mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

March 31, 2006

ACLU: Jesus=Bad, Mosque=Good

Posted by: Rusty at 10:19 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.

1 If the US does not wake up and stop this, I predict we will see jihadist training camps springing up all over the US. Good God, what is the thinking of the Corp and the US Government?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 31, 2006 10:33 AM (rUyw4)

2 its not just the people in power to blame its the citizens who dont give a sh#t and just let it happen

Posted by: ianm at March 31, 2006 12:06 PM (GhCfc)

3 The ALCU are nuts. The minority always seems to be heard the loudest. Joe if have training camps we're in trouble

Posted by: Robert Savage at March 31, 2006 01:43 PM (xLcBf)

4 I can't wait to do night ops on a terrorist camp close to home. My wife will not let me go to far, so I have to wait until they come close to me. 0200hr wake up on a three quarter moon. Of course, that's if my wife will let me go.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 31, 2006 03:11 PM (D2g/j)

5 ACLU the Atheist.Communist. and Lawyers. Underground the legal arm of such as THE WEATHERMAN UNDERGROUND and other 70s terrorists groups need anymore reason to revoke the ACLUs tax exempt status and maybe indite thm all?

Posted by: sandpiper at April 01, 2006 08:57 AM (uo3LX)

6 Deal with the fact that today in North America, many college students will never have the opportunity to hear the gospel of Jesus Christ. College students, numbering approximately 16 million, are one of the most significant and unevangelized people groups in North America. The battle for the souls of collegians is growing more desperate each year. Research indicates that more churches are closing every year than are being started, conversions to other religions and dropouts from Christianity are escalating, and it takes on average 85 Christians working an entire year to produce one convert. The collegiate church starting strategy summarized below is an attempt to address the non-Christians found on North AmericaÂ’s college campuses in light of the declining resolve of many local churches to enter the collegiate world with the gospel of Christ.

Posted by: Ilohim gadol at April 06, 2006 04:17 PM (zqsRN)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 30, 2006

Cynthia McKinney: Why She Punched That Pesky Cop

Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) allegedly assaulted an officer of the law earlier today, when he failed to recognize her as she rushed past a metal detector. While members of Congress are not required to go through the Capitol metal detectors, they are supposed to present their credentials. McKinney was in too big a hurry to be bothered complying with one of the people who help ensure her safety. According to witnesses, she hit him in the chest with her cell phone. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:04 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 343 words, total size 2 kb.

March 29, 2006

Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi to Personally Liquidate Osama

From the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON - Congressional Democrats promise to "eliminate" Osama bin Laden and ensure a "responsible redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq in 2006 in an election-year national security policy statement.

Please pardon my skepticism, but this comes from a political party that represents those who pretty much agree with Osama bin Laden.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:39 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Will they also dish out witty one liners as they kill OBL with their bare hands?

Posted by: Rusty at March 29, 2006 12:43 PM (JQjhA)

2 Don't ask them hey're going to do it, Rusty... the important part is saying they will.

Posted by: Brian B at March 29, 2006 01:03 PM (rGfpg)

3 I think they'll kill him with the one-liners. And I must say that I am shocked, shocked I tell you that they openly advocate violating Osama's civil rights. What about the Geneva Conventions? Oh, the humanity...

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 29, 2006 01:04 PM (RHG+K)

4 One liners ? Osama has heard them before. The first time I heard them I believed them, now I am not so sure.

Posted by: john Ryan at March 29, 2006 01:25 PM (nkDPg)

5 We really ought to have a contest: What will Harry Reid say as he personally blasts OBL? "Tell Satan Dirty Harry sent you!"

Posted by: Rusty at March 29, 2006 01:29 PM (JQjhA)

6 Stop me if you've heard this before: How do you intend to stabilize Iraq to withdraw our troops? I have a plan for Iraq how do you intend to get the United Nations involved with Iraq? I have a plan to get the United Nations involved in Iraq How do you intend to fight the war on terror? I have a plan to fight the war on terror It's the John Kerry "I have a plan™ for < insert situation here>" Welcome to the new plan, same as the last plan. No details, nothing other than a promise.

Posted by: davec at March 29, 2006 01:34 PM (CcXvt)

7 I'm shocked too, Bluto. What? No trial? No ACLU lawyers? Where's Ramsey Clarke when you need him? Why Nancy Pelosihitler and harry Reidmarx are trying to turn us into a fascist state. I feel an uncontrollable urge to start an "imsorryosama.com" site to make sure he understands that we respect his right to exist.

Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 01:41 PM (rGS2g)

8 Right,left repubcrat or democan, we all have plans don't we? What a pack of fools on both sides. What would happen if all this absurd scapegoating stopped and someone actually took responsibility based on reality,not some dunderheaded political myth?

Posted by: whatthe at March 29, 2006 02:04 PM (VSHgb)

9 I'm still tryin' to figure this one out - if we re-locate out the enemy will come to us? If we re-locate out - then it's totally out of the region - no one's gonna take us in (why would they). OK - so let's re-locate back to the States! Weather is nicer and shopping and amenities much better. Let'em come! It would be a hell of a lot more efficent and easier cleaning up after a car/truck bombing when all the casualties speak English and most have health insurance. Works for me.

Posted by: hondo at March 29, 2006 05:24 PM (StM4D)

10 Maybe they meant that they plan to eliminate him from the dhimmicratic party?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 30, 2006 06:48 AM (0yYS2)

11 The secret plan: Howard Dean and John Kerry get on Kerry's magical flying swiftboat and Kerry uses his Vietnam-senses (think Spider-senses) to detect where Osamma is. They descend and Dean uses his Hypersonic Scream of Justice to collapse the cave on Osamma.

Posted by: Ranba Ral at March 30, 2006 10:52 AM (GyNTD)

12 You mean they dont want to play a freindly game of checkers with his?

Posted by: sandpiper at April 01, 2006 09:04 AM (uo3LX)

13 WorldSex Daily Updated Free Links to Hardcore Sex Pictures, Movies, Free Porn Videos and XXX Live Sex Cams

Posted by: SEXMENS at April 06, 2006 09:24 PM (8RU62)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 22, 2006

Charlie Sheen: CIA, Jews, Space Aliens Caused 9/11

Via Michelle.

The best thing about this article is that it claims Sheen is a "prominent credible" whistleblower. Charlie Sheen is prominent? Charlie Sheen is credible? Charlie Sheen is a whistleblower?

Charlie. Sheen. Prominent. Credible. Whistleblower.

I need to let that one sink in for a bit.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:07 PM | Comments (50) | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Mr. Carlos Irwin EstÃƒÂ©vez probably thinks he was in a documentary when he filmed The Arrival. You've got to consider the source.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at March 22, 2006 04:16 PM (0fZB6)

2 hahaha! thanks for the belly laugh. Now add an exclamation mark to that headline and it's a go.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 22, 2006 04:18 PM (8e/V4)

3 A whistleblower as prominent and credible as Charlie Sheen can hardly be expected to believe this nonsense. It seems far more likely he is in the service of an ALIEN POWER. Maybe those lizard people from V.

Posted by: Flea at March 22, 2006 04:22 PM (KO3l2)

4 Well technically they didn't say what area his credibility comes from. If you think about it, he is a credible public figure.............on the subject of the extortionate prices charged for cocaine and high priced call girls.

Posted by: Graeme at March 22, 2006 04:33 PM (0yOLq)

5 Alex Jones wrote the story? *The* Alex Jones? *Bwahahahaha!!!!* Excuse me, I have to go to an Illuminati meeting via my black helicopter. It's being held at a Mena, Arkansas, airfield.

Posted by: elgato at March 22, 2006 04:38 PM (kV59d)

6 The Cat [elgato] beat me to it. Alex jones was greg's favorite. He quoted Jones just about every other post. He probably had wet dreams about him when he wasn't here touting every word that left Jones' mouth as if it were gospel. The apple truly doesn't fall far from the tree. Look at who Charlie's father is.

Posted by: Oyster at March 22, 2006 05:02 PM (g9UJq)

7 I've certainly called him a whistle blower. Or at least something to that effect.

Posted by: a4g at March 22, 2006 05:10 PM (yfmd5)

8 If being credible means I've got to bed many I high priced hooker, marry and make babies with a hottie who posed in Playboy, and divorce her in favor of the hookers... where do I sign up?

Posted by: jwookie at March 22, 2006 06:16 PM (x0sPW)

9 A leader who seeks soley his own council is a dangerous man! Object lesson in progress!

Posted by: Thesaurus at March 22, 2006 06:20 PM (Y2ILH)

10 Maybe Greg can be his agent.

Posted by: davec at March 22, 2006 06:37 PM (CcXvt)

11 What can you expect from a guy who "dates" prostitutes? BTW, have you all heard what Richard Belzer said the other evening on the Bill Maher show? An actual F.A.G. (reference Team America) member at work! I used all of my knowledge from the Psychology 101 class that I took decades ago to diagnose the imbecile: http://dmdlp.blogspot.com/2006/03/munchahole-syndrome.html

Posted by: Don Miguel at March 22, 2006 06:44 PM (UAn5X)

12 whats so wrong with *dating* prostitutes?

Posted by: Rubin at March 22, 2006 06:55 PM (FlPMW)

13 I'm glad Charlie is on the case. Maybe he can connect the dots and tell us what REALLY happened! I think insanity must run in that family.

Posted by: Richard at March 22, 2006 07:34 PM (7KF8r)

14 Prostitutes are people too! We are all going to pay for it one way or another. Well, most of us.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 22, 2006 07:57 PM (D2g/j)

15 Whistleblower=actor who has played a person in government albeit fictional.spin city. Credible=son of another actor who was president, albeit fictional. Prominent=Man who was in a little black book of a infamous hollywood madam(with many little stars next to his name.)

Posted by: patrick at March 22, 2006 08:05 PM (7KYmz)

16 Sounds like he needs to get his own whistle blown and leave politics alone. Or maybe it was blown one too many times like Bill Clinton...

Posted by: RepJ at March 22, 2006 10:00 PM (KpfBT)

17 charlie sheen must think all of us who graduated from high school must admire people like him who failed to graduate from high school, and only skill set for the working life is reading lines from a teleprompter. i think rush limbaugh once mentioned charlie is the guy with so much compassion for the homeless in malibu he got the city to permit the homeless to reside in the city, and when the homeless started to use charlie's property for their tents, he drove them away.

Posted by: red state voter living in a blue state at March 22, 2006 11:58 PM (7MWJo)

18 Charlie is doing drugs again. And drinking. And God help him, thinking. Never forget that his best thinking got him to Hydie's. Oh, and caused Denise Richards to divorce him. Maybe his contract is up, or something.

Posted by: Tom at March 23, 2006 07:15 AM (w68a9)

19 I got to quit laughing so much, my guts hurt.

Posted by: 10ksnooker at March 23, 2006 07:17 AM (7evkT)

20 Charle Sheen a chip off the old blockhead

Posted by: sandpiper at March 23, 2006 09:37 AM (1LUQw)

21 Yeah, when CNN covers it, now that makes it fact. I'm laughing too hard to finish my post.......it was on the Hollywood report......hahahahahaha!!!!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 10:33 AM (rUyw4)

22 you dumb neocon sheep,eveything charlie said was the truth,Silverstein admitted he pulled the building,it takes weeks to prepare to bring down a building,not hours,morons

Posted by: dale at March 23, 2006 03:18 PM (fM9Xc)

23 dale, did you attend a public school in a blue state city, or were you home-schooled by an idiot? It has to be one of the two.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 04:41 PM (rUyw4)

24 All he did is as for the truth. And all you people who can't handle the truth, you should show the evidence...show us all the pentagon videos. Right you can't becuase you not what you speak of. If you can't admit 9/11 changed your rights as US Citizen then Stop basing your opinion on non facts. Until One of you can produce an actual video of the pentagon being hit but the plane that they claimed hit the building keep quiet.

