mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

September 30, 2005

'Bad' Polygamy vs. 'Good' Polygamy

Bad Polygamy

Good Polygamy

Because Steve the Llama Butcher asked and Michelle Malkin didn't want the answer....

Posted by: Rusty at 12:06 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.

September 28, 2005

Anna Nicole Smith Case Goes to Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear Anna Nicole Smith's probate case. The case of Vickie Lynn Marshall (aka, Anna Nicole Smith) vs. E. Pierce Marshall centers on whether a federal bankruptcy court can rule on wills and estates.

Anna Nicole Smith's laywer claims she will personally be at the Supreme Court during the hearing. Let the media circus begin!

Why would the Supreme Court agree to hear Anna Nicole Smith's case? Two reasons: The Rule of Four and TrimSpa.

It takes four justices to agree to hear a case. Remember, there are seven men on the Supreme Court--four of which are presumed to be straight (Stephens and Breyer are iffy). Plus you have Ginsburg--you know what I'm talking about. And you're going to tell me Thomas wasn't leading the charge? He's a swinger baby!

Another victory for corporate America. I mean do you think the old Anna Nicole Smith would have had a snowball's chance in hell of getting her case heard had the TrimSpa corporation not done their magic? Let's not forget the silicon-industrial complex here.

LA Times:

In 1993, Smith was Playboy's Playmate of the Year, and shortly afterward, the 26-year-old married Texas oil tycoon J. Howard Marshall. He was 89, and a fan of her strip act.
He died a year later, and Smith has fought with Marshall's son, Pierce, over an estate valued at more than $1.6 billion.
A Texas probate judge ruled that Marshall's son was his sole heir and entitled to his fortune. However, a federal bankruptcy judge in California later ruled that Marshall's son had schemed to move assets from his father's estate. Smith was awarded $88 million in damages.
Although the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the probate ruling should stand, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the dispute to decide when, if ever, bankruptcy judges can rule on probate matters.

Is it any coincidence that the Supreme Court grants Anna Nicole Smith certiorari only after she loses all that weight? I think not!

Presenting the certiorari worthy versus uncertiorari worthy Anna Nicole Smith. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 08:54 AM | Comments (17) | Add Comment
Post contains 392 words, total size 4 kb.

1 A fine test for Roberts' first case.

Posted by: Howie at September 28, 2005 08:58 AM (D3+20)

2 That second uncertiorari picture looks like the product of breeding between John Wayne Gacy and a barbie doll. Though, maybe that's just butch enough for Ginsburg's tastes...

Posted by: Wine-aholic at September 28, 2005 09:27 AM (Wsn+K)

3 we've certainly come a long way. Once the SCOTUS was charged with deciding issues that would change the course of humanity, but now they're just accomodating land-thiefs and inheritence-whores.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 28, 2005 11:14 AM (0yYS2)

4 Plus you have Ginsburg--you know what I'm talking about. That takes "Bad Gay" to a whole new level.

Posted by: Brian B at September 28, 2005 01:11 PM (CouWh)

5 Mariage is a sacred institution, we can't let the court destrroy that also. In my lifetime, I am 57, I have seen divorce rates go from almost zero to over 1/2. I can remember how the few kids in a class of 25 were known as coming from "broken homes" and pitied by all. After we straighten out the abortion issue we should take another look at divorce and the breakup of the American Family.

Posted by: john Ryan at September 28, 2005 01:12 PM (ads7K)

6 John, the massive divorce rate is just another symptom of the runaway liberalism that infests this country, and it is simply one more tactic of the anti-civilization crowd who only want to destroy every aspect of Western civilization so that nothing will stand between them and a one-world hegemony.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 28, 2005 01:21 PM (0yYS2)

7 Right IM. I swore till death do us part adn by god in intend to stick to it. Now I only got one thing to say. come on death.

Posted by: Howie at September 28, 2005 02:08 PM (D3+20)

8 my typing sucks today

Posted by: Howie at September 28, 2005 02:09 PM (D3+20)

9 Howie, Death sucks even more!

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 28, 2005 03:41 PM (rUyw4)

10 John Ryan: ???????????????????????. Are you saying a big tited low life should be allowed to take advantage of a sentile old man and rob his family of their inheritance?

Posted by: greyrooster at September 28, 2005 04:49 PM (M7kiy)

11 Surely a dirty old man can be called just that, instead of saying he was a fan of her strip act. Hell, baseball has fans, strippers have leacherous dirty old men drooling after them!

Posted by: DL at September 28, 2005 05:30 PM (sHsB3)

12 I don't get it. So, it was ok for said old man to give her $100 for a lap dance, but not ok for said old man to give here $100 million for sex? We had settled WHAT she was long ago, the only haggling between her and in-laws is over PRICE. Since the old guy negotiated the price, it was fair (price is always fair by definition when no duress is present), and since they got married it was legal. I see no harm here, other than the children treating the old man as a child.

Posted by: Rusty at September 28, 2005 09:43 PM (JQjhA)

13 At over $277 MILLIOn per tit...one hopes that she is conservatively dressed when she shows up at the court building!

Posted by: Macker at September 29, 2005 08:42 AM (2GH66)

14 Rusty: 89 year old man having sex with her. Ya, sure. I can only hope so. Do you really believe that? That old man had the mind of a two year old. Maybe it's okay for strippers to talk two year old heirs to marry them. She is a golddigger and trash for taking advantage of an senile old and man and causing his family much pain. She really loved the old fart. Ya, sure, and Osama Bin Laden is looking after your best interests also.

