March 18, 2006

When the Agenda Hits the Fan

The headline fairly drips with that patented New York Times air of moral superiority: Symbol of Abu Ghraib Seeks to Spare Others His Nightmare, and the copy is written in their smarmy and lugubrious the-evil-that-we-do style:

AMMAN, Jordan, March 8 — Almost two years later, Ali Shalal Qaissi's wounds are still raw.

There is the mangled hand, an old injury that became infected by the shackles chafing his skin. There is the slight limp, made worse by days tied in uncomfortable positions. And most of all, there are the nightmares of his nearly six-month ordeal at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003 and 2004.

Mr. Qaissi, 43, was prisoner 151716 of Cellblock 1A. The picture of him standing hooded atop a cardboard box, attached to electrical wires with his arms stretched wide in an eerily prophetic pose, became the indelible symbol of the torture at Abu Ghraib, west of Baghdad.

There's just one problem, Ali Shalal Qaissi isn't the prisoner in the photograph, as the Times was forced to admit today in a humiliating mea culpa. Today on page one is the fake-but-accurate explanation of the incident:
Certainly, he was at Abu Ghraib, and appears with a hood over his head in some photographs that Army investigators seized from the computer belonging to Specialist Charles Graner, the soldier later convicted of being the ringleader of the abuse.
You'll excuse me if I take anything further the Times has to say on the affair with a large grain of salt.

The man the Gray Lady described with such assurance as the "indelible symbol" of Abu Ghraib is a fraud. Birds of a feather.

Via Michelle Malkin

Also posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 10:22 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 290 words, total size 2 kb.

1 WOOMP there it is.. The Newspaper of Record The Newspaper of smarmy lugubrious evil-that-we-do style ht. pet jawas

Posted by: Rubin at March 18, 2006 10:58 AM (BrVW0)

2 For 86 years the NYT has not hesitated to print anything thay may make America or American ideals seem bad. They care not if it is a lie as long as it defames what America stands for. This is just one example of thousands of such fabrications. The all time best happened 70 years ago when they ran a series of fabrications about how great and loving ol Joe was. Got an America hating Pulitzer for them. These "news" stories have all been proved to be just stories since the fall aof the USSR. But the NYT did not care 70 years ago and do not care in 06. Anything to hurt America and Get Americans killed is front page "news" for the NYT; and has been since Woody was President. Give them credit for a consistent policy the last 86 years.

Posted by: Joe macDlugal at March 18, 2006 05:00 PM (2vpLj)

3 The NYT should be burned to the ground with all aboard, and in its place a monument erected to the millions who have died at the hands of murderers whose acts were shielded and excused by its lies.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 19, 2006 07:13 AM (0yYS2)

4 Do you support the actions of our troops at Abu Gharaib? The NYT is right about this one. There should be enough shame about Abu Gharaib for all Americans.

Posted by: Robert at March 19, 2006 03:15 PM (DY+i6)

5 Robert: Since the troops at Abu Ghraib who committed crimes were a tiny percentage of the total, and those were investigated and punished, of course I support the troops at Abu Ghraib, you repugnant weasel. The treasonous surrender monkeys at the Gray Lady have admitted that they were not right, so your comment makes sense only to imbecilic partisan Bush-haters who long for America's defeat...such as yourself.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at March 19, 2006 03:57 PM (RHG+K)

6 When the time comes, the best part about hanging liberals and muslims will not be the one on the rope, kicking and turning purple, but watching those in line as they ponder their fate. I pray that time comes soon.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 19, 2006 06:45 PM (0yYS2)

7 Improbulus Maximus, well said, I like the purple part.

Posted by: Rubin at March 19, 2006 07:16 PM (zvCwC)

8 Thanks Rubin. I should have written; ...as they ponder their fate, along with their sins. As we all know, the wages of sin is death.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 20, 2006 06:02 AM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0753, elapsed 0.4123 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.404 seconds, 257 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.