March 22, 2006

Charlie Sheen: CIA, Jews, Space Aliens Caused 9/11

charlie_sheen_tin_foil.jpg

Via Michelle.

The best thing about this article is that it claims Sheen is a "prominent credible" whistleblower. Charlie Sheen is prominent? Charlie Sheen is credible? Charlie Sheen is a whistleblower?

Charlie. Sheen. Prominent. Credible. Whistleblower.

I need to let that one sink in for a bit.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:07 PM | Comments (50) | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Mr. Carlos Irwin Estévez probably thinks he was in a documentary when he filmed The Arrival. You've got to consider the source.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at March 22, 2006 04:16 PM (0fZB6)

2 hahaha! thanks for the belly laugh. Now add an exclamation mark to that headline and it's a go.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 22, 2006 04:18 PM (8e/V4)

3 A whistleblower as prominent and credible as Charlie Sheen can hardly be expected to believe this nonsense. It seems far more likely he is in the service of an ALIEN POWER. Maybe those lizard people from V.

Posted by: Flea at March 22, 2006 04:22 PM (KO3l2)

4 Well technically they didn't say what area his credibility comes from. If you think about it, he is a credible public figure.............on the subject of the extortionate prices charged for cocaine and high priced call girls.

Posted by: Graeme at March 22, 2006 04:33 PM (0yOLq)

5 Alex Jones wrote the story? *The* Alex Jones? *Bwahahahaha!!!!* Excuse me, I have to go to an Illuminati meeting via my black helicopter. It's being held at a Mena, Arkansas, airfield.

Posted by: elgato at March 22, 2006 04:38 PM (kV59d)

6 The Cat [elgato] beat me to it. Alex jones was greg's favorite. He quoted Jones just about every other post. He probably had wet dreams about him when he wasn't here touting every word that left Jones' mouth as if it were gospel. The apple truly doesn't fall far from the tree. Look at who Charlie's father is.

Posted by: Oyster at March 22, 2006 05:02 PM (g9UJq)

7 I've certainly called him a whistle blower. Or at least something to that effect.

Posted by: a4g at March 22, 2006 05:10 PM (yfmd5)

8 If being credible means I've got to bed many I high priced hooker, marry and make babies with a hottie who posed in Playboy, and divorce her in favor of the hookers... where do I sign up?

Posted by: jwookie at March 22, 2006 06:16 PM (x0sPW)

9 A leader who seeks soley his own council is a dangerous man! Object lesson in progress!

Posted by: Thesaurus at March 22, 2006 06:20 PM (Y2ILH)

10 Maybe Greg can be his agent.

Posted by: davec at March 22, 2006 06:37 PM (CcXvt)

11 What can you expect from a guy who "dates" prostitutes? BTW, have you all heard what Richard Belzer said the other evening on the Bill Maher show? An actual F.A.G. (reference Team America) member at work! I used all of my knowledge from the Psychology 101 class that I took decades ago to diagnose the imbecile: http://dmdlp.blogspot.com/2006/03/munchahole-syndrome.html

Posted by: Don Miguel at March 22, 2006 06:44 PM (UAn5X)

12 whats so wrong with *dating* prostitutes?

Posted by: Rubin at March 22, 2006 06:55 PM (FlPMW)

13 I'm glad Charlie is on the case. Maybe he can connect the dots and tell us what REALLY happened! I think insanity must run in that family.

Posted by: Richard at March 22, 2006 07:34 PM (7KF8r)

14 Prostitutes are people too! We are all going to pay for it one way or another. Well, most of us.

Posted by: Leatherneck at March 22, 2006 07:57 PM (D2g/j)

15 Whistleblower=actor who has played a person in government albeit fictional.spin city. Credible=son of another actor who was president, albeit fictional. Prominent=Man who was in a little black book of a infamous hollywood madam(with many little stars next to his name.)

Posted by: patrick at March 22, 2006 08:05 PM (7KYmz)

16 Sounds like he needs to get his own whistle blown and leave politics alone. Or maybe it was blown one too many times like Bill Clinton...

Posted by: RepJ at March 22, 2006 10:00 PM (KpfBT)

17 charlie sheen must think all of us who graduated from high school must admire people like him who failed to graduate from high school, and only skill set for the working life is reading lines from a teleprompter. i think rush limbaugh once mentioned charlie is the guy with so much compassion for the homeless in malibu he got the city to permit the homeless to reside in the city, and when the homeless started to use charlie's property for their tents, he drove them away.

Posted by: red state voter living in a blue state at March 22, 2006 11:58 PM (7MWJo)

18 Charlie is doing drugs again. And drinking. And God help him, thinking. Never forget that his best thinking got him to Hydie's. Oh, and caused Denise Richards to divorce him. Maybe his contract is up, or something.

Posted by: Tom at March 23, 2006 07:15 AM (w68a9)

19 I got to quit laughing so much, my guts hurt.

Posted by: 10ksnooker at March 23, 2006 07:17 AM (7evkT)

20 Charle Sheen a chip off the old blockhead

Posted by: sandpiper at March 23, 2006 09:37 AM (1LUQw)

21 Yeah, when CNN covers it, now that makes it fact. I'm laughing too hard to finish my post.......it was on the Hollywood report......hahahahahaha!!!!

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 10:33 AM (rUyw4)

22 you dumb neocon sheep,eveything charlie said was the truth,Silverstein admitted he pulled the building,it takes weeks to prepare to bring down a building,not hours,morons

Posted by: dale at March 23, 2006 03:18 PM (fM9Xc)

23 dale, did you attend a public school in a blue state city, or were you home-schooled by an idiot? It has to be one of the two.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 23, 2006 04:41 PM (rUyw4)

24 All he did is as for the truth. And all you people who can't handle the truth, you should show the evidence...show us all the pentagon videos. Right you can't becuase you not what you speak of. If you can't admit 9/11 changed your rights as US Citizen then Stop basing your opinion on non facts. Until One of you can produce an actual video of the pentagon being hit but the plane that they claimed hit the building keep quiet.

Posted by: Rick at March 23, 2006 10:27 PM (jEhqx)

25 I've got that video Rick, right next to my Alien Autopsy DVD, and my vacation shots from Area 51, where I got to ride in the captured alien spacecraft and meet Zq-Werty-u-Iop, its pilot, with whom I later played a round of golf. On the moon. The bunkers were hell.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 24, 2006 06:19 AM (0yYS2)

26 Rick, you're drunk, or high, or stupid. Which is it?

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 10:21 AM (rUyw4)

27 lol for one this is no alien crap. This is reality. Call it what you like, call me what you want you words mean nothing when your sitting in a prison camp. It's called news read it. When the day you realize all your rights as a citizen have been taken away and you realize you had a chance to know the truth be it in favor of your government or "conspiracy theory people". It's not about politics is about rights as a US citizen to get the fact good or bad. All Sheen and 75% of the US is wanting is a Logical answer to simple questions why is so hard for the administration to tell the truth. As for nut cases explain how a guy like Alex Jones 2 months prior to 9/11 can warn people of a terrorist attack in the portion to Pearl Harbor and name the conspirator that would be blamed. Either this guy is a terrorist himself, Psychic, or just as I think He follows the news and actually reads it for what it is. You have a right to your opinion just remember right before your final breath you chose your fate and will stand by it 100%. And your proud to be apart of this country.

Posted by: Rick at March 24, 2006 03:40 PM (jEhqx)

28 Rick, tell me which one of your rights have been violated. You people please tell me something you can't do today that you could do 10 years ago. Tell me who is about to put you in a prison camp, and for what reason. I'm waiting for you to make some sense.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 24, 2006 07:33 PM (rUyw4)

29 Popular Mechanics Attacks Its "9/11 LIES" Straw Man by Jim Hoffman Version 1.2, February 9, 2005 The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11. The article's approach is to identify and attack a series of claims which it asserts represent the whole of 9/11 skepticism. It gives the false impression that these claims, several of which are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges to the official account of the flights, the World Trade Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity to carry out the attack. Read the rest of the article here: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/ P.S. Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff's 25-year old cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, penned the Popular Mechanics piece on 9/11 sceptics. This represents a huge conflict of interest. Do your own research. Watch this video and tell me it does not raise some questions: "9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?" http://youtube.com/watch?v=psP_9RE0V2I Watch the video of this speech wich origionally aired on C-Span: The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions David Ray Griffin Description: David Ray Griffin takes a critical look at the official 9/11 Commission Report. Professor Griffin argues that "omissions and distortions" in the report amount to a cover-up by government officials and says that the available evidence suggests that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9/11 attacks. Professor Griffin covers topics he says have been inadequately answered by the commission. These include questions surrounding the attack on the Pentagon, the way in which the World Trade Center towers collapsed, and the behavior of President Bush and his Secret Service detail following notification that a second plane had hit the WTC. The talk was hosted by the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth (www.mujca.com) and took place at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Includes Q&A. Author Bio: David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, where he taught for over 30 years (retiring in 2004). He has authored or edited over two dozen books, including "God and Religion in the Postmodern World," "Religion and Scientific Naturalism," and "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11." http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