Posted by: Rick at March 23, 2006 10:27 PM (jEhqx)

25 I've got that video Rick, right next to my Alien Autopsy DVD, and my vacation shots from Area 51, where I got to ride in the captured alien spacecraft and meet Zq-Werty-u-Iop, its pilot, with whom I later played a round of golf. On the moon. The bunkers were hell.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 24, 2006 06:19 AM (0yYS2)

26 Rick, you're drunk, or high, or stupid. Which is it?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 10:21 AM (rUyw4)

27 lol for one this is no alien crap. This is reality. Call it what you like, call me what you want you words mean nothing when your sitting in a prison camp. It's called news read it. When the day you realize all your rights as a citizen have been taken away and you realize you had a chance to know the truth be it in favor of your government or "conspiracy theory people". It's not about politics is about rights as a US citizen to get the fact good or bad. All Sheen and 75% of the US is wanting is a Logical answer to simple questions why is so hard for the administration to tell the truth. As for nut cases explain how a guy like Alex Jones 2 months prior to 9/11 can warn people of a terrorist attack in the portion to Pearl Harbor and name the conspirator that would be blamed. Either this guy is a terrorist himself, Psychic, or just as I think He follows the news and actually reads it for what it is. You have a right to your opinion just remember right before your final breath you chose your fate and will stand by it 100%. And your proud to be apart of this country.

Posted by: Rick at March 24, 2006 03:40 PM (jEhqx)

28 Rick, tell me which one of your rights have been violated. You people please tell me something you can't do today that you could do 10 years ago. Tell me who is about to put you in a prison camp, and for what reason. I'm waiting for you to make some sense.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 07:33 PM (rUyw4)

29 Popular Mechanics Attacks Its "9/11 LIES" Straw Man by Jim Hoffman Version 1.2, February 9, 2005 The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11. The article's approach is to identify and attack a series of claims which it asserts represent the whole of 9/11 skepticism. It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack. Read the rest of the article here: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/ P.S. Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff's 25-year old cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, penned the Popular Mechanics piece on 9/11 sceptics. This represents a huge conflict of interest. Do your own research. Watch this video and tell me it does not raise some questions: "9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?" http://youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I Watch the video of this speech wich origionally aired on C-Span: The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions David Ray Griffin Description: David Ray Griffin takes a critical look at the official 9/11 Commission Report. Professor Griffin argues that "omissions and distortions" in the report amount to a cover-up by government officials and says that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Professor Griffin covers topics he says have been inadequately answered by the commission. These include questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon, the way in which the World Trade Center towers collapsed, and the behavior of President Bush and his Secret Service detail following notification that a second plane had hit the WTC. The talk was hosted by the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth (www.mujca.com) and took place at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Includes Q&A. Author Bio: David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, where he taught for over 30 years (retiring in 2004). He has authored or edited over two dozen books, including "God and Religion in the Postmodern World," "Religion and Scientific Naturalism," and "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11." http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

Posted by: Erik at March 25, 2006 06:55 AM (zh/NE)

30 Yes Rick, I choose my fate, and I will stand by my choice, unto death. As long as I can take some muslims and leftards with me, that is.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 25, 2006 07:21 AM (0yYS2)

31 My choice is to support a guy who has more to lose than of us, Charlie Sheen. Ask yourself what a guy of his wealth and popularity would have to gain from doing speaking out on a topic like this. Go ahead say he's crazy. Blame his father. Bash his past. Bash is movies. Be as ignorant as the next guy. All he is asking of The Government is to answer doubt in his mind to clear up the controversy. I don't think he's doing to run for president. I applaud him for having enough balls as a citizen to speak out publicly. What could really harm you if they re-investigate this issue....nothing. Unless there truth may be is what he says. Improbulus I myself had the same feelings about couple of years ago. All that is asked of you is read up on this and not just 1 article. Educate yourself. If 1 thing of this day can cast a shadow of doubt about 9/11 investigate. To many strange coincidences shroud this event not just the event itself but the lead up to the events and after. Either those terrorist won the jihadist lottery or something's doesn't fit in the puzzle.

Posted by: Rick at March 25, 2006 01:31 PM (jEhqx)

32 Please take the time to listen to the questions Charlie poses. You will see that they are very legitimate and remain unanswered. Namely the collapse of WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING 7. The FEMA report had this to say about the collapse of WTC 7. "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5) http://www.wtc7.net/ http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html The owner of WTC 7 admitted in a PBS documentary to "pulling" the building. "Pull it" is a demolition term for bringing down a building. "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." Larry Silverstein - owner of WTC 7 Putting explosives in a building takes weeks and could not have been placed between the time of the first two tower collapses and the collapse of WTC 7. WTC7 shares all the characteristics of a controlled demolition and has yet to be explained by the government. Millions of people all over the world question the official US government story of 9/11 for very good reasons, and namely the collapse of WTC Building 7. Don't be so quick to proclaim Charlie Sheen is stupid and wrong if you have not done any research regarding the subject. Look at what he is asking instead of just attacking Charlie Sheen's character over the internet. If Charlie Sheen is so wrong just present evidence that proves him wrong. Challenge him on the facts not his personnal life.

Posted by: Andy White at March 25, 2006 03:56 PM (z6oqu)

33 Operation Northwoods: In 1962 the Joint Chiefs of Staff were going to paint a plane like a commercial airliner and swap it with a real one. Then they were gonna shoot it down and blame Castro for it. Then go to war against Cuba using this fake terrorism. The document shows that they were not opposed to killing civilians to make this plan happen. I think maybe they finally got around to using this tactic on Sept 11, 2001. All you have to do is read history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Posted by: Truth for a Change at March 26, 2006 02:49 AM (lYFpY)

34 You guys are sad. Charlie has done his research. And for anyone to demonize his personal life shows a deep concern to obstruct the facts that he brings up.... 911 was an inside job. Do a google search for 911 Bush and see what you get. Wake up now, or wake up later in a POLICE STATE.

Posted by: James Powell at March 27, 2006 12:30 AM (dgmhr)

35 No American administration would ever do anything to harm innocent civillians. Charlie Sheen is a nutjob. I love Bush and teh official version of events for 911 is the truth. The terrists knew they'd be able to fly around in the most protected airspace on the palnet without getting shot down or intercepted as they knew our air defences would be busy doing other stuff. Those terrists were smart/physcic and Charlie Sheen sleeps with protistsutes so don't listen to him. Terrists did it because they hate our freedoms. I don't want to listen to lefties. Or Rightities. I don't read books. Or watch the news. Terrists did it. My dad says terrirsts did it and he should know cos he went to high school. He doesn't watch the news either.

Posted by: Dean at March 27, 2006 05:33 AM (36kR5)

36 charlie sheen did not speak of aliens and other weird stuff he just asks for answers your government isn't giving you. please look at the facts and come to your own conclusion. when was the last time your government told you something that wasn't a lie

Posted by: casaubon at March 27, 2006 06:33 AM (JALOd)

37 Despite the use of such classic tin accusation terms such as Jews and Space Aliens used, Sheen said so such thing. He had some questions about specific aspects. However his overall message is that he didn't know it all, that he simply wanted people to question things for themselves. Here is a short list of people who spoke out before Mr. Sheen about their concerns about 9-11. * Former head of Star Wars and air force colonel, Bob Bowman * BYU physicist Steve Jones and Clemson engineering professor Judy Wood * Underwriters Laboratories employee Kevin Ryan (UL Certified the Steel used in the WTC) *Former high-level Reagan appointee and prominent conservative, Paul Craig Roberts *Former U.S. congressman Dan Hamburg *Former chief labor economist under George W. Bush, Morgan Reynolds *Former high-level intelligence analysts, Ray McGovern and Wayne Madsen (who briefed presidents and vice-presidents) If it weren't for the fact the father of Reaganomics amongst others have spoke out before Mr. Sheen... I might not continue to chuckle so much at the knee-jerk reactions to his interview.

Posted by: Doc at March 27, 2006 07:20 AM (3lcR9)

38 After reading about half of the junk in this thread, I realized that nobody was going to discuss any thing Sheen said. Just personal attacks. Ho-hum.

Posted by: Fred at March 27, 2006 03:18 PM (Owwje)

39 Thank god this is finally getting attention, hopefully it's not to late. but yes, for those of you haven't done your homework on 9/11, the evidence is actually pointing towards government involvement, and most specifically controlled demolition of the towers. The official theory sure doesn't add up... . Either way it's great to have a prominent celeb bringing attention to this incredibly important issue to us all.

Posted by: johnshaw at March 28, 2006 12:56 AM (7jywQ)

40 Sooo many people choose to use personal attacks against someone who is only trying to get people to think. None of you people posting this drivel ever made any mistakes in your past? (Bullshit)His ideas in general are sound ideas. Ideas that must make any critically thinking American stand up and question what is obviously a problem. I cannot get over what happened on 9/11 without thouroughly looking into the information that has been provided. Part of my healing is to learn as much about it as possible so that I can support projects/laws that might stop it from happening in the future (NOT PATRIOT ACT BULLCRAP). Whether it was done by our Government or to quote another blogger, "Jewish space Aliens", I don't want to ever see it happen again. If space aliens are responsible, I expect their heads to be paraded across the White House lawn when we find 'em, but at the same time there must be irrefutable proof that those dastardly aliens were behind this. Bottom line, stop attacking the man and stand back and look at what he's talking about with a critical mind. If you don't believe it, change the damn channel. Be human and stop attacking people for things that have nothing to do with their views. Get a life, stop being a part of the sheeple in-crowd, and make the determination on your own after looking at more than what mainstream media will show you.

Posted by: Jeff at March 28, 2006 08:26 AM (Da6a7)

41 Wow, what a spin! Do the research, compare it with the official story, and tell me what you come up with. Ive done extensive research and I can only come up with one conclusion. than god Charlie Sheen has the courage to step up to the plate. Jews, and space aliens? I don't remember hearing anything about that. Keep on spinning and smearing, it's only helping us out.

Posted by: Jake Gaeta at March 28, 2006 02:51 PM (uN/oE)

42 Charlie said none of the bs that you post there. He said nothing about Jews, about Aliens or alike. Why this lie? To ridicule him? He said it looked odd to him, to him as a citizen, as a taxpayer. And i have to agree with him - there is much yet to be clarified, the iron curtain of secrecy yet to be lifted. What has Charlie done that you attack him that much? What was wrong with what he said? Is it not allowed to believe in a conspiracy? Why is it not allowed?

Posted by: Greg at March 29, 2006 06:20 AM (tDmg3)

43 In reference to my comments above. They were directed at the people that are stating above that, that jews and space aliens did it (poking fun at Charlie). Perhaps Jake should look at the context of my comments and direct them at the people who are not doing the research. Also, English is perhaps a second language to you so you may have to get a better translator in order to understand what I posted. The bottom line, people are not paying attention to the facts and are attacking Charlie for nothing more than his past and not the facts. Read on!

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:29 AM (Da6a7)

44 Perhaps Jake should get a better translator and re-read my post. I am referencing posts above my comments about space aliens and jews in order to poke fun at the people who refuse to see the issue for the facts and insist on using outlandish statements that have nothing to do with Charlie's original statements. Also in my post you will see (with the proper translator) that I am also supporting researching this for yourself since the facts do show a problem with the official story. The people that want to attack him on a personal basis are the people that do not have a valid argument and thus must resort to more seedy tactics to present their cases (poking fun and being insulting to someone who should be considered a critical thinker). Please reread my post in that context and then tell me you think I was spinning anything.

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:34 AM (Da6a7)

45 Man... Some of you folks really need to learn to read before you post. Stop having someone else read posts to you and read them yourself.

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:36 AM (Da6a7)

46 Yes indeed! Thank God this is getting attention! Why do the ignorant and unimformed choose to attack the messenger rather than the message? OK, so Charlie Sheen has a maybe not so clean private life, does that matter? Before you ignorent fools start bleating, take a long hard look at the evidence! The truth IS out there, maybe it's not what you want to hear, but it is there! Oh yes, Dean, are you for real? Or perhaps it's time for your medication?

