March 20, 2006

Saddam Al-Qaeda Cooperation Revealed

One bright sunny September morning the thought ran though my head that Iraq must have a hand in this. Just a bit more complicated than blowing up Buddha donÂ’t you think? Probably they would need some support for an operation like that. Just where would an organization like Al-Qaeda get money and support besides the Taliban?

Newsmax : An Iraqi intelligence document released last week indicates that Osama bin Laden sought to conduct "joint operations" with Saddam Hussein's regime six years before the 9/11 attacks - and was given the green light by the Iraqi dictator.

The document, detailed in the March 27 issue of the Weekly Standard, describes a Feb. 1995 meeting between bin Laden and Iraqi intelligence that was personally approved by "the Honorable Presidency" - an apparent reference to Saddam.

[See the translation of the original document here in which 'joint operations' are proposed between al Qaeda and Iraq]. Oh you mean that Saddam? Shocking!

Also see The Revolution Will be Blogged

I wonder how Democrats will react when documented proof that UBL "sought to conduct "joint operations" with Saddam Hussein's regime five years before the 9/11 attacks, and was given the green light by the Iraqi dictator." I suspect that they'll ignore it as best they can and hope that their media allies move to the next subject as quickly as possible.
Pretty damn good guess I'd say.
More from the Newsmax story : "We discussed with [bin Laden] his organization. He requested the broadcast of the speeches of Sheikh Sulayman al-Uda [who has influence within Saudi Arabia and outside due to being a well known religious and influential personality] and to designate a program for them through the broadcast directed inside Iraq, and to perform joint operations against the foreign forces in the land of Hijaz [Saudi Arabia]."
The document goes on to note that "the Honorable Presidency was informed of the details of the meeting in our letter 370 on March 4, 1995."
The document indicates that Saddam personally granted bin Laden's request for help with propaganda broadcasts and instructed his agents "to develop the relationship [with bin Laden] and the cooperation between the two sides to see what other doors of cooperation and agreement open up."
The 1997 Iraqi intelligence document goes on to report: "Currently we are working to invigorate this relationship through a new channel in light of his present location [Afghanistan]."
The reference by Iraqi intelligence to "joint operations" with bin Laden apparently contradicts one of the 9/11 Commission's most important findings that Saddam had no "operational relationship" with al Qaeda.

Posted by: Howie at 12:01 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 394 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Howie, just as an editorial comment, exclamations marks on a headline don't add authority to it. Quite the opposite. My advice, lose it. Now I'll read the rest of the post.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 20, 2006 01:03 PM (8e/V4)

2 >>>I wonder how Democrats will react Why, they WON'T react. This will be completely ignored by both the Democrats and their water carriers in the mainstream media (but they'll run fake Abu Graib stories ad nauseum until they can get a Democrat back in the White House).

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at March 20, 2006 01:06 PM (8e/V4)

3 Yes I never heard the words NO WMD or such stuff more than last week as this info was coming out. They just shouted louder and more often hoping no one would notice anything else.

Posted by: Howie at March 20, 2006 01:13 PM (D3+20)

4 Yes, this is all good and fine and all, but DICK CHENEY SHOT SOMEONE!!!!!!!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 20, 2006 02:22 PM (0yYS2)

5 And Cheny was drunk when he did it, and he wanted to murder his lawyer and blah...blah...blah...and what other lies can we come up with? Any lie will do, because our friends at CNN, ABC, CBS and especially the NYT will spread the lies.

Posted by: jesusland joe at March 20, 2006 04:30 PM (rUyw4)

6 Hilarious. It takes a special kind of ideological fervor to imagine that this document proves anything with regard to 9/11, and that it exculpates the Bush administration which, for mysterious reasons, refuses to trumpet that exculpation when it's faced with 33% approval ratings. I am DYING to hear your fevered theories as to why the administration is shy about discussing publicly such critically important evidence. What a wonderful, magical land you all inhabit.

Posted by: Slippery Pete at March 21, 2006 01:26 PM (vUlAq)

7 Yes it does take a special kind of moonbat to overlook the entire Iraq documentent translation project and all it's yield from the last two weeks. Hillarious.

Posted by: Howie at March 21, 2006 01:35 PM (D3+20)

8 They're all "special" Howie. In a "short bus" kind of way, though.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 22, 2006 06:06 AM (0yYS2)

9 IM: Oh good one. I'm grinning.

Posted by: Howie at March 22, 2006 08:42 AM (D3+20)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.0184, elapsed 0.1988 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1892 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.