say, do it, and have no idea how the real world works. What a bunch of idiots.

Posted by: jesusland joe at April 06, 2006 09:42 AM (rUyw4)

7 I graduated from that school last year. There are TONS of bias teachers in that school its unbelievable! :[

Posted by: Billy Faeth at April 06, 2006 01:59 PM (KR0ga)

8 Welcome to California. Check out one of the candidates for governor: http://janicejordan.org

Posted by: ken at April 06, 2006 05:39 PM (hFZJx)

9 Billy, how did you keep your sanity?

Posted by: jesusland joe at April 06, 2006 06:50 PM (rUyw4)

10 Sheehan is one ugly cow. Someone pleeeeesssse put that cow out to pasture.

Posted by: Leatherneck at April 06, 2006 07:55 PM (D2g/j)

11 WorldSex Daily Updated Free Links to Hardcore Sex Pictures, Movies, Free Porn Videos and XXX Live Sex Cams

Posted by: SEXMENS at April 06, 2006 09:23 PM (dMWB/)

12 If these people had a "revolution" and were successful, who would do any work? First you hold a bunch of Revolutionary Meetings, elect some Revolutionary-Steering-Committees, and some Sub-Committee on Revolutionary Prid. Just give everybody a Committee-Level Managerial Job, it's socialist paternalism the way SF has always been. And it's San Francisco, they have resources - why else declare the whole City a "City-of-Refuge," free from the enforcement of federal immigration laws. It'a fly-a trap (and often smells that way) - they round up all the Illegal Aliens in their Amnesty Shelters, and put THEM to work....

Posted by: -keith in silicon valley at April 07, 2006 03:35 PM (pmP8H)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 31, 2006

ACLU: Jesus=Bad, Mosque=Good

Because of the hypocrisy.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:19 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.

1 If the US does not wake up and stop this, I predict we will see jihadist training camps springing up all over the US. Good God, what is the thinking of the Corp and the US Government?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 31, 2006 10:33 AM (rUyw4)

2 its not just the people in power to blame its the citizens who dont give a sh#t and just let it happen

Posted by: ianm at March 31, 2006 12:06 PM (GhCfc)

3 The ALCU are nuts. The minority always seems to be heard the loudest. Joe if have training camps we're in trouble

Posted by: Robert Savage at March 31, 2006 01:43 PM (xLcBf)

4 I can't wait to do night ops on a terrorist camp close to home. My wife will not let me go to far, so I have to wait until they come close to me. 0200hr wake up on a three quarter moon. Of course, that's if my wife will let me go.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 31, 2006 03:11 PM (D2g/j)

5 ACLU the Atheist.Communist. and Lawyers. Underground the legal arm of such as THE WEATHERMAN UNDERGROUND and other 70s terrorists groups need anymore reason to revoke the ACLUs tax exempt status and maybe indite thm all?

Posted by: sandpiper at April 01, 2006 08:57 AM (uo3LX)

6 Deal with the fact that today in North America, many college students will never have the opportunity to hear the gospel of Jesus Christ. College students, numbering approximately 16 million, are one of the most significant and unevangelized people groups in North America. The battle for the souls of collegians is growing more desperate each year. Research indicates that more churches are closing every year than are being started, conversions to other religions and dropouts from Christianity are escalating, and it takes on average 85 Christians working an entire year to produce one convert. The collegiate church starting strategy summarized below is an attempt to address the non-Christians found on North AmericaÂ’s college campuses in light of the declining resolve of many local churches to enter the collegiate world with the gospel of Christ.

Posted by: Ilohim gadol at April 06, 2006 04:17 PM (zqsRN)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 30, 2006

Cynthia McKinney: Why She Punched That Pesky Cop

Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) allegedly assaulted an officer of the law earlier today, when he failed to recognize her as she rushed past a metal detector. While members of Congress are not required to go through the Capitol metal detectors, they are supposed to present their credentials. McKinney was in too big a hurry to be bothered complying with one of the people who help ensure her safety. According to witnesses, she hit him in the chest with her cell phone. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:04 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 343 words, total size 2 kb.

March 29, 2006

Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi to Personally Liquidate Osama

From the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON - Congressional Democrats promise to "eliminate" Osama bin Laden and ensure a "responsible redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq in 2006 in an election-year national security policy statement.

Please pardon my skepticism, but this comes from a political party that represents those who pretty much agree with Osama bin Laden.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:39 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Will they also dish out witty one liners as they kill OBL with their bare hands?

Posted by: Rusty at March 29, 2006 12:43 PM (JQjhA)

2 Don't ask them hey're going to do it, Rusty... the important part is saying they will.

Posted by: Brian B at March 29, 2006 01:03 PM (rGfpg)

3 I think they'll kill him with the one-liners. And I must say that I am shocked, shocked I tell you that they openly advocate violating Osama's civil rights. What about the Geneva Conventions? Oh, the humanity...

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 29, 2006 01:04 PM (RHG+K)

4 One liners ? Osama has heard them before. The first time I heard them I believed them, now I am not so sure.

Posted by: john Ryan at March 29, 2006 01:25 PM (nkDPg)

5 We really ought to have a contest: What will Harry Reid say as he personally blasts OBL? "Tell Satan Dirty Harry sent you!"

Posted by: Rusty at March 29, 2006 01:29 PM (JQjhA)

6 Stop me if you've heard this before: How do you intend to stabilize Iraq to withdraw our troops? I have a plan for Iraq how do you intend to get the United Nations involved with Iraq? I have a plan to get the United Nations involved in Iraq How do you intend to fight the war on terror? I have a plan to fight the war on terror It's the John Kerry "I have a plan™ for < insert situation here>" Welcome to the new plan, same as the last plan. No details, nothing other than a promise.

Posted by: davec at March 29, 2006 01:34 PM (CcXvt)

7 I'm shocked too, Bluto. What? No trial? No ACLU lawyers? Where's Ramsey Clarke when you need him? Why Nancy Pelosihitler and harry Reidmarx are trying to turn us into a fascist state. I feel an uncontrollable urge to start an "imsorryosama.com" site to make sure he understands that we respect his right to exist.

Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 01:41 PM (rGS2g)

8 Right,left repubcrat or democan, we all have plans don't we? What a pack of fools on both sides. What would happen if all this absurd scapegoating stopped and someone actually took responsibility based on reality,not some dunderheaded political myth?

Posted by: whatthe at March 29, 2006 02:04 PM (VSHgb)

9 I'm still tryin' to figure this one out - if we re-locate out the enemy will come to us? If we re-locate out - then it's totally out of the region - no one's gonna take us in (why would they). OK - so let's re-locate back to the States! Weather is nicer and shopping and amenities much better. Let'em come! It would be a hell of a lot more efficent and easier cleaning up after a car/truck bombing when all the casualties speak English and most have health insurance. Works for me.

Posted by: hondo at March 29, 2006 05:24 PM (StM4D)

10 Maybe they meant that they plan to eliminate him from the dhimmicratic party?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 30, 2006 06:48 AM (0yYS2)

11 The secret plan: Howard Dean and John Kerry get on Kerry's magical flying swiftboat and Kerry uses his Vietnam-senses (think Spider-senses) to detect where Osamma is. They descend and Dean uses his Hypersonic Scream of Justice to collapse the cave on Osamma.

Posted by: Ranba Ral at March 30, 2006 10:52 AM (GyNTD)

12 You mean they dont want to play a freindly game of checkers with his?

Posted by: sandpiper at April 01, 2006 09:04 AM (uo3LX)

13 WorldSex Daily Updated Free Links to Hardcore Sex Pictures, Movies, Free Porn Videos and XXX Live Sex Cams

Posted by: SEXMENS at April 06, 2006 09:24 PM (8RU62)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 22, 2006

Charlie Sheen: CIA, Jews, Space Aliens Caused 9/11

Via Michelle.

The best thing about this article is that it claims Sheen is a "prominent credible" whistleblower. Charlie Sheen is prominent? Charlie Sheen is credible? Charlie Sheen is a whistleblower?

Charlie. Sheen. Prominent. Credible. Whistleblower.

