April 20, 2005

Man Arrested for Spitting on Jane Fonda

Wait, did you say arrested? Shouldn't that read given a medal?

Filthy Allah e-mails this story Local6:

Police said they arrested a man for spitting on two-time Academy Award-winning actress Jana Fonda during a book-signing stop in Kansas City Tuesday night.
Notice how the paper sets the story up by making Fonda out to be a sympathetic character? This is what Chomsky's Propaganda Theory calls 'Framing' and 'Selection'. Factually the story, so far, is correct. Nevertheless it is biased.
At about 9 p.m., police said, a man who had been waiting in line for about 90 minutes, passed a book to Fonda and then spit a large amount of tobacco juice into her face.

They said the man then ran away and was taken into custody by off-duty officers, who were providing security for the event.

Fonda declined to prosecute the man.

How utterly magnanimous of Fonda. Of course, the city doesn't need Fonda's permission to prosecute the man. So he'll wind up in the pokey for a brief stint or pay a fine.

Ok, so in order to be fair, after the story is already framed, they throw this in the last paragraph:

In 1972, Fonda was photographed sitting in a North Vietnamese anti-aircraft tank. About her involvement in the Vietnam War, Fonda has apologized for her anti-aircraft tank photo. She has called it an incredible lapse in judgment.
A lapse in jugement? Right. As I've said a hundred times before, traitors rarely think their acts of treason are really that bad.

PS-As I've said, busy morning. More posts to follow later.

UPDATE: Malkin not amused.

UPDATE II: I'm with Bill Quick and Kim du Toit on this one.

Right Nation makes this important contribution:

Smith avrebbe meritato una medaglia
Indeed.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:55 AM | Comments (239) | Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.

1 The vet, slurped on some Tabakki and gobbed up a juicy one right in her commie hag face. I LOVE THIS MAN!!! I hope that vets everywhere, line up for her booksignings, and spit in this harpys face. I will be happy to start up a bail fund.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 10:09 AM (yBHNA)

2 oh, it's just a harmless prank, like throwing pies!

Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2005 10:16 AM (tFXpR)

3 But spitting? That's crude. I think he could have made his point with a nasty commnet, no?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 10:23 AM (x+5JB)

4 Should have smacked the bitchs face. I hope some of that lung butter got in her pinched mouth.

Posted by: Obsnooks at April 20, 2005 10:34 AM (yBHNA)

5 I think mimicking a scene between Jane and her father from "On Golden Pond" would have been far more embarrassing.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 10:45 AM (x+5JB)

6 Medal? I was thinking of maybe erecting a monument in honor of this man.

Posted by: Red at April 20, 2005 10:57 AM (oH25g)

7 I wish I was there. I'd of beat the shit out of the man.

Posted by: greg at April 20, 2005 11:52 AM (/+dAV)

8 Yep,that was just too crude. eeeew spit. eeeew Jane Fonda. Eeeew spit on Jane Fonda. eeeeeew, gag, barf choke.

Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2005 11:53 AM (D3+20)

9 Chicken Hawk Greg rushing to defend Jane Traitor Fonda. Go Figure.

Posted by: filthy allah at April 20, 2005 12:00 PM (yBHNA)

10 I don't disagree with the spitter's message, just his means of conveying it.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 12:27 PM (x+5JB)

11 The truth is it was crude. Not in the league of 'giving aid and comfort to enemies', but crude. The former is treason, the latter just gross.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at April 20, 2005 12:27 PM (JQjhA)

12 Perhaps he should have taken her social security # and givin it to her guard who then, beat the hell out of her....no wait, that is what she did to 10 POWS causing 3 of their deaths. My Bad. Hang the f-ing byachhhh and then burn her corpse.

Posted by: Ob Snooks at April 20, 2005 12:29 PM (yBHNA)

13 Maybe Bukakke'd her face instead? But who would be able to look at her and be in any sort of excitement mode? I am sure it has been a while since she has watched and participated in any of her old work out tapes I feel sorry for the guys spit. It had to touch that haggard old witch!!!

Posted by: mike at April 20, 2005 12:33 PM (nyxv/)

14 And if someone had spit on my dad, what would you think of the spitter? THis is a riddle, silly: You wouldn't think anything, because no one who doens't like my dad is allowed to attend his events! Now that's America. (But if he did get in and spit at Daddy, the SS would shoot him dead anyway!)

Posted by: Jenna Bush at April 20, 2005 12:37 PM (6fXP1)

15 Hate to sound like Collin here, but was she ever found guilty of treason in a court of law? Why not? I just think doing things like spitting on a human being does more harm than good. She was wrong. She made a mistake. She admitted it. She may be evil incarnate to some, but it does not help the arguments against her by doing something animalistic.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 12:40 PM (x+5JB)

16 spitters end up looking stupid, just like pie throwers.

Posted by: Carlos at April 20, 2005 12:41 PM (tFXpR)

17 Careful "Jenna Bush"--I may change my mind.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 12:42 PM (x+5JB)

18 Yup, spitting was pretty crude. Let's compare. Spitting at Jane Fonda vs. Jane Fonda spitting in the face of every Vietnam Vet? Hmmm. This is a tuffy. From the looks of the excerpts of her book, looks like a lot worse was done to her over the years by the people she married.

Posted by: Red at April 20, 2005 12:44 PM (oH25g)

19 Carlos: At least the salad dressing on Buchanan showed some panache. Kidding. C'mon. That goofy mohawked kid just looked like a moronic grade-schooler trying to impress his friends (not that he probably has any).

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 12:45 PM (x+5JB)

20 I agree she may deserve it, Red, but it's stooping to her level, and it doesn't dignify those who have a serious beef with her.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 12:48 PM (x+5JB)

21 Spitting might not have been the correct approach. I think maybe... a Hot Karl or, A dirty sanchez followed by a rusty fish hook would have been more appropriate.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 12:59 PM (yBHNA)

22 Filthy: NOW you're talking!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 01:04 PM (x+5JB)

23 YBP I'm afraid you are wasting your time here. Some people just don't understand you can't earn respect with disrespect. First you show a civilized degree of respect for like dead people and living ones too. How can you get your point across when you act and sound like a moron. There is that fring of radicals that believe anything to get my point across on both sides. They just make the cause they are attempting to support look bad. I just don't want you to have make yout point all alone.

Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2005 01:04 PM (D3+20)

24 The Hot Karl is the way to go FIlthy. Make sure to hit Taco Bell prior to the book signing. Work up a good Chalupa!

Posted by: Obsnooks at April 20, 2005 01:05 PM (yBHNA)

25 "Shouldn't that read given a medal?" Because big strong right-winger chicken hawks really demonstrate how brave they are by attacking 60 year old women. The only ones who are braver are the ones who hide in their mother's basements and type fantasies that are more extreme than spitting. good going guys. You really rock.

Posted by: JRI at April 20, 2005 01:12 PM (EeQUM)

26 Hey... JRI, go back to coming the junior high for dates you liberal pimp.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 20, 2005 01:13 PM (yBHNA)

27 Hey... JRI, go back to combing the junior high for dates you liberal pimp.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 20, 2005 01:13 PM (yBHNA)

28 Greg. You candy assed punk you couldn't beat the shit out of your old lady, er, I mean domestic partner. I always wanted to piss in a balloon for a week and then smack the bitch in the face with it. The guy who spit was probably a Vietnam Vet who seen some of his buddys die while the bitch was partying in North Vietnam. And now she's sorry. She's sorry all right. Sorriest bitch in the world. She declined to prosecute because she knows he is right. Also, a whole lot of spitters would be at the courthouse. Why is it the liberal moonbats never uttered a word when asshole commie supporters spit at our troops when they returned from Vietnam? If they can spit at patriots. Patriots can spit on them. I wonder how much the fine is? HMMMM. Might be worth it.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 01:23 PM (aq8Ok)

29 So when Jane's crowd spat upon returning US soldiers because they at the time believed they were justified in doing so that was acceptable. Just as acceptable as spitting on Jane Fonda. Maybe she did kind of deserve it a little but are we now copycatting those whom we would jump all over for the same act of disrespect. I'm not trying to copare Jane to those GI's I'm trying to show that this guy looks like one of those leftists Ya'll are always complaining about. Militant idiot he was.

Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2005 01:32 PM (D3+20)

30 Rooster, You're just an old man who can't piss a straight line on a wall anymore.

Posted by: greg at April 20, 2005 01:38 PM (/+dAV)

31 Thanks, Howie.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 01:49 PM (x+5JB)

32 You are quite welcome YBP.

Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2005 01:55 PM (D3+20)

33 I still think the Steaming Hot Karl would be appropriate.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 02:07 PM (yBHNA)

34 Filthy: Me: You are a horny and degenerate sand-lech. You: Praise will get you nowhere.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 02:27 PM (x+5JB)

35 So much for being the party of law and order, huh? Figures ... You sad old "men" are still pissed at Jane because you all want her, but she would give the time of day to guys with even less brains then Terry Schiavo. Give it a rest. Don't you have minorities to harass?

Posted by: Billy at April 20, 2005 02:38 PM (rkKCO)

36 Jane's crowd spit on soldiers? You nitwits belief in anything, don't you? What's next, you're going to start raving about how there ARE WMDs in Iraq, or that the Swifties WERE right about Kerry or that evolution is just a THEORY ... Tired of liberals looking down at you? Then try getting smarter or getting the hell out of the way.

Posted by: BigBob at April 20, 2005 02:42 PM (rkKCO)

37 Hmm, sounds like you guys are really into the whole humiliation & BDSM thing Then why are you so anti-gay? End the self-repression, K?

Posted by: Miss Kitty at April 20, 2005 02:47 PM (rkKCO)

38 Wow, you guys got LOTS of problems with women, don't you? I'd say y'all need to get laid more, but it seems that ain't happening much already.

Posted by: Jimmi at April 20, 2005 02:50 PM (rkKCO)

39 BigBob is a big boobie. A moooo ron.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 20, 2005 02:52 PM (yBHNA)

40 I was thinking of maybe erecting a monument in honor of this man. Posted by: Red at April 20, 2005 Still waiting for that Viagra shipment to come in Red? Erect this, come on that ... you silly boys are all the same: insecure about your size, your lack of performance and the intellectual capacity of 3rd rate banana republic hacks.

Posted by: Tami at April 20, 2005 02:55 PM (rkKCO)

41 Tami at liberal. net? MOOOOOONBAT!!!! WHOOOOP WHOOOP WHOOOOP!!! Bet you gave a ton of money to Dean eh? Bet you also think that Kerry is really Irish too-

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 20, 2005 02:59 PM (yBHNA)

42 show me where the WMDs are obsnooks ... maybe you can have your pastor (a true man of god, I'm sure) help you out when he's done explaining how you didn't come from no monkey ...

Posted by: bigBob at April 20, 2005 02:59 PM (rkKCO)

43 Obsnooks: Maybe there's a typo. BigBoob?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:00 PM (x+5JB)

44 You degenerate libs seem to forget that the majority of the country thinks you.....suck. Go smoke some more weeeeeed Hippaaaaaaay!

Posted by: FilthyAllah at April 20, 2005 03:01 PM (yBHNA)

45 Ahhh, what's a matter Earl, wife laughed at you last night when you could get it up. Again.

Posted by: tami at April 20, 2005 03:02 PM (rkKCO)

46 Filthy: Again, you are a horny and degenerate sand-lech.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:03 PM (x+5JB)

47 Who is this saucy female Tami?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:04 PM (x+5JB)

48 Ohhh ohh. Big Bob is one of those: BUSH LIED MEN DIED!! BUSH CAUSED 911. BUSH KNEW!! AWOL BUSH!! Big Boobie, you are too obvious. Ask Kerry where the WMD is. Ask Clinton. Both of them. Ask all of your Dem leaders. THey all said they were there. So, Bob.... Fuck off you see. Take your loonie crazy liberal talking points somewhere else.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 20, 2005 03:05 PM (yBHNA)

49 Actually Tami, I am a gay man. Now, let's here more of your hate mongering. I love it.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 20, 2005 03:06 PM (yBHNA)

50 Love these moonbat liberals. BUSH LIED. Wheres the WMD. Hell, I don't know where the f-they are. Ask Chiraq. He said that Iraq had WMD, so did the Krauts, the Ruskis, the Dems.... but only when I guess it was convenient for them to do soooo... Hey Teddy K! Where is Mary Jo? Hmmmm. Hic... she was in the car when i left her? Burp

Posted by: filthy allah at April 20, 2005 03:08 PM (yBHNA)

51 Earl: "Actually Tami, I am a gay man." Please--you will excite Filthy.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:11 PM (x+5JB)

52 Urp..... eraaaaaa.... wheres my pants....(Hic)

Posted by: Ted Kennedy at April 20, 2005 03:13 PM (yBHNA)

53 Actually, His gayness does not excite me. He is not Scott Baio. I am waiting for the moonbats to send their hate speech Earls way. They always bash gays.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 03:14 PM (yBHNA)

54 Jason: Do we have to get serious again? Sheesh. The guy spit on her and ran away? And she sat there and continued signing. Sorry, but she ended up looking better than he did.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:15 PM (x+5JB)

55 eraaaa I did not spit on aaaaa Mary Jo eraaaaa (hic) before I went to aaaaa auBar...

Posted by: Ted Kennedy at April 20, 2005 03:16 PM (yBHNA)

56 Big Ass Bob: Note that Jane Fonda was an antiwar activist in the 60's & 70's. Therefore I can safely say that her "crowd" that is other like minded people of whom she was a leader definately spit upon returning American soldiers. I have seen the footage myself. In fact everyone over about 30 has seen it although they may have been too young to remember. I suggest you put down the chips and turn off the TV and go study some history for you are sadly uninformed.

Posted by: Howie at April 20, 2005 03:17 PM (D3+20)

57 Filthy: Forgive me, Your Turbanned Filthiness. I must remember that you are eternally faithful to the great thespian Scott Baio.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:18 PM (x+5JB)

58 Fonda is a traitor as is John Kohn Kerry. Both should be in jail. But, Liberals will excuse their behavior because it suits them. THat is the liberal way. Choose which laws apply to you. The rest do not matter. Kerrys dishonerable discharge is coming out. Libs will still think he is a war hero. The filthy git.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 20, 2005 03:19 PM (yBHNA)

59 Does Jane really have this many defenders, or is it the same person posting under assumed names? Jane does have blood on her hands, but spitting on the treasonous bitch is still assault. Best thing to do is just ignore her.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 20, 2005 03:19 PM (jPCiN)

60 What a hero. Spit on a woman and run away. That's quite a set of brass ones he's packing, alright. Then again, he's clearly got a lot in common with some of the chest thumping heroes posting their juvenile comments here, so I can understand why he's the darling of this blog. Little boys will be little boys, after all.

Posted by: Jimbo at April 20, 2005 03:20 PM (wbpga)

61 Where are the friendly four? I want them back. Especially that saucy one. She does to me what the great thespian Scott Baio does to my friend Filthy.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:20 PM (x+5JB)

62 Now if someone had spit on Scott Baio at one of his Charles in Charge meet and greets.... It could have gotten messy. THis turban is not only there to cover my brand new plugs!

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 03:21 PM (yBHNA)

63 Jimbo,(hic) you are here eh? Eraaaaaaaaaahhh

Posted by: Ted Kennedy at April 20, 2005 03:22 PM (yBHNA)

64 The Happy Days Scott Baio or the Charles in Charge Scott Baio?

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 20, 2005 03:23 PM (jPCiN)

65 Jimbo! A fifth person has joined the chorus of this Greek--er, freak drama!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:23 PM (x+5JB)

66 I prefer the Happy Days Scott Baio but in a pinch, The Charles in Charge Mr. Baio will suffice. Okay libbs! Call me a faggot now. You always do. Libs are so filled with hate & rage. They should all just smoke some more weeeeeeeeeeeeeed and watch Charles in Charge.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 03:26 PM (yBHNA)

67 Defense Guy: "Does Jane really have this many defenders, or is it the same person posting under assumed names?" (Shhhh--Secret. I think they're all Jane herself.)