Posted by: greyrooster at September 29, 2005 09:45 AM (M7kiy)

15 Why would the Supreme Court agree to hear Anna Nicole Smith's case? Because it'll give Thomas something new to fanaticize about.

Posted by: Johnny at September 29, 2005 12:31 PM (lh3c2)

16 I think several of you may need to read up on this case before acting like two year olds shooting off your mouths about something you know nothing about...

Posted by: cooter at November 04, 2005 06:24 PM (ehklm)

17 I believe Miss Vicky Lynn Marshall indirectly murdered Mr. J. Howard Marshall to be freer and to enjoy here little petits a bit more, but that was only done once she was in his mega-money area. That stuff also happened to to very a wealthy Mr. Zafra. I back Mr. Pierce Marshall completly.

Posted by: Martin Aguero Gallo at December 03, 2005 04:54 PM (ncqnJ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

September 23, 2005

Hurricane Rita hits: Adult Entertainers, Single Mothers Disproportionally Affected

Things were just about getting back to normal in New Orleans. The lushes were out in force, transvestyte hookers were trickling back into the city, and a strip club had reopened to service the needs of armies of insurance adjusters and lonely FEMA workers. There were even rumors of a new Girls Gone Wild: Hurricane Victims edition about to begin production work. Alas, it will all have to wait. Damn you Rita! Damn you to hell!!!

If you want to see the picture accompanying this story, better check out Riehl World View--and yes, that picture actually was part of a news story. Because journalists are after the important scoops. Notice that both the Reuters story and the pic that Dan Riehl have is of the same stripper. Why do I have the feeling that one Reuters reporter is a very satisfied customer? Reuters :

In a sign that things may be returning to normal in New Orleans, strip shows are back in the city's famous French Quarter.
Erotic dancers and strippers are entertaining crowds of police, firefighters and military personnel instead of the usual audiences of drunken conventioneers and tourists in Bourbon Street's Deja Vu club, which reopened this week.
It's the first strip joint to resume business, three weeks after Hurricane Katrina struck in the worst natural disaster ever to hit the United States.
"It's nice to get back to work, and all these men need some entertainment," Dawn Beasley, 27, a dancer at the club, said on Tuesday night. "They haven't seen anybody but their buddies for two weeks."
The crowd hooted and hollered as women peeled off their tops and gyrated, as customers tucked tips into their G-strings.

But don't you worry. FEMA cards are accepted for lap dances. Via QandO this Times Online story entitled Vote Republican for Free Lap Dances. I knew there was a reason I voted for that guy!:

Interviewed by a reporter for the local TV station, Abby over at Baby Dolls said she had seen many clients using their debit cards. She had nothing but praise for this exercise in government largesse. Â“A lot of customers have been coming in from Louisiana and theyÂ’ve been real happy about the $1.75 beers and theyÂ’re really nice.Â” It was only fair, she added that they should get a little publicly funded help. Â“You lost your whole house, then, why not?Â” she said. Â“You might want some beer in a strip club. There are a lot of guys out there that like to do that.Â”

With the mandatory evacuation of Houston's adult entertainment establishment, what will thousands of single mothers do to feed their children? Just one more way in which in Bush's America, single mothers are once again affected more deeply by natural disasters. ;-)

Posted by: Rusty at 02:16 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 478 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Notice, too, that if you click on the pic in Rueters, at the bottom is the clickable link "Buy Pictures".

Posted by: Oyster at September 23, 2005 02:21 PM (fl6E1)

2 Reuters=journalism at its best.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 23, 2005 02:31 PM (JQjhA)

3 WTF... is she wearing tube socks?

Posted by: Ariya at September 23, 2005 03:55 PM (noCGr)

4 Bushie is running around there, promising not to get in the way - potemkin loser off-the-wagon punk

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 06:45 PM (VhNDM)

5 SCREECHING DRUNKEN MONKEY!

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 07:16 PM (VhNDM)

6 Tube socks are hot on a girl. I used to have a girlfriend who would wear her softball socks and hat. And nothing else. YEAH BABY!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 08:52 PM (0yYS2)

7 Potemkin, as in fake prop, Homer

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:05 PM (VhNDM)