I need to let that one sink in for a bit.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:07 PM | Comments (50) | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Mr. Carlos Irwin EstÃƒÂ©vez probably thinks he was in a documentary when he filmed The Arrival. You've got to consider the source.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at March 22, 2006 04:16 PM (0fZB6)

2 hahaha! thanks for the belly laugh. Now add an exclamation mark to that headline and it's a go.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 22, 2006 04:18 PM (8e/V4)

3 A whistleblower as prominent and credible as Charlie Sheen can hardly be expected to believe this nonsense. It seems far more likely he is in the service of an ALIEN POWER. Maybe those lizard people from V.

Posted by: Flea at March 22, 2006 04:22 PM (KO3l2)

4 Well technically they didn't say what area his credibility comes from. If you think about it, he is a credible public figure.............on the subject of the extortionate prices charged for cocaine and high priced call girls.

Posted by: Graeme at March 22, 2006 04:33 PM (0yOLq)

5 Alex Jones wrote the story? *The* Alex Jones? *Bwahahahaha!!!!* Excuse me, I have to go to an Illuminati meeting via my black helicopter. It's being held at a Mena, Arkansas, airfield.

Posted by: elgato at March 22, 2006 04:38 PM (kV59d)

6 The Cat [elgato] beat me to it. Alex jones was greg's favorite. He quoted Jones just about every other post. He probably had wet dreams about him when he wasn't here touting every word that left Jones' mouth as if it were gospel. The apple truly doesn't fall far from the tree. Look at who Charlie's father is.

Posted by: Oyster at March 22, 2006 05:02 PM (g9UJq)

7 I've certainly called him a whistle blower. Or at least something to that effect.

Posted by: a4g at March 22, 2006 05:10 PM (yfmd5)

8 If being credible means I've got to bed many I high priced hooker, marry and make babies with a hottie who posed in Playboy, and divorce her in favor of the hookers... where do I sign up?

Posted by: jwookie at March 22, 2006 06:16 PM (x0sPW)

9 A leader who seeks soley his own council is a dangerous man! Object lesson in progress!

Posted by: Thesaurus at March 22, 2006 06:20 PM (Y2ILH)

10 Maybe Greg can be his agent.

Posted by: davec at March 22, 2006 06:37 PM (CcXvt)

11 What can you expect from a guy who "dates" prostitutes? BTW, have you all heard what Richard Belzer said the other evening on the Bill Maher show? An actual F.A.G. (reference Team America) member at work! I used all of my knowledge from the Psychology 101 class that I took decades ago to diagnose the imbecile: http://dmdlp.blogspot.com/2006/03/munchahole-syndrome.html

Posted by: Don Miguel at March 22, 2006 06:44 PM (UAn5X)

12 whats so wrong with *dating* prostitutes?

Posted by: Rubin at March 22, 2006 06:55 PM (FlPMW)

13 I'm glad Charlie is on the case. Maybe he can connect the dots and tell us what REALLY happened! I think insanity must run in that family.

Posted by: Richard at March 22, 2006 07:34 PM (7KF8r)

14 Prostitutes are people too! We are all going to pay for it one way or another. Well, most of us.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 22, 2006 07:57 PM (D2g/j)

15 Whistleblower=actor who has played a person in government albeit fictional.spin city. Credible=son of another actor who was president, albeit fictional. Prominent=Man who was in a little black book of a infamous hollywood madam(with many little stars next to his name.)

Posted by: patrick at March 22, 2006 08:05 PM (7KYmz)

16 Sounds like he needs to get his own whistle blown and leave politics alone. Or maybe it was blown one too many times like Bill Clinton...

Posted by: RepJ at March 22, 2006 10:00 PM (KpfBT)

17 charlie sheen must think all of us who graduated from high school must admire people like him who failed to graduate from high school, and only skill set for the working life is reading lines from a teleprompter. i think rush limbaugh once mentioned charlie is the guy with so much compassion for the homeless in malibu he got the city to permit the homeless to reside in the city, and when the homeless started to use charlie's property for their tents, he drove them away.

Posted by: red state voter living in a blue state at March 22, 2006 11:58 PM (7MWJo)

18 Charlie is doing drugs again. And drinking. And God help him, thinking. Never forget that his best thinking got him to Hydie's. Oh, and caused Denise Richards to divorce him. Maybe his contract is up, or something.

Posted by: Tom at March 23, 2006 07:15 AM (w68a9)

19 I got to quit laughing so much, my guts hurt.

Posted by: 10ksnooker at March 23, 2006 07:17 AM (7evkT)

20 Charle Sheen a chip off the old blockhead

Posted by: sandpiper at March 23, 2006 09:37 AM (1LUQw)

21 Yeah, when CNN covers it, now that makes it fact. I'm laughing too hard to finish my post.......it was on the Hollywood report......hahahahahaha!!!!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 10:33 AM (rUyw4)

22 you dumb neocon sheep,eveything charlie said was the truth,Silverstein admitted he pulled the building,it takes weeks to prepare to bring down a building,not hours,morons

Posted by: dale at March 23, 2006 03:18 PM (fM9Xc)

23 dale, did you attend a public school in a blue state city, or were you home-schooled by an idiot? It has to be one of the two.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 04:41 PM (rUyw4)

24 All he did is as for the truth. And all you people who can't handle the truth, you should show the evidence...show us all the pentagon videos. Right you can't becuase you not what you speak of. If you can't admit 9/11 changed your rights as US Citizen then Stop basing your opinion on non facts. Until One of you can produce an actual video of the pentagon being hit but the plane that they claimed hit the building keep quiet.

Posted by: Rick at March 23, 2006 10:27 PM (jEhqx)

25 I've got that video Rick, right next to my Alien Autopsy DVD, and my vacation shots from Area 51, where I got to ride in the captured alien spacecraft and meet Zq-Werty-u-Iop, its pilot, with whom I later played a round of golf. On the moon. The bunkers were hell.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 24, 2006 06:19 AM (0yYS2)

26 Rick, you're drunk, or high, or stupid. Which is it?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 10:21 AM (rUyw4)

27 lol for one this is no alien crap. This is reality. Call it what you like, call me what you want you words mean nothing when your sitting in a prison camp. It's called news read it. When the day you realize all your rights as a citizen have been taken away and you realize you had a chance to know the truth be it in favor of your government or "conspiracy theory people". It's not about politics is about rights as a US citizen to get the fact good or bad. All Sheen and 75% of the US is wanting is a Logical answer to simple questions why is so hard for the administration to tell the truth. As for nut cases explain how a guy like Alex Jones 2 months prior to 9/11 can warn people of a terrorist attack in the portion to Pearl Harbor and name the conspirator that would be blamed. Either this guy is a terrorist himself, Psychic, or just as I think He follows the news and actually reads it for what it is. You have a right to your opinion just remember right before your final breath you chose your fate and will stand by it 100%. And your proud to be apart of this country.

Posted by: Rick at March 24, 2006 03:40 PM (jEhqx)

28 Rick, tell me which one of your rights have been violated. You people please tell me something you can't do today that you could do 10 years ago. Tell me who is about to put you in a prison camp, and for what reason. I'm waiting for you to make some sense.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 07:33 PM (rUyw4)

29 Popular Mechanics Attacks Its "9/11 LIES" Straw Man by Jim Hoffman Version 1.2, February 9, 2005 The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11. The article's approach is to identify and attack a series of claims which it asserts represent the whole of 9/11 skepticism. It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack. Read the rest of the article here: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/ P.S. Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff's 25-year old cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, penned the Popular Mechanics piece on 9/11 sceptics. This represents a huge conflict of interest. Do your own research. Watch this video and tell me it does not raise some questions: "9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?" http://youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I Watch the video of this speech wich origionally aired on C-Span: The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions David Ray Griffin Description: David Ray Griffin takes a critical look at the official 9/11 Commission Report. Professor Griffin argues that "omissions and distortions" in the report amount to a cover-up by government officials and says that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Professor Griffin covers topics he says have been inadequately answered by the commission. These include questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon, the way in which the World Trade Center towers collapsed, and the behavior of President Bush and his Secret Service detail following notification that a second plane had hit the WTC. The talk was hosted by the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth (www.mujca.com) and took place at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Includes Q&A. Author Bio: David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, where he taught for over 30 years (retiring in 2004). He has authored or edited over two dozen books, including "God and Religion in the Postmodern World," "Religion and Scientific Naturalism," and "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11." http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