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:26 PM (x+5JB)

68 Yes, Filthy, he is younger in "Happy Days," eh?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:27 PM (x+5JB)

69 Errraaaaah Jimbo is a chick? C'mon (urp).... Hop in Jimbo...hic....I can drive you huh huh....eraaaaaahhh Home....hic....

Posted by: Ted Kennedy at April 20, 2005 03:28 PM (yBHNA)

70 Now look at what you've done, guys--you've driven the friendly five away with your insensitive, callous remarks.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:28 PM (x+5JB)

71 Yes Sahib, he was....sob....sniff... dab dab But alas it is time that takes him from Happydays to the aged but yet still supple figure of Charles in Charge........DAMN YOU FATHER TIME!!! I feel shame.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 20, 2005 03:30 PM (yBHNA)

72 Someone please take Ted's keys away. He's had enough. And put his pants back on. And call a cab for Jimbo.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 20, 2005 03:35 PM (x+5JB)

73 Why don't ALL of you macho fuckwads msg your names/addresses to each other and have a real face to face meeting? Otherwise you're all fuckin pansies who hide behind a keyboard calling each other names, like bloody schoolchildren! Read this thread, it's like being in grade 4! Are you grown ups?

Posted by: angryflower at April 20, 2005 03:44 PM (Bss6w)

74 angryflower asks: "Are you grown ups?" Now, I can only speak for myself, but No. I am more of a cross between peter pan and a young scott baio. I refuse to grow up, but I still want to have sex with Chachi. "Why don't ALL of you macho fuckwads msg your names/addresses to each other and have a real face to face meeting?" Because I don't have a face. There are you happy now that I am forced to admit my shameful status? I suppose I could wear a mask, but what would that prove.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 20, 2005 03:50 PM (jPCiN)

75 So then, you're ALL gay and fighting over Cachi? This is all starting to make sense now.

Posted by: greg at April 20, 2005 04:08 PM (/+dAV)

76 Not gay for everyone greg, just that Scott Baio. Don't even pretend that you don't want to ride that hunky piece of man love. On the other hand, what I meant to say was Joni. Don't tell my fiancee, she might try to hide all her shoes on me.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 20, 2005 04:24 PM (jPCiN)

77 Wow, if you take this single page to represent all Americans, considering clever arguments and spelling and grammar, it's pretty clear that the liberals are smarter than the conservatives by leaps and bounds. I guess those studies were right.

Posted by: Paul at April 20, 2005 04:25 PM (G0kuh)

78 Wow, if you take this single page to represent all Americans, considering clever arguments and spelling and grammar, it's pretty clear that the liberals are smarter than the conservatives by leaps and bounds. The libs point out that Jane was not actually convicted of treaon, and that spitting on someone to express your disagreement with them is a pretty sad way to go about it. Meanwhile, with all the maturity of 4-year-olds, the conservatives here are lamenting that the guy didn't shit on her. I guess those studies showing that liberals are by and large more intelligent than conservatives were right. Proven right here!

Posted by: Paul at April 20, 2005 04:33 PM (G0kuh)

79 I think you boys better get back to Cuba. See in the United States we try to protect people and enforce laws equaly even if the people are unpopular and we can sympathize with the law breaker. This is what distinguishes our society from others.

Posted by: american at April 20, 2005 05:29 PM (LjEkF)

80 Greg: I can and will piss straight enough to piss on you. Care to set something up? Now is the time for you to get your 15 minutes if your man enough.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 06:50 PM (aq8Ok)

81 My Friend Greyrooster, What drives your rage, mate?

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 20, 2005 07:47 PM (FV4oJ)

82 I don't talk to traitors.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 20, 2005 09:27 PM (aq8Ok)

83 Leave Kerry out of this!

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 21, 2005 04:18 AM (FV4oJ)

84 Wow - at the top of the page it says "everything you thought you knew about conservatives is wrong". Wrong, but right - I didnt know that *anyone*, even a conservative, could be so stupid, clownish, and bitter, all at the same time. Have a nice day, losers...

Posted by: stinky at April 21, 2005 05:22 AM (PFSLc)

85 Stinky's tender words go right to my heart, fellahs.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 07:14 AM (x+5JB)

86 He should get a Navy Cross for his heroic action. I would have done it but I dont have the balls. Given the liberal leaning of Bush what he did took real courage. You know he will be harased for years. More guts than what I got a Bronze star for. He is a real American hero! God bless him!

Posted by: Rod Stanton at April 21, 2005 07:30 AM (vRg2Q)

87 In the day of AIDS, and other fluid-born diseases, spitting in the face of someone could get you a serious assault charge in court. I think its much worse than pie throwing. Think of it, would you volunteer to be in a pie throwing stand for charity by multiple pie throwers? Probably for the right cause. Would you volunteer to be spat in the face for charity by multiple people? Not on your life.

Posted by: goyen1 at April 21, 2005 07:45 AM (JT6Ur)

88 Greg: I can and will piss straight enough to piss on you. Care to set something up? Now is the time for you to get your 15 minutes if your man enough.-Rooster Rooster, You're an old man. While I'm not always as respectful to my elders as I should be, I don't go around beating them up. Have another scotch and go back to bed.

Posted by: greg at April 21, 2005 08:16 AM (/+dAV)

89 greg, you could always take a page from their book by spitting in the old guy's face and running. Apparently, that's the fiber a hero is made of in their eyes.

Posted by: Jimbo at April 21, 2005 08:39 AM (wbpga)

90 Hateful people. Hateful comments. Is it any wonder the world thinks we're idiots?

Posted by: deccles at April 21, 2005 08:54 AM (K+Iaf)

91 Yeah man, if we could all just, like, get along and be cool than the world would like love us. Remember, one personÂ’s tyranny is anotherÂ’s heaven. Pay no attention to the actions of the tyrant, just like be cool. The guy was wrong. I said that before, and I'll repeat it here. This does not change the fact the Jane Fonda was a treasonous bitch that did actual harm to the American soldier. But don't let the mean old conservatives say you enlightened liberals don't support the troops or anything.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 09:26 AM (jPCiN)

92 Jane Fonda is an ass and anyone who buys that book of hers is an even bigger ass. What a twat. I hope some of that toobakki juice got in her mouth.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 11:52 AM (yBHNA)

93 Amazing how the libs will forgive any indiscretion, any crime as long as it is committed by another liberal. Sandy Berger? Ahhhhhh he didnt mean to take and destroy those classified docs... he is just a slob. Bill Clinton? It is a private matter. His sex life has nothing to do with how he governs... Jane Fonda. So she got some POWs killed. She was young. Lets buy her book. Isnt she amazing!

Posted by: Ob Snooks at April 21, 2005 12:00 PM (yBHNA)

94 what kind of man applauds spitting on a woman?

Posted by: jshaw at April 21, 2005 12:07 PM (5Jy+G)

95 She is not worthy of any respect. I would not piss on her if she was on fire. I would applaud if someone beat her the way the POWs were beaten because of her. She is a traitor and a whore. I hope she rots in hell.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 12:12 PM (yBHNA)

96 >> Amazing how the libs will forgive any indiscretion, any crime >> as long as it is committed by another liberal. Only if you're able to conveniently ignore conservatives doing exactly the same thing, defending the crimes of their own which are arguably more aggrievous. I haven't seen any liberals saying that Hanoi Jane did the right thing in N Vietnam. On the other hand, anyone want to talk about Tom DeLay? Didn't think so.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 12:38 PM (G0kuh)

97 >>what kind of man applauds spitting on a woman? Only the most cowardly who were not taught better by their parents.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 12:40 PM (G0kuh)

98 Hey, if Ted Kennedy can murder a chick and get away with it.... Then all is fair game eh? DeLay did nothing wrong you jackass. Just you filthy liberals getting your panties moist because you do nothing else.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 01:02 PM (yBHNA)

99 Spit on? Better check your history: http://www.veteransforpeace.org/Did_protesters_spit_050803.htm http://slate.msn.com/id/1005224/ http://bn.bfast.com/booklink/click?sourceid=412995&isbn=0814751466 http://www.theithacajournal.com/news/stories/20030507/opinion/253194.html http://www.capveterans.com/ http://www.mountainx.com/news/2003/0319troops.php

Posted by: Alan at April 21, 2005 01:16 PM (rkKCO)

100 Jeez, guys, get a life. A dottering old actress had a youthful indescretion over 40 years ago. She has apologized multiple times including in her new autobiography. Lost in all of your diatribes is the fact that the Vietnam War was a big mistake and sorry to say that Democratic presidents were equally culpable in pursuing it. Everybody else has moved on and you should, too. The misguided vet is lucky that she will probably not press charges because she is more of a man than he is.