8 ADULT PSYCHO-ENTERTAINMENT!! I LOVE WAR!!! New reports of the 82nd Airborne TORTURING IRAQIs surfaces: "Murderous Maniacs" attacked and tortured!! It was Sport!! "On their day off people would show up all the time. Everyone in camp knew if you wanted to work out your frustration you show up at the PUC tent.1 In a way IT WAS SPORT. The cooks were all U.S. soldiers. One day [a sergeant] shows up and tells a PUC to grab a pole. He told him to bend over and broke the guy’s leg with a mini Louisville Slugger, a metal bat. He was the fucking cook. He shouldn’t be in with no PUCs." "Military Intelligence personnel, they said, directed and encouraged army personnel to subject prisoners to forced, repetitive exercise, sometimes to the point of unconsciousness, sleep deprivation for days on end, and exposure to extremes of heat and cold as part of the interrogation process. At least one interrogator beat detainees in front of other soldiers." SSSSMOKIN!! The torture of detainees reportedly was so widespread and accepted that it became a means of STRESS RELIEF for soldiers. Soldiers said they felt welcome to come to the PUC tent on their off-hours to “Fuck a PUC” or “Smoke a PUC.” “Fucking a PUC” referred to beating a detainee, while “Smoking a PUC” referred to forced physical exertion sometimes to the point of unconsciousness. The soldiers said that when a detainee had a visible injury such as a broken limb due to “fucking” or “smoking,” an army physician’s assistant would be called to administer an analgesic and fill out the proper paperwork. They said those responsible would state that the detainee was injured during the process of capture and the physician’s assistant would sign off on this. Broken bones occurred “every other week” at FOB Mercury."

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 10:22 PM (VhNDM)

9 Rusty, this piece of shit moron is giving aid and comfort to the enemy and lying about our troops. If you insist on letting him continue, I will not be back.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 23, 2005 10:48 PM (0yYS2)

10 Impy, DSM is your only truthful FRIEND in all the Bushie-Chimpie swirling madness: http://hrw.org/reports/2005/us0905/ and http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1108972,00.html They were being beaten by mini-sluggers and more! You can't get awaaay! You can't get awaaay! Woo-hoo!

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 23, 2005 11:00 PM (VhNDM)

11 DSM, I just shed a tear for the terrorists who got "tortured" by the 82nd Airbourne, no --- I did really. Did you forget the part where they stepped up the torture to include chinese rope burns, nipple twisters, camel bites and atomic wedges, or will I have to read more later?

Posted by: dave at September 23, 2005 11:57 PM (CcXvt)

12 Davie, It's all fine and dandy to beat detainees until their friends decide it's fine and dandy to torture Americans back, right? What goes around comes around?

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 24, 2005 12:21 AM (VhNDM)

13 "It's all fine and dandy to beat detainees until their friends decide it's fine and dandy to torture Americans back, right?" You got your argument backwards, DSM. It was the other way around. I read your links. TIME, being the anti-American publication they've become, is bound and determined to keep old news alive regardless of what corrective measures have been taken to curb or stop abuse. What you and they want are public hangings. Nothing less would shut you up. Isn't that a little hypocritical? You won't EVER see a TIME article outlining any of those corrective measures. It's the same old mantra in their headlines "Abuse!" - never "20 New Iraqi Hospitals Open". You'll never read the word "terrorists" in their stories. It would dilute their message. They prefer "insurgents" or "resistance" to describe them and soften the blow of their horrendous acts committed against soldier and civilian alike. And HRW uses moral equivalence to an astounding degree. Unless they start documenting and condemning Palestinian human rights infractions, they are just mouthpieces. Until HRW takes a stance on the murder and maiming committed by terrorists instead of whether they're being treated kindly enough when caught, they can climb up my arse and fight for air. From the mysterious "former Captain": "We had these new high-speed trailer showers. One guy was the cleaner. He was an Iraqi contractor working on base. We were taking pretty accurate mortar fire and rockets and we were getting nervous. Well one day we found him with a GPS11 receiver and he is like calling in strikes on us! What the fuck!? We took him but we are pissed because he stabbed us in the back. So we gave him the treatment. We got on him with the jugs and doused him and smoked and fucked him." All this from a guy who gleefully participated? This guy's not a whistle blower. He's trying to save his own neck. And your "chickenhawk" arguments are nothing but empty insults because you, yourself, seem to have plenty to say about something you have no firsthand experience of, so you can't say what you'd do. Just what would you have done? Give the guy a massage? I think they should have put a bullet between his eyes. You are so single minded and hell bent (not to mention the fact that you NEVER contribute a coherent message because you hate everyone and everything equally) that no one here can take you seriously. You're an absolute joke. How long have you been spouting off here and have yet to win a single convert with your nonsensical, regurgitated crap? It really scares me that you're out there walking around among sane people. [shudder]

Posted by: Oyster at September 24, 2005 07:36 AM (YudAC)

14 Hey Oyster, Common sense says don't torture or they'll torture back. Want an all-out mob war over there with no friggin rules? Mad Max rules? Want captured American soldiers burned alive in front of video cameras? Hell No! War is hell and we are becoming frigging barbarians beating people to death. Want war? Go pick up a 16 and go over to that rotten place.

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 24, 2005 07:47 AM (VhNDM)

15 Wow, Oyster. I've never seen such dissembling in the name of supporting torture. To wit: 1. It's a liberal media outlet. (Ignores the fact it's information provided by a credible source, a participant and troop member.) 2. He participated and is trying to cover his butt. (What precisely does this do in terms of making the story true or untrue? There's more than one whistleblower. Whether they participated or not, they are still a whistleblower and pretty damnhonest to admit they were involved.) To use your own wording against you: it really scares me that people like YOU are out there walking among sane people. Soulless ghouls should only be out on Halloween. Just cut the crap and say it: you support torture as long as it furthers your goals.

