May 15, 2005

Newsweek Paragraph Sparks Violence. Were They Cavalier in Their Reporting?

It was one small seemingly insignificant paragraph to Isikoff, but the results were significant and deadly.

The unrest began this week after Newsweek published an allegation that American military interrogators had desecrated the Islamic holy book in an effort to rattle detainees at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. The report said that they had placed the Koran on the lavatory inside inmates’ cells and had “in at least one case, flushed a holy book down the toilet” .


AT LEAST nine people were killed yesterday as a wave of anti-American demonstrations swept the Islamic world from the Gaza Strip to the Java Sea, sparked by a single paragraph in a magazine alleging that US military interrogators had desecrated the Koran. lts were devastating.
Now it's beginning to become clear that the "devastating" paragraph wasn't true.

On Saturday, Isikoff spoke to his original source, the senior government official, who said that he clearly recalled reading investigative reports about mishandling the Qur'an, including a toilet incident. But the official, still speaking anonymously, could no longer be sure that these concerns had surfaced in the SouthCom report. Told of what the NEWSWEEK source said, DiRita exploded, "People are dead because of what this son of a bitch said. How could he be credible now?"

Another reliable "anonymous" source. To make a contention with this sort of potential impact Isikoff should have had at least 3 sources two of which would be willing to go on the record. Don't these people have the slightest concern for the consequences of their actions. Are they so myopic in their zeal that thinly verified assertions are synonomous with fact.

The pen is mightier than the sword and when used indiscrimantly equally as deadly.


Update: Newsweek apologizes....sort of:

Last Friday, a top Pentagon spokesman told us that a review of the probe cited in our story showed that it was never meant to look into charges of Qur'an desecration. The spokesman also said the Pentagon had investigated other desecration charges by detainees and found them "not credible." Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of the alleged Qur'an incident in the report we cited, and said it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts. Top administration officials have promised to continue looking into the charges, and so will we. But we regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst.
Posted by Traderrob

Posted by: Traderrob at 09:42 AM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 439 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Newsweek is responsible for these riots and deaths. They should be proud of themselves.

Posted by: Carlos at May 15, 2005 10:04 AM (8e/V4)

2 What can I do? Well, go ahead and try to sell me a Newsweek. Go ahead, try! I demand accountability for this irresponsible article. ItÂ’s typical of the MSM to search high and low for any item that would damage the cause of Democracy in Iraq. Pro Democracy Newsweek subscribers should demand IsikoffÂ’s job. Let Newsweek try to make a profit selling their rag to the salons of Urban America. Then they can try to get Volvo and Trojan to buy all their add space. DonÂ’t support this crap with your money! Boycott Newsweek!

Posted by: Brad at May 15, 2005 10:09 AM (pO1tP)

3 Isikoff should be made to answer for this. People died because of his reporting. He hands the jihadis a tailor made reason to spread hate against the U.S. It's obvious that his intent was to gen up a slanderous scandal, abu-Grab II, use it against the Bush administration and take the credit for it. He went too far. Unless he has hard proof of his charges -- He should be fired.

Posted by: bill at May 15, 2005 10:33 AM (7evkT)

4 Fired? His words are directly responsible for several deaths! Surely there are criminal charges that could be brought? Seriously....the man needs to be held responsible.

Posted by: BorgQueen at May 15, 2005 11:14 AM (AxlwF)

5 Normally I am on board with you guys. How about blaming the psycho Muslims for taking the whole thing a little too seriously. If you look at them the wrong way, they flip out. Look at the women, they flip out. Criticize suicise bombing, they flip out. Ask them to consider a more rational approach to their religion and, you guessed it, the flip out. The MSM is biased and lame, but this should have been a non-story. Recall some "art" display in the US a few years ago, called "Piss Jesus". Some "artist" dunked a crucifix in urine. Christians protested. Liberals defended the a-hole. And then everyone went home. Peacefully. Quietly. Would you have blamed the MSM for inflaming Christian passions by reporting the story? The MSM is responsible for many things, but these riots are the fault of extremists and idiots who happen to be Muslims.

Posted by: Bill Dautrieve at May 15, 2005 11:31 AM (aH2mq)

6 If the story had been true, I would agree with you for the most part. The point is, it was in all liklihood not, and that reckless reporting with little regard for the consequences is the crux of the issue.

Posted by: traderrob at May 15, 2005 01:19 PM (3al54)

7 What happened to Blog Sabbath? Is Ozzie gonna be a guest blogger?

Posted by: Mr. K at May 15, 2005 01:48 PM (QqA6E)

8 The Koran is as holy as a Reader's Digest.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at May 15, 2005 03:30 PM (Fw/Gv)

9 Its just absolutely unthinkable that anything bad would happen to koran in the custody of the US war on terror.

Posted by: actus at May 15, 2005 10:05 PM (QPrcU)

10 Howard Fineman was on Imus this morning, and he was trying to defend and spin Newsweek's handling of the matter into something other than a complete and utter mess that it is. Even Imus was having none of it; asking why and how Newsweek could run a story with one source providing the attribution and the 'second' source never even commenting on the section in question. The 'second' source apparently critiqued a different part of the story, and that served as the basis for validating the entire story. Fineman noted that Newsweek ran a more detailed research on the story after reports surfaced that the original story could not be confirmed. That seems to be bass ackward, considering the import of the story. How about this - do the research and due diligence first, run the story second. Not the reverse, which could get a lot of poeple killed, damage credibility of numerous parties involved, and have political, social, and religious ramifications that extend well beyond what anyone could have imagined. Meanwhile, the riots continue, the US has a far more difficult situation ahead of it because Newsweek ran a story that appears concocted out of the mind of a solitary individual (sound familiar?), and people are dead. Where is the culpability on the part of Newsweek and how many other stories are run using the same methodology used here. It really makes you wonder who is cavalier with their stories, the original media, or the immedia (bloggers)?

Posted by: lawhawk at May 16, 2005 08:14 AM (nzf/N)

11 >>>"It really makes you wonder who is cavalier with their stories, the original media, or the immedia (bloggers)?" Exactly. These are the same people who sneeringly look down their noses at alternative media, including the blogs and radio talkers.

Posted by: Carlos at May 16, 2005 09:00 AM (8e/V4)

12 Newsweek and The Washington Post, thier parent, should be boycotted. At some point the American public no matter what their ideals needs to make it known that irresponsible jurnalism will not be tolerated. As an american we are all now more likely to be victims of terrorism because of this false unsubstantiated story. Even if the story itself only adds a fraction of a percent to that likelyhood it is still an escalation and something the US public doesn't want to suffer. We are already suffering enough just for trying to make the lives of these people better but now we must suffer for things that never occured. This should be unacceptable to everyone in the US.

Posted by: Reho at May 17, 2005 09:20 AM (vTNxk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
26kb generated in CPU 0.0145, elapsed 0.1155 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1092 seconds, 261 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.