August 22, 2005

Navy Officer Affirms Assertions About Pre-9/11 Data on Atta

A second officer has come forward to cooberate Lt. Col. Shaffer's story concerning Able Danger and the indentification of Atta.

WASHINGTON, Aug. 22 - An active-duty Navy captain has become the second military officer to come forward publicly to say that a secret defense intelligence program tagged the ringleader of the Sept. 11 attacks as a possible terrorist more than a year before the attacks.

The officer, Scott J. Phillpott, said in a statement today that he could not discuss details of the military program, which was called Able Danger, but confirmed that its analysts had identified the Sept. 11 ringleader, Mohamed Atta, by name by early 2000. "My story is consistent," said Captain Phillpott, who managed the program for the Pentagon's Special Operations Command.
"Atta was identified by Able Danger by January-February of 2000."

His comments came on the same day that the Pentagon's chief spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita, told reporters that the Defense Department had been unable to validate the assertions made by an Army intelligence veteran, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, and now backed up by Captain Phillpott, about the early identification of Mr. Atta.

The Pentagon better come up with something a bit more in keeping with the accumulating evidence.

Posted by: Traderrob at 06:44 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 221 words, total size 2 kb.

1 It's quite possible the paperwork is still in Sandy Berger's pants, or socks, or underwear. Get's funnier by the day. Who is covering for who -- that is the question.

Posted by: bill at August 22, 2005 07:08 PM (7evkT)

2 We have to stand behind these guys who are risking their careers so that the TRUTH can come out! These politics of hiding behind the classifications has to stop when it is an issue as important as this! Not only must we find out more about Able-Danger, we must also track down WHAT happened to the documents pertaining to it!

Posted by: Perlguy at August 23, 2005 07:03 AM (jP9xk)

3 Now that the libs have lionized whistleblowers, watch them try to downplay the role to the best of their ability. Or at least try to deflect blame of bad policy from every previous administration. How many times have they pulled the August 6th (2001) memo back out of the dustbin in the past couple weeks in their first attempts?

Posted by: Oyster at August 23, 2005 07:28 AM (YudAC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
18kb generated in CPU 0.1163, elapsed 0.2014 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.194 seconds, 252 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.