Posted by: Anne at September 24, 2005 08:47 AM (ERpL1)

16 I guess you'll say it for me, Anne. Since I said no such thing.

Posted by: Oyster at September 24, 2005 03:28 PM (YudAC)

17 Oyster does everyone just like fith with you or what? I've not noticed you being too radical but then again this is the Jawa Report.

Posted by: Howie at September 24, 2005 03:34 PM (D3+20)

18 People seem to put words in my mouth a lot lately, Howie. They have their own ideas and unless I shouted from the rooftops exactly what they want to hear then they'll take my words and make them into something they can spout their indignance at. It's the recognition of their selective reasoning that gets them upset. These are the people who quickly and vocally condemn anything the US military does and don't just as openly give, at the very least, equal voice to wrongs done "to" the US military. But they support the troops! In a nut shell, if we do something wrong, it's bad, if they do something wrong, it's because of something we did. Anne "assumes" too much. She assumes I endorse torture because I disapprove of TIME'S efforts to keep alive issues that have been and are being addressed without saying that they are, in fact, being addressed. I never said the Captian was lying, but because I question his motives and point out his own guilt (which he pointed out himself) she assumes many things. One, that I imply his story is untrue and then she goes on to defend him for his "honesty". That's fine. But, it doesn't erase his guilt and it doesn't make it right for TIME or anyone else to continue to beat that drum which emboldens their "insurgents" and feeds the flame of anti-American sentiment. But heaven forbid if "I" defend anything. Becuase "I'm wrong". I guess I have to spell out in elementary terms that I believe torture is wrong. But let me add that I think it's wrong for ANYONE, not just us. The double standards just don't cut it. Regarding my above post and the story of the guy who was caught with the GPS - Anne was indignant over the fact that the guy was beat up, but didn't have anything to say about him directing mortar attacks on the soldiers? These people don't realize that our defense of the military or anything American didn't spring out of a void. It was born out of incessant verbal attacks that focused on one thing; America bashing to the exclusion of all else. And I'm just one of those people who are sick of it.

Posted by: Oyster at September 25, 2005 08:46 AM (YudAC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

September 14, 2005

A Guy, A Train, National Review, and a Thong

The Maximum Leader waxes poetic.

Posted by: Rusty at 05:40 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.

Apprentice Contestant Alla Wartenberg Is Ex Stripper Who Inspired Death Row Inmates Killing Spree: Image Gallery

Alla Wartenberg scandal and photo gallery here. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:16 PM | Comments (26) | Add Comment
Post contains 356 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Apologies for reposting, but we were getting massive Google hits to the main page and not to the archive.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 12:58 PM (JQjhA)

2 Besides, not every post can be about Angelina Jolie's lesbian experiences.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 01:10 PM (JQjhA)

3 And I can't single-handedly win the war on terror.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 01:12 PM (JQjhA)

4 And think of all the crazy blog money!!

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 01:13 PM (JQjhA)

5 So get off my case!!

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 01:16 PM (JQjhA)

6 Not that any one is e-mailing me saying, "Gee, Rusty, what is with another stupid post on this chick? We come here for the terrorism related posts not this chick."

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 01:18 PM (JQjhA)

7 But I know what you're thinking. Especially you Filthy....and you Joe...and you Brad...... So give me a break!! /mental breakdown

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 01:20 PM (JQjhA)

8 I know this is going to bring more charges of not just being GAY, but being BAD GAYÂ….even so, Â….. I have to say that Â…I donÂ’t like this one either. She just looks like sheÂ’s seen better days. Maybe 20 years ago on a high school wrestling trip to Minsk. You know how to tell if you really have a hot one? If that other fruitcake DON will switch teams for her, then, you have something special.I guess he will jump ship for a quickie then go back to batting lefty. If not, sheÂ’s just damaged Slavic goods.

Posted by: Brad at September 14, 2005 01:50 PM (3OPZt)

9 Nah, I think you're right with this one.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 02:04 PM (JQjhA)

10 I'd like to go on the record as saying that I am 100% in favor of putting ex-stripper skanks on prime time television and would encourage more of this sort of decision-making from television executives across the country.

Posted by: Rob at September 14, 2005 03:29 PM (fcqpB)

11 oh rusty. what will you Put up next. ARe we goIng to See Nothing more than prUrient photos DEsigned to boost readership?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 14, 2005 03:54 PM (RHG+K)

12 I want Jen! And right now. Rusty, don't you have some Jen phots archived somewhere?

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 14, 2005 04:30 PM (q9AWQ)

13 Rusty, I hate to go OT on you, but I just read on WuzzaDem that Aaron Broussard's interview with Tim Russert on NBC was nothing but a crock. I either commented here or at LGF, I can't remember which, that his story was fishy from the beginning because phone service was nil after the hurricane hit. I'm glad to be vindicated. Brossard was probably covering for whoever didn't evacuate those poor old people from the nursing home. I understand that the owners of the home have been charged with negligent homicide but are already out on bond. Nope, he can't pin this one on George Bush.

