Caption this photo of the return of Qetzocoatl to Iran. Winners announced next week.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:44 PM | Comments (38) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

The Commissar turns the tables on the Guardian's efforts to affect the 2004 election. Your Fight Club homework assignment: Write a Brit and get him to vote. Or, at least write the Guardian UK and let them see how it feels.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:21 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.

Un-be-freaking-lievable!!

FYI-I've e-mailed Google News at least a dozen times now without a single response asking them exactly what was said here that qualified as 'hate speech' that got us kicked off.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:08 PM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.

Ok, since The Jawa Report has been Sgrena debunking central since, well, since way before debunking Giuliana Sgrena became a popular sport, I'm all on board with the CBS report that vindicates what American soldiers have been saying all along--Sgrena's car was speeding.

But, I have this lingering feeling that the alleged satellite images that CBS claims proves the U.S. version of the story are bogus.

Why? Well, because in order to calculate speed the satellite would have needed to take two seperate still images of the car's route within seconds of each other. That's how you measure speed. Speed = Distance x Time. In order to measure distance you need a start and a finish point.

That, or you're telling me that the CIA is now using live-image streaming from their satellites. And if the latter is the case then that satellite just happened to be broadcasting images of a road on the outskirts of Baghdad? At the very moment when Sgrena's car is speeding toward a checkpoint?

I'm sorry, this is just way too far-fetched to believe. As noted here at least umpteen bajillion times, Giuliana Sgrena is a serial liar who's sole purpose in life is to discredit the United States and who will do anything or say anything to that end.

Here's the story:

A US satellite reportedly recorded a checkpoint shooting in Iraq last month, enabling investigators to reconstruct how fast a car carrying a top Italian intelligence official and a freed hostage was traveling when US troops opened fire.

CBS, citing Pentagon officials, said the satellite recording enabled investigators to reconstruct the event without having to rely on the eyewitness accounts....

It said the soldiers manning the checkpoint first spotted the Italian car when it was 137 yards (meters) away. By the time they opened fire and brought the car to a halt, it was 46 yards (meters) away. CBS said that happened in less than three seconds, which meant the car had to be going over 60 miles an hour.

CBS said Italian investigators refused to accept that the Americans were justified in shooting so quickly, arguing among other things that the checkpoint was not properly marked.

Again, if someone has some better info on the capabilities of satellites, I'd love to hear from them. And by info, I don't mean 'I saw this JAG episode once where....'

I'm actually quite shocked that Captain Ed isn't questioning this story or the voice of moderation himself, Joe Gandalman. Look, I just don't want us all piling on to what very well may be a bogus story. Maybe CBS is being overzealous in disproving their bias in the same way they were overzealous in 'proving' that Bush was AWOL.

UPDATE: Charles 'Smack those bitches at CBS down' Johnson doesn't even question this report. Are all of us letting our wishful thinking get the best of us? The report could be true, I'd just like someone elses word besides CBS on this.

UPDATE II: Say Anything, Hyscience too.

UPDATE III: And Betsy's Page, Pirate King, Cracker Barrel Philosopher, Dangerous Dan, Vista on Current Events, The Knock Down Rule and others.

UPDATE IV 5/02: TRADERROB takes up the arguement here and does a good job rebutting me.

But here's something important, I think. I recieved an e-mail from USAF Intelligence Officer who has been on the job for 19 years, so I take it he knows what he's talking about. I'll leave his name out of the post since the e-mail he sent is from a .mil address and says 'Classified' in the signature. The crux of it is that I am right to be skeptical about the satellite claim, however, it may be that CBS simply inferred that the images were from a satellite and misreported that info.

He says, "The most obvious source of data on how fast a vehicle was moving would be a JSTARS using their Moving Target Indicator (MTI) radar. I don't know for a fact if they're still in the area but they were at the start of the war and I'd be willing to bet that they're still there. Piece of cake for them to record an entire mission and later analyze this type of thing."

He also sends a link to a site which explains how JSTARS and Global Hawk actually do give real time data. Pretty cool stuff. So, maybe we do have the goods on Sgrena and the data is their to prove it. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:54 PM | Comments (32) | Add Comment
Post contains 958 words, total size 8 kb.

1 Whether this report is accurate or not, I have no doubt that this commie woman, whose freedom the Italians paid terroists for, is trying to exploit her situation for personal and poitical gain.

