May 21, 2005

Oil for Food Rundown

The Oil-for-Blood mess is pretty complicated, and Saddam thrived on the ambiguities. Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard does the world a service by serving up a very readable primer on the situation: how it got started, how it worked, and why it matters.

This isn't a partisan article. Which is good because Oil-of-Uday shouldn't be a partisan issue.

I will point this out just to exercise the moonbats who flutter by here now and then: if you honestly think there is some unsavory link persisting between Dick Cheney and Halliburton, how can you fail to be outraged at the much grander, and more brazen, corruption between Saddam and the UN--criminal activity that snatched relief from starving Iraqis, that supported terrorist groups, that bribed world leaders, and that subverted and made a mockery of the very international institutions you hold so dear?

Posted by: seedubya at 11:39 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.

1 [crickets]

Posted by: Oyster at May 22, 2005 07:59 AM (YudAC)

Posted by: Robin Roberts at May 26, 2005 01:11 AM (xauGB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.2735, elapsed 1.0082 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.8395 seconds, 251 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.