Posted by: Erik at March 25, 2006 06:55 AM (zh/NE)

30 Yes Rick, I choose my fate, and I will stand by my choice, unto death. As long as I can take some muslims and leftards with me, that is.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 25, 2006 07:21 AM (0yYS2)

31 My choice is to support a guy who has more to lose than of us, Charlie Sheen. Ask yourself what a guy of his wealth and popularity would have to gain from doing speaking out on a topic like this. Go ahead say he's crazy. Blame his father. Bash his past. Bash is movies. Be as ignorant as the next guy. All he is asking of The Government is to answer doubt in his mind to clear up the controversy. I don't think he's doing to run for president. I applaud him for having enough balls as a citizen to speak out publicly. What could really harm you if they re-investigate this issue....nothing. Unless there truth may be is what he says. Improbulus I myself had the same feelings about couple of years ago. All that is asked of you is read up on this and not just 1 article. Educate yourself. If 1 thing of this day can cast a shadow of doubt about 9/11 investigate. To many strange coincidences shroud this event not just the event itself but the lead up to the events and after. Either those terrorist won the jihadist lottery or something's doesn't fit in the puzzle.

Posted by: Rick at March 25, 2006 01:31 PM (jEhqx)

32 Please take the time to listen to the questions Charlie poses. You will see that they are very legitimate and remain unanswered. Namely the collapse of WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING 7. The FEMA report had this to say about the collapse of WTC 7. "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5) http://www.wtc7.net/ http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html The owner of WTC 7 admitted in a PBS documentary to "pulling" the building. "Pull it" is a demolition term for bringing down a building. "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." Larry Silverstein - owner of WTC 7 Putting explosives in a building takes weeks and could not have been placed between the time of the first two tower collapses and the collapse of WTC 7. WTC7 shares all the characteristics of a controlled demolition and has yet to be explained by the government. Millions of people all over the world question the official US government story of 9/11 for very good reasons, and namely the collapse of WTC Building 7. Don't be so quick to proclaim Charlie Sheen is stupid and wrong if you have not done any research regarding the subject. Look at what he is asking instead of just attacking Charlie Sheen's character over the internet. If Charlie Sheen is so wrong just present evidence that proves him wrong. Challenge him on the facts not his personnal life.

Posted by: Andy White at March 25, 2006 03:56 PM (z6oqu)

33 Operation Northwoods: In 1962 the Joint Chiefs of Staff were going to paint a plane like a commercial airliner and swap it with a real one. Then they were gonna shoot it down and blame Castro for it. Then go to war against Cuba using this fake terrorism. The document shows that they were not opposed to killing civilians to make this plan happen. I think maybe they finally got around to using this tactic on Sept 11, 2001. All you have to do is read history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Posted by: Truth for a Change at March 26, 2006 02:49 AM (lYFpY)

34 You guys are sad. Charlie has done his research. And for anyone to demonize his personal life shows a deep concern to obstruct the facts that he brings up.... 911 was an inside job. Do a google search for 911 Bush and see what you get. Wake up now, or wake up later in a POLICE STATE.

Posted by: James Powell at March 27, 2006 12:30 AM (dgmhr)

35 No American administration would ever do anything to harm innocent civillians. Charlie Sheen is a nutjob. I love Bush and teh official version of events for 911 is the truth. The terrists knew they'd be able to fly around in the most protected airspace on the palnet without getting shot down or intercepted as they knew our air defences would be busy doing other stuff. Those terrists were smart/physcic and Charlie Sheen sleeps with protistsutes so don't listen to him. Terrists did it because they hate our freedoms. I don't want to listen to lefties. Or Rightities. I don't read books. Or watch the news. Terrists did it. My dad says terrirsts did it and he should know cos he went to high school. He doesn't watch the news either.

Posted by: Dean at March 27, 2006 05:33 AM (36kR5)

36 charlie sheen did not speak of aliens and other weird stuff he just asks for answers your government isn't giving you. please look at the facts and come to your own conclusion. when was the last time your government told you something that wasn't a lie

Posted by: casaubon at March 27, 2006 06:33 AM (JALOd)

37 Despite the use of such classic tin accusation terms such as Jews and Space Aliens used, Sheen said so such thing. He had some questions about specific aspects. However his overall message is that he didn't know it all, that he simply wanted people to question things for themselves. Here is a short list of people who spoke out before Mr. Sheen about their concerns about 9-11. * Former head of Star Wars and air force colonel, Bob Bowman * BYU physicist Steve Jones and Clemson engineering professor Judy Wood * Underwriters Laboratories employee Kevin Ryan (UL Certified the Steel used in the WTC) *Former high-level Reagan appointee and prominent conservative, Paul Craig Roberts *Former U.S. congressman Dan Hamburg *Former chief labor economist under George W. Bush, Morgan Reynolds *Former high-level intelligence analysts, Ray McGovern and Wayne Madsen (who briefed presidents and vice-presidents) If it weren't for the fact the father of Reaganomics amongst others have spoke out before Mr. Sheen... I might not continue to chuckle so much at the knee-jerk reactions to his interview.

Posted by: Doc at March 27, 2006 07:20 AM (3lcR9)

38 After reading about half of the junk in this thread, I realized that nobody was going to discuss any thing Sheen said. Just personal attacks. Ho-hum.

Posted by: Fred at March 27, 2006 03:18 PM (Owwje)

39 Thank god this is finally getting attention, hopefully it's not to late. but yes, for those of you haven't done your homework on 9/11, the evidence is actually pointing towards government involvement, and most specifically controlled demolition of the towers. The official theory sure doesn't add up... . Either way it's great to have a prominent celeb bringing attention to this incredibly important issue to us all.

Posted by: johnshaw at March 28, 2006 12:56 AM (7jywQ)

40 Sooo many people choose to use personal attacks against someone who is only trying to get people to think. None of you people posting this drivel ever made any mistakes in your past? (Bullshit)His ideas in general are sound ideas. Ideas that must make any critically thinking American stand up and question what is obviously a problem. I cannot get over what happened on 9/11 without thouroughly looking into the information that has been provided. Part of my healing is to learn as much about it as possible so that I can support projects/laws that might stop it from happening in the future (NOT PATRIOT ACT BULLCRAP). Whether it was done by our Government or to quote another blogger, "Jewish space Aliens", I don't want to ever see it happen again. If space aliens are responsible, I expect their heads to be paraded across the White House lawn when we find 'em, but at the same time there must be irrefutable proof that those dastardly aliens were behind this. Bottom line, stop attacking the man and stand back and look at what he's talking about with a critical mind. If you don't believe it, change the damn channel. Be human and stop attacking people for things that have nothing to do with their views. Get a life, stop being a part of the sheeple in-crowd, and make the determination on your own after looking at more than what mainstream media will show you.

Posted by: Jeff at March 28, 2006 08:26 AM (Da6a7)

41 Wow, what a spin! Do the research, compare it with the official story, and tell me what you come up with. Ive done extensive research and I can only come up with one conclusion. than god Charlie Sheen has the courage to step up to the plate. Jews, and space aliens? I don't remember hearing anything about that. Keep on spinning and smearing, it's only helping us out.

Posted by: Jake Gaeta at March 28, 2006 02:51 PM (uN/oE)

42 Charlie said none of the bs that you post there. He said nothing about Jews, about Aliens or alike. Why this lie? To ridicule him? He said it looked odd to him, to him as a citizen, as a taxpayer. And i have to agree with him - there is much yet to be clarified, the iron curtain of secrecy yet to be lifted. What has Charlie done that you attack him that much? What was wrong with what he said? Is it not allowed to believe in a conspiracy? Why is it not allowed?

Posted by: Greg at March 29, 2006 06:20 AM (tDmg3)

43 In reference to my comments above. They were directed at the people that are stating above that, that jews and space aliens did it (poking fun at Charlie). Perhaps Jake should look at the context of my comments and direct them at the people who are not doing the research. Also, English is perhaps a second language to you so you may have to get a better translator in order to understand what I posted. The bottom line, people are not paying attention to the facts and are attacking Charlie for nothing more than his past and not the facts. Read on!

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:29 AM (Da6a7)

44 Perhaps Jake should get a better translator and re-read my post. I am referencing posts above my comments about space aliens and jews in order to poke fun at the people who refuse to see the issue for the facts and insist on using outlandish statements that have nothing to do with Charlie's original statements. Also in my post you will see (with the proper translator) that I am also supporting researching this for yourself since the facts do show a problem with the official story. The people that want to attack him on a personal basis are the people that do not have a valid argument and thus must resort to more seedy tactics to present their cases (poking fun and being insulting to someone who should be considered a critical thinker). Please reread my post in that context and then tell me you think I was spinning anything.

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:34 AM (Da6a7)

45 Man... Some of you folks really need to learn to read before you post. Stop having someone else read posts to you and read them yourself.

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:36 AM (Da6a7)

46 Yes indeed! Thank God this is getting attention! Why do the ignorant and unimformed choose to attack the messenger rather than the message? OK, so Charlie Sheen has a maybe not so clean private life, does that matter? Before you ignorent fools start bleating, take a long hard look at the evidence! The truth IS out there, maybe it's not what you want to hear, but it is there! Oh yes, Dean, are you for real? Or perhaps it's time for your medication?

Posted by: Osmodia at March 29, 2006 10:47 AM (lDj8F)

47 It's always great fun, if a little sad to read the ramblings of the "head-in-the-sand" brigade. The "so-what-if our-president-is-an-oil-man-and-he-knew-the-bin-laden-family-personally" nutcases. The truth is a little too much for these guys to cope with. The "Okay-Adolf-is-a-bit-of-a-character-but-these-jews-are-trying-to-destroy-the-german-homeland" types. You know the ones. The "we-rule-the-world-cos-we're-the-greatest-even-though-we-couldn't-show-you-afghanistan-iraq-grenada-libya-or-yugoslavia-on-a-map-but-our-supreme-leader-says-lets-blow-em-up-so-we-will" types. Well, good for you. It's just a pity that you shout louder than your more sensible countrymen. And when your economy crumbles to dust because the world wants nothing to do with the dollar and when oil is $10 a gallon 'cos GW Bush has told Iraq to keep it's oil production down, in line with OPEC. And when you're scared to complain about any of it because your scared of what people may say about you, go and educate yourselves. Learn that patriotism is about your country not your president. Remember that this land of the free of yours has only been letting black people sit where they want on the bus since the 60's. All the moms apple pie and place names like "Glorytown", "Lovelinessville" and "Superdupercottoncandytown" shouldn't be enough to blind intelligent people from the evils of corrupt power whether your leader wears an army uniform, a businessmans suit or a towel on his head. Peace

Posted by: thinktheunthinkable at March 29, 2006 12:19 PM (0FZ2t)

48 Look at the facts, not Charlie's history, it's irrelavant. Some honest inquiry on CNN is not I've set up a site at BravoCharlie911.com The intent is to give Charlie Sheen the support he so deserves, and in all likelyhood could probably use right about now. It's also hoped that the sentiments and suppoert expressed there will encourage others to step into the light as well. Pop by and leave a note of support

Posted by: Dan at March 29, 2006 06:34 PM (A/RmO)

49 You can say what you will about Charle Sheen's crediblity, but maybe you would do better to actually read what some very credible people have said. There are plenty to choose from. Or, you could open your eyes and look for yourself. This is not what it seems and I don't need charle sheen to tell me that. I am grateful that he has the balls to do so. He is risking his life and that is why it is not getting more mainstream coverage. Anyone who has a mainstream voice knows the risks and keeps quite. WHat a great country.

Posted by: john monto at March 30, 2006 01:43 PM (u4aW4)

50 LOL @ all the conservative jokesters disappearing after the legitimate discrepancies were posted Hilarious!

Posted by: Huey at March 31, 2006 01:28 AM (j4pHj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

How Much Would the Dems Sacrifice to Regain Power?

Democratic party apparatchiks and their co-conspirators in the mainstream media seem to have placed their hopes for the midterm elections on the perception of American defeat in Iraq. With the economy humming, the Dubai Ports World deal a fading memory, and television viewers nationwide suffering from Katrina fatigue syndrome, the Democratic Party is left to focus on the Global War on Terror, and to downplay the progress made since 9/11.

Thus, we get the recent relentless drumbeat of negative network reporting from hotel balconies all over the Baghdad Green Zone, with the barely concealed hope that civil war will break out soon.

But how much damage is the Left willing to inflict on the United States in order to start winning elections? more...

Posted by: Bluto at 10:31 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.

March 18, 2006

Air America Host Calls Our Troops "Murderers", Nazis

Mike Malloy from Air America:

This is on a level with the Hitlerian attitudes towards the Jews and towards the Russians. This is just butchery, this is just murder, my God.

Hat tip: Wizbang.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:52 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.

March 17, 2006

Does the ACLU Love Terrorists?

Or do they simply hate America? It's kind of hard to tell sometimes. Now the ACLU is asking the United Nations to hold the U.S. accountable for [insert whiney reason here]. Wait, aren't these guys supposed to be upholding the U.S. Constitution? As I force all of my students to memorize, it starts this way: We the people of the United States.... I don't seem to recall anything in the Constitution about the U.N., the international community, or international law.

Stop the ACLU has more.

Posted by: Rusty at 07:49 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.

March 16, 2006

When Up is Down

When you're a Leftist blogger up is down, war is peace, and losing is winning. Orwell still matters.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:22 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

Harvard & Georgetown Sell Out to Islamofascists

Harvard we can understand, but Georgetown? What's a nice Catholic school like you doing taking money from him?

Posted by: Rusty at 09:11 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

Thank The Maker!

For us Star Wars geeks.

Because our robots have no laws prohibiting them from killing the enemy.

Via LGF.

Scroll all the way down and laugh as great conversations erupt as to whether or not Asimov's "laws" are truly laws, or simply fiction, or whether or not these machines are true robots or not.

Reminds of something, but I just can't place it.

Posted by: Vinnie at 01:59 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

March 15, 2006

The Clooney-Huffington Affair

Oh no! Arianna's caught in a web of lies. Oh, the humanity! From the LA Times:

Oscar winner George Clooney may make politically provocative films like "Syriana." But he doesn't write politically provocative blogs.
So imagine his ire when Arianna Huffington used some of his recent answers to political questions in a way that makes it look as if he wrote one for her Huffington Post blog site.

The Huffmeister puts it off to a misunderstanding between her and Clooney's publicist.

Clooney's statement:

"Miss Huffington's blog is purposefully misleading and I have asked her to clarify the facts. I stand by my statements but I did not write this blog. With my permission Miss Huffington compiled it from interviews with Larry King and The Guardian. What she most certainly did not get my permission to do is to combine only my answers in a blog that misleads the reader into thinking that I wrote this piece. These are not my writings Â— they are answers to questions and there is a huge difference."

Yes, The Dread Pundit Bluto was taken in by the devious Huffintoness as well! Oh no! Looks like Huffy pulled George's "blog". What a shame. The fawning "Oh, Mr. Clooney..." comments were priceless.

Via Neocon Express.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 08:36 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Whose George Clooney?

Posted by: hondo at March 15, 2006 08:40 PM (9pQ6D)

2 Not mine, I'll tell you that, hondo.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 15, 2006 09:04 PM (rUyw4)

3 I hope you don't mind, but I am getting bum rushed at www.rayrobison.com by the liberal avenger crowd and could use a hand. but don't forget to come straight back here.

Posted by: Ray Robison at March 15, 2006 09:08 PM (4joLu)

4 The bitch lied. And she got busted.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 09:34 PM (8e/V4)

5 Oh, the huge manatee! I'm so frackin' embarrassed to be related to that guy. Lots of nuts in my family tree. I'm the black walnut.