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 14, 2005 04:43 PM (q9AWQ)

14 Yeah, I saw John's post. Awesome stuff.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 04:51 PM (JQjhA)

15 "Besides, not every post can be about Angelina Jolie's lesbian experiences." Why the hell not? Surely you can manage just drop in a link at the bottom of the post?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 14, 2005 05:13 PM (0yYS2)

16 Now, Rusty, where are those Jen photos? I'm gettin' impatient!

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 14, 2005 05:14 PM (q9AWQ)

17 Who the hell is Jen??!!

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 14, 2005 05:26 PM (JQjhA)

18 Call me crazy, but I don't think she's that hot. Looks like she's been rode hard and put away wet. East block style. Big calves, smells like cabbage. I'll take the "Hot Muslim" Miss UK.

Posted by: California Conservative at September 14, 2005 05:34 PM (f2ERQ)

19 Randy, uh, Jennifer Anniston, like, you know, that girl that is the main star of that television show, like, you know, called Amigos.

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 14, 2005 05:38 PM (q9AWQ)

20 Actually Rusty, according to The Smoking Gun, her previous last name was not Moldova, but Kosova. It's in the court transcripts on their site.

Posted by: Digger at September 14, 2005 08:32 PM (WfCl/)

21 Talk about phallic symbols, is that the Chrysler building rising up behind her or is it just a Mirage?

Posted by: Scribbler at September 16, 2005 04:03 AM (6WgY5)

22 i think alla is a money hungry bitch

Posted by: bill at September 16, 2005 02:55 PM (VyPTG)

23 Before moving to Las Vages Alla was a stripper at a all nude location in Salt lake, Utah. Moving up the ranks she begn to travel to Vages on weekends for increased profits. In mid 1995 she established a permanent residence in Vegas so she could work every day in the local club. This is when she meet her killer buddy. In the months to come she became a ghost, only to be heard again when the story broke on a national news program. In her true colors is was not about the tragedy that had taken place, it was just about the notirity of being a so called victom. Success should never leave the trampled in its wake. If Trump is looking for success no matter the consequence then he may have found his apprentice.

Posted by: One at October 09, 2005 01:13 AM (6mUkl)

24 Before moving to Las Vages Alla was a stripper at a all nude location in Salt lake, Utah. Moving up the ranks she begn to travel to Vages on weekends for increased profits. In mid 1995 she established a permanent residence in Vegas so she could work every day in the local club. This is when she meet her killer buddy. In the months to come she became a ghost, only to be heard again when the story broke on a national news program. In her true colors is was not about the tragedy that had taken place, it was just about the notirity of being a so called victom. Success should never leave the trampled in its wake. If Trump is looking for success no matter the consequence then he may have found his apprentice.

Posted by: One at October 09, 2005 01:14 AM (6mUkl)

25 That woman isn't a self made anything. My sister worked for her at her "salon". She would starve out her stylists and than sue them for getting jobs elsewhere. One of them lost their house.

Posted by: Jana at October 14, 2005 01:30 AM (DchmI)

26 One of her employees was raped for several hours in the parking lot of her salon. Alla sent her a big bunch of flowers the next day with a card that read."Lets not make a big deal out of this" What a snake. Also she owns one salon..not four. She married her money.

Posted by: Jana at October 14, 2005 01:36 AM (DchmI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

September 13, 2005

57% of College Girls Want Sex with Angelina Jolie

A new survey by Playboy indicates that while only 54% of college coeds would cheat on their boyfriends with Brad Pitt, 57% would hook up with Angelina Jolie. Who can blame them?

Flash News:

HereÂ’s some kinky news for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie: A lot of female college students want to sleep with them. Both of them.
According to Playboy magazine, 54 percent of college gals would cheat on their boyfriend with Pitt and 57 percent want to get jiggy with Jolie.

In other Angelina Jolie related polls (hey, pollsters have to do something in off-election years too!), 27 percent of 18-59 year old women say that they would 'most like to resemble Anglina Jolie in the bedroom'.

In an unscientific poll conducted by The Jawa Report, 100% of husbands say they wish their wives would resemble Angelina Jolie in the bedroom, too. The margin of error in our poll is plus or minus zero percent. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:01 PM | Comments (40) | Add Comment
Post contains 323 words, total size 3 kb.

1 100% of Bloggers named Shamalama want Sex with Angelina Jolie. 100% of the wives of Bloggers named Shamalama would Slice off his Johnson if he had Sex with Angelina Jolie, assuming that He would still have a Johnson left after Sex with Angelina Jolie. --- What is it about her that makes me think of her as an absolute Sex Machine? Is it her lips? Her figure? Her walk? Her (assumed) attitude? I don't know - I just know it works. Anniston ain't got nuthin' on Jolie. Brad certainly upgraded this time.

Posted by: shamalama at September 13, 2005 04:30 PM (TfBxJ)

2 I can't say that I blame those college girls. I would have sex with Angelina! She's is one of the most sexy women in the world, if not THE sexiest. Brad has done well. Too bad Jen! You're out!

Posted by: Angelina Kidman at September 13, 2005 04:37 PM (C2Szf)

3 100% of Nancy Gribbles would kill Dale Gribbles for even thinking of it. Then again, Nancy does sort of have Angelina Jolie's lips.......

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 13, 2005 04:38 PM (JQjhA)

4 Say what you want, but I'll take Jen any time!

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 13, 2005 04:50 PM (q9AWQ)

5 Yeah but Jen would not give you any. she would just stand around looking good hoping that would be enough. Hint Jen you have to give it up. Just having it ain't enough.