Posted by: jwbrown1969 at April 30, 2005 05:05 PM (YLesG)

2 Well, this did happen on the road to Baghdad Airport, arguably the most dangerous road in the world right now... given that, I am sure we have been watching that road rather closely... it could be coincidence that our satellites (whatever their capabilities may be) caught it on tape, or perhaps we actually were watching the road... and still are... constantly. Besides, I doubt the public will ever know the true capabilities of our satellites... I mean, look at how good they work on 24!

Posted by: Ariya at April 30, 2005 05:10 PM (IXXEm)

3 Honestly, though, except for on TV, I've never heard any one claim that satellites now run streaming video. At least, not at a high enough resolution that could pick out Sgrena's car. I could be wrong, though. It just seems more like, well, an episode of 24 than anything else.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 30, 2005 05:13 PM (JQjhA)

4 Speed= distance / time not speed= distance x time. but what you said is right. one would need to photos where one can measure the distance and the time between the photos.

Posted by: Wernero at April 30, 2005 05:45 PM (XsUDS)

5 I tend to believe the U.S. version.

Posted by: Stefania at April 30, 2005 05:59 PM (kNi8c)

6 Good work, we don't want to be like the Kos crowd, crowing about anything just because we agree with it. Here's a question I haven't been able to answer: a reader took me to task, saying that Sgrena & her paper are not Communist but Socialst. The two terms aren't interchangeable, & I'd like to know for sure. I'm guilty of called her a Stalinist, but if she & her paper are socialst, that's bogus. I still think she's scum, but I'd like to know what denomination of scum... [fyi the spam bot won't let you type socialst correctly, because of the viagra-like drug it includes]

Posted by: jeff at April 30, 2005 06:14 PM (FER/R)

7 Perhaps it wasn't really satellite imagery that they used, but local recon assets. Like a gun camera on a helicopter or a drone flying surveillance on the road. I have no actual knowledge if such recon flights occur or not, but it isn't unreasonable. In this case, the only (bleep) up by CBS would be "satellite" versus "unmanned drone" or some such. But, this is pure speculation.

Posted by: Mark Flacy at April 30, 2005 06:22 PM (8aYgm)

8 No information exactly, but a simple comment. It is possible to estimate speed somewhat accurately with a still image... If the exposure time is long enough (but not too long) to show 'ghosting' or motion blur, and the exposure time is known (or course the exposure time would be known) then a time and distance could be estimated. It would also be best to know the length of the car so that could be removed from the calculation. For those of you wondering, exposure time is a term used with film, but it is relevant to digital images as well. It is usually on the order of milliseconds, but for low light or high magnification it is frequently on the order of multiple seconds, even minutes. Cheers.

Posted by: Chad at April 30, 2005 06:25 PM (mNkeJ)

9 The obvious times that would be used for a non-video picture would be the time that the lens opened, and the time that the lens closed. That puts the car as a blur, and the length of the blur would be related to the speed. If the video was from a synthetic aperature radar, the image of the road is given from a moving satillite looking from several different angles. Because the image from a synthetic image is made up from many reflections over time, moving vehicles are plotted off the road. The distance of the image of a vehicle from the synthetic image of the road can be related to the speed of the vehicle.

Posted by: Don Meaker at April 30, 2005 06:26 PM (CCwl2)

10 Satellite photos are time-stamped. When you have the distance covered over a set time period, you can extrapolate the velocity using basic physics equations.

Posted by: kim at April 30, 2005 07:03 PM (zkSPq)

11 Jeff, Sgrena is a commie, not a socialst. Il Manifesto is her commie paper. Rusty, The technology to shoot streaming video (from space, or anywhere else) has been around for decades, so I'd find it odd if we didn't have it deployed in fairly substantial amounts in orbit cansidering its usefulness, though as Mark mentioned, it could have easily been shot from a UAV. Our intelligence ops possibly picked up that specific vehicle for one or more of many reasons: potential white-on-white intel ops (or in this instance, white on gray), suspicious movement (where, when, how), or simply tracked across it because of dumb luck. I prefer to think that they were tracking the vehicle on purpose (white-on-gray), but who knows... The more I think about it, the more it sounds possible that a GlobalHawk was probably the camera platform, and was tasked to patrol this specific road because of past incidents. They have the streaming video technology, and fly at high altitudes (45,000 ft. or more, from what I've heard) that would give a top-down look similar to a satellite picture. So I guess what I'm saying is that though it very well could have been a satellite that was lucky, I think it most likely a tasked UAV, and the high-flying GlobalHawk would seem the most likely one, and targeting the road for vehicles of interest, not Sgrena in specific.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at April 30, 2005 07:46 PM (MxN1F)

12 My understanding is that they were expecting Negropante to be arriving at the airport so I suspect surveillance on that road would have been heavy. I believe the US version. However, this will not convince the Italians who have a need to play the victim in this incident.