Posted by: David at April 21, 2005 01:20 PM (ivK+l)

101 Filthy Allah sez "Just you filthy liberals getting your panties moist because you do nothing else." Are you serious? How about writing the constitution? The Declaration of Independence? How about starting America? You think Jefferson was conservative? Alexander Hamilton? Tom Paine? Ben Franklin? John Adams? Get Real ... don't you have some textbooks to burn?

Posted by: SteveG at April 21, 2005 01:22 PM (rkKCO)

102 >>Hey, if Ted Kennedy can murder a chick and get away with >> it.... Then all is fair game eh? Nice strawman argument. Nobody here has defended Ted Kennedy's actions at Chapaquiddik. Of course, you knew that and were just trying to obfuscate the point that convervatives will rally around their own regardless of their crimes. Then you say: >>DeLay did nothing wrong you jackass. Just you filthy liberals >> getting your panties moist because you do nothing else. A perfect example of my point. You are either blissfully ignorant of the charges that even fellow republicans have chastised him for, or, like other republicans, you know about them but feel more comfortable denying them rather than addressing them. Anyhow, although I'm sure you're immune to any sort of attempts at bettering yourself -- based on your other comments on this page -- here's a rundown of just how Tom DeLay never did anything wrong. Happy reading... http://houseofscandal.org/

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 01:26 PM (G0kuh)

103 Libs don't want the ethics comm to investigate delay because they know it's is bunk and they are afraid they will be exposed for doing the same that delay did. And More. Libs do nothing but snipe and bitch. Libs are worthless.

Posted by: Obsnooks at April 21, 2005 01:35 PM (yBHNA)

104 oh snooks, you forgot to appease the lefties by saying Bush lied, bush is hitler.... Awol.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 01:36 PM (yBHNA)

105 Is that the best argument your little brain can up with Obsnooks? Limp.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 01:39 PM (rkKCO)

106 He did lie, and he was AWOL. Why do conservatives have such problems with facts?

Posted by: Bone at April 21, 2005 01:41 PM (rkKCO)

107 God, just look at how the wingnuts parsed the uranium from Niger nonsense. Typical. Pretty soon, they're going to be telling us what the definition of 'is' is. Can't govern straight. Can't screw straight. Can't manage straight. Can't lie straight. Boring and tepid, two hallmarks of conservatism.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 01:47 PM (rkKCO)

108 Dave: "she is more of a man than he is." Do you know something we don't?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 01:50 PM (x+5JB)

109 Tami: Yo, you got a problem with conservatives not screwin' straight? How many you had?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 01:54 PM (x+5JB)

110 Tami, sounds like you and Bone oughtta get together.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 01:56 PM (x+5JB)

111 AHHHH AHAHAHAHAHAHAH THE MOONBATS HAVE ARRIVED!!! Bush is hitler. How do you libs manage to keep losing elections? Hitler.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 01:59 PM (yBHNA)

112 Hey Tami. Go shave your balls.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 21, 2005 02:00 PM (yBHNA)

113 Bush lied. Awol. CHimp. Libs still cant figure out why they cannot win an election. Boggles their puny minds. Maybe it is all the Weeeeeeed they smoke and those vegi bean pies they wolf down. Bush is hitler. Uhhhhh CHimp

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 21, 2005 02:03 PM (yBHNA)

114 Ah, I see the saucy one has returned. She seems delightful. I insist that you do not slander her womanly body, ObSnooks.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 02:04 PM (x+5JB)

115 I was the only black guy I know who voted for Bush. Wasn't about to vote for no condescending Kerry-bitch. An insult to every race.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 02:07 PM (x+5JB)

116 Dude, use yer hand. Your hand won't give you blisters. Tami is a liberal. Lib chicks bang anything and thusly have rotten cooters. Don't go near her man, she got speed bumps on her pootie.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 21, 2005 02:07 PM (yBHNA)

117 I am probably the only Muslim to vote for Bush. My people are crazy. They saw heads off, hide our women behind burkas, bugger little boys and half ripened fruits in exchange for sweets and nuts. I want bush to justicize every muslim terrorist and if he happens to splatter some that are not, well..... to make the omlette you must break some eggs. Bush is hitler

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 02:11 PM (yBHNA)

118 ObSnooks: I just know she's not like that. I know she's a fine woman, the kind to bring home to mother. (Not to father, though, but that's a long story.) Why do you insist she's a harlot, no better than some slut from one of Filthy's reeking tents? Do you KNOW her???

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 02:11 PM (x+5JB)

119 Lib chicks are all alike. Dirty cooters. Not Clean my friend. If she pulls her pants down, throw rocks at it and run.

Posted by: Obsnooks at April 21, 2005 02:13 PM (yBHNA)

120 I concur. It just sounds like she's had some bad relationships. But it does kind of sound like you know her? 'Fess up!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 02:16 PM (x+5JB)

121 whats "cooter?"?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 02:18 PM (x+5JB)

122 I believe your people use the quaint term "jellyrole."

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 02:20 PM (x+5JB)

123 Filthy Allah, sorry to break this to you, but I don't believe you're a Muslim, and neither does anyone here with a functioning brain. Your attempt to portray yourself as such, which you hope will lend credibility to your otherwise rabid generalizations, is another example of your dishonesty. Your insipid repetition of your "Bush is Hitler" slogans only draws more attention to the fact that you really have no viewpoint other than violence for America's sake, and no ability to support that viewpoint using mature, rational means.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 02:20 PM (G0kuh)

124 >>Libs don't want the ethics comm to investigate delay because >>they know it's is bunk and they are afraid they will be >>exposed for doing the same that delay did. I don't suppose you can support that claim, can you? Didn't think so. So allow me to prove that you're full of shit. http://www.democrats.org/specialreports/delaycasefile/ This is a list of DeLay's scandals. The little magnifying glass icon means that regarding most of the scandals, an investigation has been launched on the urging of democrats. So much for your claim that democrats don't want investigations. Lie much?

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 02:23 PM (G0kuh)

125 Sorry paul. I don't talk to traitor liberals. Fuck off you see.

Posted by: filthy allah at April 21, 2005 02:24 PM (yBHNA)

126 Oh, that old chestnut. Nyah nyah nyah I can't hear you because my fingers are in my ears. Sure, I know that one from 2nd grade. Rather than write it out in long form, you should have just said "Number 6!" That's the number of that childish defense.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 02:26 PM (G0kuh)

127 By the way, Filthy, if your next line of defense is the "I am rubber you are glue" one, as I anticipate it is, you can shorten that by just writing "Number 3!"

