April 20, 2006

Students Protest “Radical” Teaching in UK.

At least some Muslims realize the damage and shame Islam suffers at the hands of those who preach the doctrine of hate.

Times Online :MUSLIM students training to be imams at a British college with strong Iranian links have complained that they are being taught fundamentalist doctrines which describe nonMuslims as “filth”.

The Times has obtained extracts from medieval texts taught to the students in which unbelievers are likened to pigs and dogs. The texts are taught at the Hawza Ilmiyya of London, a religious school, which has a sister institution, the Islamic College for Advanced Studies (ICAS), which offers a degree validated by Middlesex University.

The students, who have asked to remain anonymous, study their religious courses alongside the university-backed BA in Islamic studies

Asked to remain anonymous? Let me translate that, wished to keep their heads attached to their bodies.
Mr Moezi is also the director of the Islamic Centre of England in Maida Vale, a large mosque and community centre that is a registered charity. Its memorandum of association, lodged with the Charity Commission, says that: “At all times at least one of the trustees shall be a representative of the Supreme Spiritual Leadership of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

Both the Irshad Trust and the Islamic Centre of England Ltd (ICEL) were established in 1996. Mr MoeziÂ’s predecessor as Ayatollah KhameneiÂ’s representative, another cleric called Mohsen Araki, was a founding trustee of both charities.

It is strange why they tolerate this from Iran. Note the nesting of politics and Islam because Islam is both religion and politics they are not separate.
‘The water left over in the container after any type of animal has drunk from it is considered clean and pure apart from the left over of a dog, a pig, and a disbeliever’

‘There are ten types of filth and impurities: urine, faeces, semen, carrion, blood of carrion, dogs, pigs, disbelievers’

(You get that? Your blood is equated with fecal matter)

‘When a dog, a pig, or a disbeliever touches or comes in contact with the clothes or body [of a Muslim] while he [the disbeliever] is wet, it becomes obligatory- compulsory upon him [the Muslim] to wash and clean that part which came in contact with the disbeliever’

Filthy Kufr! Let me again translate for you. Disbeliever means you most likely and that includes liberals. I again heard calls for “bridges of understanding” in the Middle East on NPR this AM. That’s all fine and dandy if you are dealing with people who consider you human and act in a civilized manner. The terrorists and those who follow their doctrine will cross over that bridge to cut your throat. As long as the first cut is in the direction of Mecca it’s all good. Now do you understand?

Also see Jihad Watch, Michelle Malkin, who includes new pic of Muhammed on her post and USS Neverdock.

Posted by: Howie at 08:55 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 484 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Does it mean that since these students have spoken out against these teachings that they're islamophobic?

Posted by: Graeme at April 20, 2006 10:17 AM (xnfHT)

2 Here's where some Leftard apologist for islam tells them "it's not in the Koran."

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 20, 2006 10:19 AM (8e/V4)

3 Anything similar to that in the old testament ? I know their are a lot of really weird things in those old books. I think the problem is the muslims just still believe in all of that ancient texts.

Posted by: john Ryan at April 20, 2006 10:27 AM (TcoRJ)

4 Not wishing to totally side with the terorists but I am thinking that if I get someones blood on me or feces etc it might be a good idea to wash it off. My mom always advocated that, and that was even in the pre AIDS era.

Posted by: john Ryan at April 20, 2006 10:36 AM (TcoRJ)

5 But John whick blood is worse? Infidel blood. Catholic Blood, Baptist blood. See how this works?

Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2006 10:47 AM (D3+20)

6 >>>Anything similar to that in the old testament? The difference between islam and christianity is that christians believe Christ has paid the price, so we no longer have to. That's the difference between how christians read the old testament vs how muslims read the Koran. There is no such softening of the ancient texts in islam, so it's no wonder radical islam is so dominant.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 20, 2006 10:53 AM (8e/V4)

7 Don't be in to much shock folks, it has been going on here a lot. Now you can be in shock.

Posted by: Leatherneck at April 20, 2006 03:48 PM (D2g/j)

8 Uh, John, they are comparing you to feces, vomit, etc. They are not saying to do these things if another Muslim touches them in that way. Can't you see the difference? Duh?

Posted by: jesusland joe at April 20, 2006 05:10 PM (rUyw4)

9 In as much as there are invariably different issues that are raised against some forms of Islam and rightly so, I personally, having read al-Hilli have to say that the above piece is very one-dimensional and does not depict the truth of his stance. Not everyone falls into one bag and the People of the Book i.e, Christians, Jews and Sabians are excluded. There is also difference in opinion amongst them as to the position of the Zoroastrians and other modern day dualists. Secondly, this ditsy approach to an important matter astonished me coming from the Times, but within the lines of the article you can orchestrate a symphony about Iran and their Supreme Leader. All that about al-Hilli was a side show my friends, the real matter for the coalition is now Iran, so let's wake up to it and not be played around like fools.

Posted by: Xi Xhing at April 20, 2006 05:49 PM (NrsdV)

10 "Not wishing to totally side with the terorists..." Just "partly" right?

Posted by: Oyster at April 21, 2006 04:42 AM (YudAC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0523, elapsed 0.5211 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.4724 seconds, 259 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.