Posted by: Kate at April 30, 2005 08:34 PM (lMB9s)

13 What I find hard to believe in this is that the US Gov't would have certainly shared this with the Italians to prove that Sgrena was lying through her bad communist teeth, yet nary a word from the Italian gov;t about it. Once they start commenting, I will believe it.

Posted by: William Teach at April 30, 2005 09:43 PM (HxpPK)

14 Rusty, I've seen reports that the latest Keyhole surveillance satellites do real-time video. Whether or not there was actually on-going surveillance at the time is of course arguable.

Posted by: Robin Roberts at April 30, 2005 09:44 PM (xauGB)

15 There is some discussion of space-based radar here: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/216/1 Maybe a misleading leak to CBS was made to affect the congressional debate referenced in that article, to show how valuable such as system would be. Here are so farther out goals, if you are interested: http://www.vs.afrl.af.mil/factsheets/TechSat21.html

Posted by: Jon Cohen at May 01, 2005 01:28 AM (uwilN)

16 The US have unclassified a report with the conclusions of the investigations. The document distribuited to the press was a .pdf and had many omisseses (mainly regarding the name of the involved soldiers and the details of some US army procedures). Well, Italian press is now laughing... the .pdf wasn't encrypted and allowed the copy. With a complex as complex as cutting and pasting it, all the omisses may (and have) been removed. Compliments!!!

Posted by: paul at May 01, 2005 07:21 AM (a6Lgr)

17 Maybe they don't want YOU to know how they are doing it? Why would they put out in public what they are doing to monitor anything in Iraq? Why would they let the terrorists know? Surely we have realtime video from plenty of places in Iraq, after all, what do you think all those drones are doing? Maybe the drones fly the airport road at night looking for terrorists planting bombs for tommorrow? Wouldn't the JAWA drones be doing this? I would bet they shared the real data with the recalcitrant Italians though -- but Commies do what Commies do, they lie. When caught, like the LATimes, they just lie some more. See Patterico's report for the latest LATimes lies. http://patterico.com/2005/05/01/2939/its-no-accident-la-times-editors-have-done-it-again/ I think your analysis is correct, but your facts may be garnered from misinformation -- that would be on purpose misleading information about ways and means of collecting intelligence information.

Posted by: bill at May 01, 2005 07:55 AM (7evkT)

18 from the report: I. (U) Recommendations (S//NF) Recommend the Force Protection Working Group consider the use of additional non-lethal measures (e.g., spike strips, temporary speed bumps, and wire) be emplaced to slow down or stop vehicles before the use of disabling shots. The intent is to provide as many non-lethal options as possible before asking a Soldier to focus on firing the weapon. yeah, good idea, isn'it?

Posted by: paul at May 01, 2005 08:05 AM (a6Lgr)

19 Yes Paul, if the troops had been trained and equipped for police work they would be better policemen. And, if you had been traveling at 100 kph toward that checkpoint I would hope that they would blast away at your car until it was totally disabled. If you were struck and killed by a stray shot then you, and you alone, would be responsible for your death. I see no point in debating what "could have" happened, if they were following procedure that is all you can ask of the troops. Are we to change workable procedures because someone somewhere sometime might do something stupid?

Posted by: RicardoVerde at May 01, 2005 01:01 PM (3DOby)

20 I've personally done satellite image analysis in a research capacity, and based on my knowledge from that I would urge EXTREME CAUTION in evaluating this claim. If it even exists on a satellite yet, real-time image streaming is going to be rare, and it's unlikely the spooks would waste the capability on observing a roadblock. The possibility of getting two time-separated shots that both contain the same vehicle is similarly unlikely, though not impossible -- the platform is most likely going to outpace the automobile, and the probability of it just happening to be overhead at the right time to begin with is small. My guess is that if this imagery does exist, it is in fact video footage from a surveillance drone or other aircraft.