Posted by: Howie at September 13, 2005 04:59 PM (D3+20)

6 Guys, it may be tempting, but IÂ’m bettin that chick has cooties. Good God, just the thought of covering the same ground as Billy Bob would be a big enough turn off for me. And you gals,Â….. 54% of college chicks want to sleep with this bed hopping Petri dish? Better send up some of that Michael Vicks Vapo rub to college health centers. 54% ??? Man IÂ’m starting to see signs of the final days.

Posted by: Brad at September 13, 2005 05:22 PM (3OPZt)

7 I just don't see it. To me she looks like the epitome of "ordinary." Maybe it's because I know she's trying so damned hard to be extra-ordinary. I also know she rejects her dad, for no obvious reason other than that existentially hyperstrained dark female anti-heros are supposed to reject their dads. Ordinary.

Posted by: Demosophist at September 13, 2005 05:25 PM (rRxGF)

8 Rusty, I just heard through an evacuee from NO whose husband is a police officer that they did not receive the monies due them on their regular payday.(last Friday, I think) Does anyone out there know whether this is true or not? If true, this is an additional scandal. The men who stayed and did not bug out are the real heroes in this NO mess. They deserved to be paid.

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 13, 2005 05:37 PM (q9AWQ)

9 I don't think Angelina is ordinary at all. She has a very unique beauty that is incredibly appealing.

Posted by: Angelina Kidman at September 13, 2005 05:45 PM (jMkPi)

10 I agree with Angelina Kidman. In fact, Angelina and Angelina..... Joe, I've heard nothing, but if you think about it, if the bank that the checks are written from is flooded...It's probably a temporary glitch.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 13, 2005 06:26 PM (JQjhA)

11 EwwwÂ….Itchy/Scratchy

Posted by: Brad at September 13, 2005 06:55 PM (3OPZt)

12 Every girl I know has expressed the same thing.

Posted by: Will Franklin at September 13, 2005 08:46 PM (C5hzG)

13 Rusty, I was informed that the checks were to be direct deposit and the payment was promised by the mayor. I'll try to get more information when I talk to this lady tomorrow, but she is reluctant to say too much. She fears for her husband's job. That's all they have right now.

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 13, 2005 09:29 PM (q9AWQ)

14 Brad is clearly gay, the bad kind!! Seriously, can a straight man actually not have the hots for Angelina Jolie?? :-)

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 13, 2005 10:03 PM (JQjhA)

15 I wouldn't bet on Angelina being disease free, so I'd only do her with a condom, and I wouldn't kiss her.

Posted by: Carlos at September 13, 2005 10:42 PM (8e/V4)

16 Hey man, 4 things I just cannot get over: Billy Bob Thornton DNA. Maybe I do have problems, I am obviously not main stream America. My mom once told me I was born into the wrong century. I wonder what she meant by that?

Posted by: Brad at September 13, 2005 10:46 PM (6mUkl)

17 I was just watching a feature on Angelina this afternoon on TV. The odd thing is, I find her hot. Not that it's a big thing, but I'm gay. Anyway, point is, Angelina Jolie is HOT! I'd be straight for 5 minutes in bed with her!

Posted by: don at September 13, 2005 11:43 PM (h9tow)

18 Hmm...batcrap crazy AND skanky. What's not to love? And the collagen-lip thing is old now. I'm with Brad and Demosophist on this one. If such a thing were to happen, it would be in a hot tub with a fairly strong bleach solution.

Posted by: See-Dubya at September 14, 2005 01:57 AM (jV2ep)

19 The thing is... Angelina Jolie has so much plastic surgery on her face and also on her body that the only thing left natural is her lips, which were quite puffy already, so as a natural model, I feel it is a farce to find anything so plastic really sexy. I liked her in Gia, pre-boob job and pre-mandibular implants, pre-Asian eye surgery and before several nose jobs. She could give Michael Jackson a lesson or two on the perfect nose! Granted, it is great work and subtly done over the last 7 years, but she is one of the most unnatural women in Hollywood. Yet, nobody ever points this out! This gives girls a very unrealistic expectation of what they should look like. Check out the wide nose she had in Gia and Hackers (serious bridge and tip work!) Her new look brought new attention, and then her career really took off. This sends only one message... get the knife out and start chiseling the perfect face! Leave nothing to chance or talent. Those of us who stay natural are compared to the work of a surgeon, not the work of nature! Still, many of us European models prefer to stay imperfect and leave the knives and plastic look to Hollywood. She turned out fantastic, yet I still would not sleep with a woman so insecure about her own looks. And what color ARE her eyes? Blue? No, but those contacts almost look real. She looks very exotic with dark hair and skin with blue eyes, but her eyes aren't blue!They are brownish green which does not look nearly as nice! Now I hear she is reading the Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Further proof that this woman is Phony. Ayn Rand, please! Next she will name her new baby Dagny or John Galt. No wonder her partner Brad is taking up a new hobby, architecture...I guess he has read Ayn Rand as well. A pholosophy considered the "virtue of selfishness" and "treating persons as ends rather than as means only". It didn't really work for Ayn Rand, and I dare say - it also won't work for Jolie. For anyone interested... Ayn Rand is worth reading only to find out just how narcisstic and selfserving one person can become.