Posted by: Osmodia at March 29, 2006 10:47 AM (lDj8F)

47 It's always great fun, if a little sad to read the ramblings of the "head-in-the-sand" brigade. The "so-what-if our-president-is-an-oil-man-and-he-knew-the-bin-laden-family-personally" nutcases. The truth is a little too much for these guys to cope with. The "Okay-Adolf-is-a-bit-of-a-character-but-these-jews-are-trying-to-destroy-the-german-homeland" types. You know the ones. The "we-rule-the-world-cos-we're-the-greatest-even-though-we-couldn't-show-you-afghanistan-iraq-grenada-libya-or-yugoslavia-on-a-map-but-our-supreme-leader-says-lets-blow-em-up-so-we-will" types. Well, good for you. It's just a pity that you shout louder than your more sensible countrymen. And when your economy crumbles to dust because the world wants nothing to do with the dollar and when oil is $10 a gallon 'cos GW Bush has told Iraq to keep it's oil production down, in line with OPEC. And when you're scared to complain about any of it because your scared of what people may say about you, go and educate yourselves. Learn that patriotism is about your country not your president. Remember that this land of the free of yours has only been letting black people sit where they want on the bus since the 60's. All the moms apple pie and place names like "Glorytown", "Lovelinessville" and "Superdupercottoncandytown" shouldn't be enough to blind intelligent people from the evils of corrupt power whether your leader wears an army uniform, a businessmans suit or a towel on his head. Peace

Posted by: thinktheunthinkable at March 29, 2006 12:19 PM (0FZ2t)

48 Look at the facts, not Charlie's history, it's irrelavant. Some honest inquiry on CNN is not I've set up a site at BravoCharlie911.com The intent is to give Charlie Sheen the support he so deserves, and in all likelyhood could probably use right about now. It's also hoped that the sentiments and suppoert expressed there will encourage others to step into the light as well. Pop by and leave a note of support

Posted by: Dan at March 29, 2006 06:34 PM (A/RmO)

49 You can say what you will about Charle Sheen's crediblity, but maybe you would do better to actually read what some very credible people have said. There are plenty to choose from. Or, you could open your eyes and look for yourself. This is not what it seems and I don't need charle sheen to tell me that. I am grateful that he has the balls to do so. He is risking his life and that is why it is not getting more mainstream coverage. Anyone who has a mainstream voice knows the risks and keeps quite. WHat a great country.

Posted by: john monto at March 30, 2006 01:43 PM (u4aW4)

50 LOL @ all the conservative jokesters disappearing after the legitimate discrepancies were posted Hilarious!

Posted by: Huey at March 31, 2006 01:28 AM (j4pHj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

How Much Would the Dems Sacrifice to Regain Power?

Democratic party apparatchiks and their co-conspirators in the mainstream media seem to have placed their hopes for the midterm elections on the perception of American defeat in Iraq. With the economy humming, the Dubai Ports World deal a fading memory, and television viewers nationwide suffering from Katrina fatigue syndrome, the Democratic Party is left to focus on the Global War on Terror, and to downplay the progress made since 9/11.

Thus, we get the recent relentless drumbeat of negative network reporting from hotel balconies all over the Baghdad Green Zone, with the barely concealed hope that civil war will break out soon.

But how much damage is the Left willing to inflict on the United States in order to start winning elections? more...

Posted by: Bluto at 10:31 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.

March 18, 2006

Air America Host Calls Our Troops "Murderers", Nazis

Mike Malloy from Air America:

This is on a level with the Hitlerian attitudes towards the Jews and towards the Russians. This is just butchery, this is just murder, my God.

Hat tip: Wizbang.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:52 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.

March 17, 2006

Does the ACLU Love Terrorists?

Or do they simply hate America? It's kind of hard to tell sometimes. Now the ACLU is asking the United Nations to hold the U.S. accountable for [insert whiney reason here]. Wait, aren't these guys supposed to be upholding the U.S. Constitution? As I force all of my students to memorize, it starts this way: We the people of the United States.... I don't seem to recall anything in the Constitution about the U.N., the international community, or international law.

Stop the ACLU has more.

Posted by: Rusty at 07:49 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.

March 16, 2006

When Up is Down

When you're a Leftist blogger up is down, war is peace, and losing is winning. Orwell still matters.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:22 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

Harvard & Georgetown Sell Out to Islamofascists

Harvard we can understand, but Georgetown? What's a nice Catholic school like you doing taking money from him?

Posted by: Rusty at 09:11 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

Thank The Maker!

For us Star Wars geeks.

Because our robots have no laws prohibiting them from killing the enemy.

Via LGF.

Scroll all the way down and laugh as great conversations erupt as to whether or not Asimov's "laws" are truly laws, or simply fiction, or whether or not these machines are true robots or not.

Reminds of something, but I just can't place it.

Posted by: Vinnie at 01:59 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

March 15, 2006

The Clooney-Huffington Affair

Oh no! Arianna's caught in a web of lies. Oh, the humanity! From the LA Times:

Oscar winner George Clooney may make politically provocative films like "Syriana." But he doesn't write politically provocative blogs.
So imagine his ire when Arianna Huffington used some of his recent answers to political questions in a way that makes it look as if he wrote one for her Huffington Post blog site.

The Huffmeister puts it off to a misunderstanding between her and Clooney's publicist.

Clooney's statement:

"Miss Huffington's blog is purposefully misleading and I have asked her to clarify the facts. I stand by my statements but I did not write this blog. With my permission Miss Huffington compiled it from interviews with Larry King and The Guardian. What she most certainly did not get my permission to do is to combine only my answers in a blog that misleads the reader into thinking that I wrote this piece. These are not my writings Â— they are answers to questions and there is a huge difference."

Yes, The Dread Pundit Bluto was taken in by the devious Huffintoness as well! Oh no! Looks like Huffy pulled George's "blog". What a shame. The fawning "Oh, Mr. Clooney..." comments were priceless.

Via Neocon Express.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto and Vince Aut Morire.

Posted by: Bluto at 08:36 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Whose George Clooney?

Posted by: hondo at March 15, 2006 08:40 PM (9pQ6D)

2 Not mine, I'll tell you that, hondo.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 15, 2006 09:04 PM (rUyw4)

3 I hope you don't mind, but I am getting bum rushed at www.rayrobison.com by the liberal avenger crowd and could use a hand. but don't forget to come straight back here.

Posted by: Ray Robison at March 15, 2006 09:08 PM (4joLu)

4 The bitch lied. And she got busted.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 09:34 PM (8e/V4)

5 Oh, the huge manatee! I'm so frackin' embarrassed to be related to that guy. Lots of nuts in my family tree. I'm the black walnut.

Posted by: Princess Kimberley at March 15, 2006 10:18 PM (9xjdU)

6 Ok .. so to back track a bit on a comment I'd made when I read Clooney's post, when it was still his post. I'd chastised him for publishing the post right as his political movie goes on sale. That wasn't Clooney's fault, apparently. It was Arianna's for trying to coat-tail on the oscar-driven DVD sale. Not one poster at the Huff&Blo seems to have picked up on that. My bad.

Posted by: Yo at March 15, 2006 11:03 PM (6DvwA)

7 Even if he did't write the post, neither did he disavow the words, so he's still a leftard moonbat one way or another.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 15, 2006 11:22 PM (0yYS2)

8 Ray: Yarr, sounds like a job for Bluto's Pirate crew! I however lent a hand until the pro's could take the field

Posted by: davec at March 15, 2006 11:30 PM (CcXvt)

9 Wake up people, George Clooney is a Neocon! Max Boot said so in the LA Times today.

Posted by: comandante agi at March 15, 2006 11:52 PM (LPeCt)

10 Clooney "doesn't write politically provocative blogs." Bullsh*t. He did before the election and then deleted it after the election. There's no trail now. I should have gotten a screen shot. He was also commenting in other blogs (and articles that allowed commenting) under the pseudonym "Justice Jack". Which was funny because Justice Jack was obviously someone he must have admired. He was a judge in the UK, who after the expiration of a 1695 piece of legislation which guaranteed freedom of the press in Britain, rendered a judgement in 2001 which was leading to new legislation that would gag any stories written by the press which told of the private lives of Hollywood stars. Specifically their love lives. God forbid anyone should find out that our beloved Hollywood stars are promiscuous.

Posted by: Oyster at March 16, 2006 04:28 AM (YudAC)

11 I have little regard for Clooney and even less for A. Huffo. I can't shake the thought that she married a perfectly hetero male millionaire and in no time turned him into a homo. She's sinister.

Posted by: Mike at March 16, 2006 05:01 AM (NygMM)

12 George Cloney the worlds worst actor he could do better being the backend of a horse becuase that what he is

Posted by: sandpiper at March 16, 2006 09:39 AM (wksIu)

13 It's all out civil war! lol! http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/400027p-338931c.html

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 16, 2006 10:13 AM (8e/V4)

14 So, now Drudge and the AP are flogging this "controversy" - it's so irritating to see how well Hollywood PR people finesse things - this has probably doubled DVD sales for his movie - what's it called? "Whatever and Good Riddance?" - this controversy is the new millenium version of Liz Taylor getting married 8 times - only less entertaining.

Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at March 16, 2006 12:59 PM (aH6Zf)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Relocating To France Is Still An Option

The DUmmy spaketh:

Americans are among the stupidest people in the world.
And politicians of both parties know it. Democrat politicians regret this, bitch about it, and do everything they can to change it. Republican politicians love this reality, exploit it, and do everything they can to keep it that way.
It's difficult to place the blame in any one place. The MSM is part of the problem. The Republican propaganda machine keeps the ball rolling. The Republican religious faction actually believe they're "doing the Lord's work," and the good ole' standby of waving the flag and appealing to blind patriotism works wonders.
Most Democrats/Liberals, on the other hand, believe in the basic goodness of mankind, the things that are written in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and that if people could just see the truth, they'd throw the criminals out.
As a Democrat and a liberal, I agree with them. So given the insanity that the American public has allowed to go on for the past five years, I guess I'm as ineffective as any Democrat politician out there.
The journalist H.L. Mencken said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people" and he's been proved right time and again.
So what, if anything, are we going to do about it?

Move to France? That bastion of liberty China? How about Cuba and their awesome healthcare system?

Then again, there's always this solution.

Stein hoist: Jheka in the LGF comments. Which reminds me, I owe Taqiyyotomist a stein hoist for the MEMRI link in this post.

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:59 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 277 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Back in the old days politicians would pay cold hard cash when they wanted to buy votes.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 07:32 PM (8e/V4)

2 Now that's funny! Dem campaign worker - "Hey stupid! Ya you! - and the idiot next to you! Vote Democratic!

Posted by: hondo at March 15, 2006 08:48 PM (9pQ6D)

3 "Americans are among the stupidist people in the World" Speak for yourself, buddy! And don't let that door hit you in the ass on your way to France!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 15, 2006 09:12 PM (rUyw4)

4 Libtards, please, LEAVE. Be my guest.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 09:36 PM (8e/V4)

5 You know if this educated and intelligent fool and so many others like him ever decide to leave the wretched America for the shores of Eurabia, sorry, Europe and settle there and do theit bit (who am i kidding, these parasites won't contribute to anything).. They'll be the first ones to cry and beg those 'stupid' american marines to come and save their asses when the islamists one day decide, time to slit some throats. Yeah bon voyage @%%$!*&#$

Posted by: MathewK at March 15, 2006 11:06 PM (pVHqF)

6 Well, we know that roughly half the people are stupid, because they voted for Carter, Clinton, Gore, Kerry etc..

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 15, 2006 11:28 PM (0yYS2)

7 So what, if anything, are we going to do about it? Oh, thats an easy question little moonbat. You all will simper, whine, grovel, and generally be useless. What a moron.

Posted by: nuthin2seehere at March 16, 2006 02:43 AM (blNMI)

8 Ahhh, The rich irony of a leftist complaining about stupid Americans. The funny part is they accuse Republicans working to keep Americans stupid. Funny me, I always thought the Teacher's Industrial Complex (TIC) always supports leftists. That is, the people who fail at their job of educating Americans is leftist in nature.

Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at March 16, 2006 06:54 AM (ffPYG)

9 The worlds most stupidist people are the ones who live in HOLLYWOOD and donate to the demacrats in every election and give money to and do ads for PETA,SIERRA CLUB,GREENPEACE,NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and make dumb movies like WATERWORLD,FREE WILLIE, and many others of the same kind like BABE,GORDY etc

Posted by: sandpiper at March 16, 2006 09:45 AM (wksIu)

10 Comments most interesting? The comments posted are symtomatic of todays Dis-United States. Ah,name calling, that's great! That is why less than forty percent even get involved anymore. I am sure Rome declined the same way and then just became history. Oh, remember who ran the show after the republic collapsed.