Posted by: Varenius at May 01, 2005 04:48 PM (pGHMt)

21 So, what is being questioned? CBS's report or the fact that the US has incontivertable evidence to the speed of the vehicle. If the U.S really is saying that it has the evidence then obvioulsy it does. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they would never tell a lie, but the military lying about something that could so easily proved wrong just doesn't seem very likely.

Posted by: Michael at May 01, 2005 05:32 PM (nEJWS)

22 There are lots of satellites... And their orbits are known... So you would just have to find for the right satellite that was over the area... There will always be a satellite over an area... The question is only whether it was one the US government would have access to... Not only that but there are drones doing recognizance and images could have been obtained from a drone... The story may or may not be true, but the availability of a satellite that could have imaged the scene is not in question...

Posted by: Iris at May 01, 2005 05:54 PM (FvsQA)

23 Satellite photos taken at night tend to have long shutter speeds and moving objects can easily have accurate speeds determined by the length of the shutter speed vs. distance traveled. No need for live video feed. Ever see a picture of the stars at night taken with a long exposure? Even though the satellite photos aren't on film, the "eye" needs more exposure time in low light settings.

Posted by: bullwinkle at May 01, 2005 06:07 PM (7doW9)

24 I am 100% with you, fella. This "news" is CBS reporting that the Pentagon says that it (the Pentagon) has seen satellite footage. This is not "news" and the fact Charlie Johnson is all over it without questioning it is shocking. It's real disappointing too. CNever mind Sgrena - Calipari is dead. this deserves something more than what smacks of a "news whitewash".

Posted by: WB at May 01, 2005 08:18 PM (PVlAC)

25 RE: Unlikelihood that a satellite was watching that spot at that time. News reports said that a top US official (Negroponte?) went through the airport about that time. Satellite video could have been called up for his protection, and then picked up the Italian's car fortuitously.

Posted by: Strobe at May 01, 2005 11:45 PM (YawHj)

26 "this deserves something more than what smacks of a "news whitewash"." A news whitewash?? Don't you think you're being just a little bit of a drama queen? So far there doesn't seem to be any evidence at all to suggest that the report is incorrect. This thread raised some questions, but several answers also seem to easily dispel any concerns. Really when you look at it, calling this story a "whitewash" when there is no real reason to believe it's anything but correct (other than CBS's poor record of accuracy) looks like nothing more than moonbat dismay at being proved wrong.

Posted by: Michael at May 02, 2005 03:15 AM (+nX1w)

27 Jeff, Sgrena calls herself a communist. And Il Manifesto is a communist paper.

Posted by: Oyster at May 02, 2005 07:25 AM (YudAC)

28 "Sgrena calls herself a communist. And Il Manifesto is a communist paper." And so? Do you have a problem with this? Do you make look that a bad thing... :-) The communist party is perfectly legal in Italy, and get around 8-10% of the votes. The ex-communist party gets another 20-25% and, together, those parties are likely to rule the country after next year elections. Il Manifesto is not 'the Pravda'. It is a normal newspaper that sells 50000 copies every day. They don't like US very much, that is sure, but that doesn't mean that they always lie...

Posted by: paul at May 02, 2005 08:00 AM (8U5to)

29 First, I agree with Confederate Yankee: how widespread it is I don't know, but some "still" cameras can expose several hundred frames per second, vs video (even "streaming") of about 20 fps. Not that I trust CBS (or worse, Agence France Presse, which posted it Sunday May 1) to know whether it was a permanent satellite, overflight by aircraft/drone, or even visual image vs radar imagery. As an example, look at the big news about a planet being "observed": it's been known about for several years via radio imaging - size, orbit, mass, average temperature, and all sorts of info. Now the very large visual scope the EU uses has been able to see it, which is news, but... I think officially the Italians will back off on all but one point: they say the CIA was kept informed, so it is still our fault. Kinda like "we told France it was going to rain in Estonia, so it's Estonia's fault for not being prepared for flooding." Unofficially, of course, we deliberately targeted wossername.

Posted by: John Anderson at May 02, 2005 08:19 AM (6A8sH)

30 "Yes, Sgrena's car was speeding, but can satellite images really show that?" Translation: We don't really know if the car was speeding or not.

