The UK plans to establish a global extremist database. The database would list "unacceptable behaviors" like radical preaching, websites and writing articles intended to foment terrorism. British Home Secretary Charles Clarke also plans to expand the definition of 'direct incitement' to include 'indirect incitement to terrorism.' The new definition "targets those who, while not directly inciting, glorify and condone terrorist acts knowing full well that the effect on their listeners will be to encourage them to turn to terrorism." Getting listed could mean expulsion from the UK [correction: expulsion isn't an option yet] or being denied entry into the UK:
BBC—The UK is to set up a global database of extremists who face automatic vetting before being allowed in, Home Secretary Charles Clarke has told MPs.
He said the database would list "unacceptable behaviour" such as radical preaching, websites and writing articles intended to foment terrorism.
Individuals' presence on the list means they may face exclusion from the UK.
Hopes for an international conference on Islamic extremism were also outlined by Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Mr Clarke told MPs he wanted to apply more widely the home secretary's powers to exclude an individual from the UK if their presence is deemed "not conducive to the public interest". [. . .].
1
I'd like to see the US set up such a list (or at least in conjunction with the UK) for just such a purpose. However, the lefty "internationalists" in our country will apply the free speech amendment to fight it, even if our constitution doesn't protect those who are not citizens. They'll waste more of our time and resources in doing it too, because that is what they do - obstruct for the sake of obstructionism. There's been too much precedence pointing to the probability that that's exactly what will happen.
Posted by: Oyster at July 20, 2005 01:05 PM (fl6E1)
2
I think a well formed perl script running against the archives of Jawa, LGF and Rantburg would give them a good start.
Posted by: Eric J at July 20, 2005 01:16 PM (hrQvk)
3
"The new definition 'targets those who, while not directly inciting, glorify and condone terrorist acts knowing full well that the effect on their listeners will be to encourage them to turn to terrorism.'"
Watch out, liberals!
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at July 20, 2005 01:22 PM (x+5JB)
4
By this definition, Gorgeous George Galloway will be towards the top of the list.
Posted by: Ratan at July 20, 2005 06:10 PM (pdzQc)
5
The USA should set up a list of extremist which would include hollywood,the demacratic party the liberal left-wing news media and various others as well as the telaban and al queda
Posted by: sandpiper at July 20, 2005 08:11 PM (nMpEK)
6
We don't need a list sandpiper, you just named them all.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 21, 2005 12:59 AM (0yYS2)
7
I'm on the list, no doubt.
Let me offer them my 'mean finger'.
Fucking Nazis!
There over 600 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by full-time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should Martial Law need to be implemented in the United States.
Check out this support facility a few miles from me in Bastrop, Texas. I've seen it with my own eyes. There are 650 brand new white vehicles that have been sitting there for at least 5 years, just waiting for a UN decal to be slapped on.
http://www.greaterthings.com/News/UN_vehicles.htm#Photos
'They are ready for the 'gathering'.
But you welcome it, because you're Nazis. Admit it, Sandpiper and IM.
Is there no one on this blog who will speak out against this?
Posted by: greg at July 21, 2005 07:28 AM (3D/yw)
8
Gee, greg, you got me. I'm the one who is always having to point out your patholigical, paranoid hatred of Jews, so I'm the Nazi. Yep, you really outed me. You are a stupid piece of shit and I would love to watch a jihadi saw your head off with a dull blade.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 21, 2005 10:18 AM (0yYS2)
9
Pathological.
Pathological.
Pathological.
I think I've got it now.
By the way, greg, how's Austin these days, hot and muggy? You gave away your location, fucktard.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at July 21, 2005 10:21 AM (0yYS2)
Posted by: greg at July 21, 2005 10:45 AM (3D/yw)
11
The problem with these so call list is when do they stop.
Just remember the line from Satisfaction by the Rolling Stones:
"But he can't be a man 'cause he doesn't smoke
The same cigarrettes as me". Like YBP says it might start off
with terrorist, then move on to Liberals, then even on to moderate
conservatives. So you best beware what you ask for.
Posted by: Butch at July 21, 2005 03:30 PM (Gqhi9)
12
You're a mean one, Mr. Greg.
You really are a heel.
You're as cuddly as a cactus,
You're as charming as an eel.
Mr. Greg.
You're a bad banana
With a greasy black peel.
Posted by: John Redcorn at July 21, 2005 06:03 PM (EHBuI)
13
"Like YBP says it might start off
with terrorist, then move on to Liberals, then even on to moderate
conservatives."
Butch: Yeah, but I'm in favor of this!
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at July 22, 2005 07:10 AM (x+5JB)
14
IM: We have known for months where Greg lives. And other things. The difference between people of character is that we will not do as the liberal muslim lovers do and publish a person private info. That is wrong, only a low life piece of garbage who is losing every argument he enters would publish a person address, employment and phone # on the internet. We added Greg's info to our list because we consider him a person would should be watched in the future. However, if you need Greg's and will keep it in private E-mail me.
Greg. You are a liar. Rome my ass.
Posted by: greyrooster at July 24, 2005 05:30 PM (CBNGy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