Posted by: Nailman at March 17, 2006 07:28 AM (J+Rmd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 14, 2006

Robertson Utters *Shocking* Words: "Islam is NOT religion of peace"

I'm shocked, outraged, and mortified that any one--let alone a so-called Christian--would dare say that Islam is NOT a religion of peace. Clearly Pat Robertson is a bigot. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 08:46 AM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Islam is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retribution, murder and terror. Islam has no plan of salvation except for martyrdom rewarded with 72 virgins. This too is ridiculous, as there is no sex in heaven. Islam is foolishness and those who believe it are fools and being fooled. God allowed Ishmael's people (arabs) to prosper only because they are a living test for all of us. There is one God, one truth, and one salvation. Those who have it will make it, those that don't, won't. God will seperate the sheep from the goats when He is ready.

Posted by: steve lodahl at March 14, 2006 09:00 AM (T6Oe0)

2 It never was the religion of peace its the religion of intolerence and take over

Posted by: sandpiper at March 14, 2006 09:03 AM (b1Fi6)

3 I'm not sure what the outrage is. From what I've read of Robertson's comments he wasn't commenting on all Muslims; just those who acted in violence over the cartoons. Saying people killing other innocent people are acting under demonic influence doesn't seem like too big a stretch.

Posted by: anonymous at March 14, 2006 09:13 AM (LVj3O)

4 Hint: ironical.

Posted by: Rusty at March 14, 2006 09:15 AM (JQjhA)

5 This isn't the first time he has said this. About 18 months ago he said "Islam is not a peaceful religion. The way most muslims practise it may be peaceful but Islam isn't."

Posted by: lonely_soul at March 14, 2006 09:26 AM (gioZZ)

6 Yippee for Pat Robertson, more people need to come out and say it. Islam is Not a religion of peace!

Posted by: Patti at March 14, 2006 09:34 AM (2hEo4)

7 Robertson is always saying wild stuff to get attention. This time he hit the nail right on the head though.

Posted by: Howie at March 14, 2006 09:41 AM (D3+20)

8 Pat gets it right again (yes, he was right on Hugo Chavez too).

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 14, 2006 09:55 AM (8e/V4)

9 Well, a blind hog will find an acorn every now and then, and Pat found a dozzie this time. Pat has said some things in the past that would have been better left unsaid, but he got it right this time, so what can one say?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 10:15 AM (rUyw4)

10 Robertson has finally made a valid, though belated, observation! How tragic that he stupidly trashed his own credibility spouting off about Ariel Sharon, etc.

Posted by: Veritas Regina at March 14, 2006 10:39 AM (jXE2n)

11 Let us all pray for God to take Pat (dickhead) from us VERY SOON

Posted by: anon at March 14, 2006 11:41 AM (Hdn6c)

12 To me, Robertson is like many other idiots out there. Just because they get one thing right out of a thousand spazmodic utterances doesn't mean they regain any respect I may have ever had for them. Not that I ever had any for Robertson. And not that what he said isn't true by my own estimation either. But you get what I mean. I can get the same information from someone like Dr. Wafa Sultan and have a lot more respect for the individual as well as the message. Like JJ said, "A blind hog..."

Posted by: Oyster at March 14, 2006 11:43 AM (g9UJq)

13 "Islam is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retribution, murder and terror. Islam has no plan of salvation except for martyrdom rewarded with 72 virgins. This too is ridiculous, as there is no sex in heaven. Islam is foolishness and those who believe it are fools and being fooled." Stephen Let's reword that for paradigmswitch consumption: CHRISTIANITY is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retibution, murder and terror. CHRISTIANITY has no plan of salvation except for ARMAGEDDON. This too is ridiculous, as there is NO SALVATION in heaven. CHRISTIANITY is foolishness and thos who believe it are fools and are being fooled. There - THAT'S the reality check - CHRISTIANITY IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ISLAM ACCEPT THE "FLAVOR"...it's ALL MAN-MADE... Change is inevitable; growth is optional.

Posted by: mommadona at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM (E3g9r)

14 When will you all learn... the pope, sheiks, bishops, priests... you silly sheep. The lord says his "sheep" will be rescued... lol mmmm i love me some lamb chops!!! The big three are fake! lies lies, murder death an lies. all are flawed. all are wrong. Human beings continue with this foolishness but in the end you get nothing. Go ahead an tell God to personally drop me a line. I'll hear him out. But people like Pat can suck a D*ck

Posted by: 666 at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM (Hdn6c)

15 "Islam is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retribution, murder and terror. Islam has no plan of salvation except for martyrdom rewarded with 72 virgins. This too is ridiculous, as there is no sex in heaven. Islam is foolishness and those who believe it are fools and being fooled." Stephen Lodahl Let's reword that for paradigmswitch consumption: CHRISTIANITY is not a religion. It is a totally man made construct of violence and retibution, murder and terror. CHRISTIANITY has no plan of salvation except for ARMAGEDDON. This too is ridiculous, as there is NO SALVATION in heaven. CHRISTIANITY is foolishness and thos who believe it are fools and are being fooled. There - THAT'S the reality check - CHRISTIANITY IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ISLAM ACCEPT THE "FLAVOR"...it's ALL MAN-MADE... Change is inevitable; growth is optional.

Posted by: mommadona at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM (E3g9r)

16 YOU GO PAT! Now, if he ever comes out and says, "Nuke Mecca", I'll buy him dinner at the Outback. Hear me, Pat? Steak dinner on me if you just say "Nuke Mecca".

/Frack islam is preferred, but I understand that he is a man of GOD an all.

Posted by: princesskimberley at March 14, 2006 12:49 PM (9xjdU)

17 mommadona: We heard you the first time. Of course, you fail to see that today isn't a conflict between Islam and Christians/Jews, but a conflict between secularism and theocracy. So while Christian is "no different from Islam" as you claim, it's still irrelevant. Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Scientologist, whatever you are doesn't matter. If you aren't a Muslim, your life isn't worth the paper it was printed on.

Posted by: Not your everyday anon poster at March 14, 2006 03:41 PM (tg91W)

18 In other words people, if you are not Muslim, then you must convert, pay the tax and live the life of the dhimmi if you are Christian or Jew, or die. There are your choices, mommadona. Pick one!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 03:49 PM (rUyw4)

19 Hmmmmm . .whose nickname is the "destroyer" and a "murderer from the beginning". Maybe we should realize the days are coming when all who profess Christ are in Satan's crosshairs . . .and why would he need Islam when so many of the world's governments are allied with him?

Posted by: Allen at March 14, 2006 04:12 PM (awp2E)

20 JJ: Mommadona won't pick one. Mommadona will go down shaking her fist at us instead of those throwing stones at her when she doesn't dhimmify herself. Or she'll be a good dhimmi and hate us instead of her masters. The anger and rage is almost always misplaced.

Posted by: Oyster at March 14, 2006 04:59 PM (YudAC)

21 I guess I'm trying to find something that is wrong or offensive to anyone who isn't a Muslim, a leftist, or an idiot.

Posted by: Rhymes With Right at March 14, 2006 05:00 PM (g3Opx)

22 Yep, oyster, she will don the burka and take it out on someone else. The Left wants to blame everyone but the Islamists for what they do. For the life of me I cannot understand this alliance between the Left and the very people who seek to destroy them.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 07:25 PM (rUyw4)

23 Knowledge ends where religion begins. "The most ridiculous concept ever perpetrated by Homo Sapiens is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of his creations, that he can be persuaded by their prayers, and becomes petulant if he does not receive this flattery. Yet this ridiculous notion, without one real shred of evidence to bolster it, has gone on to found one of the oldest, largest and least productive industries in history." Robert Heinlein

Posted by: Vancouverchap at March 14, 2006 09:01 PM (MWHpq)

24 Found on an LGF thread: Displacment: when you take your fears of the real threat and project them on to an imaginary threat, one which will never actually harm you in the way that the real one would. By doing so you get to express the fear without actually risking harm. But you also never confront the real threat. These people know well and good the the Christians and the Bushies are not going to hurt them...and they have to express hatred and anger and "fear" at something. Wafa Sultan knows what fear is. A Coptic Christian knows what fear is. Corrie Ten Boom knew what fear was. These moron leftists have no clue what fear is. --Taq

Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at March 14, 2006 09:02 PM (j8OrO)

25 Yes, vancouverchap, you addresseded the required trash the Christians mantra, but you have said nothing about the real danger, which is being forcibly overwhelmed by Islam.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 14, 2006 10:51 PM (rUyw4)

26 Taqiyyotomist, that about sums it up. And nicely too.

Posted by: Oyster at March 15, 2006 04:28 AM (YudAC)

27 But they will, Taq, they will!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 15, 2006 04:54 AM (rUyw4)

28 vancouvercrap, Heinlein's only qualification to spout off about God is that he wrote science FICTION books, i.e., books about martians and ray guns. Not to mention his book "Starship Troopers" is considered pretty solid evidence he was a closet fascist. He probably never even got laid either.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 15, 2006 09:25 AM (8e/V4)

29 When the Lord comes back, He will talk.

Posted by: Lee at April 23, 2006 05:47 AM (pgOL6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 13, 2006

Political Opportunist

Russ Feingold is entering his bid for the Democratic nomination in '08 with a brazen bit of political pandering aimed directly at the lunatic Left. Feingold thinks that the President should be censured for protecting the country from terrorist attacks. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:53 AM | Comments (46) | Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Maybe He can protect the usa from a terrorist attack! I couldn't! I mean who has time to read a PDB?

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 02:25 AM (BJYNn)

2 Any you swell people need cheaper merchandise? cause my #2 man in home land security has got hiself a system that can get you stuff for you for free. Y'all can read about it here...http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1712023 love y'all

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 02:32 AM (BJYNn)

3 I know how you feel about negras and hispanicos but I gotta tell you guys a secret. I fuck Condi three times a week.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 02:35 AM (BJYNn)

4 Russ is a dick.

Posted by: Filthy at March 13, 2006 05:16 AM (Mz14N)

5 If ever there was a cause for censure it would be comments 1, 2 and 3. I had actually decided to listen to Feingold and hear what he has to say before I condemn him simply for being a liberal Dem. But I can see now I was simply having a momentary lapse of reason.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 06:02 AM (YudAC)

6 Thank You Oyster for your fine support, not only your of myself and our fine party but of everything our great party stands for. Great things such as multiple marriages and divorces, while we accuse others of ruining the sanctity of marriage, proclaiming the culture of life, while we start phony wars that kill thousands, plus tax cuts for the top 1 percent, which we pay for by screwing people like our serve men. Oh and don' forget campaign kickbacks almost forgot how much we great Republicans love those, and now I guess...you can ad shoplifting to the list of great thing Laura and myself and great supporters like you stand for. Keep up The great work Oyster I know being a true blue patriot is hard work...it's hard work.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 06:24 AM (BJYNn)

7 oops I meant to type your support of people like myself. Typing is it's a it's hard work. Well Condi awaits.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 06:26 AM (BJYNn)

8 serve men hehehehe I meant service men...I think.