Posted by: greg at May 02, 2005 10:54 AM (/+dAV)

31 I don't think the US Army has a movie or something that shows the car speeding. If they have why Thay don't give that to the Italian intelligence? But that's not the problem. I don't believe also that the US soldiers have shooting the car on purpose. The truth is that the US soldiers in Iraq are too young and they don't have experience. They are there for to have money for their families, or for to pay the college. That is the truth. But, of course, the US Army they will never admit that their soldier are too young, without proper training ( the average of training is 6 months. Do you think it's enough for a training?). For instance there is a big difference between Communist and Socialist.

Posted by: Mauro at May 31, 2005 02:39 PM (1FCSl)

32 I'm coming late to the game, but I do not doubt that there is detailed imagery of the incident, nor is there sufficient benefit to release it. I am currently a couple hundred meters west of Airport Road. If I step outside, I can easily see 2 tethered blimps which are kept aloft almost continuously. One blimp is a mile or 2 northwest of here, the other is about a mile east (on the far side of Airport Road). The existence of these blimps is no secret, nor is the fact that the insurgents have reportedly tried to bring them down. You can use whatever style of educated guessing you want to surmise what might be on board those balloons, and why there would be reasons not to release imagery which demonstrates any sensing capabilities of whatever is on board.

Posted by: local observer at June 20, 2005 12:47 AM (4Zpit)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Serial 'torturer' Pfc. Lynndie England is set to plead guilty for her part in the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal which consisted of playing human pyramid with naked men and for pointing out the already well known fact that next to a giant American penis, no one can really compare.

USA Today via Blogs of War:

Pfc. Lynndie England, the Army reservist shown in some of the most notorious photos in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, will plead guilty to abusing Iraqi detainees in a case that sparked global outrage against the United States and its military.

England, 22, faces a maximum sentence of 11 years in prison as part of the plea deal, which still must be accepted by a military judge, her attorney, Rick Hernandez, said Friday. She had been facing up to 16 years.

The plea deal came four days before England was scheduled to go on trial in a military court in Fort Hood.

"This is in her best interests," Hernandez said.

England was one of seven members of the Maryland-based 372nd Military Police Company charged with humiliating and assaulting Iraqi detainees at the prison near Baghdad. She became a focal point of the scandal after photos of her surfaced, including one that showed her smiling and posing with nude prisoners stacked in a pyramid.

In another picture, she is smiling and pointing at a naked detainee's genitals while a cigarette dangles from the corner of her mouth.

England will plead guilty Monday to seven of the nine counts against her: two counts of conspiracy, four counts of maltreating prisoners and one count of dereliction of duty, Hernandez said. The other charges — committing indecent acts and failure to obey a lawful order — will be dropped, he said.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:09 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 313 words, total size 2 kb.

It's been 90 days since John Kerry promised to sign the forms necessary to have his military records released. I'm sure he's just being overly modest about his heroics.

Decision '08 has more.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:57 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.

Jane of Armies of Liberation and I are engaged in a discussion on whether or not what is going on in Yemen is 'ethnic cleansing' by the Sunni majority against the Zaidi Shia minority or if it's just simply 'really bad repression' coupled with flare-ups of disgusting acts of violence. I'm in the latter camp.

Either way, things are not going that well for the Zaidis of Southern Yemen.

Jane has more. Jane is well on her way to getting her first death fatwa issued before I do.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:54 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.

Call me anything you want, just don't call me late for dinner.

Matt Drudge objects to being called a blogger.

Ok, you're not a blogger. No, really, Drudge, YOU'RE NOT A FREAKING BLOGGER!

Whoever accused Drudge of being a blogger anyway? Seriously.

Me? I'm a blogger. And I really don't give a rat's ass if Drudge doesn't like it.

Trey Jackson has the video of Drudge's interview on C-SPAN. I actually watched it last night. Pretty good stuff, if you're interested in the alternative media.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:47 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.

Those crazy Mennonites are almost as bad as those suicide bombing Amish we keep hearing about.

Thanks to Reliapundit for e-mailing me this. BBC:

Algerian authorities say they have arrested the leader of an Islamic rebel group suspected of killing 14 civilians in an ambush earlier thismonth.

Boulenouar Oukil of the Armed Islamic Group (GIA), the interior ministry said in a statement.

It said the security forces also seized a large arms cache in the operation.

Dozens of people have died in recent attacks by militants who oppose the policy of reconciliation of Algeria's President Abdelaziz Bouteflika.

The interior ministry statement also said that another GIA member - Mohamed Chama - was also captured during the operation.