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 02:27 PM (G0kuh)

128 Paul is Hitler.

Posted by: filthy allah at April 21, 2005 02:34 PM (yBHNA)

129 Unnn Pauli, there are no charges. Only filthy liberal accusations. Go blot your panties somewhere else like, moveon.org. Hippy.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 21, 2005 02:35 PM (yBHNA)

130 "Lib chicks are all alike. " What a surprise, Obsnooks is a bigot. Why don't you share your heartfelt feelings about things with angryblackman? I'm sure he won't mind hanging around with bogots.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 02:45 PM (rkKCO)

131 >>Paul is Hitler. Oh, very clever. This is a twist on Number 1 child defense, "you are poo poo." What next?? >>Unnn Pauli, there are no charges. Only filthy liberal accusations. Testament to the fact that republicans control the House, and have thus far managed to draw out the proceedings and change the rules to protect their man. This is called "corruption." However, I'd like you to please explain why the republican-dominated House Ethics Committee admonished DeLay 3 times for what is nothing more than filthy liberal accusations. I await your reply.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 02:47 PM (G0kuh)

132 Tami is hitler and she has a rotted cooter.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 02:54 PM (yBHNA)

133 Listen Hitler, go spread your hate somewhere else.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 21, 2005 02:55 PM (yBHNA)

134 Actually, what DeLay has done is the same thing Harry Reid and a bunch of other dems have done. Trips, hiring family....blah blah blah who cares. Libs are nitpicking because they have no other agenda other than HATE BUSH. Bush is Hitler.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 21, 2005 02:58 PM (yBHNA)

135 "The time has come that the American people know exactly what their Representatives are doing here in Washington. Are they feeding at the public trough, taking lobbyist-paid vacations, getting wined and dined by special interest groups? Or are they working hard to represent their constituents? The people, the American people, have a right to know...I say the best disinfectant is full disclosure, not isolation." - U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, 11/16/95

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 03:01 PM (rkKCO)

136 >>Listen Hitler, go spread your hate somewhere else. On a page devoted to congratulating someone who spit on Jane Fonda, having you recoil at my deconstruction of your worldview and call it "hate" and refer to me as "Hitler" sure makes you look stupid and sad. Go on, get it all out.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:01 PM (G0kuh)

137 Paul How is a bipartisan committee considered Republican-Dominated? http://www.house.gov/ethics/CommitteeMembers.htm Also, be careful about the selectiveness of who you are pointing out, as there are several Democrats who have pending ethics 'situations', some of them with actual criminal rulings against them. I am fine with a house cleaning maneuver, just not one that stinks of partisanship.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:01 PM (jPCiN)

138 Paul, you are filled with hate. Mean people suck Paul,stop being so mean.

Posted by: Brad at April 21, 2005 03:01 PM (jQX3P)

139 Paul Cannot help but be nasty and mean. He is Hitler.

Posted by: filthy allah at April 21, 2005 03:04 PM (yBHNA)

140 Paul: All this talk of "old chestnut" and "rubber" will only excite Filthy.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 03:05 PM (QSIH2)

141 See, that's the sad part about conservative "thinkers". They think they sound like Einstein or Moses coming down from the mountain, but in reality they sound like Max Cady and go all Pentecostal. Then again, they have a real hard time handling reality, so it's not much of a surprise.

Posted by: alan at April 21, 2005 03:05 PM (rkKCO)

142 Guys--Just because Paul likes Hitler is no reason to make fun of him. We're suppose to be about the freedom to speak your mind, right?

Posted by: Youngdude at April 21, 2005 03:08 PM (QSIH2)

143 >Actually, what DeLay has done is the same thing Harry Reid >and a bunch of other dems have done. Any chance of getting you to support that? And by "support" I mean you'll have to show that Harry Reid has funnelled half a million bucks to his family from a charity and took contributions from foreign interests, among many, many others. If you can't support your statement, and let's face it nobody's holding their breath, then we can put this statement right next to the one where you claimed that democrats don't want to investigate DeLay's crimes. Obsnooks, I hate to break this to you, but when you're arguing your point on the internet, with easy verification of claims, lying to make your point is not really advisable. Go ahead, let's have another "Paul = Hitler" just to make you feel not quite so inadequate.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:09 PM (G0kuh)

144 Just curious, Paul---why do you like Hitler? I mean, I know he supposed to be charismatic...

Posted by: Youngdude at April 21, 2005 03:10 PM (QSIH2)

145 Fithy Degenerate liberals are scared to Death that the Ethics comm will investigate DeLay. Top Dems are f-d if that happens. DeLay did zippo wrong. Nuthin. Let the Ethics Committee have it liberals. Lets investigate it rather than have that KUNT pelosi and that Drunk Kennedy slander the man.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 03:10 PM (yBHNA)

146 The dude had one nut.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:11 PM (QSIH2)

147 Dude, Paul. You are Hitler.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 21, 2005 03:11 PM (yBHNA)

148 Who--Paul?

Posted by: youngdude at April 21, 2005 03:12 PM (QSIH2)

149 Apparently, around here if you don't have an argument or the intellect to think of one, it's perfectly fine to resort to namecalling. I'm so glad you all voted with your "morality." It's so fine and upstanding.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:13 PM (G0kuh)

150 Never liked nazis. Why you a nazi, Paul.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:14 PM (QSIH2)

151 "We're suppose to be about the freedom to speak your mind, right?" Right Youngdude. You wouldn't want him to end up like a Dixie Chick, would you? You little boys make me laugh with your reactions when someone makes fun of your sandbox.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 03:15 PM (rkKCO)

152 Paul will ignore anyone who doesn't call him Hitler. I refuse. Hitler was a genocidal madman. Paul is more of a partisan hack.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:15 PM (jPCiN)

153 Paul don't say the word "inadequate" around conservatives ... the reaction is usually a very negative one.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 03:17 PM (rkKCO)

154 Dixie Chicks? Those horse faced broads suck. They should go back to earning money behind the bowling alley dumpset. Like Paul here. Ohhhh. I mean Hitler.

Posted by: obsnooks at April 21, 2005 03:18 PM (yBHNA)

155 Angry Black: Don't say the words "Rotted Cooter" around Tami. Makes her think about the stink comming up out of her nasty drawers.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 03:19 PM (yBHNA)

156 It's funny that your incredibly bigoted, corrupt worldview can only survive in this GOP echo chamber, and that as soon as someone comes along to challenge it, you all dissolve into a bunch of whining, name-calling six-year-olds. This is a place where Filthy Allah can actually have people believe he's a Muslim. Where Obsnooks can claim that DeLay didn't do anything wrong, and when disproven, then claims that he didn't do anything worse than the dems. This is a place where you only have to say a lie once to have an idiot believe it. Sorry to rain on your parade, but I do get a kick out of popping by conservo-fascist blogs and reducing your claims to ridiculous namecalling. Anyhow, as you were...

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:20 PM (G0kuh)

157 Tami Is this where you tell us the Dixie Chicks have a right to free speech without dissent?

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:20 PM (jPCiN)

158 "Those horse faced broads suck. " So only cute women count? Typical. Mommy hit you when you were little and naughty, didn't she? "They should go back to earning money behind the bowling alley dumpset." You mean dumpster, right? You should really learn how to type. And form complete sentences. Put it off until you learn some respect. Little man.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 03:22 PM (rkKCO)

159 Easy Tami. You don't want that Cooter rot to spread to your ass.

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 21, 2005 03:25 PM (yBHNA)

160 Listen Hitler, Nancy Pelosi was fined by the FEC for violtion of campign finance laws.She illegally gave over $100,000 to democrat canadates in violation of the law. This is one case where a member of Congress was indeed guilty of something. Filthy..Would Tami benefit from that Cumin Rub Recipe you passed around last week?

Posted by: Brad at April 21, 2005 03:25 PM (jQX3P)

161 Paul, why you a nazi, man?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:25 PM (QSIH2)

162 Free speech is free speech. Doesn't matter who says it. Seems like a lot of you couldn't tell patriotism from a paper sack.

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 03:26 PM (rkKCO)

163 Paul is a smart one. So paul, tell us.... how come you and your degenerate ilk are not in power? Lick my boot now. THen Filthys. Beeeeyyyach. TAmi, scrub that cooter, it stinks.

Posted by: Obsnooks at April 21, 2005 03:27 PM (yBHNA)

164 Tammi sounds fine.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:27 PM (QSIH2)

165 Brad, Nice try, but they are not interested in facts. They are interested in riling up the mean old republicans so they can go back to being safe in their worldview about how bad we all are. Remember, they are members of the 'reality based community'. Because real reality just doesn't cut it.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:27 PM (jPCiN)

166 Actually, Tami.... You might want to try a cumin rub on that nasty wormed out cooter of yours. Just don't get it in your pee hole because, cumin can really sting. Thanks Brad. You da man.