Posted by: Princess Kimberley at March 15, 2006 10:18 PM (9xjdU)

6 Ok .. so to back track a bit on a comment I'd made when I read Clooney's post, when it was still his post. I'd chastised him for publishing the post right as his political movie goes on sale. That wasn't Clooney's fault, apparently. It was Arianna's for trying to coat-tail on the oscar-driven DVD sale. Not one poster at the Huff&Blo seems to have picked up on that. My bad.

Posted by: Yo at March 15, 2006 11:03 PM (6DvwA)

7 Even if he did't write the post, neither did he disavow the words, so he's still a leftard moonbat one way or another.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 15, 2006 11:22 PM (0yYS2)

8 Ray: Yarr, sounds like a job for Bluto's Pirate crew! I however lent a hand until the pro's could take the field

Posted by: davec at March 15, 2006 11:30 PM (CcXvt)

9 Wake up people, George Clooney is a Neocon! Max Boot said so in the LA Times today.

Posted by: comandante agi at March 15, 2006 11:52 PM (LPeCt)

10 Clooney "doesn't write politically provocative blogs." Bullsh*t. He did before the election and then deleted it after the election. There's no trail now. I should have gotten a screen shot. He was also commenting in other blogs (and articles that allowed commenting) under the pseudonym "Justice Jack". Which was funny because Justice Jack was obviously someone he must have admired. He was a judge in the UK, who after the expiration of a 1695 piece of legislation which guaranteed freedom of the press in Britain, rendered a judgement in 2001 which was leading to new legislation that would gag any stories written by the press which told of the private lives of Hollywood stars. Specifically their love lives. God forbid anyone should find out that our beloved Hollywood stars are promiscuous.

Posted by: Oyster at March 16, 2006 04:28 AM (YudAC)

11 I have little regard for Clooney and even less for A. Huffo. I can't shake the thought that she married a perfectly hetero male millionaire and in no time turned him into a homo. She's sinister.

Posted by: Mike at March 16, 2006 05:01 AM (NygMM)

12 George Cloney the worlds worst actor he could do better being the backend of a horse becuase that what he is

Posted by: sandpiper at March 16, 2006 09:39 AM (wksIu)

13 It's all out civil war! lol! http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/400027p-338931c.html

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 16, 2006 10:13 AM (8e/V4)

14 So, now Drudge and the AP are flogging this "controversy" - it's so irritating to see how well Hollywood PR people finesse things - this has probably doubled DVD sales for his movie - what's it called? "Whatever and Good Riddance?" - this controversy is the new millenium version of Liz Taylor getting married 8 times - only less entertaining.

Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at March 16, 2006 12:59 PM (aH6Zf)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Relocating To France Is Still An Option

The DUmmy spaketh:

Americans are among the stupidest people in the world.
And politicians of both parties know it. Democrat politicians regret this, bitch about it, and do everything they can to change it. Republican politicians love this reality, exploit it, and do everything they can to keep it that way.
It's difficult to place the blame in any one place. The MSM is part of the problem. The Republican propaganda machine keeps the ball rolling. The Republican religious faction actually believe they're "doing the Lord's work," and the good ole' standby of waving the flag and appealing to blind patriotism works wonders.
Most Democrats/Liberals, on the other hand, believe in the basic goodness of mankind, the things that are written in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and that if people could just see the truth, they'd throw the criminals out.
As a Democrat and a liberal, I agree with them. So given the insanity that the American public has allowed to go on for the past five years, I guess I'm as ineffective as any Democrat politician out there.
The journalist H.L. Mencken said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people" and he's been proved right time and again.
So what, if anything, are we going to do about it?

Move to France? That bastion of liberty China? How about Cuba and their awesome healthcare system?

Then again, there's always this solution.

Stein hoist: Jheka in the LGF comments. Which reminds me, I owe Taqiyyotomist a stein hoist for the MEMRI link in this post.

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:59 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Back in the old days politicians would pay cold hard cash when they wanted to buy votes.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 07:32 PM (8e/V4)

2 Now that's funny! Dem campaign worker - "Hey stupid! Ya you! - and the idiot next to you! Vote Democratic!

Posted by: hondo at March 15, 2006 08:48 PM (9pQ6D)

3 "Americans are among the stupidist people in the World" Speak for yourself, buddy! And don't let that door hit you in the ass on your way to France!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 15, 2006 09:12 PM (rUyw4)

4 Libtards, please, LEAVE. Be my guest.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 09:36 PM (8e/V4)

5 You know if this educated and intelligent fool and so many others like him ever decide to leave the wretched America for the shores of Eurabia, sorry, Europe and settle there and do theit bit (who am i kidding, these parasites won't contribute to anything).. They'll be the first ones to cry and beg those 'stupid' american marines to come and save their asses when the islamists one day decide, time to slit some throats. Yeah bon voyage @%%$!*&#$

Posted by: MathewK at March 15, 2006 11:06 PM (pVHqF)

6 Well, we know that roughly half the people are stupid, because they voted for Carter, Clinton, Gore, Kerry etc..

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 15, 2006 11:28 PM (0yYS2)

7 So what, if anything, are we going to do about it? Oh, thats an easy question little moonbat. You all will simper, whine, grovel, and generally be useless. What a moron.

Posted by: nuthin2seehere at March 16, 2006 02:43 AM (blNMI)

8 Ahhh, The rich irony of a leftist complaining about stupid Americans. The funny part is they accuse Republicans working to keep Americans stupid. Funny me, I always thought the Teacher's Industrial Complex (TIC) always supports leftists. That is, the people who fail at their job of educating Americans is leftist in nature.

Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at March 16, 2006 06:54 AM (ffPYG)

9 The worlds most stupidist people are the ones who live in HOLLYWOOD and donate to the demacrats in every election and give money to and do ads for PETA,SIERRA CLUB,GREENPEACE,NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and make dumb movies like WATERWORLD,FREE WILLIE, and many others of the same kind like BABE,GORDY etc

Posted by: sandpiper at March 16, 2006 09:45 AM (wksIu)

10 Comments most interesting? The comments posted are symtomatic of todays Dis-United States. Ah,name calling, that's great! That is why less than forty percent even get involved anymore. I am sure Rome declined the same way and then just became history. Oh, remember who ran the show after the republic collapsed.

Posted by: Nailman at March 17, 2006 07:28 AM (J+Rmd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 14, 2006

Robertson Utters *Shocking* Words: "Islam is NOT religion of peace"

I'm shocked, outraged, and mortified that any one--let alone a so-called Christian--would dare say that Islam is NOT a religion of peace. Clearly Pat Robertson is a bigot. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 08:46 AM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Islam is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retribution, murder and terror. Islam has no plan of salvation except for martyrdom rewarded with 72 virgins. This too is ridiculous, as there is no sex in heaven. Islam is foolishness and those who believe it are fools and being fooled. God allowed Ishmael's people (arabs) to prosper only because they are a living test for all of us. There is one God, one truth, and one salvation. Those who have it will make it, those that don't, won't. God will seperate the sheep from the goats when He is ready.

Posted by: steve lodahl at March 14, 2006 09:00 AM (T6Oe0)

2 It never was the religion of peace its the religion of intolerence and take over

Posted by: sandpiper at March 14, 2006 09:03 AM (b1Fi6)

3 I'm not sure what the outrage is. From what I've read of Robertson's comments he wasn't commenting on all Muslims; just those who acted in violence over the cartoons. Saying people killing other innocent people are acting under demonic influence doesn't seem like too big a stretch.

Posted by: anonymous at March 14, 2006 09:13 AM (LVj3O)

4 Hint: ironical.

Posted by: Rusty at March 14, 2006 09:15 AM (JQjhA)

5 This isn't the first time he has said this. About 18 months ago he said "Islam is not a peaceful religion. The way most muslims practise it may be peaceful but Islam isn't."