The civilians were ambushed by suspected militants on 7 April, when their cars were stopped at a fake roadblock near the town of Larba, about 30km (18 miles) south of the capital, Algiers.

The passengers were then forced out and shot dead. One driver escaped and alerted the security forces.

The attack happened soon after President Bouteflika had told Algerians that security had been "largely restored across the country".

The GIA and other militant groups waged a decade-long campaign of violence, following the annulment in 1992 of elections which Islamic groups were poised to win.

An estimated 150,00 people are thought to have been killed in the violence.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:43 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.

Georgia's new Republican majority repeals Jim Crow laws.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:37 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.

How low can they lower the standards?

Posted by: Rusty at 03:34 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

Zimbabwe on U.N. Human Rights Commission.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:33 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.

I'm urging Chris Short to join on up. Think about the discounts! THE DISCOUNTS, MAN!!

Posted by: Rusty at 03:31 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.

What do Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ted Kennedy have in common? They both think we're losing the war in Iraq. A new 18 minute audio has been released by the propaganda arm of al Qaeda in Iraq.

According to Zarqawi [SITE]:

... the American war in Iraq has been a failure and as a consequence, fear forced "the American enemy to open a dialogue with the mujahideen...." The message calls for Muslim brothers to refuse capitulation to this "deceit" and continue to carry out jihad against American forces, stating: "Attack from your bases with the help of God. DonÂ’t let a convoy pass. Convert their nights to days."

By any reasonable standard, our policy in Iraq is failing. We are steadily losing ground in the war.

Of course, what Zarqawi shows by his actions is that his real goal is not simply get the U.S. out of Iraq. That's just phase I. Phase two is the setting up of a Taliban like state in Iraq. That is why most of his attacks are against Shia Muslims and Iraqi security forces.

Anyway, here's more from CNN: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:40 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 647 words, total size 4 kb.

Did I say wieners? Damn that Frued and his slips!! Anyway, if it wasn't for Laura's constant nagging, I would have completely forgotten about this thing.

So many good entries, so little time. But seriously, judging them isn't half as fun as reading them.

Amicus Curiae: Inspired by the Iranian paratroopers, the suicide paratroopers in Iraq were a welcome development for US troops working on target practice.

Graeme: Praise Allah! With our state-of-the art parachute camouflage, the Great Satan will never see us coming!

No doubt inspired by Kit's earlier entry: In an effort to further discredit the American military, an Italian pro-terrorist group, led by journalist Sgrena, staged an attack on this mosque dressed as U.S. paratroopers. Unfortunately, their disguises didn't extend to their chutes.

Posted by: Rusty at 04:00 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.

The propaganda wing of al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia has released the latest edition of their online magazine, Sawt al-Jihad. You can download the entire magazine here or here in .zip format (hat tip: vlad).

Aaron at Internet Haganah reveals that the al Qaeda publication is being distributed via sites in Japan and China. And Vlad tracks down distribution to....wait for it.....drumroll please.....Canada!

If you don't speak Arabic, it's not really worth your time downloading it. However, check out the cover page I'm making available below. I think the image just about says it all. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 03:14 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 2 kb.

Fill in the blank: As a matter of mainstream and historical doctrine, _____________ does not allow the testimony of women in rape cases and ____________ countries routinely put rape victims in jail.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:33 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.

Click pic for President Spicoli's reaction. Malkin remembers the victims. (Image stolen from Beaker)

Posted by: Rusty at 02:03 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.

Where you gonna go for all your Bush=Hitler needs? The Gallery of "Bush = Hitler" Allusions is your one stop shopping mart!

Posted by: Rusty at 01:46 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

by Demosophist

I had a brief debate with Larry Johnson on the Jawa Report last week, that was recently referenced by an article in Mother Jones Blog. I expanded on the issue briefly here. To summarize, my position has basically been that:

1. The inference that State is somehow avoiding empirical evidence related to its policies is not justified by what we know and what Larry has reported. It's more likely that they are just tired of confounding policy with a report whose only real value is in a fruitless advocacy conflict; and

2. That the increase in attacks, even if specified and counted correctly, is not a meaningful indicator of whether we are "making progress" in the War on Terror, though Larry insists the data demand some negative inference.

In addition, I also suggested: more...

Posted by: Demosophist at 12:36 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 2237 words, total size 15 kb.