Posted by: federica at September 14, 2005 01:59 AM (zV2XR)

20 angelina is HOT thats why the polls are thre to prove it... sure some people deny it but who are you kidding!! oh and about the bleach thing is that what was used on you the last time some one felt desperate or got paid enough to be with you

Posted by: harmoney at September 14, 2005 02:48 AM (Q3HGJ)

21 angelina jolie. (no comment).iwish,i want tom meet with her.she is my dream.u just keep ur s smile.

Posted by: baishali at September 14, 2005 03:54 AM (WZqeS)

22 Let's see how many co-eds want to sleep with the 50 year old Jolie. Even a 45 year old body with 11 tats is a hideous thought. But a 50 year old butt with a giant dragon hovering above will be pointing down to the dragon's old den of Hill Billy Bob's remains. Now that is what I call a "Bone Collector". Luckily most of us can comment on the 50 yr old Jolie's sex appeal soon enough and I guarantee Aniston will be having the last laugh! Fake, Phoney and Old Jolie. Even her new nose won't help her then. Little Mad and Zahara are going to be the ones to really suffer. She totes them around like Prada bags, making sure they are on every magazine cover worldwide. Nice mom - even if she is using the attention to highlight the poverty issue... These are not props or commercials - they are little people who will one day grow up and wish she had protected their privacy. She is a sick girl. Later the sickness will only multiply with the years. Her only solace is that brother James will be dried up and used as well so they can still make out in public. Brad Pitt will be a footnote in this story.

Posted by: Federica at September 14, 2005 01:06 PM (zV2XR)

23 well for federica... you really made me take a look of what you are writing, even though i am a jolie-fun... your words, just changed somehow my point of view and i should thank you for that. you really point things which i -with my eyes blinded from her beauty (wheather it's real or not..)- could not see.. But please tell me.. if you hate her so much, and you think she is a bad person and a bad parent and a sick show-off girl... how are you able to know about everything she does, all the changes on her body and all her films?!? Thank you but .. no thanx!!

Posted by: Selanna at September 14, 2005 05:37 PM (+SuD6)

24 Jolie is enough to make you gag, if you look closely. She's more pneumatic and contrived than even Polythene Pam Andersaon. Why are so many guys hot for women that are plastic surgery projects gone bad?

Posted by: Daniel at September 14, 2005 08:05 PM (6mUkl)

25 Angelina is old. Her titties sag. At least 25% of college girls are prettier, probably 35%.

Posted by: Robert at September 14, 2005 11:06 PM (PKvHI)

26 Well Salanna, I have looked into this after my neice decided that she should have plastic surgery at the age of 19 because she isn't pretty enough. Angelina is her idol and so she wants to emulate her. It is alarming to have a young girl think this is a good role model for her. I don't hate Angelina I simply think she is a self contrived icon of every young girl's dissatisfaction with themselve by comparison. At least Pam Anderson admits she is plastic, and not natural. Those that go under the knife and then proclaim that they are natural should be ashamed of themselves. She is unnatural, insecure and people should be aware of this. She has problems, nothing wrong with that. We all do, but we aren't all role models for half the world's young girls. With all the risks, we have a responsibility to educate people that those risks are real. Silicon or gel or saline...you put a foreign substance in your body and you are asking for trouble. To be beautiful and healthy is a gift, to take such extreme measures to become the image of beauty via surgery because of Hollywood is sad and unfortunate. Nobody else is pointing out the smoke and mirrors here, so I feel it is important to see both sides. Why are these girls putting botulism into their face at 27 or 28 years old? Lack of education about the risks and unrealistic, airbrushed photos in the media daily. Those tight, expressionlist faces... Maybe you are right - let's cover up the shallow lives we are leading -we have too much of everything - and we are more interested in looks than anything else. Fair enough, but I don't buy it. Looks don't last, no matter how much surgery you have. Scary what these stars are doing to stay young looking and it isn't working! In most of Europe natural beauty is the way to go and taking care of yourself - I am just hoping it catches on.

Posted by: Federica at September 15, 2005 01:09 AM (zV2XR)

27 I want to lose my virginity with Angelina Jolie. I think I can do anything she wants me to do. My life wish is to taste her lips. I LOVE HER!!!!!!

Posted by: jovana at September 15, 2005 02:16 AM (WUK26)

28 well federica you take enough time out of your daily life to pick out flaws and imperfections and make comments that you dont even know whether they are true or not in order to put some one that you dont even know down, and yes no ones perfect but you cant blame some one in the media for being who they are after all its there profession. but its your job as a family memeber to make sure that your niece has enough confidence within her self not to go to the extent of plastic surgery!! and by the way im a 19year old who thinks angelina is gorgeous but no i would never contemplate the thought of surgery to look like some one else because i have the confidence to be my self...

Posted by: harmoney at September 15, 2005 03:13 AM (Mrhmm)

29 i don't know which one of you is right.. Federica has all the rights in the world to be against someone who pretends to be perfect and wants people to buy it, and even more when this person is the one that might put in danger a part of her family.. and yes it's bad that we've been brainwashed that we should look like hollywood girls. But there comes Harmoney, on the other hand, to add that noone told us that we should be like them. This is the starsystem, to create some super beautiful people just to make the rest of the world stare at them as if they are gods. And this is the only way for those people to survive. Beauty is their only weapon.. and thank god -or mr.surgeon- Angelina has a machine gun!! And for my conclusion.. i saw "gia" yesterday.. she was as beautiful as she is now.. (i mean her face).. i couldn't find any flaws.. just admit that she is a natural beauty.. no matter what she did next to become even better.

Posted by: Selanna at September 15, 2005 08:17 AM (+SuD6)

30 OK good points! My neice just saw the show about botched plastic surgery and she is a little less enthusiastic now. Also there is a great site called www.awfulplasticsurgery.com that really got her believing that there are risks involved that you don't always hear about and the results are not always better than the original. So I am happy about that. I was a bit over the edge when she told me she wanted to be perfect like Angelina Jolie! Over it now - thanks for listening.

Posted by: Federica at September 15, 2005 12:24 PM (zV2XR)

31 Federica, Selanna Harmoney, Jovana and Don: Just curious, are you the 5 blonde chicks I always see Heffner hanging around with?

Posted by: Brad at September 15, 2005 12:46 PM (3OPZt)

32 wouldnt it be wierd if Brad and Angelina actually read all the stuff yall say, they'de probably laugh there ass off..

Posted by: chelsea at September 15, 2005 02:46 PM (JUHNC)

33 hey i think brad is extreamly hot, angelina is very pretty, they look awsome together, i think the both dont have anything like HIV or AIDS, and i think they would have a sexy kid.

Posted by: chelsea at September 15, 2005 02:49 PM (JUHNC)

34 angelina jolie isnt that hot i think tanit phoenix is the most sexiest woman in the world and definetly the most experience i slep with her and i know.

Posted by: harry (prince) at October 05, 2005 03:30 AM (cJMc5)

35 angelina jolie isnt that hot i think tanit phoenix is the most sexiest woman in the world and definetly the most experience i slept with her and i know.

Posted by: harry (prince) at October 05, 2005 03:30 AM (cJMc5)

36 I just wanted to say that even if angelina jolie had that much cosmetic surgery I donÃ‚Â´t think thatÃ‚Â´s wrong, she is beautyfull and every one should be thankfull that there is sutch a face to look at. I hate when people say that cosmetic surgery is bad, as long as looks natural. you shouldnÃ‚Â´t be stuck to a face that you donÃ‚Â´t like just because itÃ‚Â´s natural.

Posted by: Tiago at October 14, 2005 07:06 AM (II6Ut)

37 fedrica seriously wher are your facts like seriously take a look at her teenage photos and of her now she hasnt changed only a bit but it comes in life you know shes naturally beautfiul well what would you say if i said you had plastic surgery thats like saying angelina does (cuz i dont know u and you dont know her and i dont have proof and neither do you) CATCH MY DRIFT????????

Posted by: anonymous at November 01, 2005 09:24 PM (0a/RG)

38 fedrica seriously wher are your facts like seriously take a look at her teenage photos and of her now she hasnt changed only a bit but it comes natural in life you know shes naturally beautfiul well what would you say if i said you had plastic surgery thats like saying angelina does (cuz i dont know u and you dont know her and i dont have proof and neither do you) CATCH MY DRIFT????????

Posted by: anonymous at November 01, 2005 09:24 PM (0a/RG)

39 plastic or not, i'd still hit it.

Posted by: random guy at November 03, 2005 08:31 AM (uTf7C)

40 plastic or not, i'd still hit it.

Posted by: random guy at November 03, 2005 08:32 AM (uTf7C)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

September 12, 2005

Brothels in Rhode Island?

It seems that a loophole allows brothels to operate legally in Rhode Island. AP:

Sex is for sale in the state capital, and police here say there's little they can do about it. Although soliciting sexual favors on the street is illegal in Rhode Island, authorities say a loophole in state law allows prostitution behind closed doors Â— including in storefronts that advertise as massage parlors and spas just blocks from City Hall. "We don't have a law criminalizing prostitution indoors," said Providence Police Lt. Thomas Verdi, who leads the department's anti-prostitution efforts.

You'll have to excuse the light blogging for the rest of the day. I'm heading up to Providence on some, er, urgent business....

Hat tip to James Joyner.

Posted by: Rusty at 12:14 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.

September 08, 2005

Company Releases X-Ray Glasses

X-Ray glasses are finally here. It's like a lifelong dream come true. Via Ghost of the Flea we learn that Advanced Intelligence has released a new CCD camera capable of seeing through clothes. And even though they mention that the camera can see through clothes in the very first sentence on their web page, the page later adds that you shouldn't use the camera to view anything 'indecent' like, er, looking through 'tight clothes, swimsuites, or sun dresses'.

The. Thought. Never. Croseed. My. Mind.

Now excuse me while I slip on these glasses.... more...

Posted by: Rusty at 11:18 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.

96kb generated in CPU 0.0335, elapsed 0.1242 seconds.
124 queries taking 0.1079 seconds, 375 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 8067
Files: 20
Bytes: 98.7M
CPU Time: 5:33
Queries: 819960

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76633

Feeds

September 30, 2005

September 28, 2005

September 23, 2005

September 14, 2005

September 13, 2005

September 12, 2005

September 08, 2005

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds