March 02, 2006

The Muslim Manifesto

Via NRO.

All I want to say about this now is what I said on my blog about the word "manifesto." It just sounds so....Marx. Kaczynski, even.

Anyway, read it for yourself. Recently, the disrespectful cartoons about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) published in Jyllands-Posten resulted in an extreme reaction among many Muslims worldwide. While we understand the feelings of our co-religionists, we strongly urge them to refrain from rage and violence.

A zeal for Allah is rightful only when it is expressed in an enlightened manner, since Allah himself has ordained a restrained response. When the early Muslims were mocked by their pagan contemporaries, the Koran ordered not a violent backlash, but rather a civilized disapproval: "When you hear Allah's verses being rejected and mocked at by people, you must not sit with them till they start talking of other things." (Koran 4:140) The Koran also describes Muslims as "those who control their rage and pardon other people, [because] Allah loves the good-doers." (3:134) Therefore all demonstrations against the mockery of Islam should be peaceful. All critiques of Islam should be countered not by threats and violence, but by rational counter-argument.

We also believe that terrorist acts can never be justified or excused. None of the challenges Muslims face, such as oppression or military occupation, can justify attacks against non-combatants. In the Holy Koran, Allah orders Muslims to "never let hatred of anyone lead you into the sin of deviating from justice." (5: The true Islamic sense of justice is well-established in the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh); even in time of war — let alone peace — Muslim soldiers should never "kill the old, the infant, the child, or the woman." Those who do so are not martyrs, but cold-blooded murderers.

Supported by the Koran's affirmation that "there is no compulsion in religion" (2:256), we cherish religious liberty. Every human has the right to believe or not to believe in Islam or in any other religion All Muslims furthermore have the right to reject and change their religion if desired. No state, community or individual has a right to impose Islam on others. People should accept and practice Islam not because they are forced to do so, but because they believe in its teachings.

We support and cherish democracy — not because we reject the sovereignty of the Almighty over people, but because we believe that this sovereignty is manifested in the general will of people in a democratic and pluralistic society. We do not accept theocratic rule-not because we do not wish to obey Allah, but because theocratic rule inevitably becomes rule by fallible (and sometimes corrupt and misguided) humans in the name of the infallible God.

We accept the legitimacy of the secular state and the secular law. Islamic law, or sharia, was developed at a time when Muslims were living in homogenous communities. In the modern world, virtually all societies are pluralistic, consisting of different faiths and of different perceptions of each faith, including Islam. In this pluralistic setting, a legal system based on a particular version of a single religion cannot be imposed on all citizens. Thus, a single secular law, open to all religions but based on none, is strongly needed.

We believe that women have the same inalienable rights as men. We strongly denounce laws and attitudes in some Islamic societies that exclude women from society by denying them the rights of education, political participation and the individual pursuit of happiness. Like men, women should have the right to decide how they will live, dress, travel, marry and divorce; if they do not enjoy these rights, they are clearly second-class citizens.

We believe that there is no contradiction between religious and national identities. Any Muslim should be able to embrace the citizenship of any modern secular state while maintaining feelings of spiritual solidarity with the umma, the global Muslim community.

We regard Christianity and Judaism as sister faiths in the common family of Abrahamic monotheism. We strongly denounce anti-Semitism, which has been alien to Islam for many centuries but which unfortunately has gained popularity among some Muslims in recent decades. We accept Israel's right to exist, as well as the justified aspiration of the Palestinian people for a sovereign state and hope that a just two-state solution in Israel/Palestine will bring peace to the Holy Land.

In short, we strongly disagree with and condemn those who promote or practice tyranny and violence in the name of Islam. We hope that their misguided deeds will not blacken our noble religion — which is indeed a path to God and a call for peace.

Posted by: Vinnie at 06:55 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 774 words, total size 5 kb.

1 While I'm encouraged to hear the voice of the "moderates" I am also familiar with the concepts of Taqiyya and kitman. I think I will wait for the action parts, the anti-terrorism/violence demonstrations, the call to dispel or incarcerate radical imam's, and informing authorities of calls for terrorism from local mosques.

Posted by: dave at March 02, 2006 07:19 PM (CcXvt)

2 Seriously, since when was it the obligation of moderate/liberal/secular/whatever Muslims to "speak" out"?...To justify themselves whenever bad behavior is committed by others who happen to be Muslim? As a contemporary Catholic, I'm not going to justify my identity because of the multiple crimes done to humanity by the COLLECTIVE Church since the age of the Inquisitions, and I shouldn’t have to. As a contemporary Christian, I'm not expected to justify my faith because of the Ku Klux Klan—America's own historic (and ongoing!) concoction of religious fundamentalism and terrorism—and its legacy of committing and getting away with the vilest crimes on the basis of biblical scripture. I won't even have to offer an explanation in light of the resurgence of the new "Christian-Right," a la ol' schoolers Robertson and Falwell, and their silly "fatwa" death prayers on Supreme court justices that aren't conservative enough, or South American presidents that are too left-wing for their liking. Congratulations, now we got Western Muslims feeding into the silliest with the unspoken obligatory insistence that they're moderate, liberal or secular which is sad and isn't necessary. It's not like this post 9/11 haze, where non-Muslims self-proclaim an "instant Islam expertise" (just add water and stir), wasn't already lame for 5 years running now. Let it go already.

Posted by: Mason at March 02, 2006 10:04 PM (T/kas)

3 As a Catholic, you're probably aware of the reputation of Catholic priests being involved in pederasty , due to the vast amounts of convictions, TV coverage, etc. I would hope that if someone likened a Catholic church as "sodomy school" you'd say something to the effect of "that's only a small amount of Catholic Priests when you look at the big picture, Father Mike is a nice guy, and he keeps his hands out of young Timmy's shorts" that isn't justification, that's your thought that in your experience your religion isn't a homosexual precursor. How about if one of those priests comes on TV and says "Jesus said love the little Children, and that is what I'm doing" would you defend the true interpretation? speak out against him? See, when four thousand terrorist acts [and counting] have occurred since 9/11 and the people committing these act says their religion commands it, then when hundreds of influential Imam's say that terrorism is OK, perhaps I want to hear the people who oppose their views. call me crazy, like that.

Posted by: dave at March 02, 2006 10:45 PM (CcXvt)

4 What is this? Muslim Obedience School? We rub their noses in some mess. They react violently. We say, "Oh, we didn't like the way you reacted. Let's try it again. We're going to show you the cartoons again. But this time you're going to be nice about it. Be nice, now." This is like those scenes in the movies when the psychopath is finally cornered by the cop, and he laughs in his face, telling him all the juicy details of the rape, then telling the cop, "And you can't touch me!" Be honest, dear reader. Don't you just love it when the cop blows him away? I think we're just provoking the same visceral reaction with the Muslim Obedience School approach, no matter how high and mighty you make it sound. To my ear, it sounds phony, hypocritical, arrogantly smug, and sadistically unbending. One of our 10 Commandments is Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of The Lord Thy God in Vain. Just because we assure ourselves that it is perfectly legal to do exactly what this commandment forbids does not mean that Muslims are going to relish our taking the same liberties with their Prophet. I realize that under the rules of your Muslim Obedience School every time this happens all Muslims should not only remain obedient and well-mannered but also vociferously denounce any Muslim who does not remain obedient, but I think this is unrealistic. Think smart. If you really want dialogue, this is not the starting point. To go around preaching that it is -- is sheer hypocrisy.

Posted by: john at March 03, 2006 02:58 AM (Uotmn)

5 Well well, it looks like we've got another snivelling muslim apologist bitchboy. Welcome, mason, and prepare for an ass-ripping when I get home from work you faithless, treasonous piece of shit.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 03, 2006 05:56 AM (0yYS2)

6 John, the problem with your argument is that Muslims didn't become outraged nor did they react violently until they were deliberately stirred to action by their own Imams. Can't you see the Pavlovian aspect to this? We didn't press their button. Their own "leaders" did. The violence started before the cartoons were even reprinted. Quit trying to justify it. When was the last time your nose got rubbed in something and you burned down an embassy or made explicit death threats? Should we have been "understanding" if you had? No one is saying they had no right to be offended. We're saying they had no right to get violent. Your obedience school analogy is way off base. You're twisting the issue. Like too many these days, you're deflecting blame away from those who willfully became violent and those who truly provoked them.

Posted by: Oyster at March 03, 2006 06:31 AM (YudAC)

7 John, I will be direct.I don't think I have EVER hated anyone for their ABSOLUTE ignorance and stupidity as I do people who gag up the vile,half-digested,bile-drenched feces such as your above post.You are a complete dumb-ass,and the temptation to treat you the same way that the extremist Muslims treat the infidels is SOOOOO strong.ONLY WE DON'T DO IT.I would explain it further--I just don't have time for this.

Posted by: David Bosworth at March 03, 2006 08:56 AM (o/AqI)

8 Thank you, David, as John Ryan is one of the apologists for the radical Muslims. Let me give you a clue, John. The cartoons were drawn for a news story. That story was about the self-censorship being practiced in Denmark due to the FEAR people had of offending Muslims. Fear as in the possiblity of being MURDERED if you happened to offend one or more of these people. The real problem is that no one can possibly know from day-to-day as to what offends these people, as they constantly expand the list of offenses. When your very life offends them, John, is that when you wish to stand up and say stop? Not me, buddy, I've had enough already.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 03, 2006 10:16 AM (rUyw4)

9 John, you want to quote scripture? What about Thou Shalt Not Kill? Or turn the other cheek? Or how about love thy neighbor as thyself? Any of these ring a bell? When Moses came down from Mt. Sinai and found the people worshipping the "gods" they had fashioned from their gold, did he burn all their possessions and kill them? No, his anger was directed at that which had offended God -- the graven idols. And in his anger, he offended God further - by smashing the Ten Commandments. As punishment for this act, was Moses killed? No. Moses' punishment was that he was never allowed to set foot in the promised land. And the people who had offended God with their blaspemy? Were they killed by God? No. They were made to wander for months in search of the promised land. Yet, even in this punishment, they were provided for. They could always find just enough food and water for sustenence. They were being taught a lesson. Tell me, John, what lesson exactly are the radical Muslims teaching?

Posted by: Sly2017 at March 03, 2006 10:33 AM (UADHi)

10 as for this manifesto... blah, blah, blah Islam is a religion of peace, blah blah blah, terrorists are not true muslims, blah blah blah, the Koran condemns violence, blah blah blah, Mohammad was a ompassionate human being, blah PUKE!!!!

Posted by: Jimmy the Dhimmi at March 03, 2006 11:00 AM (+BgKd)

11 "Ass-rippings"? Internet "ass-rippings." Oooooooh. I fear you. Really. Suck a liberal Muslim's hairy, sweaty left nut, ya slackjawed momo. Mason "Well well, it looks like we've got another snivelling muslim apologist bitchboy. Welcome, mason, and prepare for an ass-ripping when I get home from work you faithless, treasonous piece of shit."

Posted by: Mason at March 03, 2006 04:21 PM (T/kas)

12 Catch Osama Bin Laden and all the rest of them. Put 'em away. I lost people in 9-11, too. But until we catch these guys, why do stupid things like republish cartoons? You know this only helps the very people you hate recruit more terrorists. So why do it when you don't have Osama? The Danes did it and got royally spanked. And there ain't nothin' they can do about it except whine about how people shouldn't be violent. Hey I get it - nobody should be violent for any reason. They have to turn the other cheek. But guess what, people don't do that. They smack you and so far you haven't dodged their blows. You don't have Osama. You don't have the criminal offenders who torched the embassies. You hate the imams. But then you're not stopping them from recruiting more terrorists. But you're republishing cartoons giving the imams exactly what they need -- does that sound bright to you? Get a grip. You have not had much success in smoking out these terrorists and we're all in the trenches together here and all you want to do is jump out of the trench and moon the mosque. You're stuck on stupid and putting other Americans in harm's way. Keep out of my line of vision.

Posted by: john at March 03, 2006 05:47 PM (Uotmn)

13 I'll treat you in full later on mason, but suffice to say for now, were anyone inclined to suck balls, they'd have to take a miss on you, as you have none.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 04, 2006 05:43 AM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
31kb generated in CPU 2.7429, elapsed 2.7976 seconds.
119 queries taking 2.3155 seconds, 262 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.