Heather Mill's McCartney posed for a kama sutra like erotic guide to sex? You bet she did! What, you think Paul McCartney converted to Hinduism for the strict vegan diet and those groovy sitar rifts? No, it's the tantric sex, baby!
1
What a hypocritical little tramp. You know some kind of animal hide was use to make that dominatrix whip she is standing over that guy with. Probably baby sealskin or some kind of monkey parts.
Posted by: Brad at June 07, 2006 11:08 AM (3OPZt)
2
Wait.......there's a whip in that picture?
Posted by: Dandy at June 07, 2006 01:24 PM (BrPi3)
3
You right wingers are so sexually repressed its hilarious. You get all freaked out by a NC-17 book that promotes erotica and an enhanced sex life.
Oh wait, she is a liberal? What a better way to indulge in your fantasies of denegrating a liberal woman than to poke fun of a half naked celebrity.
See a therapist. This could lead to some very destructive and illegal tendencies.
Posted by: WormPaste at June 07, 2006 05:19 PM (heS+8)
4
Naa, really worm, I'm fine. Just making a little joke.
I really don't care what these carnival freak celeb s do or have done. It is sometines fun to make fun of them. If Paul married a ho, so what. He will probably be better off for it. I think her whole checkered past thing is going to save Sir Paul a lot of African Art at settlement time.
Be cool man and try to get pissed about something important like the murder of millions of kids each year by abortion . Now that's some destructive shit.
Posted by: B rad at June 07, 2006 06:11 PM (3OPZt)
5
I could make her happy.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 07, 2006 06:53 PM (di2KJ)
6
I prefer to think about real kids rather than fake kids in the form of a bunch of cells that will almost certainly spontaneously abort anyway.
For example, the real kids murdered in Iraq by soldiers and bombs on a daily basis.
What's really unfortunate is tha we apparently can't even say they do it by mistake.
Posted by: sdsdfsdafsdaf at June 07, 2006 06:59 PM (Ac0DU)
7
Im sorry for Paul, I love him very much and
I could make him happy
Posted by: sam G at June 07, 2006 07:18 PM (JIV2G)
8
Im sorry for Paul, I love him very much and
I could make him happy Too bad she never told Paul about any of this
Posted by: samantha G at June 07, 2006 07:19 PM (JIV2G)
9
Are they real kids? Or sent out to die for their pig shit religion by their barbarian parents. Or killed by their own to blame others. In the name of God. Of course.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 07, 2006 07:20 PM (di2KJ)
10
>>>the real kids murdered in Iraq by soldiers and bombs on a daily basis.
Just pretent that they aren't little brown Iraqi kids, and instead are little blonde haired blue-eyed Western kids and that should make you feel a little better.
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at June 07, 2006 10:14 PM (8e/V4)
11
"I prefer to think about real kids rather than fake kids in the form of a bunch of cells that will almost certainly spontaneously abort anyway."
Ah, wasn't that special? That's right up there with "Butch" who posted here back in May last year:
"( ... a parasitic growth that has the "potential" of becoming a living breathing person.)"
I would purport that 'Butch' and 'sdsdfsdafsdaf' never got beyond the fake or parasitic stage.
Posted by: Oyster at June 08, 2006 06:27 AM (YudAC)
12
This woman carries on about the fate of chickens in captivity and seal pups. Killing kids:
Heather Mills and sdsdfsda would support the murder of kids. They demand the right to drag a child out of it's mother's womb in the 6,7,8th month and suck out her brain.
Liberalism defined.
Rooster, you can make her happy on skill alone....The rest of you guys are only going to score if Ben Franklin finds his way into Heather's cookie jar.
Posted by: B rad at June 08, 2006 12:55 PM (3OPZt)
13
I support Heather. She has made this statement " a girl has to do to what she has to, to make a living."
She does not have a decent education. She is not able to get a good job. I do not think she is keen to work for low pay even if the job is respectable.
She rather be with men (even strangers) to make good money and do nude shots/porno movies/prostituition and terrible sex stunts than to be without money. I think she is a brave and determined girl. Do not give up Heather.
Posted by: margo at June 11, 2006 01:07 AM (L465o)
14
What's the big deal? Paul was doing handstand with numerous bimbos on the way up. Can't a girl have a bit of fun, too?
Posted by: George Dee at June 11, 2006 07:46 PM (2se8P)
15
I'm totally shocked and appalled about Heather. Being a pornographic model is one thing, at least she could have told Paul before they got married, and not just because he's famous and a billionaire.
But that is forgivable. She saw the money and the life she could have, and conveniently "forgotten" the seedy details of her past.
But being a hooker, that's another thing. This woman has no business representing serious charities about landmines or any other worthy causes. The woman is a whore that wanted the easy life by selling her body to arms dealers (and possibly terrorists). The woman has no shame.
It's no surprise that Paul divorced her, and not because of these allegations. She was simply a manipulative, controlling, self-promoter who cared not for his feelings, family or his memories of his ex-wife that truly loved him, but her own priorities, which is Heather, Heather, Heather.
On her website, she writes that she has turned down "lucrative offers" and earned $0 since meeting Paul in her assertion she is not a money-grubbing golddigger. Well that's rich (pardon the pun) considering she's married to a billionaire.
The fact is that Heather has used Paul, and has caused great unnecessary pain and embarrasment for him and his family.
With Linda, Paul had a loving wife and worthy recepient of his love and devotion. With Heather, Paul has a nightmare.
We will see how much Heather doesn't care for money in the coming months. Smart money is that she will "take him to the bank" with the divorce settlement.
Posted by: Sheila O'Malley at June 12, 2006 11:53 PM (+/Int)
16
Well, pornography usually means pictures or movies with explicit sexual acts. I havent seen any real porn with Heather Mills in it. Those pictures revealed this far IS clearly erotic, even quiet mild erotic pictures, not pornographic. But lying about past is another theme...
Posted by: Aure at June 14, 2006 07:12 AM (ox0y0)
17
Well, pornography usually means pictures or movies with explicit sexual acts. I havent seen any real porn with Heather Mills in it. Those pictures revealed this far IS clearly erotic, even quiet mild erotic pictures, not pornographic. But lying about past is another theme...
Posted by: Aure at June 14, 2006 07:12 AM (ox0y0)
18
Well, pornography usually means pictures or movies with explicit sexual acts. I havent seen any real porn with Heather Mills in it. Those pictures revealed this far IS clearly erotic, even quiet mild erotic pictures, not pornographic. But lying about past is another theme...
Posted by: aure at June 14, 2006 07:14 AM (ox0y0)
19
And she can sing better than Linda too.
Posted by: donnar at June 14, 2006 11:10 AM (BJYNn)
20
this will be one of the worlds biggest legal robberies of all time...
Posted by: Ross at June 14, 2006 01:51 PM (SdgBA)
21
i wan't to see heather mills
Posted by: smokin joe at June 14, 2006 08:25 PM (bI2D2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment