I haven't commented on these riots in France (and most of Europe for that matter) because they are simply ludicrous. Why? You don't immigrate to a country to make it your own or to carve out your own enclave. Unless, of course, you're Muslim. It's a well known fact that if you're a non-Muslim in Muslim lands that you are required to do one of three things:
If you're a Muslim and are offended by this dark spot in the Quaran I'm bringing up then maybe it's time to think about what your religion really stands for.
Let's put a few things together here. A Muslim in France immigrated there because of "opportunity". However, after a year or two of living in France the Muslim finds that the opportunity in socialist France is quite limited. The Muslims all start to recognize this and begin congregating in neighborhoods, mosques, and communities and start seeing that there are many more people like them. Eventually, a "just outside of mainstream" Muslim is going to recognize this. Then the pressure to further grow Allah's lands comes down from a handful of imams and Islamic religious leaders. At that point, all you need is a spark and apparently the Muslim rioters across Europe have found that spark and they won't be stopped until the land is Allah's or a ten year peace is established (read up on the significance of ten year peace agreements in a history of Islam).
The riots in France (the supposed leader of Europe) are well into their second week. The riots have spilled out of France and into other countries in Europe. So what should the French do? I would have dropped the hammer a while ago and stopped putting out the fires and started shooting the people starting them. But that's not the French's style. Instead, the French president Jacques Chirac is allowing curfews. Way to show that muscle France!
It's been said a few times before but Europe is the next battleground in the war on terror and the weakness of countries like France is evidence as to why.
1
To the stupid moron comment-
You don't immigrate to a country to make it your own or to carve out your own enclave. Unless, of course, you're Muslim.
This is precisely how Amerikkka was formed you dumbass!
Posted by: Jawa Sucks at November 08, 2005 12:32 PM (/3n/k)
2
Thanks for the continued stupidity jawa report. It is obvious you haven't lifted a shred of coverage on the riots in France which started because 2 youths died because of the brutality of the French police.
Secondly, if France began shooting these young rioters, there would be full scale war in Europe right now, and I think it is in France's best interest, as well as Europe and then the US for that matter, that they try curfews first before letting the guns blaze.
I'm all for letting the guns blaze, but let's blaze them at the right people, the Europeans and Americans who support the global war against Islam, and seek to imprison and kill non-white people.
Posted by: jawa Sucks so bad at November 08, 2005 12:47 PM (/3n/k)
3
While the definitions of immigrate and colonize may be similar there is a huge difference.
When you put immigration into context across history, it's a good thing. However, when you put into context over the past twenty years it's not such a great thing.
Of course, Americans didn't burn cars at Plymouth Rock either.
Posted by: Chris Short at November 08, 2005 01:04 PM (0OCQY)
4
Haha, the leftards are really enjoying this. I can't wait until they start rioting here, it'll be better than Christmas!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 08, 2005 01:08 PM (0yYS2)
5
Chris,
I was under the impression that the "youths" were killed by electrocution not "police brutality."
Glad you posted the article by the way.
Posted by: thirdee at November 08, 2005 01:10 PM (mG6T7)
6
thirdee,
Hey... The riots in LA were started because cops who subdued a man high on PCP after recklessly driving through the city were deemed to not have used excessive force. So what did the rioters do? Burned their own neighborhoods, looted stores, and beat up an innocent truck driver.
Electrocution... That's part of it. Who hides from the police in a power sub-station anyway?
Posted by: Chris Short at November 08, 2005 01:17 PM (0OCQY)
7
The youths jumped the fence at the sub-station to avoid a Police ID checkpoint, they weren't chased but they probably had reason to fear apprehension since reports also indicate that most of these "youths" are drug-dealers and thieves - how's that Police brutality?
They take a torch to my Citroen and I shoot 'em with bean-bags, then cuff them - citizen's arrest.
Posted by: -keith in mtn. view at November 08, 2005 01:21 PM (Lq/X7)
8
by showing one-sided disrespect you create anger, frustration, reaction.
That is whats happening in Palestine, Iraq and in a lesser degree in France....
time to take a conclusion I guess...
Posted by: kde at November 08, 2005 01:48 PM (w/SiQ)
9
Nice URL in the second comment there, Mr. Jawa Sucks. Bitter are we? Are you one of Malkin's disgusting email authors?
"...but let's blaze them at the right people,..."
Ever think you're part of the problem with that kind of reasoning? Give me the name of one person over there who was attacked or had their property torched because they explicitly supported killing "non-whites". Can't, can you? Because you don't know, do you? You don't know what the hell you're talking about at all, do you?
Yammer on. I'll just tune out your precious, indignant rage.
Posted by: Oyster at November 08, 2005 01:51 PM (fl6E1)
10
Secondly, if France began shooting these young rioters, there would be full scale war in Europe right now, and I think it is in France's best interest, as well as Europe and then the US for that matter, that they try curfews first before letting the guns blaze.
Brute force is the only way to quell an insurrection, less of course you think they should invite the rioters to the negotiation table? mobilizing the military and using them as a blocking force while using police to arrest and detain is as good a measure as any lethal force, using non-lethal weapons such as tear-gas, tazers, beanbag rounds, flashbangs, water-cannons can be used to if you're not willing to kill anyone. of course you have to have the will to use violence to stop violence.
Posted by: dave at November 08, 2005 01:58 PM (CcXvt)
11
"...there would be a full scale war in Europe right now..."
Does anyone in here really believe the Islamic Middle East would SURVIVE, much less win, a "Full Scale" war against what would likely come down to at least a European/US/Israeli alliance?
I'm not a fan of this scenario in any way, and neither are the dreggs of Islam. They know they'd get their collective asses handed to them in any open conflict, so they just pick away at non-Islamic states, hoping they will lack the political resolve to really do anything about it. With France they may have finally picked a winner.
Posted by: Jeremy at November 08, 2005 02:17 PM (KuG4L)
12
Dear First Poster,
As a fellow American, I will support with my money, my vote, and all else that I have your right to Free Speech. Including your right to refer to our country as "Amerikkka." However, I find your disrepect disgusting, and would like to suggest that you find a country that you will enjoy more.
Sincerely,
Jeremy
Posted by: Jeremy at November 08, 2005 02:27 PM (KuG4L)
13
Jeremy,
I think he may have posted and ran.
Posted by: thirdee at November 08, 2005 02:50 PM (mG6T7)
14
Gee... What makes you think that?
Posted by: Chris Short at November 08, 2005 02:55 PM (0OCQY)
15
Jawa sucks, Jawa sucks so bad, I agree. Maybe the names too, but it depends on what it... Nevermind.
While the definitions of immigrate and colonize may be similar there is a huge difference.
When you put immigration into context across history, it's a good thing. However, when you put into context over the past twenty years it's not such a great thing.
Of course, Americans didn't burn cars at Plymouth Rock either.
Where's the explanation on difference between immigrating and colonizing? Were there cars back then? How is immigration a good thing to others than the ones that get rid of all the immigrants?
Posted by: A Finn at November 08, 2005 02:57 PM (lGolT)
16
Something wrong with the
(i):eeing there, anyway, you know the quote.
Posted by: A Finn at November 08, 2005 03:00 PM (lGolT)
17
The French are finding out that the terror lies within. They have made some good moves though like banning that ridiculous muslim head gear in schools.
I challenge any muslim to say that other religions are embraced in muslim run countries. Muslims don't believe in liberty or care about non-muslims. Time they got their own medicine. Hang them all.
Posted by: Jester at November 08, 2005 03:19 PM (QKZX5)
18
The first poster is gone. They always leave their troll droppings, like a crow, and fly off to fowl another nest. Surely he jests on letting the guns blaze, as there are many here in Jesusland who have practiced their hunting and shooting skills for years just in case people like him might want to try something.
I suggest that if someone tried to burn my car, the police would not have to worry about arresting him or her. Sorry, call the mortician, or whoever would prance right on back to wherever they came from with no thoughts of wrongdoing. The French ought to try this system. Works pretty good here!
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 08, 2005 03:47 PM (rUyw4)
19
Immigration in modern times, is moving to another already established civilization. This usually includes conforming to their society. Colonization is establishing a civilization.
I'm so tired of idiot liberals. I'll tolerate the naive big hearted liberals who can at least make an intelligent argument until the liberal idiots are gone.
Posted by: Laura at November 08, 2005 04:30 PM (ftixA)
20
And yes I know they're RARE.
Posted by: Laura at November 08, 2005 04:31 PM (ftixA)
21
personally I was
shocked that the criminal rioters ignore a curfew and burned more cars, you mean you can't stop a criminal commiting more crime, by imposing another law on them?
How about the stage that requires getting their testicles out of their handbag, you know --
Curfew enforcement.
Posted by: dave at November 08, 2005 05:00 PM (CcXvt)
22
Are muslims offended by wet noodles? I say they need be beat with them? That'll stop that rioting...about as good as a curfew.
A Finn, You have a good point...perhaps they set each other's "wagons" on fire back in the colonization/immigration days. They were probably shot with a musket thereafter so they. Now there's a plan.
Posted by: thirdee at November 08, 2005 05:18 PM (mG6T7)
23
Screw the French - screw the Euros - nuff said
Posted by: hondo at November 08, 2005 05:32 PM (Jvmry)
24
Dear Mr. Sucks, lick me.
Great post.
Posted by: Howie at November 08, 2005 05:56 PM (D3+20)
25
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1131230997127&call_page=TS_News&call_pageid=968332188492&call_pagepath=News/News&pubid=968163964505&DPL=IvsNDS%2f7ChAX&tacodalogin=yes
Posted by: Route Irish at November 08, 2005 06:20 PM (Eh9tH)
26
Hey, everybody, you can read about the real Route Irish at Michelle Malkin's blog. It's safer than Hollywood Blvd.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 08, 2005 06:48 PM (rUyw4)
27
"Does anyone in here really believe the Islamic Middle East would SURVIVE, much less win, a "Full Scale" war against what would likely come down to at least a European/US/Israeli alliance?"
If memory serves, a massively outnumbered Israel kicked the Arabs' asses three times, and our combat forces during Desert Storm were outnumbered ten to one, but still only took a couple of days to turn the sixth largest army in the world into the second largest one in Iraq.
Arabs are totally inept at warfare, and always lose bigtime in any engagement against forces from the civilized world, because not only is their culture from the stone age, so is their battle doctrine. For people who suck at fighting, they would be well advised to avoid it, but oh well, let's give them what they want.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 08, 2005 07:24 PM (0yYS2)
28
Oh boy! The rioters are in trouble now. The French are going to allow curfews and searches without the pre-approval of a judge. THAT SHOULD TEACH THEM NOT TO MESS WITH THE FRENCH. What a joke. The candy assed french have gone over to the liberal sissy side so long they don't know what to do.
Maybe Chirac should ask Bush. Ha, Ha. I just keep remembering the french before and after the Iraq invasion.
Keep the fires burning until they get some balls.
Posted by: greyrooster at November 08, 2005 08:07 PM (ZaAd/)
29
Its time to take the rubber bullets out of the guns,put real bullets in,and start shooting to kill anyone,I repeat,anyone,who continues to riot.We did it in new orleans to stop looters,and the French need to stop this nonsense and put this thing down before these idiots torch the whole country.
Posted by: tim at November 08, 2005 08:53 PM (5wmR3)
30
Maybe a sternly worded memo from the UN?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 09, 2005 05:09 AM (0yYS2)
31
greyrooster ---- fuck off you silly cunt. How can you encourage people to burn a country down. You are so stupid you suck fuckwit.
Posted by: federico at November 09, 2005 08:53 AM (LAbuG)
32
Sure is fun to pop in here and take a few snipes at you all, in the spirit of Juba.
Keep on rioting in France young brothers! Let's spread it around a bit more, like here in the US of Amerikkka!
Lovin' it.
Posted by: I love The Jawa and all Jawa supporters! at November 09, 2005 09:27 AM (/3n/k)
33
Sure is fun to watch idiots like you further prove how completely unnecessary and inconsequential you are. Thanx for the laugh, moron.
Posted by: Oyster at November 09, 2005 09:35 AM (fl6E1)
34
Yes, please, spread it to America. I just re-zeroed my rifle today and can't wait!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 09, 2005 06:11 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
