June 27, 2005

See Dubya: FBIanetics

Ever wonder what was in Church of Scientology founder L.Ron Hubbard's FBI file?

So did the folks at The Smoking Gun. So they filed a FOIA request and got to see it.

Their conclusion? Nut. Fraud. Paranoid.

But just like with my John Kerry post below, I'm probably not breaking new ground with most of you.

Posted by: seedubya at 04:02 AM | Comments (23) | Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Yessireebob, let's see what kind of FBI files are kept on Race-baiter Chicken Beater/BABBLA, desert-dwelling scum BUSH LIES, Blood-in-the-streets Improbulus, and yes, the KING OF KINGS LOSER BUSH.

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at June 27, 2005 05:58 AM (ScqM8)

2 Your mangy dogs ate bars of soap, followed by boxes of crayons, then blew bubbles out their asses while taking technicolor dumps on your stouffer TV dinner tables.

Posted by: Downing Street Memo at June 27, 2005 06:11 AM (ScqM8)

3 DST, I mean this with all sincerity - get help.

Posted by: Oyster at June 27, 2005 06:28 AM (YudAC)

4 Rather that's DSM.

Posted by: Oyster at June 27, 2005 06:28 AM (YudAC)

5 I think DSM is already seeking help from the Scienctologists.

Posted by: Fersboo at June 27, 2005 06:44 AM (x0fj6)

6 I Like DSM. Keep up the good work, DSM, I am quite sure everyone who reads your work just can't wait to join your political party.

Posted by: West at June 27, 2005 09:58 AM (Xcwmf)

7 Gee, someone who invents their own religion, complete with extraterrestrial enemies and magical power, a nut? Naaahhhhhhh...

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 27, 2005 10:19 AM (0yYS2)

8 I made the mistake of walking into their Washington DC temple and gave them my phone number. They had no brochures and they were very secretive and wouldn't answer my questions cause they basically want you to sign up for "courses" (it costs big bucks). They wouldn't stop calling for for 6 months. So read a book on scientology by an ex-insider and learned that L Ron Hubbard was a complete nutjob. It's a cult.

Posted by: Carlos at June 27, 2005 10:34 AM (8e/V4)

9 Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job Attack Was 'Coup de'tat,' Buildings Were Demolished By Controlled Demolitions “Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out political assassinations, has gone on the record with his conviction that 9/11 was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state of emergency in America and pave the way for the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria. David Shayler joins a spate of recent credible whistleblowers who share the same sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. Former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds publicly questioned the unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7 earlier this month. In addition, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, shared his concerns last week when he said the Bush Administration were making the same mistakes as the Nazis when they invaded Russia in the dead of Winter. Roberts seriously doubts the official explanation behind 9/11.” http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/former_mi5_agent_911_was_inside_job.htm Gosh! Golly! Where do all of these moonbats come from? All of these people are saying 9-11 was an inside job. When will it stop?

Posted by: greg at June 27, 2005 10:43 AM (/+dAV)

10 Greg, isn't this what got you banned the first time? You have a self-destructive streak in you, don't you? You'd make a great suicide bomber.

Posted by: Oyster at June 27, 2005 11:42 AM (fl6E1)

11 Greg, It wasn't a surprise to read in the article submitted by you, elements of anti-semitism. In the article the Agent also believes that Israel bombed their embassy, and framed two "innocent" Palestinians. Replace 'convictions' with 'opinion' it carries even little more credibility, he has no inside knowledge, left the intelligence community long before September 11th, so what makes his opinion significant? NOTHING. Another moonbat? most definitely.

Posted by: dave at June 27, 2005 11:55 AM (fsJ2z)

12 I was reading about the whole Israel mess yesterday, and was reminded that Britain was absolutely dead set against the creation of Israel and actually sided with Arab terrorists in the beginning, and that many people in Britain, some quite influential, never stopped taking their side. Many British sided with the Nazis throughout WW2, as did many French, and the Nazis allied themselves with the Arabs in order to have access to Arab oil fields. Thus, much of the anti-semitism of the 20th century can be attributed to a need to get close to Arab oil. It's ironic that everyone keeps accusing the US of conducting war for oil, when it would be much simpler to sacrifice the Jews to the hatred of Arabs and fascists for the sake of peace and oil simultaneously, when in reality America stands on principle and sides with Israel while trying to liberate the Arabs from the religion of hate. Fascism, Islam, anti-Americanism, and anti-Semitism are part and parcel of each other.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 27, 2005 12:22 PM (0yYS2)

13 Scientoliogy Under The Electron Microscope: _______(Igor, turn up the power!!!)_______ 1.....[skepdic.com/dianetic.html]..... Oh, this is "toooo sweeeeet" 2.....[www.skeptictank.org/hs/opthet3.htm]..... "A despotic alien from outerspace named Lord Xenu was the head of a "Galactic Federation" which had a population problem, according to L. Ron Hubbard(www.nots.org/), the Scientology crime syndicate's drug addicted creator (www.cosvm.info/pinks.htm)." Oh, LOOK, L.Ron is a "war hero, too" just like uncle John: 3......[www.lermanet.com/L_Ron_Hubbard/whataguy.htm]..... well, no, actually in a head-to-head uncle John has the edge. Nice! Lots of material here. 4.....[www.xenu.net/]..... Does this "Cool Aide" taste funny to you? 5.....[www.whyaretheydead.net/]..... Reader's Digest says: "Scientology: Anatomy of a Frightening Cult" 6.....[www.lermanet.com/scientologynews/ReadersDigest.htm]..... and, see refs to major news commentaries at bottom of that web page!!!!! Next to last, and also not least, this list form quackwatch.com: 7.....[www.quackwatch.org/search/webglimpse.cgi?ARCHID_1=1&ARCHID_16=16&ARCHID_10=10&ARCHID%3D11=11&query=scientology&whole=checkbox&rankby=AGE&errors=0&age=&maxfiles=50&maxlines=30&maxchars=10000&cache=yes]..... Poor Tommy Cruise, he doesn't know the crowd he's in with,....or does he? 8.....[www.scientology-kills.org/celebrities/cruise.htm]..... "When I began making inquiries into the dealings of the church and Tom's links with it, a flurry of legal threats were made to me personally as well as to a number of associates who have helped me with my research into Tom's association with the Scientologists. At one stage, the church traced my home address and unlisted phone number. There was an overriding impression given by the tone of the letters that I should not continue my inquiries under any circumstances."

Posted by: A Bugger's Life at June 27, 2005 12:50 PM (UkAhT)

14 To: Improbulus Maximus, who says (quite correctly): "Many British sided with the Nazis throughout WW2, as did many French, and the Nazis allied themselves with the Arabs..." The Brits' role in attempting to prevent Israel from existing, while truly despicable(there were some very good ones, though), may now be ancient history. But the Arabs? Here's what an honest and very brave Muslim has to say about the Arab Nazi connection: (www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/index.htm) From what Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi says, it crystal clear that all the whiners who say Iraq is irrelevant to the war on terror are themselves irrelevant to civilization.

Posted by: yonason at June 27, 2005 01:17 PM (UkAhT)

15 Oyster:'Greg, isn't this what got you banned the first time?' Yes, but if I call them moonbats, all is fine.

Posted by: greg at June 27, 2005 01:35 PM (/+dAV)

16 The thing those Arabs who got recruited for the Nazi military didn't realize is that as soon as the Nazi's were able to realize victory they would have been next in line for the gas chambers.

Posted by: Oyster at June 27, 2005 02:55 PM (fl6E1)

17 Does that mean the Nazi's were physic?

Posted by: greyrooster at June 27, 2005 06:45 PM (CBNGy)

18 True Oyster, so true.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 27, 2005 10:44 PM (0yYS2)

19 D.S.M. is as funny as B.L.S.D....must both be followers of either Hubbard of good ole Uncle Charlie Manson....both as crazy as hell

Posted by: THANOS35 at June 27, 2005 11:38 PM (kDAye)

20 Thanatophoric, Hubbard is a cult leader like CHIMPY, while Charles Manson gives you instructions on what to do with the 60% of America that sees through CHIMPY

Posted by: BUSH LIES - SOLDIERS DIE at June 28, 2005 03:47 AM (FV4oJ)

21 Improbulus:'was reminded that Britain was absolutely dead set against the creation of Israel and actually sided with Arab terrorists in the beginning' Improbulus, Arab terrorists?. WRONG. Read a history book that isn't written by a Jew. It was the Jews who were the terrorists. Look up the Zionist terrorist, Jabotinsky. They taught the Palis well.

Posted by: greg at June 28, 2005 08:18 AM (/+dAV)

22 poor B.L.S.D., i knew him well...i shant shed a tear for him though....sucker

Posted by: THANOS35 at June 28, 2005 01:07 PM (kDAye)

23 Ah, so it was Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooos who flew the planes into the WTC then? It all becomes clear now. Don't be silly, I know there were Jewish terrorists, in fact I know far more about history than you do I bet, which is why I can be far more objective about things. The main thing that concerns me is that it is Muslims, not Jews, who are killing and plotting to kill Americans. That's really all I need to know at this juncture, and anything else is just background noise.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 28, 2005 06:24 PM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
28kb generated in CPU 0.1666, elapsed 0.3396 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.3141 seconds, 272 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.