August 04, 2004
From the Seattle Times (via FARK):
John Kerry in the latest issue of "Sword of Dracula"....The Democratic presidential candidate turns up for a sighting of the fanged one in an unusual place: Vietnam, 1968, where Kerry served in the U.S. Navy....his appearance as a swift-boat skipper in the Mekong Delta is just a flashback within the modern-day "military horror" story — in which writer Jason Henderson reimagines Drac as the world's foremost terrorist.Wow, John Kerry battles Dracula!!! But don't worry, this isn't an endorsement or anything silly like that
"I didn't put Kerry in to push a leftist doctrine. I just thought people deserved to remember that this man, when he was a young man, actually walked away from a wealthy and comfortable life and went to a place where there were pieces of metal flying around that could tear you apart."Hold on a second here! You mean John Kerry was in Vietnam? That's news to me.
It's times like this that I wish I knew how to photoshop.
Other vampire slayers: James Joyner
Posted by: Rusty at
04:59 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 216 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Or, maybe it was just Bush's new blog that turned the tide. (via Glenn Reynolds)
Update: What I didn't know was that Bush really has a blog. Even better, so do Jenna and Barb! (via Slantpoint)
Posted by: Rusty at
02:45 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
August 03, 2004
Matthew says:
If you look at the latest state by state numbers, Kerry's actually doing well enough that he could drop Florida and Pennsylvania (he's already losing in Ohio) and still win the election based on the other states where he's leading.James, is a little more optimistic than that, but:
Still, I agree with Matt: the math favors KerryBut, where exactly are they getting their state-by-state poll numbers and why should that matter? They both site electoral-vote.com as their source of information. But is that site a reliable source of information?
A scan of the site reveals that it is a highly partisan front in favor of the Kerry campaign. For instance, on one page President Bush's record is examined with links to a site accusing the Bush family of ties to the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. It also links to an article on how Bush stole the election. Electoral-vote.com is more than a partisan front--it is run by nutjobs!
A better analysis of the state-by-state electoral numbers can be found at election-projection.com. This site is run by Scott Elliot who is up front about his partisan leanings. But what makes Scott's site so good is that his electoral college vote count predictions are made using a publicly available formula. To add credence to his site, his prediction now is that Kerry wins.
These differences are very important. For instance, Scott's numbers show that Bush is ahead in several states that election-projecton show in Kerry's camp. These include TN, AZ, OH, WV, & NV. Update: Matthew Yglesias just e-mailed and, as a result I had to go back and change this--see why we use peer review in academia?). In fact, it seems that Scott has both OH and NV in Kerry's camp--the exact opposite of electoral-votee.com. It turns out, the differences aren't as important as I earlier suggested--both polls yield almost identical results! (hat tip to Matthew Yglesias for pointing that out)
The moral of this story is not to trust just any website. Yes, Kerry is slightly ahead in some state-by-state polling numbers but the race is still early. My own prediction is that Bush wins with either the exact same electoral margin as before, or slightly ahead, this time carrying MN and NM. Just a guess, but it is at least as well informed as those of election-projection.com---and probably a whole lot closer to the target.
UPDATED MORAL OF THE STORY: Blogs can be and often are wrong. This one included. Especially when writing in the heat of the moment. Ok, so both sites have similar outcomes, but I am still sticking with my original charge the electoral-vote.com is a DU fringe front and should not be the source of any credible information.
Why would I stick to this, even after my glaring mistakes were pointed out? Because, I just don't trust someone who is so far out in left field that he would actually site material linking Bush to the Nazis!!! That is beyond partisanship, that is wacko land. Our biases come out in many ways, especially when we select pieces of information used in analysis. I can't but help to think that someone who thinks Bush stole the election (literally) won't have some major data selection biases.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:19 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 568 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:45 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
Pakistan has arrested two more foreigners believed to be members of al Qaeda in the last 24 hours, local intelligence officials said Tuesday.Didn't Pakistan get the memo? These arrests weren't supposed to come until October!
Posted by: Rusty at
03:47 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
August 02, 2004
Posted by: Rusty at
04:50 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Rusty at
02:29 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
Drudge reports that the White House is not happy:
I really do not think terrorism is funny, and I would suggest PARAMOUNT give respect to those fighting and sacrificing to keep America safe," a senior Bush adviser told the DRUDGE REPORT this weekend...I think the White House has it all wrong. They just don't get it. Trey Parker and Matt Stone are hardcore hawkish libertarians, just like me. If anything, this film will serve as an antitode to F/911."This is just unconscionable. Not funny. And I believe it makes fun of everyone in law enforcement... and in the armed services who work tirelessly to keep us safe from harm."
Also, if you can't laugh at the War on Terror, what can you laugh at? The reason I started this blog was because of a SP episode called "Osama bin Laden has farty pants," which is Stone and Parker's tribute to WWII propaganda cartoons. Comedy can be an essential tool in the War on Terror inasmuch as it makes fun of our enemies.
Listen to this clip of Osama wooing the love of his life--a camel! Does that sound like anti-war Bush bashing? They may bash Bush, on occasion, but not over the war.
The trailor only lists one Republican who, it claims, will be mad over the film: George W. Bush.
But let's look at all the D's and lefties the film will piss off (again, according to the trailor and in order):
Alec Baldwin
Sean Penn
Tim Robbins
George Clooney (who I suspect is in on the joke)
Liv Tyler
Susan Sarandon
Martin Sheen
Janeane Garofalo
Michael Moore
John Kerry
Kim Jong Il
The film appears to be a play on the new Thunderbirds movie, set for release this week---only Trey and Matt stick with the original puppet format.
From the trailor, the following things can be seen which will definitely cheer up the Bush people. First, there is a quick blurb of a puppet (Kerry or Edwards?) getting what appears to be a botox injection. Second, there is a Michael Moore puppet. What is in his hand? A hot dog. Third, several shots are of places/people in France getting blown up.
From an article about some clips that were shown at this years Comic-Con we also learn that, " the opening of the film in which France is obliterated by Team America" got a loud applause.
Now, does that sound like an anti-war movie to you?
Drudge, to his credit, saves this for last:
Parker and Stone save most of the mocking for left-wing pundits and Michael Moore.Just remember the South Park formula: Tragedy + Time = Comedy
As for me, I'm going to buy my ticket early and make sure the theater has stadium seating and THX sound!
This site has a cool poem marking the occasion!
Posted by: Rusty at
02:39 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 511 words, total size 3 kb.
There is nothing to make fun of. Nothing worthwhile is being said. It's worse than that, there is nothing un-worthwhile being said either. The convention is not happening to me. It is not there and no one is writing about it. I feel nothing.Well, apparently I was right. Kevin & Paul at Wizbang have two posts (No Bump For Kerry/Edwards & DNC Bump = 4pts -- For Bush!) about two seperate polls, both of which show that the nominating convention had absolutely no effect for John F. Ferry.
Combine that with the Newsweek Poll, which will be released tomorrow, showing J Freakin K with a measly four-point bump and I think the obvious conclusion is that the American people just didn't give a rat's ass. The speech didn't matter, Michael Moore didn't matter, Ben Damon or Matt Affleck or whatever gettin it on with JK's daughter didn't matter....even that hottie Sarah Bender didn't matter.
Like I've been saying to everybody: The convention didn't happen.
Posted by: Rusty at
12:37 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
July 30, 2004
On the War on Terror? End it. Instead, let's assign lots of FBI agents to the case and get real tough. Maybe we'll get that dude from CSI! And then, once bin Laden is caught, we'll get that guy from Law and Order. Or that chick. Yeah, she's tough.
I want him tried for murder in New York City, and in Virginia and in Pennsylvania," where planes hijacked by al-Qaida operatives crashed Sept. 11, 2001...On the War in Iraq? I have a secret plan. Every time Bush screws up, I'm going to criticize him and pretend like I had planned to do what Bush says he is now going to do all along. Because if I were President I would do this thing differently, but don't ask me what differently is because I can't tell you that.
He called the Bush administration's attempt to create a Muslim security force in Iraq an overdue act of desperation. "Great idea," he said. "Should have been done from the very beginning."On the Death Penalty? I was against it, before I was for it. But I'm against it, except when I'm for it.
Kerry has long been an opponent of the death penalty, but in recent years has made an exception for terrorism. The former prosecutor said crimes like rape and child murder do not warrant the highest punishment.On the Abortion Issue? Abortion should be legal because it is legal and everything that is legal is legal. Besides, Roe v. Wade is based on the Bible. Go read it."It's certainly terrorizing to the person who's undergoing it. I understand that," Kerry said. "But terrorism is a political act to terrorize a nation, to try to challenge a way of life and a standard.. It's just a different act."
Asked whether he believes abortion is taking a life, Kerry said a fetus is a "form of life."---------------------------"The Bible itself - I mean, everything talks about different layers of development. That's what Roe v Wade does. It talks about viability. It's the law of the land."
I had no idea Kerry's ability to obfuscate was so fine tuned. Is it just me, or is this the first time for the rest of you hearing that Kerry is against the death penalty? I'm not saying the mainstream press is playing that down or anything. Because, as we all know, Kerry is not a liberal.
Michelle Malkin also notes the disaster Kerry's foreign policy would be:
So, this is how Kerry proposes to make America "stronger and more secure?" By adopting the Clinton law enforcement approach as the primary means to combat Islamic terrorism? "Fastest, surest route" to a murder conviction? What about the need to interrogate bin Laden and gather critical intelligence on al Qaeda? Where did Kerry ever get the idea that putting bin Laden through our civilian courts would be "fast?" And how clueless could he possibly be to ignore the fact that much of the evidence against bin Laden (for example, statements of interrogated al Qaeda detainees such as Ramzi bin al Shibh and Khalid Sheik Mohamed) would be inadmissable at trial?Brava! I would only add that we have already seen the fruits of treating the War on Terror as a legal manner: 9/11.The idea of prosecuting suspected terrorists like burglars or drug dealers seems to make sense in principle, but jury trials for War on Terror suspects are fraught with peril.
Posted by: Rusty at
10:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 590 words, total size 4 kb.

Via Cranky Neocon
Posted by: Rusty at
04:58 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
July 22, 2004
I used Wizbang's mirror site. Download by clicking here. It took me about two minutes.
Other links can be found via Kevin at Wizbang.
Looks like my afternoon will be filled with some heavy reading.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:51 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
July 21, 2004
Posted by: Rusty at
09:45 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
127 queries taking 0.1407 seconds, 308 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