Posted by: Filthy allah at April 21, 2005 03:28 PM (yBHNA)

167 Buncha liberal jerks, just like FrankenKerry.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:29 PM (QSIH2)

168 Why do you guys think Tammis got the skank?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:31 PM (QSIH2)

169 Free speech is indeed free speech, as opposed to, say a bologna sandwich. They can say whatever the hell they want, and we are equally allowed to call them on it. In fact, we can even stop buying their records if we feel like it, as that is another expression of free speech. Tough little world when the other side starts to get a voice too isn't it?

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:33 PM (jPCiN)

170 <> Yes, she was, and so she should have been. What are you saying, that democrats deserve to be punished and republicans don't? Does it matter that the charges were brought by the highly partisan National Legal and Policy Center in a pure effort to bring her down? No, of course doesn't matter. Nor should it matter who brought the charges against DeLay. Say it with me: Corruption is wrong, regardless of whether it's by a democrat or a republican. If you can say that with conviction, you'll be well on your way to becoming a respectable human being.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:35 PM (G0kuh)

171 angryblackman I have no opinion on Tammi's 'cooter'. Skanky or otherwise.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:35 PM (jPCiN)

172 So why not refer all the cases to the ethics committee and let the chips fall where they may?

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:37 PM (jPCiN)

173 Paul sounds cool. He is he a nazi?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:38 PM (QSIH2)

174 >>So paul, tell us.... how come you and your degenerate ilk are not in power? Very glad you asked. To some extent, it turns out that you folks that voted for Bush didn't actually know what you were voting for. See here: http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Pres_Election_04/html/new_10_21_04.html So, without any real idea of what you were voting for, you voted with your fear and prejudice, based on who you thought would most likely kick ordinary Muslims in the nuts the harder, in hopes that that would relieve you of so much of the fear you feel at the modern world. Your thought was obviously, "I won't feel scairt if I can say 'Lick my boot beyotch' to other people who are smarter than me." Sorry to tell you, this tactic will not bring long-lasting happiness.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:39 PM (G0kuh)

175 Sorry. he's a nazi?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:40 PM (QSIH2)

176 Paul, Kerrys a joke. You voted for the liberal goon? Don't get me started.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:42 PM (QSIH2)

177 Dixie chicks--horse-faced...hehe heh. That's an insult to horses, dudes.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:44 PM (QSIH2)

178 Ah, the old republicans are too stupid to know what they voted for coupled with the classic 'you guys are bigots' memes. The elitism never ends with you guys does it? I think you guys are going to like having no power, it suits you. Plus it's funny to see you all scramble to make excuses.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:45 PM (jPCiN)

179 I think the next Donk platform should be. Vote Democrat, cuz y'all are just too stupid to make your own choices.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 03:47 PM (jPCiN)

180 Paul is smug and comfortable in the knowlege that he and his ilk are the only ones who are correct. Liberals alone know how we should be ruled. Paul. Please tell us why socialized healthcare is best? Please? Hitler.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 21, 2005 03:48 PM (yBHNA)

181 Kerry would get his ass kicked by my whole neighbohood if he ever came around in his SUV. Ohhh--He don't have one, his wife does. Heheh Lying Franken-goon.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:49 PM (QSIH2)

182 Defense Guy, that slogan should turn a few red states to blue. Tami can hold the sign while flies buzz out of her cooter.

Posted by: Brad at April 21, 2005 03:50 PM (jQX3P)

183 >>Ah, the old republicans are too stupid to know what they >>voted for coupled with the classic 'you guys are bigots' >>memes. The elitism never ends with you guys does it? It's tough not to feel -- not superior but certainly smarter -- to the people posting on this page. This is the best support I've found for the claim that republicans are stupid and bigoted. Don't bitch at me for this fact. You'd do better to get some of your more challenged brethren to engage in some old fashioned book lernin' and get some class. >>Plus it's funny to see you all scramble to make excuses. Excuses such as...? How about these ones: "DeLay did nothing wrong you jackass. Just you filthy liberals getting your panties moist because you do nothing else." "Libs don't want the ethics comm to investigate delay because they know it's is bunk and they are afraid they will be exposed for doing the same that delay did. And More." "Actually, what DeLay has done is the same thing Harry Reid and a bunch of other dems have done." Defense Guy, you had a good concept going into this post, claiming that liberals can do nothing more than make excuses, but you should have done it on a different page, one where your fellow conservatives hadn't already taken up much of the space with their excuses.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:50 PM (G0kuh)

184 Hitler, I have to get back to work. If I don't make some money, your welfare check won't clear you Nazi hateful person.

Posted by: Brad at April 21, 2005 03:53 PM (jQX3P)

185 Soooo Paulitooooo. Tell us all about how libs would run things much better than that Evil Chimp Awol Hitler Bush- Ted Kennedy could be Secy of Transportation. He could be in charge of Bridge repair. Have the libs actually done anything other than obstruct? Wait, Condit killed his intern, Thats one thing....Torecelli did some massive Fraud... thats a good one....Hillary is being investigated by the FBI, Kennedy Killed a chick,.....Pelosi got taken to court for stiffing her maid....Harry Reid funnelled millions to his sons firm, What am i missing?

Posted by: Earl Dittman at April 21, 2005 03:54 PM (yBHNA)

186 What delay did, is not a crime. What the dems did, is not a crime. The dems are afraid their hypocracy will be exposed. You libs with your puny hate filled hearts. Good night Hitler. See you in the am. Don't some too much Weeeeeeeeeeeeeed tonight.

Posted by: filthy allah at April 21, 2005 03:56 PM (yBHNA)

187 >>Please tell us why socialized healthcare is best? I wouldn't advocate completely socialized medicine, and neither are any democrats I know of. However, I do support a more socialized system. Why? Glad you asked. Did you know that each year, 18,000 Americans die of easily curable conditions, all because they can't afford the healthcare? http://www.americanprogress.org/atf/cf/%7BE9245FE4-9A2B-43C7-A521-5D6FF2E06E03%7D/MOBILE.HTM That's like 6 9/11s happening every year. Doesn't it seem like something should be done to prevent those deaths? Considering all that's been done to prevent another 9/11 from happening? (I know, I'm asking a republican to care for other people, never a very compelling argument. Anyhow, stay with me a minute.) Having first-hand experience of the Canadian, British and Australian socialized medical systems, I can tell you that the care there is not inferior to our highly priced, HMO and big pharma dominated system here. That's why. Now, is it asking too much for you to explain why you're against it, providing support of external documents to bolster your argument? Or is it time for another "Paul=Hitler" spree?

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 03:58 PM (G0kuh)

188 Clinton pokin his privates in that intern's mouth.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 03:58 PM (QSIH2)

189 Whats her name? The goo-chewer.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:00 PM (QSIH2)

190 Paul Im willing to burn Delay if he is guilty, but not just him. We should go after every member with supposed violations equally, or none of them at all. I am not willing to offer him up as some sort of sacrifice to the idea of Democrat indignation. One other thing. Bush won the election. His party now controls congress. A wise party would be plotting how to get the moderates to consider them again rather than embracing those in the extreme wings of their own party.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 21, 2005 04:00 PM (jPCiN)

191 >>What am i missing? Earl, you're missing so much, one hardly knows where to begin. How about balancing the federal budget and bringing the country a budget surplus? Did you know that during republican presidents and republican control of congress that spending has spiralled the most out of control in our history? Some weird loophole in how they define "fiscal responsibility" I guess. http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 04:02 PM (G0kuh)

192 Defence Guy--Paul's got his head up his dumb ass with all the other librels--Your wastin your time. SUV-driving stooge.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:03 PM (QSIH2)

193 Angryblackman (who has as much chance of actually being black as Filthy Allah has of being Muslim), you are the absolutely last person on this page who can legitimately call anyone a dumb ass. Evidence of your pitiable stupidity litter this page like White House press passes at a GOP fundraiser.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 04:06 PM (G0kuh)

194 >>I have to get back to work. If I don't make some money, your welfare check won't clear you Nazi hateful person I understand, Brad. You can't defend your arguments, but before you run away, you wanted a last word, hopefully a clever and biting one at that. Fact is, while you're working for "da man," I employ 3 people, all of whom (and their families) are very happy that I'm not a hateful person who collects welfare. But you can believe that if you like. Hell, you believe Iraq has WMDs and that climate change is "junk science," I'm sure you can believe anything.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 04:11 PM (G0kuh)

195 Im not black? Want to see a black hand upside your head, bitch?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:11 PM (QSIH2)

196 How many of the three are blackmen? What is your quota? Heh

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:13 PM (QSIH2)

197 Liberals all alike. Bitches with SUVs. I have three people in my company? How many are black, since your such a liberal?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:14 PM (QSIH2)

198 Paul says I'm white. Dumbass liberal. Girlfriend would be suprised. I know he is--lilly white with no dong.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:20 PM (QSIH2)

199 Where Tammy at?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 21, 2005 04:21 PM (QSIH2)

200 You DO know what they say about men that are always prattling on about women, focusing exclusively on their equipment, or their sexuality; about how it is, 9 time out of 10, an infantile defense mechanism to cover up ones in inadequacies and subsumed homosexual leanings. Or didn't they get to that in your undergrad studies at Bob Jones University?

