December 20, 2004

Residents Move Back into Fallujah

- Associated Press

FALLUJAH, Iraq - Fallujans are to begin trickling back this week, but a month after the battle for the city, devastation is everywhere. Burned out cars block streets, even homes that still stand are missing roofs or walls, dead dogs litter narrow alleys.

Destruction is not total. The only damage at a benzene storage facility on the edge of town is the deterioration from years of neglect. At the end of a long block of leveled homes, a children's clinic stands untouched.

"It really looks like a time warp: Somebody left for the day and was told not to come back because of the operation," said Lt. Cmdr. Larry Merola, a Navy Seabee reservist from Stoughton, Mass., who leads a team that checks buildings important to the city's life — pharmacies, offices, gas distribution points.

Even as the U.S. military pummeled parts of the city into rubble, engineers were laying plans for rebuilding. But much of that work remains, even as the first groups from the 250,000 people who fled are to start returning Thursday.


I suppose one month should be sufficient time to rebuild a city after a war? A house in America can't be built in a month much less infrastructure, houses, hospitals and schools.

The consistent bias of the Associated Press continues to amaze me for whatever reason. Yes, I should be used to it, but I cannot get over the way the AP gladly jumps all over the United States yet defends and even embeds their reporters with terrorists killing innocent Iraqis.

Arthur Chrenkoff writes his 17th Good News from Iraq post which details where the Coallition is in rebuilding Iraq. While the AP would rather focus on the negative, Chrenkoff continues to dig through the global media and find positive stories.

Remember, Rome wasn't built in a day.

Cross-posted at In the Bullpen

Posted by: Chad at 01:00 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 2 kb.

1 True, but Grozny's still a wasteland. As a lesson from Chechny, rebuilding shouldn't take place until those that can wreck havoc are taken care of.

Posted by: Venom at December 20, 2004 01:19 PM (dbxVM)

2 Hi Chad!

Posted by: Jane at December 20, 2004 01:22 PM (+7VNs)

3 Hello there Jane

Posted by: Chad at December 20, 2004 01:33 PM (Fqzy/)

4 I dont agree with the concept of AP being the mouth of the terrorists, just as I dont believe the fact that FOX, CNN, ABC, BBC or CBC are the mouth pieces for the coalition. Having lived in a third world country hit by the occasional terrorism, it was not uncommon for a events to be caught on film. It would be like saying the people who filmed the NY world trade center and Pentagon attack's were working for Al-Queda or that every TV station that showed the footage was inciting the granduer of what one mad organisation had masterminded. We dont have to like it but the job of the media is to report it, from the "I am not a crook!", to the "I did not have sexual relations with that woman!". Regardless of how we view outcome of the incident being taped, it is the job of the media to report what they witness.

Posted by: Salamander at December 20, 2004 04:08 PM (V40IZ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.0631, elapsed 0.2059 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1958 seconds, 253 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.