Posted by: Angry Teen at March 13, 2006 06:29 AM (BJYNn)

9 And liberals wonder why they can't get elected?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 07:09 AM (rUyw4)

10 Dude, I won't address you again. You're too stupid.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 07:13 AM (YudAC)

11 Does someone spray this site with moron-loser-hippie pheromones everyday?

Posted by: Graeme at March 13, 2006 07:16 AM (EhST2)

12 No, Graeme, spraying is not required, as insects are always drawn to light.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 08:17 AM (rUyw4)

13 Fiengold the author of the CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM so whats this reptile up to?

Posted by: sandpiper at March 13, 2006 09:26 AM (7/75z)

14 >>>while we accuse others of ruining the sanctity of marriage, proclaiming the culture of life, while we start phony wars that kill thousands, what does the "sanctity of marriage" have anything to do with starting "phony wars". Are you people really as retarded as you sound? Did you not receive a formal education? What is wrong with you mind? It's not working at full capacity.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 09:31 AM (8e/V4)

15 ...with your mind.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 09:32 AM (8e/V4)

16 Apt analogy JJ.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 13, 2006 10:45 AM (0yYS2)

17 Thank You Oyster for your fine support, not only your of myself and our fine party but of everything our great party stands for. Great things such as multiple marriages and divorces, while we accuse others of ruining the sanctity of marriage, proclaiming the culture of life, while we start phony wars that kill thousands, plus tax cuts for the top 1 percent, which we pay for by screwing people like our serve men. Oh and don' forget campaign kickbacks almost forgot how much we great Republicans love those, and now I guess...you can ad shoplifting to the list of great thing Laura and myself and great supporters like you stand for. Keep up The great work Oyster I know being a true blue patriot is hard work...it's hard work. That's the kind of stream of thought rant that gives moonbats their reputation for being insane. It's just a litany of unrelated talking points, strung together as one rant. Forget a thesis sentence, forget the facts, no analysis or conclusion. Just vomit. I swear these people have no education!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 10:54 AM (8e/V4)

18 How did his name get changed from "George W. Bush" to "Angry Teen"? Whoever did it, that's funny!

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 11:35 AM (g9UJq)

19 Angry mindless immature teen would be more accurate!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 11:41 AM (rUyw4)

20 How did his name get changed from "George W. Bush" to "Angry Teen"? Easy: by the Mussolini look-alike who runs this sorry-ass excuse for a blog. Don't want TOO many dissenting views in the echo chamber!!!!!

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 12:14 PM (UHKaK)

21 You didn't give any dissenting views. What you did was act like an immature asshole. If you have something to say, act like an adult and you will be treated as such.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 01:06 PM (rUyw4)

22 >>>act like an adult and you will be treated as such. That's a fact. Most Lib dissenters who come here to spew are treated respectfully if they come respectfully. You won't be deleted or banned because of what you say, but HOW you say it. Come here as a troll with an attitude and you'll be treated as such.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 01:19 PM (8e/V4)

23 Oh come on, I've been dumped on plenty in anything but respectful tones here, no matter how rationally I've tried engaging in subjects near and dear to the New Republicans hearts (that includes threats of de-fleshing). The idea that this place is about objective exchanges of passionate viewpoints is a little, uh...disingenuous. That aside, the primary statement made here that Feingold is an opportunist is without merit. Yes, Feingold is no fan of the Bushes and has had plenty of clashes with their undertakings, including voting against the war. But it's not like his opposition to infringments on civil liberties started with GWB; before that it was with the Clinton administration over separation of powers issues. Matter of fact, he was the only Democrat who broke party ranks in 1999 to oppose a proposal to dismiss charges against Clinton before the Senate trial on the impeachment charges against the Democratic president had been completed. Look it up; the guy is a Constitutionalist. His latest move toward censure is absolutely in line with his previous actions, including toward Democrats who don't walk the walk after talking their talk.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 01:42 PM (UHKaK)

24 >>>(that includes threats of de-fleshing) lmao! That must have been Maxie. But look how well-spoken you are in your last 3 paragraphs. See, you can do it!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 01:46 PM (8e/V4)

25 Well, just for the record, that first guy (Bush Condi)wasn't me!

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 01:49 PM (UHKaK)

26 Then why didn't you say that to begin with rather than acting like a retarded idiot? You see, that's the problem, anytime someone here refutes the arguments of people like you, they are subjected to personal invective. And if one person here wishes to separate your flesh from your body, well, that doesn't mean the rest of us do.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 01:51 PM (rUyw4)

27 Valid point Joe.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 02:01 PM (UHKaK)

28 lol! I love this blog.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 02:04 PM (8e/V4)

29 So now, sir, make all the points you wish, but prepare to defend them, but please, all leave the personal invective behind.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 02:11 PM (rUyw4)

30 Fair enough. What say you, then, on the above?

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 02:26 PM (UHKaK)

31 I understand that Feingold may feel he has the necessary information to uphold cause for censure, but what about the group of Senators who were apprised of the program all along? Do they not have a responsibility for knowing whether or not the program they sign off on contains illegal procedures or affronts on individual Americans' rights? There is still significant debate going on among legal scholars on the legality of the program. What makes Feingold think his conclusion is the correct one? Whether one thinks Feingold is correct on this issue, for most people, is already based on a simple political opinion of George Bush. Not the actual legality of the program.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 02:30 PM (g9UJq)

32 Easy: by the Mussolini look-alike who runs this sorry-ass excuse for a blog. Don't want TOO many dissenting views in the echo chamber!!!!! Buy a copy of: The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. After being arrested on the frontline by counterintelligence officers because he wrote a letter to an old school friend criticizing the regime, he was taken to the Gulag. He also details the spying on, detention, arrest and execution of thousands of people who were considered dissidents by the Government, some for living in the same apartment complex as a dissident, or because they were considered associates of a "dissident", it did not matter if they were young, or old -- man or woman. You might get a education on the actions and motives of real "dictators" and evil regimes, so instead of comparing every little slight as being a dictatorship, you might actually know what one means.

Posted by: davec at March 13, 2006 02:38 PM (CcXvt)

33 From my understanding, that is a small group of Senators indeed, but yes, I think the ones that did know failed miserabley in their duties. I don't know exactly what is required for censure, if there are standards that have to be met or not, but I believe even Feingold knows this is an entirely symbolic gesture, especially in light of a Democratic opposition that likes to tread pretty lightly even when calling Bush on the carpet. Whether Feindgold is ultimately correct or not, I like to see such individualism in today's world of go-along-to-get-along politicians. I can't speak for everyone, but going by Feingold's past records of questioning politicans on both sides of the aisle, I think there's more to these censure efforts than politics as usual.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 02:47 PM (UHKaK)

34 Ok, name change, I will respond. Of all the liberals in Congress, I kinda like Russ Feingold. I believe him to be wrong, but he, at least, has credibility on the issue. As Bush will leave office, never to be reelected, I fail to see what purpose such a censure would serve, other than causing a political firestorm. By the way, I was completely against much of the silliness that took place in regards to Bill Clinton. Perhaps Feingold wishes to energize his supporters, and that might be valid were it not for the damage it would do the country. But, hey, go for it Russ, and expect heavy opposition.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 02:48 PM (rUyw4)

35 >>>Feingold thinks that the President should be censured for protecting the country from terrorist attacks. And exactly how many terrorist attacks have occurred in our country since 9/11? That's a question for Mr. Feingold.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 13, 2006 02:50 PM (8e/V4)

36 "From my understanding, that is a small group of Senators indeed, but yes, I think the ones that did know failed miserabley in their duties." Yes, it was a small group - from both sides of the aisle. Even those hostile toward Bush. For instance, Nancy Pelosi. Who, the moment the program became public knowledge, releases to the media a letter she wrote to Bush claiming her "reservations" about the program. A letter she wrote AFTER she gave it her signature and BEFORE she signed off a dozen more times after every review of the program. What did Nancy have to say about her letter later? Nothing. Is Nancy on board with Feingold's suggestion for censure? We'll see.

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 03:11 PM (g9UJq)

37 Carlos. None. And if I was Feingold, I would probably respond: Mr Bush, I don't think you can claim any particular credit for the lack of terrorist attacks in this country following the invasion of Iraq, no more so than Bill Clinton could take credit for the five years of domestic calm following the first WTC attack or the three years that passed after Oklahoma City Â—- both without starting wars incidently. Or if you can, than so can Clinton I suppose, but again, he did it without invasion.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 03:25 PM (UHKaK)

38 Oyster: Don't think I support Nancy Pelosi; no matter what the issue, her knowledge of the policy surrounding it is a study in shallowness. One more reason I like Feingold; a deep knowledge of policy and with the guts to take a stand that may not be particularly popular that day.

Posted by: Change My Name to Whatever You'd Like at March 13, 2006 03:51 PM (UHKaK)

39 Name change, I hear we may get a quick vote(perhaps tomorrow) on Feingold's motion for censure of the President. Sounds to me like most Democrats want nothing to do with it, or want to delay it until a time of their choosing. We shall see, but it should make for some fun.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 04:41 PM (rUyw4)

40 Spot the successful Clinton military action: A

Operation Desert Fox B

Operation Gothic Serpent C

Operation Deliberate Force D

Operation Allied Force E

None of the Above.

Posted by: davec at March 13, 2006 04:52 PM (CcXvt)

41 davec, you de man. Haha!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 13, 2006 04:57 PM (rUyw4)

42 I haven't mentioned defleshing, decapitating, or even defenestrating, (look it up, you won't be sorry), in a while, but mainly because I've been tired from working to support all the unwashed masses.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 13, 2006 06:10 PM (0yYS2)

43 Name change, I wasn't implying you were supportive of Pelosi. Anyone who does support her is too far left and too far gone to even talk to. Just a pre-emptive strike on anyone who tries to claim Bush staffed that particular group with "yes-men". I'll still give Feingold a fair shake. I won't have an opinion about him yet. Frankly, I don't have the time in a day to keep up with all these guys. So until it gets closer to '08 ....

Posted by: Oyster at March 13, 2006 06:19 PM (YudAC)

44 You pre-schoolers should start your own blog where you can babble and bicker and leave the mature sites for the disciplined and educated!

Posted by: TowerofBabel at March 14, 2006 10:25 AM (Y2ILH)

45 And would you care to elaborate on who the pre-schoolers are in this thread, Tower?

Posted by: Oyster at March 14, 2006 10:49 AM (g9UJq)

46 WorldSex Daily Updated Free Links to Hardcore Sex Pictures, Movies, Free Porn Videos and XXX Live Sex Cams

Posted by: SEXMENS at April 06, 2006 09:24 PM (osTpd)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 11, 2006

In the Presence of Moonbats

In his inaugural post, Sig94, retired cop (Signal 94 means "end of shift") relates his experiences sitting high in the Moonbat Gallery during Ann Coulter's recent appearance at Syracuse University:

My favorite Q&A response was the person who complained that because George Bush cut student loan allocations by $12 billion that Â“my interest rates for loans will rise to 6.8%. What is your response to this?!?!Â”
Ms. CoulterÂ’s reply: Â“ThatÂ’s because there are far too many of you who really donÂ’t belong in college.Â”
Up until then I had remained silent. Now I laughed my ass off. I made sure it was a deep, sustained, bellowing guffaw. The moonbats all around me didnÂ’t say a word. And because they are moonbats they didn't understand the implied concept of supply and demand. Priceless, simply priceless.

I had the pleasure of dining with Sig94 yesterday, arranged by Cookie from The Cookshack - Gab & Grub. Go read the rest.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:31 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Yup that is priceless. If we only had a video clip :-) I look forward to your posts Bluto.

Posted by: Javapuke at March 11, 2006 11:06 AM (uo0A0)

2 Unfortunately, Sig94 does not allow non-Blogger comments nor has he posted any way to contact him via email so I guess I'm left to comment here about it. There's a lot to say about his post (and believe me, I got great pleasure in reading it) and not enough room to say it here, but I will comment on one aspect he brought up that I've always found intriguing about leftist protesters in general. Aside from the fact that they so often seem disheveled and appear to have not bathed recently while displaying a very limited vocabulary, I've always been curious why, when engaging in a protest in which they expect to be taken seriously, they so often wear some of the most outrageous "outfits" imaginable. I mean really, what point is one trying to make by going out on the street with a poorly worded and misspelled sign while wearing a tutu, a bare chest sporting a grease-penciled peace sign and an Arafat style keffiyeh? Call me old-fashioned, but I can't take these people seriously. When speaking about the front row occupants of the theatre, this line got me laughing out loud: "One guy still had the remains of a wide receiver hanging out of the side of his mouth." Thanx, Bluto. That one was a real gem.

Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 11:13 AM (YudAC)

3 The fact that a conservative public speaker even needs bodyguards shows to what extent the American Left resembles the Brownshirts of the Weimar Republic. Even their clownish attire might be considered a uniform of sorts.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 11, 2006 11:20 AM (8e/V4)

4 Sig94 has just started his blog, so I'll ask him about the anonymous comments issue.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 11, 2006 12:04 PM (RHG+K)

5 Nevertheless, I blog-rolled him. I'll be going back anyway.

Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 12:45 PM (YudAC)

6 Oyster To them - because life is art - and art is a performance - and "performance art" is a very successful way to get peoples attention and present your point. Its not of course - it actually backfires bigtime and is key to their failures - but they will never acknowledge this - or even accept it as a "joke" - which is perfectly fine with me! Many libs and the MSM do however know this - and are often embarrassed by it. Note - when the MSM covers them, they use tight narrow shots and controlled handpicked interviews to attempt to conceal this embarrassing stupidity. Oh - how does allleged cuts in allocations affect interest rates in this case? The kid confused me - which is not surprising.