Posted by: lonely_soul at March 14, 2006 09:26 AM (gioZZ)

6 Yippee for Pat Robertson, more people need to come out and say it. Islam is Not a religion of peace!

Posted by: Patti at March 14, 2006 09:34 AM (2hEo4)

7 Robertson is always saying wild stuff to get attention. This time he hit the nail right on the head though.

Posted by: Howie at March 14, 2006 09:41 AM (D3+20)

8 Pat gets it right again (yes, he was right on Hugo Chavez too).

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2006 09:55 AM (8e/V4)

9 Well, a blind hog will find an acorn every now and then, and Pat found a dozzie this time. Pat has said some things in the past that would have been better left unsaid, but he got it right this time, so what can one say?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 10:15 AM (rUyw4)

10 Robertson has finally made a valid, though belated, observation! How tragic that he stupidly trashed his own credibility spouting off about Ariel Sharon, etc.

Posted by: Veritas Regina at March 14, 2006 10:39 AM (jXE2n)

11 Let us all pray for God to take Pat (dickhead) from us VERY SOON

Posted by: anon at March 14, 2006 11:41 AM (Hdn6c)

12 To me, Robertson is like many other idiots out there. Just because they get one thing right out of a thousand spazmodic utterances doesn't mean they regain any respect I may have ever had for them. Not that I ever had any for Robertson. And not that what he said isn't true by my own estimation either. But you get what I mean. I can get the same information from someone like Dr. Wafa Sultan and have a lot more respect for the individual as well as the message. Like JJ said, "A blind hog..."

Posted by: Oyster at March 14, 2006 11:43 AM (g9UJq)

13 "Islam is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retribution, murder and terror. Islam has no plan of salvation except for martyrdom rewarded with 72 virgins. This too is ridiculous, as there is no sex in heaven. Islam is foolishness and those who believe it are fools and being fooled." Stephen Let's reword that for paradigmswitch consumption: CHRISTIANITY is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retibution, murder and terror. CHRISTIANITY has no plan of salvation except for ARMAGEDDON. This too is ridiculous, as there is NO SALVATION in heaven. CHRISTIANITY is foolishness and thos who believe it are fools and are being fooled. There - THAT'S the reality check - CHRISTIANITY IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ISLAM ACCEPT THE "FLAVOR"...it's ALL MAN-MADE... Change is inevitable; growth is optional.

Posted by: mommadona at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM (E3g9r)

14 When will you all learn... the pope, sheiks, bishops, priests... you silly sheep. The lord says his "sheep" will be rescued... lol mmmm i love me some lamb chops!!! The big three are fake! lies lies, murder death an lies. all are flawed. all are wrong. Human beings continue with this foolishness but in the end you get nothing. Go ahead an tell God to personally drop me a line. I'll hear him out. But people like Pat can suck a D*ck

Posted by: 666 at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM (Hdn6c)

15 "Islam is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retribution, murder and terror. Islam has no plan of salvation except for martyrdom rewarded with 72 virgins. This too is ridiculous, as there is no sex in heaven. Islam is foolishness and those who believe it are fools and being fooled." Stephen Lodahl Let's reword that for paradigmswitch consumption: CHRISTIANITY is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retibution, murder and terror. CHRISTIANITY has no plan of salvation except for ARMAGEDDON. This too is ridiculous, as there is NO SALVATION in heaven. CHRISTIANITY is foolishness and thos who believe it are fools and are being fooled. There - THAT'S the reality check - CHRISTIANITY IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ISLAM ACCEPT THE "FLAVOR"...it's ALL MAN-MADE... Change is inevitable; growth is optional.

Posted by: mommadona at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM (E3g9r)

16 YOU GO PAT! Now, if he ever comes out and says, "Nuke Mecca", I'll buy him dinner at the Outback. Hear me, Pat? Steak dinner on me if you just say "Nuke Mecca".

/Frack islam is preferred, but I understand that he is a man of GOD an all.

Posted by: princesskimberley at March 14, 2006 12:49 PM (9xjdU)

17 mommadona: We heard you the first time. Of course, you fail to see that today isn't a conflict between Islam and Christians/Jews, but a conflict between secularism and theocracy. So while Christian is "no different from Islam" as you claim, it's still irrelevant. Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Scientologist, whatever you are doesn't matter. If you aren't a Muslim, your life isn't worth the paper it was printed on.

Posted by: Not your everyday anon poster at March 14, 2006 03:41 PM (tg91W)

18 In other words people, if you are not Muslim, then you must convert, pay the tax and live the life of the dhimmi if you are Christian or Jew, or die. There are your choices, mommadona. Pick one!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 03:49 PM (rUyw4)

19 Hmmmmm . .whose nickname is the "destroyer" and a "murderer from the beginning". Maybe we should realize the days are coming when all who profess Christ are in Satan's crosshairs . . .and why would he need Islam when so many of the world's governments are allied with him?

Posted by: Allen at March 14, 2006 04:12 PM (awp2E)

20 JJ: Mommadona won't pick one. Mommadona will go down shaking her fist at us instead of those throwing stones at her when she doesn't dhimmify herself. Or she'll be a good dhimmi and hate us instead of her masters. The anger and rage is almost always misplaced.

Posted by: Oyster at March 14, 2006 04:59 PM (YudAC)

21 I guess I'm trying to find something that is wrong or offensive to anyone who isn't a Muslim, a leftist, or an idiot.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at March 14, 2006 05:00 PM (g3Opx)

22 Yep, oyster, she will don the burka and take it out on someone else. The Left wants to blame everyone but the Islamists for what they do. For the life of me I cannot understand this alliance between the Left and the very people who seek to destroy them.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 07:25 PM (rUyw4)

23 Knowledge ends where religion begins. "The most ridiculous concept ever perpetrated by Homo Sapiens is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of his creations, that he can be persuaded by their prayers, and becomes petulant if he does not receive this flattery. Yet this ridiculous notion, without one real shred of evidence to bolster it, has gone on to found one of the oldest, largest and least productive industries in history." Robert Heinlein

Posted by: Vancouverchap at March 14, 2006 09:01 PM (MWHpq)

24 Found on an LGF thread: Displacment: when you take your fears of the real threat and project them on to an imaginary threat, one which will never actually harm you in the way that the real one would. By doing so you get to express the fear without actually risking harm. But you also never confront the real threat. These people know well and good the the Christians and the Bushies are not going to hurt them...and they have to express hatred and anger and "fear" at something. Wafa Sultan knows what fear is. A Coptic Christian knows what fear is. Corrie Ten Boom knew what fear was. These moron leftists have no clue what fear is. --Taq

Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at March 14, 2006 09:02 PM (j8OrO)

25 Yes, vancouverchap, you addresseded the required trash the Christians mantra, but you have said nothing about the real danger, which is being forcibly overwhelmed by Islam.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 10:51 PM (rUyw4)

26 Taqiyyotomist, that about sums it up. And nicely too.

Posted by: Oyster at March 15, 2006 04:28 AM (YudAC)

27 But they will, Taq, they will!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 15, 2006 04:54 AM (rUyw4)

28 vancouvercrap, Heinlein's only qualification to spout off about God is that he wrote science FICTION books, i.e., books about martians and ray guns. Not to mention his book "Starship Troopers" is considered pretty solid evidence he was a closet fascist. He probably never even got laid either.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 09:25 AM (8e/V4)

29 When the Lord comes back, He will talk.

Posted by: Lee at April 23, 2006 05:47 AM (pgOL6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 13, 2006

Political Opportunist

Russ Feingold is entering his bid for the Democratic nomination in '08 with a brazen bit of political pandering aimed directly at the lunatic Left. Feingold thinks that the President should be censured for protecting the country from terrorist attacks. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:53 AM | Comments (46) | Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Maybe He can protect the usa from a terrorist attack! I couldn't! I mean who has time to read a PDB?

