February 21, 2006

No, I'm not a Conservative

No, I'm not a conservative and neither is Glenn Reynolds. I'm a neo-libertarian. It's kind of like being a conservative, only we dig the notion of legal pimps and hoes. And it's kind of like being a libertarian, only we really dig our military. Is that clear?

UPDATE: Neither is Stephen Green. And a response for the poli sci geeks who secretly dwell among us.

UPDATE II:
More political science geekiness, but true. When I teach ideology to my intro class I always first introduce them to the normal left-right graphic. Something like this:

political-ideology-left-right.jpg

I then tell them how the above is only a model to help us understand people's political beliefs and that the model is too simplistic. I then build a much more elaborate model and use an x-y graph to illustrate (excuse the bad screen cap from a lame slideshow). The x axis is support of economic intervention by government. The y axis is support of social intervention by the government.

Click to zoom.

No model is perfect, but some are better than others.

Posted by: Rusty at 08:14 AM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I always thought you were far right like Improbulus Maximus.

Posted by: Max Power at February 21, 2006 08:31 AM (5E0ex)

2 How can I argue with a guy with a name like Max Power? Guys want to be him and chicks want to be with him. [insider joke for Simpsons geeks]

Posted by: Rusty at February 21, 2006 08:34 AM (CIynh)

3 Improbulus Maximus is far right? I thought he was far left. Now I am far right.

Posted by: jesusland joe at February 21, 2006 10:04 AM (rUyw4)

4 sure Max, IM loves George Bush just ask him.

Posted by: dave at February 21, 2006 10:33 AM (CcXvt)

5 No need for sarcasm Jesusland Joe and Dave. I know it's that obvious.

Posted by: Max Power at February 21, 2006 03:36 PM (5E0ex)

6 I'm far right? Please, explain what that means to you, before I tear into you.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 21, 2006 04:29 PM (0yYS2)

7 I'm not looking for trouble Improbulus Maximus. I'm just saying you are far right. There's nothing wrong with being far right. Please don't hurt me. I'll admit I fear you. I remember what you did to the last guy that criticized you.

Posted by: Max Power at February 21, 2006 05:52 PM (5E0ex)

8 Rusty, that model might also have an interesting "look" if you rotated it clockwise 90 degrees.

Posted by: Don Miguel at February 21, 2006 05:58 PM (+KixN)

9 Yeah, fine, but what the hell does far right mean to you? What ideology are you subscribing to me? To whom are you comparing me? Let me cluebat you real quick; I believe in liberty and justice for all, the rights of individuals to self-determination, and constitutional republican government, i.e., everything our founders intended. I don't care who you are or what you want to do with your life, as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others, particularly mine. But, if you do infringe, I'm ready to fight to the death without question or hesitation, which is why I hate islam and wish the hell that the muslims would go ahead and start the war in America, which is inevitable, so I can enjoy killing some of the bastards before I get too old. My birthday is soon and all I want is a muslim in my rifle sights. And a pony.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 21, 2006 06:44 PM (0yYS2)

10 Well, to tell you the truth, wanting to legalize prostitution (which I find abhorrent) is so far right that it's left. In other words, it's so far to the right in that a person wants the gov't to stay out of it that they end up agreeing with liberals who want a bye for bad behavior. Same with marijuana. Someone like Dr Rusty might say, "don't enter my house to look for drugs" while a hippie lib would say, "Dude, I'm just looking for a good time. What's the crime."

Posted by: RepJ at February 21, 2006 07:45 PM (ju4XF)

11 I believe in letting stupid people kill themselves and ruin their lives and not interfering in the process. In that case I think that if people want to pay prostitues for sex and shoot drugs, I couldn't care less. But to think that either of these will ever be legalized wihtout onerous legislation and an increase in crime and that the taxpayer won't bear the cost of both is ridiculous. Which brings us back to letting stupid people kill themselves and ruin their lives without interference. It'll never happen that way.

Posted by: Oyster at February 22, 2006 06:01 AM (YudAC)

12 A crime should be defined thus: A deliberate act which causes direct harm or loss to any person or group of persons. Anything which does not fit this description shouldn't be a crime, including prostitution and drug use. Not that these things shouldn't be controlled, but putting people in jail hasn't done anything but fill the jails.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 23, 2006 04:18 PM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
22kb generated in CPU 0.0195, elapsed 0.1455 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1333 seconds, 261 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.