Posted by: hondo at March 11, 2006 01:18 PM (fyKFC)

7 Ooops. Sorry about that! Bluto slapped me upside the head and the comments are now fixed. This is my very first blog and I have alot to learn. Please be patient with me. And thanks a million Jawa!

Posted by: sig94 at March 11, 2006 01:32 PM (BnMdL)

8 Yay, thanks, Sig.

Posted by: Oyster at March 11, 2006 01:47 PM (YudAC)

9 Hey I have an even better idea than what Bush did. Stop stealing my money and giving it to moonbats so they can go to college. I'm a hardworking young man putting myself through school, and I seriously resent that part of the 15% or so that comes out of my check every 2 weeks is going to put people I absolutely despise through school. What ever happened to freedom of association? Or does my money no longer count for that?

Posted by: MiB at March 12, 2006 01:13 PM (VeYWn)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 09, 2006

ACLU Opposes Surveillance Agreement

Big surprise: loud squawking from an organization that has done its best to thwart counter-terrorism efforts. The ACLU is upset because Republicans have come up with a compromise to allow the NSA to continue monitoring conversations between Americans and suspected terrorists. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 12:33 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 2 kb.

Hillary: Enforcing Law Equals 'Police State'

I'm not sure who Hillary thinks she's fooling with this one. From boston.com news:

WASHINGTON --Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, a potential White House candidate in 2008, said Wednesday some Republicans are trying to create a "police state" to round up illegal immigrants.
Speaking at a rally of Irish immigrants, Clinton criticized a bill the House passed in December that would impose harsher penalties for undocumented workers.
"Don't turn your backs on what made this country great," she said, calling the measure "a rebuke to what America stands for."
Clinton said it would be "an unworkable scheme to try to deport 11 million people, which you have to have a police state to try to do."

Illegal immigration made this country great? How so? And of course, if we do as Hillary says, and surrender to the flood of illegals, how long before the Democrat party begins registering those 11 million to vote?

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:53 AM | Comments (25) | Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.

1 >>>Enforcing Law Equals 'Police State' and yet she's "tough on the borders". Hillary's the Queen Bitch of Triangulation.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 09, 2006 11:00 AM (8e/V4)

2 when is someone who actually holds elective office going to stand up and say, "Our immigration system is out of date and no longer working, it is time to restart from scratch."

Posted by: KG at March 09, 2006 11:22 AM (SZsz5)

3 Enforcing the law equals police state, but sending in the Gestapo to burn out some religious nuts, and to assassinate a rural Idaho family is just okey dokey. Liberals are scum and should all be killed.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 09, 2006 12:04 PM (0yYS2)

4 And this comming from a woman married to americas first dictator

Posted by: sandpiper at March 09, 2006 02:26 PM (FpZEl)

5 We need to position the miltary at our borders and gun down all mexicans and other filth that attempts to cross our borders. No exceptions. A family running across; bullets in the heads of every one including children and infants who will just grow up to bleed our great country dry. Hillary can eat it.

Posted by: USA Patriot at March 09, 2006 02:28 PM (AqYSV)

6 You're a fraud. no one even remotely agree's with you here.

Posted by: davec at March 09, 2006 02:39 PM (CcXvt)

7 Sorry, I can't see Hillary as president.

Posted by: Ed Bremson at March 09, 2006 03:01 PM (y6n8O)

8 Sorry, I can't see Hillary as president. I can however see Bill Clinton as the First Lady.

Posted by: davec at March 09, 2006 03:16 PM (CcXvt)

9 USA Patriot, once again, you should either go to Stormfront, or back to Kos. You're just making a fool of yourself here.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 09, 2006 03:38 PM (RHG+K)

10 Who IS this guy?

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 03:41 PM (rf0W8)

11 stormfront is for racists which i am not. i have no idea what kos is. i do however endorse death to all of America's enemies which includes arabs.

Posted by: USA Patriot at March 09, 2006 04:04 PM (p74Yq)

12 Best go place a shotgun in your mouth then, because you are a threat to America's ideals moron.

Posted by: davec at March 09, 2006 04:06 PM (CcXvt)

13 USA patriot is a fool - regardless of where ever he came from. Oh - reference Hillary. Wow! She really is shotgunning all over the spectrum! I'm still waiting for two different (and opposite) opinions on the same day. To me, this is classic fishing for a "catch cause" - and a clear sign of weakness. Take a lil' interest in her Senate race - something may be afoot. We may have a darkhorse developing here in NY - one very sharp and tough Irish broad itching to fight the wimping entrenched GOP here and the Lady In Pink.

Posted by: hondo at March 09, 2006 04:23 PM (fyKFC)

14 Actually, if you think about it. We're telling this guy/girl/whatever to take a hike, yet we haven't said the same thing to IM. Not trying to stir up any trouble, but it's true. I understand that we kinda know IM and we have developed a rapport with him. But well, you know what I'm saying.

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 04:31 PM (rf0W8)

15 Oyster Not in so many words - cause we like him and consider him a friend and a "character". Let's no go there - no one gains from it. maxie - don't pop a bloodvessel!

Posted by: hondo at March 09, 2006 04:38 PM (fyKFC)

16 He won't. I think he understands what I'm saying.

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 04:44 PM (rf0W8)

17 You say that, but IM and I had a disagreement about the very same on another thread. I might not agree with IM's opinion, but he has other interesting perspectives -- unlike this moron who's only contribution is to equate any issue into killing Mexicans/Arabs men,women and children.

Posted by: davec at March 09, 2006 05:17 PM (CcXvt)

18 Okay so I didn't elucidate that properly. My point is that if we're worried about that this guy makes us look bad, as some have said in the last couple threads (and frankly, I don't care about what others think of me personally) anyone who walks in here for the first time will se this guy being berated and see similar comments made by IM and no such admonishments made toward him and will immediately wonder why. I think IM has some very good insights, but it's because I've been hanging around long enough to know that. Sure, I think this guy is an idiot too. I'm only bringing up a point I wish now that I hadn't. Just an observation. If IM wants to let me have it then I'm ready. I won't get any further into it. Yeesh.

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 05:49 PM (YudAC)

19 Well of course. She wants to protect all criminals as they are likely to vote for people like her.

Posted by: RA at March 09, 2006 06:33 PM (u3a5v)

20 Oyster, it's my opinion that AP is an agent provocateur from some Leftie site. A sheep in wolf's clothing. That said, maybe IM could tone down his invective a tad.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 09, 2006 07:37 PM (RHG+K)

21 Just like Hondo said, IM is some kind of "character". He got most of the time a very insightful point of view, but he exagerate (sometimes too much) about muslims. In another way, I don't mind reading harsh things about them. It seems that everybody else can say whatever they want except when it comes to them. That's why I keep reading this blog everyday since I found it on the web. It quite balances for all the stupidities I hear all day long in the MSM of my city/province/country. Hope I made myself clear enough so you could understant. My English's not quite good enough! - Max

Posted by: Max at March 10, 2006 08:17 AM (WM45z)

22 Good point Oyster, because some of USAP's posts seem to be copied and pasted from mine, but I think he's just trying to stir up trouble, since he appeared at roughly the same time as greg and his idiot friends. My enmity for muslims is no secret, likewise my hatred for all of America's enemies, but that is where we part company. I do not advocated violence against illegal aliens, though I do wish the idiots in government would do something to secure our borders, because not one living soul should be allowed to come into this country without following all proper legal channels, no matter who they are or where they come from. I do advocate changing old laws, enacting new ones, and taking strong measures to secure the borders and stem the flow of enemies and potential enemies into this country. I also advocate citizens getting involved in stopping the invasion of our country by foreign nationals, which is exactly what it is, regardless of reason, and I oppose all efforts by liberals and other enemies of America, including both political parties, whom I consider no better than traitors and whores, to weaken the social fabric of our nation and dilute its culture for their own financial gain. We, the People, are caught between our enemies at home and abroad, and a corrupt, self-serving government which seeks to appease and placate them with our blood and wealth. We are being sold out bit by bit, and it will not end until we take back our country, and we will probably have to take arms to do so. When my forefathers put on the Continental blue and took up arms aganst Britain, their lawful, sovreign government; they committed a defacto act of rebellion and were treated as traitors, but they fought for against tyranny for the sake of liberty. Who is any one of us to do less?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 10, 2006 08:25 AM (0yYS2)

23 I'm 100% percent on board with every word there, IM. And the government who does not put into action these very ideas is comprised of both liberals and conservatives. The libs are overt about what they think and the cons just give us lip service and do little or nothing. Ech side has their own agenda in allowing this mass migration. The libs do it for votes and the cons think they're helping the economy. The minutemen who staged themselves along the borders to assist in catching these illegals are patriots regardless of who calls them "vigilantes". I could have throttled Bush myself for that remark.

Posted by: Oyster at March 10, 2006 09:40 AM (rf0W8)

24 "Liberals" and "Conservatives" in government are both bizarre combinations of whores, thieves, and fanatics, and though they may dislike one another, they will work together to ensure that nobody presents a challenge to their absolute, despotic power - especially not We, the People. The ballot box is stuffed; the jury box is packed; the cartridge box is all that's left to us to set America straight. America cannot be fixed without a cleansing, and will continue to decline until we rise up and take our country back from the whores whom we have allowed to steal it, or until the day when one of our enemies abroad, with technology given away and sold by our own citizens, (all liberals, oddly enough), turns our capitol city into glowing ruins, and thus doing us an immeasurable favor by freeing us from our own government, and allowing our military to retaliate in kind to an infinite magnitude.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 11, 2006 09:24 AM (0yYS2)

25 The turkey and the witch broke all the laws they wanted to

Posted by: sandpiper at March 11, 2006 02:01 PM (qMAo+)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 08, 2006

And They Call Us Bigots?

What a dumbass.

So - the 82nd Airborne needs a guy to sell pencils in Iraq now? After the war is over he can get a job as a greeter at Wal-Mart. Trailer-people can come in and rub his stub for good luck on their way to the dog track.

Nothing for me to add, except this:

Update: And on a related note, Cindy Sheehan's son lies in an unmarked grave.

Update Too: LA drops a turd in his own comments:

I was mildly surprised that almost nobody understood what I perceived to be the gross absurdity of the situation: a bunch of fucking war cheerleaders crying about a nasty prank card some asshole sent to this poor kid whose leg has been vaporized and THEN weÂ’re going to clap our hands and pretend that everything is OK because heÂ’s going to go back to work for the 82nd. Way to cleanse yourself of sin, wingnuts. ItÂ’s such a brave and inspirational story! Is it? Or is it a devastating tragedy?

What a perfect display of leftist thought. The Leftard Avenger is trying to backpedal from his original display of glorious stupidity.

But even his own readers aren't buying it:

# Terry Says:
March 8th, 2006 at 10:02 pm
Jesus, LA and sgo. Stop it. Just stop it. Your attempts at shock and awe are wearing a little thin. ThatÂ’s right - shock and awe. Are you proud of this? I hope not.
The man made a sacrifice for his country. An extreme sacrifice. You may (as I do) question his motives for doing so, but he made the sacrifice nonetheless. He bought the NaziconÂ’s sale of goods, and he paid for it. Big time. Is this a reason to ridicule his sacrifice? I donÂ’t think so. I think he did what he thought was right, and he got his ass kicked for it.
So stop ridiculing this poor bastard to make your point. YouÂ’re really not doing the cause any favors. I donÂ’t think the fact that this poor son of a bitch bought the company line makes him fair game for our derision.
And thatÂ’s what youÂ’re doing, boys. You may think that youÂ’re making a political point, but youÂ’re not. What youÂ’re really doing is belittling another americanÂ’s sacrifice to further your own agenda. Exactly what you blame the other side for doing.
So knock it off. Just grow up and knock it off.

I love Leftist cannabilism.