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 02:25 AM (BJYNn)

2 Any you swell people need cheaper merchandise? cause my #2 man in home land security has got hiself a system that can get you stuff for you for free. Y'all can read about it here...http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1712023 love y'all

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 02:32 AM (BJYNn)

3 I know how you feel about negras and hispanicos but I gotta tell you guys a secret. I fuck Condi three times a week.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 02:35 AM (BJYNn)

4 Russ is a dick.

Posted by: Filthy at March 13, 2006 05:16 AM (Mz14N)

5 If ever there was a cause for censure it would be comments 1, 2 and 3. I had actually decided to listen to Feingold and hear what he has to say before I condemn him simply for being a liberal Dem. But I can see now I was simply having a momentary lapse of reason.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 06:02 AM (YudAC)

6 Thank You Oyster for your fine support, not only your of myself and our fine party but of everything our great party stands for. Great things such as multiple marriages and divorces, while we accuse others of ruining the sanctity of marriage, proclaiming the culture of life, while we start phony wars that kill thousands, plus tax cuts for the top 1 percent, which we pay for by screwing people like our serve men. Oh and don' forget campaign kickbacks almost forgot how much we great Republicans love those, and now I guess...you can ad shoplifting to the list of great thing Laura and myself and great supporters like you stand for. Keep up The great work Oyster I know being a true blue patriot is hard work...it's hard work.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 06:24 AM (BJYNn)

7 oops I meant to type your support of people like myself. Typing is it's a it's hard work. Well Condi awaits.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 06:26 AM (BJYNn)

8 serve men hehehehe I meant service men...I think.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 06:29 AM (BJYNn)

9 And liberals wonder why they can't get elected?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 07:09 AM (rUyw4)

10 Dude, I won't address you again. You're too stupid.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 07:13 AM (YudAC)

11 Does someone spray this site with moron-loser-hippie pheromones everyday?

Posted by: Graeme at March 13, 2006 07:16 AM (EhST2)

12 No, Graeme, spraying is not required, as insects are always drawn to light.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 08:17 AM (rUyw4)

13 Fiengold the author of the CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM so whats this reptile up to?

Posted by: sandpiper at March 13, 2006 09:26 AM (7/75z)

14 >>>while we accuse others of ruining the sanctity of marriage, proclaiming the culture of life, while we start phony wars that kill thousands, what does the "sanctity of marriage" have anything to do with starting "phony wars". Are you people really as retarded as you sound? Did you not receive a formal education? What is wrong with you mind? It's not working at full capacity.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 09:31 AM (8e/V4)

15 ...with your mind.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 09:32 AM (8e/V4)

16 Apt analogy JJ.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 13, 2006 10:45 AM (0yYS2)

17 Thank You Oyster for your fine support, not only your of myself and our fine party but of everything our great party stands for. Great things such as multiple marriages and divorces, while we accuse others of ruining the sanctity of marriage, proclaiming the culture of life, while we start phony wars that kill thousands, plus tax cuts for the top 1 percent, which we pay for by screwing people like our serve men. Oh and don' forget campaign kickbacks almost forgot how much we great Republicans love those, and now I guess...you can ad shoplifting to the list of great thing Laura and myself and great supporters like you stand for. Keep up The great work Oyster I know being a true blue patriot is hard work...it's hard work. That's the kind of stream of thought rant that gives moonbats their reputation for being insane. It's just a litany of unrelated talking points, strung together as one rant. Forget a thesis sentence, forget the facts, no analysis or conclusion. Just vomit. I swear these people have no education!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 10:54 AM (8e/V4)

18 How did his name get changed from "George W. Bush" to "Angry Teen"? Whoever did it, that's funny!

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 11:35 AM (g9UJq)

19 Angry mindless immature teen would be more accurate!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 11:41 AM (rUyw4)

20 How did his name get changed from "George W. Bush" to "Angry Teen"? Easy: by the Mussolini look-alike who runs this sorry-ass excuse for a blog. Don't want TOO many dissenting views in the echo chamber!!!!!

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 12:14 PM (UHKaK)

21 You didn't give any dissenting views. What you did was act like an immature asshole. If you have something to say, act like an adult and you will be treated as such.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 01:06 PM (rUyw4)

22 >>>act like an adult and you will be treated as such. That's a fact. Most Lib dissenters who come here to spew are treated respectfully if they come respectfully. You won't be deleted or banned because of what you say, but HOW you say it. Come here as a troll with an attitude and you'll be treated as such.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 01:19 PM (8e/V4)

23 Oh come on, I've been dumped on plenty in anything but respectful tones here, no matter how rationally I've tried engaging in subjects near and dear to the New Republicans hearts (that includes threats of de-fleshing). The idea that this place is about objective exchanges of passionate viewpoints is a little, uh...disingenuous. That aside, the primary statement made here that Feingold is an opportunist is without merit. Yes, Feingold is no fan of the Bushes and has had plenty of clashes with their undertakings, including voting against the war. But it's not like his opposition to infringments on civil liberties started with GWB; before that it was with the Clinton administration over separation of powers issues. Matter of fact, he was the only Democrat who broke party ranks in 1999 to oppose a proposal to dismiss charges against Clinton before the Senate trial on the impeachment charges against the Democratic president had been completed. Look it up; the guy is a Constitutionalist. His latest move toward censure is absolutely in line with his previous actions, including toward Democrats who don't walk the walk after talking their talk.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 01:42 PM (UHKaK)

24 >>>(that includes threats of de-fleshing) lmao! That must have been Maxie. But look how well-spoken you are in your last 3 paragraphs. See, you can do it!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 01:46 PM (8e/V4)

25 Well, just for the record, that first guy (Bush Condi)wasn't me!

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 01:49 PM (UHKaK)

26 Then why didn't you say that to begin with rather than acting like a retarded idiot? You see, that's the problem, anytime someone here refutes the arguments of people like you, they are subjected to personal invective. And if one person here wishes to separate your flesh from your body, well, that doesn't mean the rest of us do.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 01:51 PM (rUyw4)

27 Valid point Joe.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 02:01 PM (UHKaK)

28 lol! I love this blog.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 02:04 PM (8e/V4)

29 So now, sir, make all the points you wish, but prepare to defend them, but please, all leave the personal invective behind.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 02:11 PM (rUyw4)

30 Fair enough. What say you, then, on the above?

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 02:26 PM (UHKaK)

31 I understand that Feingold may feel he has the necessary information to uphold cause for censure, but what about the group of Senators who were apprised of the program all along? Do they not have a responsibility for knowing whether or not the program they sign off on contains illegal procedures or affronts on individual Americans' rights? There is still significant debate going on among legal scholars on the legality of the program. What makes Feingold think his conclusion is the correct one? Whether one thinks Feingold is correct on this issue, for most people, is already based on a simple political opinion of George Bush. Not the actual legality of the program.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 02:30 PM (g9UJq)

32 Easy: by the Mussolini look-alike who runs this sorry-ass excuse for a blog. Don't want TOO many dissenting views in the echo chamber!!!!! Buy a copy of: The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. After being arrested on the frontline by counterintelligence officers because he wrote a letter to an old school friend criticizing the regime, he was taken to the Gulag. He also details the spying on, detention, arrest and execution of thousands of people who were considered dissidents by the Government, some for living in the same apartment complex as a dissident, or because they were considered associates of a "dissident", it did not matter if they were young, or old -- man or woman. You might get a education on the actions and motives of real "dictators" and evil regimes, so instead of comparing every little slight as being a dictatorship, you might actually know what one means.

Posted by: davec at March 13, 2006 02:38 PM (CcXvt)

33 From my understanding, that is a small group of Senators indeed, but yes, I think the ones that did know failed miserabley in their duties. I don't know exactly what is required for censure, if there are standards that have to be met or not, but I believe even Feingold knows this is an entirely symbolic gesture, especially in light of a Democratic opposition that likes to tread pretty lightly even when calling Bush on the carpet. Whether Feindgold is ultimately correct or not, I like to see such individualism in today's world of go-along-to-get-along politicians. I can't speak for everyone, but going by Feingold's past records of questioning politicans on both sides of the aisle, I think there's more to these censure efforts than politics as usual.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 02:47 PM (UHKaK)

34 Ok, name change, I will respond. Of all the liberals in Congress, I kinda like Russ Feingold. I believe him to be wrong, but he, at least, has credibility on the issue. As Bush will leave office, never to be reelected, I fail to see what purpose such a censure would serve, other than causing a political firestorm. By the way, I was completely against much of the silliness that took place in regards to Bill Clinton. Perhaps Feingold wishes to energize his supporters, and that might be valid were it not for the damage it would do the country. But, hey, go for it Russ, and expect heavy opposition.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 02:48 PM (rUyw4)

35 >>>Feingold thinks that the President should be censured for protecting the country from terrorist attacks. And exactly how many terrorist attacks have occurred in our country since 9/11? That's a question for Mr. Feingold.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 02:50 PM (8e/V4)

36 "From my understanding, that is a small group of Senators indeed, but yes, I think the ones that did know failed miserabley in their duties." Yes, it was a small group - from both sides of the aisle. Even those hostile toward Bush. For instance, Nancy Pelosi. Who, the moment the program became public knowledge, releases to the media a letter she wrote to Bush claiming her "reservations" about the program. A letter she wrote AFTER she gave it her signature and BEFORE she signed off a dozen more times after every review of the program. What did Nancy have to say about her letter later? Nothing. Is Nancy on board with Feingold's suggestion for censure? We'll see.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 03:11 PM (g9UJq)

37 Carlos. None. And if I was Feingold, I would probably respond: Mr Bush, I don't think you can claim any particular credit for the lack of terrorist attacks in this country following the invasion of Iraq, no more so than Bill Clinton could take credit for the five years of domestic calm following the first WTC attack or the three years that passed after Oklahoma City Â—- both without starting wars incidently. Or if you can, than so can Clinton I suppose, but again, he did it without invasion.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 03:25 PM (UHKaK)

38 Oyster: Don't think I support Nancy Pelosi; no matter what the issue, her knowledge of the policy surrounding it is a study in shallowness. One more reason I like Feingold; a deep knowledge of policy and with the guts to take a stand that may not be particularly popular that day.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 03:51 PM (UHKaK)

39 Name change, I hear we may get a quick vote(perhaps tomorrow) on Feingold's motion for censure of the President. Sounds to me like most Democrats want nothing to do with it, or want to delay it until a time of their choosing. We shall see, but it should make for some fun.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 04:41 PM (rUyw4)

40 Spot the successful Clinton military action: A

Operation Desert Fox B

Operation Gothic Serpent C

Operation Deliberate Force D

Operation Allied Force E

None of the Above.

Posted by: davec at March 13, 2006 04:52 PM (CcXvt)

41 davec, you de man. Haha!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 04:57 PM (rUyw4)

42 I haven't mentioned defleshing, decapitating, or even defenestrating, (look it up, you won't be sorry), in a while, but mainly because I've been tired from working to support all the unwashed masses.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 13, 2006 06:10 PM (0yYS2)

43 Name change, I wasn't implying you were supportive of Pelosi. Anyone who does support her is too far left and too far gone to even talk to. Just a pre-emptive strike on anyone who tries to claim Bush staffed that particular group with "yes-men". I'll still give Feingold a fair shake. I won't have an opinion about him yet. Frankly, I don't have the time in a day to keep up with all these guys. So until it gets closer to '08 ....

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 06:19 PM (YudAC)

44 You pre-schoolers should start your own blog where you can babble and bicker and leave the mature sites for the disciplined and educated!

Posted by: TowerofBabel at March 14, 2006 10:25 AM (Y2ILH)

45 And would you care to elaborate on who the pre-schoolers are in this thread, Tower?

Posted by: Oyster at March 14, 2006 10:49 AM (g9UJq)

46 WorldSex Daily Updated Free Links to Hardcore Sex Pictures, Movies, Free Porn Videos and XXX Live Sex Cams

Posted by: SEXMENS at April 06, 2006 09:24 PM (osTpd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 11, 2006

In the Presence of Moonbats

In his inaugural post, Sig94, retired cop (Signal 94 means "end of shift") relates his experiences sitting high in the Moonbat Gallery during Ann Coulter's recent appearance at Syracuse University:

My favorite Q&A response was the person who complained that because George Bush cut student loan allocations by $12 billion that Â“my interest rates for loans will rise to 6.8%. What is your response to this?!?!Â”
Ms. CoulterÂ’s reply: Â“ThatÂ’s because there are far too many of you who really donÂ’t belong in college.Â”
Up until then I had remained silent. Now I laughed my ass off. I made sure it was a deep, sustained, bellowing guffaw. The moonbats all around me didnÂ’t say a word. And because they are moonbats they didn't understand the implied concept of supply and demand. Priceless, simply priceless.

I had the pleasure of dining with Sig94 yesterday, arranged by Cookie from The Cookshack - Gab & Grub. Go read the rest.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:31 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Yup that is priceless. If we only had a video clip :-) I look forward to your posts Bluto.

Posted by: Javapuke at March 11, 2006 11:06 AM (uo0A0)

2 Unfortunately, Sig94 does not allow non-Blogger comments nor has he posted any way to contact him via email so I guess I'm left to comment here about it. There's a lot to say about his post (and believe me, I got great pleasure in reading it) and not enough room to say it here, but I will comment on one aspect he brought up that I've always found intriguing about leftist protesters in general. Aside from the fact that they so often seem disheveled and appear to have not bathed recently while displaying a very limited vocabulary, I've always been curious why, when engaging in a protest in which they expect to be taken seriously, they so often wear some of the most outrageous "outfits" imaginable. I mean really, what point is one trying to make by going out on the street with a poorly worded and misspelled sign while wearing a tutu, a bare chest sporting a grease-penciled peace sign and an Arafat style keffiyeh? Call me old-fashioned, but I can't take these people seriously. When speaking about the front row occupants of the theatre, this line got me laughing out loud: "One guy still had the remains of a wide receiver hanging out of the side of his mouth." Thanx, Bluto. That one was a real gem.

Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 11:13 AM (YudAC)

3 The fact that a conservative public speaker even needs bodyguards shows to what extent the American Left resembles the Brownshirts of the Weimar Republic. Even their clownish attire might be considered a uniform of sorts.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 11, 2006 11:20 AM (8e/V4)

4 Sig94 has just started his blog, so I'll ask him about the anonymous comments issue.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 11, 2006 12:04 PM (RHG+K)

5 Nevertheless, I blog-rolled him. I'll be going back anyway.

Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 12:45 PM (YudAC)

6 Oyster To them - because life is art - and art is a performance - and "performance art" is a very successful way to get peoples attention and present your point. Its not of course - it actually backfires bigtime and is key to their failures - but they will never acknowledge this - or even accept it as a "joke" - which is perfectly fine with me! Many libs and the MSM do however know this - and are often embarrassed by it. Note - when the MSM covers them, they use tight narrow shots and controlled handpicked interviews to attempt to conceal this embarrassing stupidity. Oh - how does allleged cuts in allocations affect interest rates in this case? The kid confused me - which is not surprising.

Posted by: hondo at March 11, 2006 01:18 PM (fyKFC)

7 Ooops. Sorry about that! Bluto slapped me upside the head and the comments are now fixed. This is my very first blog and I have alot to learn. Please be patient with me. And thanks a million Jawa!

Posted by: sig94 at March 11, 2006 01:32 PM (BnMdL)

8 Yay, thanks, Sig.

Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 01:47 PM (YudAC)

9 Hey I have an even better idea than what Bush did. Stop stealing my money and giving it to moonbats so they can go to college. I'm a hardworking young man putting myself through school, and I seriously resent that part of the 15% or so that comes out of my check every 2 weeks is going to put people I absolutely despise through school. What ever happened to freedom of association? Or does my money no longer count for that?

Posted by: MiB at March 12, 2006 01:13 PM (VeYWn)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

201kb generated in CPU 0.0439, elapsed 0.1548 seconds.
135 queries taking 0.1256 seconds, 573 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 2949
Files: 9
Bytes: 38.0M
CPU Time: 1:26
Queries: 335476

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76633

Feeds

April 17, 2006

April 14, 2006

April 10, 2006

April 07, 2006

April 05, 2006

March 31, 2006

March 30, 2006

March 29, 2006

March 22, 2006

March 18, 2006

March 17, 2006

March 16, 2006

March 15, 2006

March 14, 2006

March 13, 2006

March 11, 2006

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds