August 18, 2005
Star Wars Geeks We'd Like to Date
For some reason, whenever some one finds a piece of Star Wars related porn they send it to me. Am I complaining? Hell no! Thanks to Rob Porter of Say Anything and Wizbang for sending me this. He found a gallery of Star Wars geeks who are also babes at Flickr here and here. I know it sounds like an oxymoron, but check out this babe below. Good catch Rob, live long and prosper. Oh, wait, wrong sci-fi geek lingo........
Good uber star wars geek Leia wannabe.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Bad uber star wars geek Leia wannabe.
More good uber star wars geek Leia wannabes.
Posted by: Rusty at
03:23 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Ygggaaaaaaah!!!
Those two on the bottom are awful!!!
Get me back to the Hatcher thread quick!!!
Posted by: Brad at August 18, 2005 03:47 PM (3OPZt)
2
I've got a baaad feeling about this. Yes, the first one is babe-a-licious, but she's also got a look in her eye that says to me "potential slaughterer of family pets". Turn the ship around.
Posted by: Robert the Llama Butcher at August 18, 2005 04:20 PM (IkTb7)
3
Aye,
That first oneÂ’s a bunny boiler for sure.
Posted by: Brad at August 18, 2005 05:38 PM (3OPZt)
4
star wars porn sounds good
Posted by: DarthMole at August 18, 2005 08:05 PM (wWAmZ)
5
I don't get it? You mean the real leia would not be a bunny boiler? Comeon, I don't see her liking pet dropping all over the palace.
Posted by: Fred Fry at August 19, 2005 11:50 AM (JXdhy)
6
Fred
Glen Close boiled the family bunny in "Fatal Attraction" , and it had nothing to do with pet droppings.
Robert sounded like he was having thoughts of some sort of relationship with this Star wars hussie.
Posted by: Brad at August 19, 2005 12:29 PM (3OPZt)
7
Never go for the rebel Princesses. You want want to go after the princess who's daddy is in power.
Posted by: Fred Fry at August 19, 2005 02:44 PM (JXdhy)
8
umm... technically the rebel princess' daddy WAS in power.
Posted by: TJ at August 21, 2005 12:03 PM (B5LkG)
9
You can't be 60170 serious?!?
Posted by: Max Ballstein at August 02, 2006 05:08 PM (9+T+f)
21kb generated in CPU 0.0171, elapsed 0.1841 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1747 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
119 queries taking 0.1747 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