Posted by: Tami at April 21, 2005 05:13 PM (rkKCO)

201 When will the hatemongering toward Jane Fonda end?

Posted by: Collin Baber at April 21, 2005 06:26 PM (FV4oJ)

202 Tami, you are one sassy chic. Ummnn!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 07:05 PM (QSIH2)

203 Collin: How about when she stops writing stupid books?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 21, 2005 07:08 PM (QSIH2)

204 >>Have the libs actually done anything other than obstruct? I don't suppose you've heard of these: - Equal rights for women and african americans - The 5-day work week - social security (which despite the "crisis" has been effective for 60+ years) - separation of church and state - the constitution - the end of feudalism I'm going back a ways in history. The point being that conservatives have always been on the wrong side of progress.

Posted by: Paul at April 21, 2005 08:16 PM (G0kuh)

205 Perhaps because spitting on someone is BIOLOGICAL TERRORISM. What if that man has Hepatitis or AIDS? HMMMM? You would condone violence against someone just because YOU disagree with them? Of course this sick and demented person needs help and jail time. It's simply not ok to spit on people no matter how you feel. Or maybe you like to promote the degradation of civil society?

Posted by: lostleftie at April 21, 2005 10:29 PM (hG/gf)

206 Great Scott, you're bring up Social Security as a positive? You ARE a liberal! Kerry is certainly for the separation of church and state. Hence his moronic stance on abortion, calling it solely a religious matter. What was wrong with the feudal system? We had it in the South in the 1800's. The agrarian lifestyle yielded fresh food from this country with no pesticides. After abolishing slavery, farm owners would pay the workers a fair wage. The South was partly right. The factories of the North held their own variety of slavery.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 22, 2005 08:11 AM (x+5JB)

207 Anyway, off subject. Keep it to Jane getting spat upon. I hereby pronounce that it was a bad move.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 22, 2005 08:25 AM (x+5JB)

208 Earl Dittman, Angryblackman: Can you guys set me up with Tami? Paul: You figured out that filthy wasn't a muslim? Was that all by yourself. You so smart. Why do moonbats bring the items on your list of 6 above into a bullshit arguement? Equal rights for women and black Americans. I see you left out all other Americans. Feudalism? Where in America is that practiced? Conservatives are the ones wishing to protect the constution from change. Constitution? Freedom? The Constitution was enacted by many who were slave holders. Doesn't make sense for you to bring that into your liberal ideas. Thats such a pitiful arguement. As a conservative the only issue you mentioned I have a possible problem with is Social Security. My reasoning is that if social security doesn't protect have nots from themselves I will have to pay more taxes to support them later. Conservative are anti progress. Depends on what you call progress. Every liberal program in America has failed and achieved the opposite as intended. Generally, I have found conservatives to possess something liberal moonbat types don't have. Common sense. I don't believe conservatives are more intelligent or better educated than liberals. But they do possess an ability to make the right choices. That is why conservatives are generally more successful in life. Anyway you are not talking sense. This is the Jawa report.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 22, 2005 08:28 AM (CBNGy)

209 Tami: I am in total agreement with your post of 4/21/2005 at 5:31 PM. But please do a little research and see if liberals or conservatives are the ones fixated on the subject. As a liberal leaning person you will be surprised.

Posted by: greyrooster at April 22, 2005 08:34 AM (CBNGy)

210 I have a feeling Paul would be surprised to learn which party voted against the Civil Rights act in greater numbers. He is busy swallowing the lies.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 22, 2005 08:52 AM (jPCiN)

211 Defense Guy is right about one thing. I remember growing up in thhe south during the civil right s movement. The Dixiecrats were very much against the movement. That's when the Republicans moved in and converted the Dixiecrats. The racist Democrats became Republicans. So the current strength of the Republican party was born out of racism.

Posted by: greg at April 22, 2005 09:54 AM (/+dAV)

212 Yes greg, keep swallowing those lies. Nevermind the bitter taste and the facts that confound your beliefs. Hate the republicans having the audacity to vote for the Civil Rights act in greater numbers. Hate the republicans for not needing a quota sytem to get minorities into the highest ranks of power. Hate them for making the racists of old leave that shit at the door if they wanted in. Hate the party of lincoln for doing what you donks only talk about, and never get around to actually doing. Hate, hate, hate, hate, hate... the strength of the modern Democrat party.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 22, 2005 11:02 AM (jPCiN)

213 I'm a Libertarian. I hate both major parties. You both spend too much money and take away liberties.

Posted by: greg at April 22, 2005 11:15 AM (/+dAV)

214 i'm sending a virtual medal from italy. it surely wasnt an elegant move, it made me laugh a lot tho

Posted by: KrilliX at April 22, 2005 11:45 AM (ByTzj)

215 Stop the hate greg. Just stop the hate. Libertarian or anarchist? Hey man, don't like constrain me.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 22, 2005 12:13 PM (jPCiN)

216 Greyrooster... Equal rights for women and black Americans. I see you left out all other Americans. Did you see "the Constitution" mentioned? (Duh) Feudalism? Where in America is that practiced? Nowhere. I said I'm going back in history a ways, showing that liberal, progressive minds were behind every social advance in history, and always at odds with the conservatives of their day. Constitution? Freedom? The Constitution was enacted by many who were slave holders. That's true. However, given the time, the framers of the constitution acted out of a liberal, progressive intention in creating a representative government instead of a monarchy, as the conservatives of the time preferred. Remember, it was called a "more perfect union," not an absolutely perfect one. My reasoning is that if social security doesn't protect have nots from themselves I will have to pay more taxes to support them later. These "have nots" are old people who used to sell pencils on the street in order to put cat food on their table. Social security ended that. You apparently want it brought back. Have you told your grandparents? Conservative are anti progress. Depends on what you call progress. I'm talking about every single moment of social progress in the history of civilization. The mere concept of progress derives from a liberal mind unbeholden to the status quo, just as the concept of conservatism is antithetical to progress, being completely tied to the status quo. Look these terms up if you're confused. Every liberal program in America has failed and achieved the opposite as intended. Such as? Allowing blacks and women to vote? Establishing the 40-hour work week? Writing the constitution with the words "all men are created equal?" Please tell me specifically how these things I've mentioned have failed, and then tell me which others you consider failures. Thanks. Generally, I have found conservatives to possess something liberal moonbat types don't have. Common sense. Yes, that's always been the argument. It was common sense to think that the world is flat, remember? Common sense to know that a black person could never be equal to a white person. Common sense to know that a woman's place was in the kitchen. I don't believe conservatives are more intelligent or better educated than liberals. You'd have a helluva time arguing that point! But they do possess an ability to make the right choices. Looking back through history, I don't find any examples of this. Do you? Please provide details. That is why conservatives are generally more successful in life. I don't see it that way at all. I see the union of conservatism and material success in that conservatism is an ideology designed to protect moneyed interests. So people with money are bound to gravitate towards it. And people with that dog-eat-dog approach to life, so central to the conservative mindset, are often rewarded in a capitalist system. There are exceptions, materially successful people who still have time to care for people besides themselves, however.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 01:46 PM (G0kuh)

217 I have a feeling Paul would be surprised to learn which party voted against the Civil Rights act in greater numbers. Oh, I know all about that and I'm glad you mention it. That was back when the southern racist "dixicrats" dominated the democratic party. They eventually realized that the GOP was the true home for bigots when Strom Thurmond switched and ran for president on an pro-segregation platform. That spirit is still alive in the GOP, as indicated by Trent Lott's comment on how better off we'd all be if Strom Thurmond had won.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 01:51 PM (G0kuh)

218 Oh, I see that Greg already pointed that out about the dixicrats. And what does Defense Guy have to say about it? Not a lot. Hate the republicans having the audacity to vote for the Civil Rights act in greater numbers. That was before the dixicrats turned republican. Hate the republicans for not needing a quota sytem to get minorities into the highest ranks of power. That was after the dixicrats turned republican, at which point the party changed. The sincere drive by the GOP to get minorities into the highest ranks of power is a very recent one. Previously, the GOP has worked against this. You only need to talk to some older republicans to understand this. Hate the party of lincoln for doing what you donks only talk about, and never get around to actually doing. Funny you mention Lincoln, a true liberal by today's standards. Check out this quote: "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration." Hate, hate, hate, hate, hate... the strength of the modern Democrat party. On a page devoted to the celebration of someone spitting tobacco juice in Jane Fonda's face to express hate, this is probably the most hypocritical statement you could have made.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 02:00 PM (G0kuh)

219 Will someone please spit on the trator Jane Fonda again so we can get back on subject? BTW ebay is selling a Robert Byrd white sheet for only $5!!!

Posted by: Brad at April 22, 2005 02:06 PM (jQX3P)

220 BTW ebay is selling a Robert Byrd white sheet for only $5!!! Brad, your boss wants his ass licked, better hop to it. No, seriously, please explain how this Robert Byrd comment constitutes getting back on the Jane Fonda topic. What's that?? It doesn't? You mean you were just trying to take another parting shot by pointing out that there are racists in the democratic party? Do you want to go down the line and compare democrat vs GOP ranks in the KKK? Didn't think so.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 02:12 PM (G0kuh)

221 I know your party has the only sitting (former?) Klansman in the US Senate. He gets a free pass from the MSM,just like Pelosi. The fact that conservatives stand up for themselves on blogs like this is a source of anger to you libs. Try to cool down son, your posts are showing some hate and anger management problems.

Posted by: Brad at April 22, 2005 02:18 PM (jQX3P)

222 Paul: We have another thread if you want to talk dirty. No ass licking here.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 22, 2005 02:21 PM (x+5JB)

223 Whoah Hitler....... take the hate speech somewhere else. I think there might be some Jews over at Salon for you to rant against.

Posted by: Ob Snooks at April 22, 2005 02:30 PM (yBHNA)

224 Anyone notice the length of Hitler's postings? Looks like someone has some time on his hands. Finished exterminating the jews Pauli?

Posted by: Filthy Allah at April 22, 2005 02:32 PM (yBHNA)

225 Quit whining about it, that man was just as old as that hag Fonda and she deserved every last milliliter of spit she got. It is too bad someone didn't get a good photo of that or video since that hagged out tramp deserves that and so much more. Her ilk spat all over people like him and he was returning the favor on the same coin. She doesn't like it? Tough luck. Now, recently leftists have been throwing salad dressing and pies at political figures they don't like. I wonder if Fonda will sue this man for what he did? If so, will the "right" sue those on the left for acts of violence such as being drenched in salad dressing and pies? I'd have to say if it is sauce for the goose, it is sauce for the gander.

Posted by: Andre at April 22, 2005 02:34 PM (N/Slw)

226 Dudes, why is Paul a nazi? is he really?

Posted by: youngdude at April 22, 2005 02:35 PM (x+5JB)

227 By all means Paul, lets compare the number of current representatives in the party of hate vs the GOP that were one time members of the KKK. You can spin it all you want, you can talk about before this and after that, but only one party every ran on a platform of white rule, and only one party can't bring itself to allow minorities into the leadership roles of this country, and only one party holds up a former KKK kleagle as some sort of moral vanguard. It ain't the Republicans. You can try to hide the true face of your party, or you can let it die the death it so richly deserves and work on building a new party that actually means what it says it stands for.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 22, 2005 02:41 PM (jPCiN)

228 Paul One other thing. The wrath that I have for the party does not apply to all its adherants. I used to count myself as a member, but got tired of all the lies and ability to excuse bad behavior based on which party it was coming from. For all I know, you are a fine upstanding citizen.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 22, 2005 02:55 PM (jPCiN)

229 "For all I know, you are a fine upstanding citizen." Or at least a fine, upstanding Nazi.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at April 22, 2005 03:08 PM (x+5JB)

230 Goosesteppping sonovabitch.

Posted by: angryblackman at April 22, 2005 03:12 PM (x+5JB)

231 Def Guy, since you cannot seem to address my points one-by-one, particularly regarding the transformation of the GOP party once the dixicrats joined, and instead would like to discuss generalities, then I take it you have no defense for any of that. This is the difference between real political debate, of which my lengthy posts are an example, and political hackery, which the "Paul=Hitler" comments best exemplify. I imagine the last thing you want to discuss David Duke, or the entirety of the KKK membership, all of whom are solidly GOP. Also, let me clear something up: The democrats are not my party. Kerry was the first democrat I voted for in decades. Not that I prescribe to the American Taliban (aka the GOP). In some ways, I believe that it will take the GOP to turn this country into a real theocracy like the Taliban, which is clearly the goal of a highly visible contingent of the party, before people wake up from their Swift Boat intellectual malaise and actually take back their country.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 04:13 PM (G0kuh)

232 For all I know, you are a fine upstanding citizen. Cheers for that. You have distinguished yourself as the most respectable person posting on this page. I would grant you the same compliment, but I've got a question. You say: I used to count myself as a member, but got tired of all the lies and ability to excuse bad behavior based on which party it was coming from. If you don't see the GOP engaging in lies and excusing bad behavior based on which party it is coming from, then I really question your ability to see straight. I admit the democrats are made up of politicians who have a tendency toward corruption, just as the framers of our country predicted. If you can't say the same about the GOP, then you are a partisan hack.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 04:16 PM (G0kuh)

233 The fact that conservatives stand up for themselves on blogs like this is a source of anger to you libs. Brad, it is absolutely hilarious that you think ignoring a long string of valid points against the GOP and coming back with "Paul=Hitler" constitutes "conservatives standing up for themselves." Sorry, mate. That's "conservatives up against the wall and lashing out."

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 04:19 PM (G0kuh)

234 Why you a nazi, Paul?

Posted by: angryblackman at April 22, 2005 04:25 PM (d99JR)

235 Paul, A real discussion of politics is best held on a paintball course after getting all liquored up. This is really more foreplay. Not that I think your gay or anything.

Posted by: Defense Guy at April 22, 2005 04:27 PM (jPCiN)

236 Paul whines about Brad not replying to his "long string of valid points." I only went about halfway up the page and all I saw were fragmented incoherent "points" from Paul.

Posted by: CJ at April 22, 2005 04:31 PM (xkIHW)

237 A real discussion of politics is best held on a paintball course after getting all liquored up. LOL! Classic conservative thing to say. I don't hold that against you, though.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 04:35 PM (G0kuh)

238 Paul whines about Brad not replying to his "long string of valid points." Actually, that's not whining. That's ridicule. Everyone posting on this page deserves it, apart from Def Guy who is at least attempting to address issues. I only went about halfway up the page and all I saw were fragmented incoherent "points" from Paul. See, the fact that you're unable to point to any examples shows that you're really flailing. Why not just write "Paul=Hitler?" That seems to be a popular way to express your disagreement with me, and among this crowd of imbeciles is probably pretty effective too.

Posted by: Paul at April 22, 2005 04:38 PM (G0kuh)

239 Now there is the internet. And I really appreciate people like you who take their chance in such an excellent way to give an impression on certain topics. Thanks for having me here.

Casinos

Posted by: Casinos at May 20, 2005 07:44 PM (NJs6H)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
121kb generated in CPU 0.1078, elapsed 0.181 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1587 seconds, 488 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.