November 29, 2005
- He will rebuild his arsenel of weapons of mass destruction. Some day, somewhere, I am certain, he will use that arsenel again as he has ten times since 1983.
- Saddam Hussein certainly has chemical and biological weapons. There's no question about that.
- There's unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons. And will likely have nuclear weapons in the next five years. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress that Saddam has been able to make in the development of weapons of mass destruction.
- He continues to attempt to gain access to additional capability including nuclear capability. There is a real debate on how far off that is. Whether it is a matter of years or whether it is a matter of less than that.
- Good Evening. Earliear today I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs. Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.
- Other countries posess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there's one big difference. He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. And I have no doubt today that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again.
- Inspectors are saying that even if they could stay in Iraq their work would be a sham. Saddam's deception has defeated their effectiveness. Instead of the inspectors disarming Saddam, Saddam has disarmed the inspectors.
- The hard fact is that as long as Saddam is in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of the region, the security of the world. The best way to end that threat, once and for all, is with a new Iraqi government. A government willing to live in peace with its neighbors. A government that respects the lives of its people.
- The decision to use force is never cost free. Whenever American forces are placed in harm's way, we risk the loss of life. And while our strikes are focused on Iraq's military capabilities, there will be unintended Iraqi casualties.
- Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction.
- Saddam will strike again at his neighbors. He will make war on his own people. Mark my words. He will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them. And he will use them.
2. Nancy Pelosi
3. Jay Rockafeller
4. Joe Biden
5 - 11. Bill Clinton
So why are these quotes important to the "wrong war" statement? Well, all of these statements were said during the Clinton administration. They are the Democratic leaders coming out in favor of military action against Iraq and against Saddam's weapons of mass destruction while Clinton was President. So don't EVER again let a democratic senator or congressman lie to you and tell you that George Bush lied to him. They had the idea that Saddam had wmd's long before Bush ever got into office. That's a little fact that they'd seem to like you to forget.
So when a Democrat says "wrong war, wrong place, wrong time" what they're really saying is "we didn't get a chance to wage this exact same war and now we're mad." Anything else is just a lie.
All of the quotes above come from this clip sent to me by Amawalk John. Listen to it for yourself. Then decide who's REALLY against the war.
Posted by: Drew at
08:16 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 674 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 29, 2005 10:31 AM (rUyw4)
Posted by: john ryan at November 29, 2005 12:43 PM (ads7K)
Posted by: fretless at November 29, 2005 01:41 PM (twzGk)
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 29, 2005 03:52 PM (rUyw4)
Posted by: Howie at November 29, 2005 08:42 PM (D3+20)
119 queries taking 0.1427 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.