October 05, 2005

When Journalists are the Enemy

posing_insurgent_ap_bilal_hussein.jpg

Above photo taken by AP stringer Bilal Hussein embedded with terrorist forces in Iraq. Thanks for the tip from Sir Humphrey who has much, much more.

I've written extensively about Bilal Hussein and the traitors at the Associated Press who employ him. Since I know a number of soldiers from Centcom's Iraq offices read this blog, here's a hint on how to catch some more terrorists: put a bug on Bilal Hussein.

And if he refuses put him in jail and apply some extreme pressure for him to give up his sources in the terrorist organizations he is embedded with.

What is the line between spreading enemy propaganda, having contacts with the enemy, and actually being one of the enemy? In war, no such line exists. This is why, as I have argued extensively in the past, Nazi propagandists such as Joseph Goebbels were as guilty of war crimes as any of the other leaders of the Third Reich.

Propaganda is a weapon in war. Enemies with weapons can be shot. Journalists who do propaganda for the enemy are therefore legitimate targets unless they lay down their weapons.

Earlier posts on Bilal Hussein:
Complete Bilal Hussein Archives

Bilal Hussein dead pool.
Bilal Hussein, still anti-American
Pulitzer Prize given to Terrorists
The Pulitzer and Terrorist Embeds
Editor and Publisher Apologizes for Terrorist Embeds *shock*

Posted by: Rusty at 01:29 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I Filthy Allah, do offer 3 lamb kabbabs, 1 dozen cumin cakes and my man servants entire Jim Nabors record collection to the soldier or soldiers that indroduces this terrorist to 72 virgins. He is a foul kite and needs to be stopped, dispatched, fitted for a shroud and or given a lead poke.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at October 05, 2005 01:35 PM (5ceWd)

2 Dirty vile crawling journalists the best buddies of the liberal news media why else dont the terrorists ever harm these reptiles becuase they are the big freinds of all the terrorists thats why they did,nt hit the New York Times building becuase they dont want to kill their biggist supporters

Posted by: sandpiper at October 05, 2005 03:10 PM (0eEOk)

3 Al-Reuters and AP are nothing but aiders and abettors for terrorist scum. If this guy gets shot, it would not be a journalist who is killed, but a terrorist. He cannot claim to be a reporter working on a story, especially when he is staging the terrorists before he takes the photos. Sick!

Posted by: jesusland joe at October 05, 2005 04:52 PM (rUyw4)

4 He is part of the enemy. "Come on guys let us go kill some Americans today so I can film it". Kill him.

Posted by: greyrooster at October 05, 2005 06:13 PM (ywZa8)

5 Filthy Allah (istagfar allah alazim), I would appreciate it if you changed your name and I kindly ask you to stop making fun of my god for no apparent reason. Make fun of the terrorists, not my religion or the religion they claim to be fighting for.

Posted by: Me at October 06, 2005 03:40 PM (9QpXU)

6 Embedded?

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at October 07, 2005 06:01 AM (A5eqb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
20kb generated in CPU 0.0181, elapsed 0.1413 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1326 seconds, 255 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.