May 08, 2006
Sac Bee Intentionally Undermining Federal Case?
Hmmm, I wonder why all the news coming out of the Hayat terror cases was so negative?
Aggressive Tendencies:
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
According to my fly on the wall, in retaliation for the leak investigation, the Bee editors have decided to actively work to undermine the prosecution's case by slanting the stories on the pages of the Bee.No bias here folks, move along.The U.S. Attorney's Office is not amused, and will be having a little sit down meeting with the Bee editors in the coming days to express their unhappiness with the paper.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:31 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am shocked. Shocked and appalled. [/sarcasm]
Following the case as closely as I did, every time I read a story, I wondered what actually happened in the court room. I couldn't believe that the US Attorney's office was screwing things up as badly as it looked like they were.
On the bright side, this explains why I was off on my acquittal predictions.
Posted by: KG at May 08, 2006 07:30 PM (hyH5v)
2
More from the liberal news papers the birdcage linners
Posted by: sandpiper at May 08, 2006 09:56 PM (xt8mX)
3
Those McClatchy papers aren't to be trusted. And they just bought the Knight-Ridder papers but I hear they sold most of them off already.
Posted by: crosspatch at May 09, 2006 12:02 AM (kNJth)
17kb generated in CPU 0.0258, elapsed 0.1508 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1409 seconds, 252 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
119 queries taking 0.1409 seconds, 252 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
