Rambling post. Mostly about oil. And RINOs, and Zarqawi. Soros. Throwing stars, too.
Zarqawi's old neighbor saying that these attacks were "
something that not even a Jew would do", and the Hashemite dynasty is ready to make
hash out of him. Right now, Zarqawi is furiously spinning his latest massacre, trying to explain to a shocked and grieving Jordan why it was necessary and why they should still support him. Sounds like Al-Qaeda has jumped the Zarq in Jordan.
A similar miscalculation has occurred in America. Fourteen moderate, squishy Republicans decided they were more interested in the psychological health of the Alaskan caribou than they were about the ability of poor Americans to heat their homes and drive to work. So they scuttled plans to finally tap a little of that sweet, sweet crude in ANWR. Hope those caribou vote for you, fellas. Tell'em to bring a photo ID.
Meanwhile down in Southern California, a strange thing happened. There's this blogger and radio host who has been extremely accomodating of lapses in party discipline by House and Senate Republicans. He's a nice guy (and according to people who know him, not just on the air) and a clever writer and he is, even when you disagree with him, always worth paying attention to--but he takes a lot of criticism because he cuts so much slack to 'moderate' Republicans. We're all Republicans here, we can't afford to alienate the moderates, he says repeatedly; and he's right to a point--it is when the moderates feel comfortable alienating the conservative majority that they deserve criticism and political pressure. But softly, softly, advises our California friend.
Imagine my surprise when I go over to his blog, and see a list of the defectors' names, with a sweaty, chanting, bare-chested Hugh Hewitt painting voodoo signs around them, a dagger in his teeth and a fatwa-writin' pen in hand:
...a defeat on this issue has to lead to retribution. If the party isn't dedicated to being a majority party organized around the core issue of national security seriousness, it won't last as a majority anyway. Exiling the weak-kneed on a national security issue is exactly the sort of action that will underscore the seriousness of the party on these issues.
So would be the stripping of some committee and subcommittee chairs from a couple of unreliable-on-national-security Members.
OOH-RAH! I hope he doesn't see this entry of the Therapist's or he might crank the outrage level up from "masked French youth" to "Private Pyle in Full Metal Jacket".
I like the new Hugh. So before he pins my hand to my keyboard with a throwing star, I'm going to duck down into the extended entry and point out the one thing that slightly moderates my own fury about this situation:
Oil prices are down. They must be way down, because gas prices here in Northern California, while still exorbitant, are well below where they were before Katrina hit. The summer driving season is over, and the fall so far has been mild so heating oil usage hasn't depleted supplies yet. Bloomberg says that prices are going lower still.
The high prices triggered more exploration and production and got oil into barrels. It took a while and there were shortages, and oil is still too high, but it looks like the blip might be correcting itself. Which is, I should add, very promising for the economy.
Some of the urgency about tapping into ANWR has disappeared. Oil's too high but it's not at the shrieking, dive-klaxon-and-strobe-light emergency we were enduring in September. Government's always slower to respond to these things than a free market, and the legislation might have come in late on this one.
I'll be curious to see what the oilmen have to say about this. I'm not saying we shouldn't drill, but I do think there's cause to revisit the debate.
There's no cause, however, for Republicans to take money from George frickin' Soros. I wonder how much money he's making on this deal?
Posted by: seedubya at
07:28 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 682 words, total size 5 kb.
1
C-Dub: You might want to fix your second link.
I hope the Jordanians didn't think that Zarqawi cared about them or anything. This thing - "I'm mad at your government so you don't mind if I kill a bunch of you ordinary citizens, do you?" is all fine and dandy until you find out this means you as well. How does it feel, Jordan?
Posted by: Oyster at November 13, 2005 12:01 PM (YudAC)
2
The Soros factor and his blatant attempt to buy the US government is just another example of neo-liberal hypocrisy. We liberals can spent and influence all we want on politics but you conservatives can't. Hence the attempt to ban political speech and control the internet.
Posted by: jesusland joe at November 13, 2005 02:18 PM (rUyw4)
3
It looks like everyone is jumping the shark this week.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 13, 2005 02:52 PM (0yYS2)
4
Fixed the second link Thanks, Oyster.
Posted by: See-Dub at November 13, 2005 04:43 PM (yhNln)
5
The most optimistic estimate is that ANWR can produce only 10,000,000 barrels of oil -- which isn't worth the risk of permanently dmaging ANWR since the United States consumes over 7,000,000,000 barrels of oil each year.