Final update: Ayup, he yanked the post. And then he does a mea culpa, which I'll not link to, comparing PFC Sparling to Max Cleland. Sorry, chuckles, it doesn't fly.

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:57 PM | Comments (55) | Add Comment
Post contains 451 words, total size 3 kb.

1 here we have a traitor. this person should be brutally assaulted and killed. his entire family should be slaughtered. his house should be burned to the ground and a sign posted on the ashes with that disgusting blog entry on it.

Posted by: USA Patriot at March 08, 2006 07:03 PM (AqYSV)

2 The more they keep posting trash like that, the more they expose their contempt for the military, all this: We support our troops, just not the War is fake, and they keep proving it. It almost needs a compilation of quotes such as this, to show their lies.

Posted by: davec at March 08, 2006 07:04 PM (CcXvt)

3 davec, I think I agree with what you said on the other thread. More posing, I'm afraid. USA Patriot is most likely Greg.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 08, 2006 07:23 PM (rUyw4)

4 As soon as I cursored over the link I burst out laughing. Is this your first encounter with this guy? I've been watching him for a long time. He's really, really effed up. He's especially obsessed with Michelle Malkin and used to comment regularly at captainsquarters. Everyone was so fed up with his absolutely disgusting commentary that I don't know if he was banned or if he finally got tired of the ridicule. Now I'll go read his screed because I'm a glutton for punishment. Or maybe this one will be a real laugh. Who knows?

Posted by: Oyster at March 08, 2006 07:24 PM (YudAC)

5 I left some love for them. It is full of compassion, and care for their feelings.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 08, 2006 07:27 PM (D2g/j)

6 Nah, Oyster, I've seen him, er, it around.

Posted by: Vinnie at March 08, 2006 07:31 PM (f289O)

7 And davec, I apologize for how my post came off. Greg and the noice have got me a little edgy, I'm afraid. Sorry!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 08, 2006 07:35 PM (rUyw4)

8 Kill 'em all; it's the only reasonable option left to us.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 08, 2006 07:35 PM (0yYS2)

9 It's just easier to be mean. Also it's an expression of the anti-war crowd's bitterness about wounded soldiers not feeling (or rather publicly expressing) any kind of resentment or hatred aimed at the government over what's happened to them. Instead they're faced with people who either want to go back and risk their lives again or just get on with their lives and be productive i.e. get a job, be a responsible citizen. A concept foreign to a lot of people. As for USA Patriot's contributions, isn't imitation the sincerest form of flattery?

Posted by: Graeme at March 08, 2006 07:51 PM (qR32H)

10 Graeme, you just hit the nail on the head.

Posted by: Oyster at March 08, 2006 07:55 PM (YudAC)

11 My man Graeme has a way with the written word! Perhaps the spoken word, also, but I can't say. Great post, Graeme.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 08, 2006 08:03 PM (rUyw4)

12 Joe, no problem. Always amusing how no one can never tell friend or foe, when Greg is around, due to the fact that he creates new characters, or brings his friends here. Google is full of examples of how Greg's posts are followed by characters that claim to be Republicans, and use some crazy opinion to slander everyone, or some 9/11 conspiracy freak post, gee might want to start posting as a whack job a couple of days before you reappear Greg, so it's not so obvious.

Posted by: davec at March 08, 2006 08:45 PM (CcXvt)

13 Why are all Repubican men pussies?

Posted by: Count Istvan at March 08, 2006 09:01 PM (BJYNn)

14 The little cunt has to hide behind his gay-boy blog; come to my jobsite (no, not a desk, you coward LA)and we can just as easily discuss your "let's bend over and get fucked in the ass" worldview... What a dhimmi, camel cock-sucking, sandal-licking coward, to attack who he did. I really mean this: he'd best hope his IP is not easily traceable!

Posted by: jonathan at March 08, 2006 09:01 PM (rh5AQ)

15 what Would you do if he cam to your jobsite Jonathen shit your drawers? or would you do your job and serve him his Big Mac and fries?

Posted by: Prince Esteban at March 08, 2006 09:11 PM (BJYNn)

16 Ricky Martin: Whatever I did I would do it using proper English, you swallower of Juan Valdez's cum. Go die.

Posted by: jonathan at March 08, 2006 09:20 PM (rh5AQ)

17 Oh Jonathan! you should know about swallowing cum. I bet no one has ever given out more BJ'S to men then you!

Posted by: Duke Ivan at March 08, 2006 09:32 PM (BJYNn)

18 thats's true Ivan! We are forever having oral, I mean we turn on Fox news and when O'Reilly or Hannity come on the tube we just masterbait off each other and blow each other silly!

Posted by: Jonathan's Boyfriend at March 08, 2006 09:36 PM (BJYNn)

19 Lookie, lookie, a gaggle of sissies has appeared. What will it be gents, or should I say, ladies?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 08, 2006 09:39 PM (rUyw4)

20 I love LA's blog! When i'm not busy being a traitor to my country, or feeling guilty for the West's superiority (even though I would never admit this to anyone!), or going to my local mosque to foster understanding, sensitivity and dialogue, I bend over in front of my computer so that my friend Abu Arafat fucks me in my poop-shoot whilst reading LA's manly pronouncements!

Posted by: reader of liberal avenger at March 08, 2006 09:44 PM (rh5AQ)

21 hey jesusland you're kinda cute want to three way with me johnathan?

Posted by: Jonathan's Boyfriend at March 08, 2006 09:45 PM (BJYNn)

22 Haha, funnyboy, you wouldn't want to get that close to me I don't think, but if you want to entertain a meeting, just give me your address or meet me somewhere. Or I will give you my address. Wanna play?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 08, 2006 09:51 PM (rUyw4)

23 I can't wait until America is 6o% Muslim; then, I'll be a minority, a status I have wanted all along! I love to be a victim, almost as much as I love the Liberal Avenger and getting fucked in my ass by my local imam! Ohhhhhh, I'm so proud of my party-- they really help people of color! Ohhhhhhh!

Posted by: reader of liberal avenger at March 08, 2006 09:56 PM (rh5AQ)

24 So much for the pussy comment. We all know who fits in that category, and it is not the regulars on The Jawa. You monkeys from the Liberal Avenger need to grow a spine, and quit acting like a bunch of girls. You're likely to need that spine sooner than you think, as you boys live in cities that are likely to be hit by terrorists, while us rednecks live in rural areas unlikely to be attacked. No charge for those words of wisdom, little monkeys.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 08, 2006 10:11 PM (rUyw4)

25 I guess the gaggle had to run off to their sensitivity training seminars. Or maybe the "How To Be a Good Dhimmi" class. Or maybe to continue their ruining of our country. Or maybe they went back to academia to ponder "Ontology of Other-ness/ A Radical Subversion of Hegelian Dynamics and Thoughts on a New Paradigm for Understanding People of Cultures Wherein Muslims Explode Themselves" .

Posted by: jonathan at March 08, 2006 10:47 PM (rh5AQ)

26 wow, who opened the door for the trash to blow in?

Posted by: davec at March 09, 2006 12:38 AM (CcXvt)

27 Yes we sure do know who the pussies are! If I walked behind any of you fuckers and yelled boo there would be so much shit in your drawers no amount Calgon could ever take the stain away. stupid pussies. I bet Jonathan and jesuslandjoe are pleasuring each other as I write.

Posted by: Duke Ivan at March 09, 2006 12:40 AM (BJYNn)

28 Oh dear God! here comes them towel heads! I just shit myself again!

Posted by: Real Republican at March 09, 2006 12:45 AM (BJYNn)

29 you seem rather obsessed with homosexual sex, projecting a little? even more ironic you combine it with the need to come across as very 'manly' with threats, whilst belitting others manhood. You do not need to be Einstein to work out who's really insecure in their sexuality and manhood, tough guy.

Posted by: davec at March 09, 2006 12:46 AM (CcXvt)

30 Or maybe to continue their ruining of our country.-Jonathan Jonathan I am on your side but how are "they" ruining the country when we are in charge of all three branches of government?

Posted by: Real Republican at March 09, 2006 12:47 AM (BJYNn)

31 It smells like traitor on this thread.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 09, 2006 01:50 AM (8e/V4)

32 Man, who confiscated all the bongs? Are you libtards so pissed that Brokeback Mountain lost Best Picture that you need to vent here? >>>stupid pussies. ...Says Dookie Ivan from the protection of his mighty keyboard.

Posted by: Son Of The Godfather at March 09, 2006 03:21 AM (maXzk)

33 It's really going to be fun killing them when the time comes, and I hope that's real soon. I lay awake at night dreaming of how they babble and shit themselves when the rope begins to bite as they're hoisted up -not dropped down- to choke slowly, and maybe I'll let them dangle on their tip-toes for a while. Come on you little fags, let's get this party started.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 09, 2006 06:05 AM (0yYS2)

34 Ha, The original post is not gone. "Error 404" Guess he couldn't take the heat.

Posted by: Fred Fry at March 09, 2006 06:51 AM (JXdhy)

35 I see "Liberal Avenger" tore down his/her post. LOL Couldn't stand the heat

Posted by: Don Surber at March 09, 2006 06:52 AM (OIxNx)

36 So you guys send death threats for a joke? You're a regular bunch of Muslim terrorists...

Posted by: Sirkowski at March 09, 2006 07:20 AM (fMeQP)

37 Not threats you idiot, promises.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 09, 2006 07:53 AM (0yYS2)

38 LA took the post down without explanation ala Kos? Will he just pretend it was never there or offer some lame platitude? Inquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 08:34 AM (rf0W8)

39 For supposed "activists" that favor or claim to advocate "inclusion" and "tolerance," the leftist trolls that infected this comment thread are surprisingly (or not) homophobic, slanderous and hostile. Where's the original post, Lib Avenger? Down the memory hole with the rest of your bullsh*t jargon? What a seditious moron.

Posted by: Good Lt at March 09, 2006 09:07 AM (yT+NK)

40 All the homophobic language here sounds suspiciously like greg as well. He even thought he was hurting my feelings a couple weeks ago calling me effeminate. haha. When he gets backed into a corner he starts with the foul sexual references and "faggot" language.

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 09:16 AM (rf0W8)

41 He offered a lame platitude that I didn't bother linking to, Oyster.

Posted by: Vinnie at March 09, 2006 09:49 AM (f289O)

42 "Not threats you idiot, promises. Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 9, 2006 07:53 AM" Ooooh, threats on the interweb, look at the big boy! X-D What are you gonna do, poke me with a keyboard? lol

Posted by: Sirkowski at March 09, 2006 09:59 AM (fMeQP)

43 Is it just me, or do Count Istvan, Prince Esteban, Duke Ivan and Jonathan's Boyfriend sound like a teenage girl working herself into soupy panties by saying anything and everything that doesn't die of loneliness in her vacuous little mind just to piss you guys off? At least three have the same email address, the fourth is basically the same. No matter, she should be treated the same way you would treat any child acting out just for attention -- ignore her. They only thrive if you feed them.

Posted by: Sly2017 at March 09, 2006 10:11 AM (UADHi)

44 Improbulus Maximus has promised to kill someone. I'd say that's a *real* procecutable threat.

Posted by: ira at March 09, 2006 10:21 AM (ZQ41M)

45 IM's going to get procecuted?

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 10:51 AM (rf0W8)

46 >>>I'd say that's a *real* procecutable threat. As opposed to treason and sedition, nowadays. Today, that's considered "patriotic."

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 09, 2006 11:02 AM (8e/V4)

47 No, I'm just going to hoist you up on some structure and move on down the line.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 09, 2006 12:11 PM (0yYS2)

48 Good grief! Where did all those Homos come from. I bet you they have aids form poking each other in the old A hole. That type of behavior will not get you into Heaven. Bad Homo, Bad Homo!

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 09, 2006 05:59 PM (D2g/j)

49 Oh wow a blog full of racist, homosexual, star wars geeks! I bet you guys are ultra cool

Posted by: King Midas at March 10, 2006 12:10 AM (BJYNn)

50 I am so fucking stupid. But hey I do play with myself alot especially when Hannity is on. Oh boy I do slap myself silly then.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 10, 2006 12:13 AM (BJYNn)

51 Good grief! Where did all my Homos go?. we all have have aids form poking each other in the old A hole. I know That this type of behavior will not get you into Heaven. I have been Bad Homo, Bad Homo! bt the way the name is Mark Morris@Mark.Morris@att.net come fuck me up the ass.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 10, 2006 12:16 AM (BJYNn)

52 Real Republican did ask a good question though guys and maybe we could figure out an answer at are next group ass bang. How can they be ruining the country when we are in charge of all three branches of government?

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 10, 2006 12:20 AM (BJYNn)

53 Oh no! Someone has spoofed my identity! Whatever shall I do? I am vanquished... Jesus H., liberals are such fucking morons. It will indeed be a pleasure to kill them when the time is right.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 10, 2006 08:27 AM (0yYS2)

54 I thought that was weird. Sure didn't sound like you.

Posted by: Oyster at March 10, 2006 12:08 PM (rf0W8)

55 No, 'twasn't me, 'twas only the idiot pedophile greg, recently returned, no doubt, from one of his tours of Mexico, when he ventures on occasion to find those "special treats" that he can't easily get in his hated home country.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 11, 2006 09:31 AM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

GOP, White House Reach Agreement on Intercepts

From the New York Times:

WASHINGTON, March 7 Â— Moving to tamp down Democratic calls for an investigation of the administration's domestic eavesdropping program, Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee said Tuesday that they had reached agreement with the White House on proposed bills to impose new oversight but allow wiretapping without warrants for up to 45 days.

This is the Times supposedly in "news" mode, but you'll notice that they refer to "domestic eavesdropping", even though that's not really the truth - all of these calls and emails have either a destination or an origin outside of the United States. The Gray Lady also insists on calling the intercepts "wiretapping", which is the equivalent of calling a Ferrari Testarossa a "horseless carriage".

Here's the reason this accord is big news [emphasis added]:

The agreement, hashed out in weeks of negotiations between Vice President Dick Cheney and Republicans critical of the program, dashes Democratic hopes of starting a full committee investigation because the proposal won the support of Senators Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Olympia J. Snowe of Maine. The two, both Republicans, had threatened to support a fuller inquiry if the White House did not disclose more about the program to Congress.

Of course there will be a thorough investigation into just who betrayed his or her country by leaking details of the intercept program to the New York Times.

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 12:57 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.

1 "Domestic eavesdropping" drives me nuts. I don't know what the heck they're talking about. It kind of reminds me of the old days when I would listen in on my big sisters's phone calls from the phone in the kitchen. I'd pick up the phone nice and slow, and then quickly put my hand over the mouthpiece. I'd hear two or three sentences before she'd start screaming. That's domestic eavesdropping. I have no clue what the moonbats at the New York Times are "reporting" about.

Posted by: Asgerd at March 08, 2006 04:38 AM (E71Rz)

2 I can't help but think that the mindset of the Times, some in Congress and many in the public screech about this, calling it what it *isn't*, comes from a certain unadmitted guilt. Calling it domestic wiretapping (actually insisting that's what it is) makes them feel justified in the leak and justified in the demands of full disclosure. Playing with words. Damn common sense tells ALL of us that undermining the country in a time of war is inexcusable so change the words around and Voila! you can call yourself a "patriot". I understand that for some it's simple distrust of the government, but for the majority it's plain old Bush hatred. I say this because I never heard a peep out of these same people when Clinton was doing some pretty outrageous things.

Posted by: Oyster at March 08, 2006 06:19 AM (YudAC)

3 Another attempt by the NYT to gin up and keep alive a story that fell flater than my daughter's pancakes.

Posted by: hondo at March 08, 2006 11:13 AM (fyKFC)

4 That's a really good point, Oyster. I guess I never considered the possibility that mainstream editors and reporters were capable of feeling guilt.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 08, 2006 11:28 AM (RHG+K)

5 I think they do feel guilt. They just reason it away. BSD is too pervasive in their minds. They HAVE to hate Bush. They can't help it. It supercedes everything else, so they convince themselves that what they're doing is exposing some perceived evil deed he has perpetrated and not an actual act of sedition. And they do it over and over. And they call Bush "The boy who cried wolf?"

Posted by: Oyster at March 08, 2006 12:35 PM (rf0W8)

6 Oyster: "I understand that for some it's simple distrust of the government, but for the majority it's plain old Bush hatred. I say this because I never heard a peep out of these same people when Clinton was doing some pretty outrageous things." Great Gawd Almighty, this Psychosomatic-Bush-Hate stuff is like a sound bite from the Clinton days....just swap parties and "Bush" for "Clinton" and the rhetoric is virtually interchangeable. Of course you didn't hear a peep from these people ... they were DEMOCRATS. I heard plenty of peeps from the other people back then, I think they were REPUBLICANS! Now we've just got different loyal oppostion parties. Intellectual honesty time Oyster...though it might be satisfying to draw these conclusions because it plays comfortably into your worldviews, what makes this line of bull any more legitimate now than then?

Posted by: Goliath at March 08, 2006 01:30 PM (UHKaK)

7 It's legitimate because for one thing, I'm not from that camp. You know ... the Clinton bashers. And there are a bunch of people who feel the same way. I'm not just speaking for my self. The only time I ever bring Clinton up is to highlight a point that counters another. And I'm also not speaking for those who argue simple party-line arguments. You're right in that there are those who divide the ideals along a definitive party-line. But not like we're seeing now. I've never, in my many decades, seen anything like this. Now that the internet is open to everyone, EVERYBODY's a critic. And a significant number of them are hacks and newbies. Try asking any of these people what the Iraq war is really about and see what answers you get. Try asking any of them about social security and watch their eyes glaze over. Ask any of them what the difference is between progressive taxation and a flat tax and a fair tax. That's what I'm talking about. And the media is the worst of all. Their lazy. They've never really had to answer to anyone. And they perpetuate and cheer on this idiocy. Just sayin'.

Posted by: Oyster at March 08, 2006 08:20 PM (YudAC)

8 Alright, that was last night and after a few beers. My point is that these are the people who during the last general election cycle could not for the life of them tell you why they voted for Kerry without giving an answer equivalent to "He's not Bush." I would ask how they felt about Kerry's plan for healthcare or social security and nearly every time they couldn't answer the question and would instead bash Bush's plans. Yet they couldn't tell me any particulars at all about Bush OR Kerry's plans. Every time I ever asked them about Kerry the answer started with, "Well, Bush ..."

Posted by: Oyster at March 09, 2006 06:44 AM (YudAC)

9 xgkpwfke gstcgjtroc soeyngvhng

Posted by: mfsfmzco at May 23, 2006 08:39 PM (xaET5)

10 My main areas within linguistics are semantics (about the general linguistic meanings of words and things) and pragmatics (about how we work out what people mean in a particular context).

Posted by: avfwxuim at May 28, 2006 06:16 AM (BoZyE)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

March 07, 2006

When Terrorism Isn't Terrorism

From the Washington Post:

CHAPEL HILL, N.C., March 6 -- A University of North Carolina graduate from Iran, accused of running down nine people on campus to avenge the treatment of Muslims, said at a hearing Monday that he was "thankful for the opportunity to spread the will of Allah."

Okay, this guy rents an SUV for the express purpose of attacking UNC students to make a statement about the treatment of Muslims. He deliberately drives onto a campus area open only to foot traffic and hits nine of them, and only random chance prevents death or serious injury to anyone. Attacking innocent people to generate fear. This is the very definition of terrorism. more...

Posted by: Bluto at 01:17 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 322 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Next we will have some jihadi cutting loose with an AK in a crowded mall and that won't be terrorism either, unless he had at least one accomplice.....it sounds like bullshit to me, though I'm sure the good folks in NC regard him as a muslim terrorist

Posted by: goesh at March 07, 2006 01:30 PM (vX0fY)

2 Well one thing's for cetain - he wasn't a very good terrorist - allah must be disappointed. Anyway - now the real fun starts - lawyers can now sue the car rental agency and vehicle manufactor for damages and negligence. They can sue the university - but its a state institution and it takes forever to collect.

Posted by: hondo at March 07, 2006 01:59 PM (fyKFC)

3 Fuck Muslims and Fuck Allah!

Posted by: Andy at March 07, 2006 02:29 PM (tMU4W)

4 Admit it, Libs. You think he's a freedom fighter, a "minuteman."

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 07, 2006 02:32 PM (8e/V4)

5 "thankful for the opportunity to spread the will of Allah." He is going to have a hard lesson at the end of the trial when he finds out that it is the court that will be spreading the will of Allah. Then Allah will use Bubba as his tool for delivering his message to this terrorist.

Posted by: Fred Fry at March 07, 2006 02:37 PM (JXdhy)

6 What Andy said is what I think millions of Americans are thinking. Does anyone know where the next anger rally is being held at for Muslims who hate everything? I really want to go to the next one.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 07, 2006 03:27 PM (D2g/j)

7 Let's talk Gillette out of a LOT of single edge razor blades and present every muslim in the land with a "little gem dandy suicide/martyr kit".

Posted by: Kerry at March 07, 2006 03:40 PM (AOFPD)

8 First they came for the TERRORISTS; soon they wanted the EXTREMISTS; then they culled the ACTIVISTS; after awhile it was the PROGRESSIVES; and LIBERALS . . . . DEMOCRATS . . . . MODERATES. . . . You'll need some very large domestic detention camps to house hate that deep.

Posted by: Steve Cone at March 07, 2006 04:56 PM (JIHfi)

9 Steve Cone, Are you saying we should hold hands, and sing songs with the terrorists? I do not think most American men will want to do that. I think what you are trying to write goes something like this: First, they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew. Then they came for the etc...

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 07, 2006 05:57 PM (D2g/j)

10 Steve, that's the second stupidest thing I've heard today. Spare us your schlock.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 07, 2006 06:00 PM (8e/V4)

11 JC What's the first? Steve was mine - n' he truly earned it.

Posted by: hondo at March 07, 2006 06:50 PM (fyKFC)

12 Count me in with Andy.. well said, succinct, and to the point.

Posted by: Richard at March 07, 2006 06:52 PM (7KF8r)

13 That was one of those posts - run away - n' do that Mickael Jackson giggle ... Hee Heee hhheeeee Ooooooooo!

Posted by: Hondo at March 07, 2006 06:53 PM (fyKFC)

14 No Leatherneck, Steve's right; he is simply illustrating the chain of accountability, and the order in which our enemies are to be dealt with. His reference to hate is correct too, because our enemies are the embodiment of it, and even though he meant to infer that we are the haters, and not them, he inadvertantly revealed his entire mindset in a nutshell, as as well as admitted that he supports terrorism, along with the rest of his treasonous kindred. As I often repeat, we will have to kill them all eventually, because they will never cease their war against us until they are all dead.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 07, 2006 07:33 PM (0yYS2)

15 What kind of excuse is his lawyers going to use? will it be anything like the rediclous TWINKIES DEFENSE? err too many PORKY PIG CARTOONS

Posted by: sandpiper at March 07, 2006 08:47 PM (XnXsx)

16 IM: You've outdone yourself this time, took the words right out of my mouth. If there aren't enough trees because you live in the cities, use the traffic posts and light poles, or build gallows in the stadiums. Pay per view it if you like. It doesn't really matter how you erase this blight before it erases you or yours. It only matters that get started on it. They're not that hard to find, they teach at your schools and colleges. The Islamic Fascists have come looking for the heads of your children and your women. How long must you ponder this?

Posted by: forest hunter at March 08, 2006 03:08 AM (Fq6zR)

17 Leatherneck Just remember, front sight/press.

Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at March 08, 2006 04:29 AM (CtVG6)

18 You're preaching to the choir here forest, but I like it anyway!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 08, 2006 05:04 AM (0yYS2)

19 By the way forest, you have mail.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 08, 2006 07:25 AM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

203kb generated in CPU 0.0928, elapsed 0.1902 seconds.
136 queries taking 0.1563 seconds, 600 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 2333
Files: 7
Bytes: 30.2M
CPU Time: 1:07
Queries: 265002

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76633

Feeds

March 31, 2006

March 30, 2006

March 29, 2006

March 22, 2006

March 18, 2006

March 17, 2006

March 16, 2006

March 15, 2006

March 14, 2006

March 13, 2006

March 11, 2006

March 09, 2006

March 08, 2006

March 07, 2006

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds