April 27, 2005

Religion of Peace Roundup: White Trash Wednesday Edition

Man, I never knew the Religion of Peace and good old fashioned white trash had so much in common!

There's nothing a redneck loves more than a good bloody flick, right? So CAIR gives its seal of approval to the new movie Kingdom of Heaven. I was so looking forward to it too! Let me guess: when CAIR says the flick gives a 'balanced' view of the Crusades they really mean 'Christians look bad'. Count me out now.

Lamia Abed Khadouri al-Sagri, a member of Iraq's National Assembly,
was murdered by terrorists inside her house. These guys are just like the Klan on meth.

The deadline is up for the 3 Romanian and 1 American hostage being held in Iraq. Romania has asked that their captors extend the deadline. No jokes, just pray.

Like rich-white-trash diva Paris Hilton's Blackberry, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's computer got hacked. What was on it? Porn, of course.

The Ebb and Flow Institute has a great biography of Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician who is being held in prison to guard him from members of the Religion of Peace who peacefully have threatened to peacefully cut his head off because he had the nads to speak out against them.

Highest religious authority in Saudi Arabia gets caught on tape urging young Muslims to go fight in Iraq, use General Lee to cross border.

High-school dropout? Learn a new skill from home: USDOJ publishes al Qaeda training manual. (Via Evil Glenn)

Islamic scholar Ali al-Timimi convicted of inciting al Qaeda support, Muslims seethe.

Pakistan will not give up nukes. Meanwhile, the Religion of Peace beats the crap out of an uppity young Pakistani Christian.

Man convicted in missile sting operation. I'm sure it was a setup.

"I punched Saddam in the mouth!"--Man, I envy that dude!

Groups in Turkey move to ban Schwarzenegger films because of his support for recognition of Armenian genocide. Gay porn still popular in Turkish mountains.

The Muslim school agenda vs. the Creationist school agenda. Food for thought.

Andrew Sullivan in full Freak-Out mode. And speaking of Andrew Sullivan: Gay rebels married in Philippines first openly gay-terrorist wedding ceremony.

MoveOn.org has some new TV spots. Let me give you a hint: there are no chicks in bikinis.

When 'people of the soil' protest Bush.

More oil refineries? Hell yes!

The Abe Fortas fillibuster in perspective.

When white-trash marries a promulent lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards' tinfoil brigades.

Jeff Quinton must not get a lot of trolls these days. Hey Jeff, come on over whenever you feel the need to go troll hunting!

Thomas Sowell on Black Rednecks.

And remember, for all your teacher-student sex-scandal updates check out Interested Participant!

Check out these other WTW participants:

Posted by: Rusty at 02:34 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 466 words, total size 5 kb.

1 What is a "prumulent" lawyer? My ESL dictinary is of no assistance. Please explificate!

Posted by: Brian H at April 27, 2005 05:11 PM (8AabM)

2 I hate to be the bearer of bad news...but Christians WERE BAD during the Crusades. They killed lots and lots of folks. Any film that didn't portray Christians of that time as doing a bad thing would be an completely unbalanced (and historically inaccurate) piece.

Posted by: carla at April 27, 2005 05:13 PM (FNmPI)

3 Because, as we all know, Islam was, at that time, and now, the Religion of Peace & Trade.

Posted by: Eric at April 27, 2005 06:03 PM (lK7Sh)

4 Yup. We know.

Posted by: Anwar at April 27, 2005 06:08 PM (8vKPW)

5 carla, but they didn't kill lots and lots of folks every single day and minute they were there, which was close to 250 years. Should the movie only depict the bloodthirsty moments just to please you and all the christianity haters? That would make it an Oliver Stone movie.

Posted by: Carlos at April 27, 2005 10:43 PM (8e/V4)

6 Here we go again. There were atrocities commited by both sides, but the Church has condemned those committed by the Christians. That's the difference. (I'm talking about the atrocities, not the mano a mano warfare.)

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 28, 2005 07:12 AM (x+5JB)

7 Of course attrocities were committed, but it begs the larger point (at least, in my mind). The larger point is that the Crusades were a response to 600 years of Islamic expansionism.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 28, 2005 08:45 AM (JQjhA)

8 >>>"The larger point is that the Crusades were a response to 600 years of Islamic expansionism." True. those provinces were christian provinces before the islamic horde exploded out of the arabian peninsula in 700 AD.

Posted by: Carlos at April 28, 2005 09:14 AM (8e/V4)

9 Perhaps my point was unclear. All I'm saying is that... 1. There were atrocities committed by both sides. 2. The Church has condemned the atrocities committed by those fighting as Christians. And rightly so. 2. I (nor the Church) condemn the fighting between actual combatants nor the original goals of the crusades.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 28, 2005 10:26 AM (x+5JB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0172, elapsed 0.1239 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1144 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.