Sure, ANWR wouldn't supply the entire annual U.S. consumption and would supply only a portion of it over a period of a number of years. But much of that portion would not be needed if Americans focused more on mandatory conservation and alternative fuels.
I'd like to see some of the planet's wilderness and wildlife preserved for my great-grandchildren. Why risk the planet they inherit so that selfish Americans can keep their SUVs or commute to and from work one person to a vehicle.
Posted by: Jack at November 14, 2005 01:09 AM (vp0Ii)
6
Jack,
If oil exploration and production is such an ecological nightmare, why is it that the caribou population in Alaska has increased along the Alaska pipeline? And why is the best fish habitat in the coastal US off the coast of Louisiana [at oil/gas production platforms]?
Really funny story: When a platform is abandoned, the company is required to cut it off at the bottom of the gulf and remove it for ecological reasons. Where does it go? Why it is towed eastward and sunk off the coast of Florida as an artificial reef!!!
Do a little research before you believe everything you read in the Sierra Club newsletter.
Posted by: Charlie at November 14, 2005 08:32 AM (2ZhL/)
7
"mandatory conservation"
Like "mandatory voting"? Or "mandatory product pricing"? Or "mandatory recycling"? Or ....
I prefer "encouragement" and "education"? Jack, just so you know, no one here is cheering for the wanton destruction of our wilderness.
I'm not implying this is you, but if some are worried about preserving our wilderness, why aren't they also worried about preserving those wildernesses in other countries where they're drilling like madmen?
Just to get the facts straight, in 1980 the U.S. Geological Survey estimated ANWR's Coastal Plain alone could contain up to "17 billion barrels of oil and 34 trillion cubic feet of natural gas". They increased that number in 1998.
The problem is that powerful environmental groups have effectively quashed nearly every alternative choice anyone comes up with for a variety of reasons. It mars the landscape, it has a nasty by-product, it killed some birds, etc. Yes, we should be leaders in renewable energy sources. But no one has yet come up with a viable alternative to replace oil. And not just here in the US.
I'll suggest a far fetched theory that if we stopped, or at least minimized, the importation of oil we might work harder and faster to come up with alternatives knowing we had a finite number of indiginous barrels. Necessity is the mother of invention. When the Middle East runs out of oil, if we haven't solved the problem yet, we'll be drilling "everywhere" here.
Posted by: Oyster at November 14, 2005 08:46 AM (YudAC)
8
It's offshore drilling the residents up these don't like. they actually like the road jobs and schools. I saw one local who was hoping for some drilling. Drilling really tkaes up very little space. When he grew up he had to to to Seatle to go to HS. His kids go HS right at home and he liked that and he liked the jobs and roads. The only objection he has was to offshore drilling in arctic conditions. So the locals were all for some drilling.
Posted by: Howie at November 14, 2005 09:42 AM (D3+20)
9
Jack will forgive us I'm sure if his comments fall on deaf ears, since the legitimate environmental concerns of the past have morphed into an all-out campaign to halt and reverse American economic supremacy in the world, and to lower the standard of living for the average American. It is no secret that environmentalism and anti-Americanism go hand-in-hand, and the same people who protest to save the slime molds are the same masked terrorists who riot at every anti-American rally or protest at every event that could possibly raise and stabilize the standard of living for anyone.
I love nature, and I love to see healthy wildlife populations. I remember when the sight of a hawk was a memorable occasion, and turkeys and deer were extinct in some areas. When I was young, DDT had just about wiped out many species of birds, so I understand the importance of responsibly environmental stewardship, but I do not pretend that modern environmentalism is anything but a campign by some flavor of anti-American Marxists who want to see us on par with the neolithic tribesmen who lived here before us. So if Jack wants to live in a cave and eat berrys and twigs, well fine, it's a free country, but his argument is childish in its simplicity and shortsightedness, and so we must disregard it.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 14, 2005 10:17 AM (0yYS2)
10
Technically pal, I believe it's either "Uh-rah" or "Hoo-ah", depending on your branch of service.
That, and good piece.
Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge at November 14, 2005 10:46 AM (y1hCN)
11
Dave, that's one of those things that cannot be spelled to correctly convey the spirit of the sound, so it's kind of a moot point, since everyone understands what it means.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at November 14, 2005 12:58 PM (0yYS2)
12
What? Well in this branch of service, here in the 509th Chickenhawk Commando Batallion we say OOH-RAH, soldier! Drop and give me 40!
Posted by: See-Dubya at November 14, 2005 01:23 PM (yhNln)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
28kb generated in CPU 0.05, elapsed 0.1566 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1457 seconds, 261 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.