Posted by: Erik at March 25, 2006 06:55 AM (zh/NE)

30 Yes Rick, I choose my fate, and I will stand by my choice, unto death. As long as I can take some muslims and leftards with me, that is.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 25, 2006 07:21 AM (0yYS2)

31 My choice is to support a guy who has more to lose than of us, Charlie Sheen. Ask yourself what a guy of his wealth and popularity would have to gain from doing speaking out on a topic like this. Go ahead say he's crazy. Blame his father. Bash his past. Bash is movies. Be as ignorant as the next guy. All he is asking of The Government is to answer doubt in his mind to clear up the controversy. I don't think he's doing to run for president. I applaud him for having enough balls as a citizen to speak out publicly. What could really harm you if they re-investigate this issue....nothing. Unless there truth may be is what he says. Improbulus I myself had the same feelings about couple of years ago. All that is asked of you is read up on this and not just 1 article. Educate yourself. If 1 thing of this day can cast a shadow of doubt about 9/11 investigate. To many strange coincidences shroud this event not just the event itself but the lead up to the events and after. Either those terrorist won the jihadist lottery or something's doesn't fit in the puzzle.

Posted by: Rick at March 25, 2006 01:31 PM (jEhqx)

32 Please take the time to listen to the questions Charlie poses. You will see that they are very legitimate and remain unanswered. Namely the collapse of WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING 7. The FEMA report had this to say about the collapse of WTC 7. "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5) http://www.wtc7.net/ http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html The owner of WTC 7 admitted in a PBS documentary to "pulling" the building. "Pull it" is a demolition term for bringing down a building. "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." Larry Silverstein - owner of WTC 7 Putting explosives in a building takes weeks and could not have been placed between the time of the first two tower collapses and the collapse of WTC 7. WTC7 shares all the characteristics of a controlled demolition and has yet to be explained by the government. Millions of people all over the world question the official US government story of 9/11 for very good reasons, and namely the collapse of WTC Building 7. Don't be so quick to proclaim Charlie Sheen is stupid and wrong if you have not done any research regarding the subject. Look at what he is asking instead of just attacking Charlie Sheen's character over the internet. If Charlie Sheen is so wrong just present evidence that proves him wrong. Challenge him on the facts not his personnal life.

Posted by: Andy White at March 25, 2006 03:56 PM (z6oqu)

33 Operation Northwoods: In 1962 the Joint Chiefs of Staff were going to paint a plane like a commercial airliner and swap it with a real one. Then they were gonna shoot it down and blame Castro for it. Then go to war against Cuba using this fake terrorism. The document shows that they were not opposed to killing civilians to make this plan happen. I think maybe they finally got around to using this tactic on Sept 11, 2001. All you have to do is read history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Posted by: Truth for a Change at March 26, 2006 02:49 AM (lYFpY)

34 You guys are sad. Charlie has done his research. And for anyone to demonize his personal life shows a deep concern to obstruct the facts that he brings up.... 911 was an inside job. Do a google search for 911 Bush and see what you get. Wake up now, or wake up later in a POLICE STATE.

Posted by: James Powell at March 27, 2006 12:30 AM (dgmhr)

35 No American administration would ever do anything to harm innocent civillians. Charlie Sheen is a nutjob. I love Bush and teh official version of events for 911 is the truth. The terrists knew they'd be able to fly around in the most protected airspace on the palnet without getting shot down or intercepted as they knew our air defences would be busy doing other stuff. Those terrists were smart/physcic and Charlie Sheen sleeps with protistsutes so don't listen to him. Terrists did it because they hate our freedoms. I don't want to listen to lefties. Or Rightities. I don't read books. Or watch the news. Terrists did it. My dad says terrirsts did it and he should know cos he went to high school. He doesn't watch the news either.

Posted by: Dean at March 27, 2006 05:33 AM (36kR5)

36 charlie sheen did not speak of aliens and other weird stuff he just asks for answers your government isn't giving you. please look at the facts and come to your own conclusion. when was the last time your government told you something that wasn't a lie

Posted by: casaubon at March 27, 2006 06:33 AM (JALOd)

37 Despite the use of such classic tin accusation terms such as Jews and Space Aliens used, Sheen said so such thing. He had some questions about specific aspects. However his overall message is that he didn't know it all, that he simply wanted people to question things for themselves. Here is a short list of people who spoke out before Mr. Sheen about their concerns about 9-11. * Former head of Star Wars and air force colonel, Bob Bowman * BYU physicist Steve Jones and Clemson engineering professor Judy Wood * Underwriters Laboratories employee Kevin Ryan (UL Certified the Steel used in the WTC) *Former high-level Reagan appointee and prominent conservative, Paul Craig Roberts *Former U.S. congressman Dan Hamburg *Former chief labor economist under George W. Bush, Morgan Reynolds *Former high-level intelligence analysts, Ray McGovern and Wayne Madsen (who briefed presidents and vice-presidents) If it weren't for the fact the father of Reaganomics amongst others have spoke out before Mr. Sheen... I might not continue to chuckle so much at the knee-jerk reactions to his interview.

Posted by: Doc at March 27, 2006 07:20 AM (3lcR9)

38 After reading about half of the junk in this thread, I realized that nobody was going to discuss any thing Sheen said. Just personal attacks. Ho-hum.

Posted by: Fred at March 27, 2006 03:18 PM (Owwje)

39 Thank god this is finally getting attention, hopefully it's not to late. but yes, for those of you haven't done your homework on 9/11, the evidence is actually pointing towards government involvement, and most specifically controlled demolition of the towers. The official theory sure doesn't add up... . Either way it's great to have a prominent celeb bringing attention to this incredibly important issue to us all.

Posted by: johnshaw at March 28, 2006 12:56 AM (7jywQ)

40 Sooo many people choose to use personal attacks against someone who is only trying to get people to think. None of you people posting this drivel ever made any mistakes in your past? (Bullshit)His ideas in general are sound ideas. Ideas that must make any critically thinking American stand up and question what is obviously a problem. I cannot get over what happened on 9/11 without thouroughly looking into the information that has been provided. Part of my healing is to learn as much about it as possible so that I can support projects/laws that might stop it from happening in the future (NOT PATRIOT ACT BULLCRAP). Whether it was done by our Government or to quote another blogger, "Jewish space Aliens", I don't want to ever see it happen again. If space aliens are responsible, I expect their heads to be paraded across the White House lawn when we find 'em, but at the same time there must be irrefutable proof that those dastardly aliens were behind this. Bottom line, stop attacking the man and stand back and look at what he's talking about with a critical mind. If you don't believe it, change the damn channel. Be human and stop attacking people for things that have nothing to do with their views. Get a life, stop being a part of the sheeple in-crowd, and make the determination on your own after looking at more than what mainstream media will show you.

Posted by: Jeff at March 28, 2006 08:26 AM (Da6a7)

41 Wow, what a spin! Do the research, compare it with the official story, and tell me what you come up with. Ive done extensive research and I can only come up with one conclusion. than god Charlie Sheen has the courage to step up to the plate. Jews, and space aliens? I don't remember hearing anything about that. Keep on spinning and smearing, it's only helping us out.

Posted by: Jake Gaeta at March 28, 2006 02:51 PM (uN/oE)

42 Charlie said none of the bs that you post there. He said nothing about Jews, about Aliens or alike. Why this lie? To ridicule him? He said it looked odd to him, to him as a citizen, as a taxpayer. And i have to agree with him - there is much yet to be clarified, the iron curtain of secrecy yet to be lifted. What has Charlie done that you attack him that much? What was wrong with what he said? Is it not allowed to believe in a conspiracy? Why is it not allowed?

Posted by: Greg at March 29, 2006 06:20 AM (tDmg3)

43 In reference to my comments above. They were directed at the people that are stating above that, that jews and space aliens did it (poking fun at Charlie). Perhaps Jake should look at the context of my comments and direct them at the people who are not doing the research. Also, English is perhaps a second language to you so you may have to get a better translator in order to understand what I posted. The bottom line, people are not paying attention to the facts and are attacking Charlie for nothing more than his past and not the facts. Read on!

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:29 AM (Da6a7)

44 Perhaps Jake should get a better translator and re-read my post. I am referencing posts above my comments about space aliens and jews in order to poke fun at the people who refuse to see the issue for the facts and insist on using outlandish statements that have nothing to do with Charlie's original statements. Also in my post you will see (with the proper translator) that I am also supporting researching this for yourself since the facts do show a problem with the official story. The people that want to attack him on a personal basis are the people that do not have a valid argument and thus must resort to more seedy tactics to present their cases (poking fun and being insulting to someone who should be considered a critical thinker). Please reread my post in that context and then tell me you think I was spinning anything.

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:34 AM (Da6a7)

45 Man... Some of you folks really need to learn to read before you post. Stop having someone else read posts to you and read them yourself.

Posted by: jeff at March 29, 2006 08:36 AM (Da6a7)

46 Yes indeed! Thank God this is getting attention! Why do the ignorant and unimformed choose to attack the messenger rather than the message? OK, so Charlie Sheen has a maybe not so clean private life, does that matter? Before you ignorent fools start bleating, take a long hard look at the evidence! The truth IS out there, maybe it's not what you want to hear, but it is there! Oh yes, Dean, are you for real? Or perhaps it's time for your medication?

Posted by: Osmodia at March 29, 2006 10:47 AM (lDj8F)

47 It's always great fun, if a little sad to read the ramblings of the "head-in-the-sand" brigade. The "so-what-if our-president-is-an-oil-man-and-he-knew-the-bin-laden-family-personally" nutcases. The truth is a little too much for these guys to cope with. The "Okay-Adolf-is-a-bit-of-a-character-but-these-jews-are-trying-to-destroy-the-german-homeland" types. You know the ones. The "we-rule-the-world-cos-we're-the-greatest-even-though-we-couldn't-show-you-afghanistan-iraq-grenada-libya-or-yugoslavia-on-a-map-but-our-supreme-leader-says-lets-blow-em-up-so-we-will" types. Well, good for you. It's just a pity that you shout louder than your more sensible countrymen. And when your economy crumbles to dust because the world wants nothing to do with the dollar and when oil is $10 a gallon 'cos GW Bush has told Iraq to keep it's oil production down, in line with OPEC. And when you're scared to complain about any of it because your scared of what people may say about you, go and educate yourselves. Learn that patriotism is about your country not your president. Remember that this land of the free of yours has only been letting black people sit where they want on the bus since the 60's. All the moms apple pie and place names like "Glorytown", "Lovelinessville" and "Superdupercottoncandytown" shouldn't be enough to blind intelligent people from the evils of corrupt power whether your leader wears an army uniform, a businessmans suit or a towel on his head. Peace

Posted by: thinktheunthinkable at March 29, 2006 12:19 PM (0FZ2t)

48 Look at the facts, not Charlie's history, it's irrelavant. Some honest inquiry on CNN is not I've set up a site at BravoCharlie911.com The intent is to give Charlie Sheen the support he so deserves, and in all likelyhood could probably use right about now. It's also hoped that the sentiments and suppoert expressed there will encourage others to step into the light as well. Pop by and leave a note of support

Posted by: Dan at March 29, 2006 06:34 PM (A/RmO)

49 You can say what you will about Charle Sheen's crediblity, but maybe you would do better to actually read what some very credible people have said. There are plenty to choose from. Or, you could open your eyes and look for yourself. This is not what it seems and I don't need charle sheen to tell me that. I am grateful that he has the balls to do so. He is risking his life and that is why it is not getting more mainstream coverage. Anyone who has a mainstream voice knows the risks and keeps quite. WHat a great country.

Posted by: john monto at March 30, 2006 01:43 PM (u4aW4)

50 LOL @ all the conservative jokesters disappearing after the legitimate discrepancies were posted Hilarious!

Posted by: Huey at March 31, 2006 01:28 AM (j4pHj)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
48kb generated in CPU 0.031, elapsed 0.1607 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1476 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.