1 Forget the Koran, flush fanatical muslims.

2 Was it a large print version, Dr. Rusty?

3 Notice the Koranimals mass by the tens of thousands to protest alleged Koran mishandling, but nary a peep from them to protest muslim terrorism. The truth couldn't be more obvious.

4 That picture was obviously photoshopped. Rusty if you are going to say shit then you might as well do it for real.

5 OMG - those photos were photoshopped? My faith in humanity is ruined!

6 All I am saying is that if you think defecating on a holy book (regardless of whose it is) is proving a point or helping some cause or if indeed you so desperately want a fatwa why don't you put your money where your mouth is and actually do it. Tape it. Otherwise don't say shit.

7 Pfft. Just my luck. I delete a post only to find it got linked. 'Preciate the link, anyway, Rusty.

8 I'm not going to visit this blog anymore - you must be an idiot if you can't see that pictures like that fuel hatred and ultimately end up costing people's lives (be they coalition servicemen, or Muslims caught up in the anti-American riots that inevitably, and totally understandably, follow). Doesn't it annoy you when you see people burning the American flag? How the hell is this any different??? (don't bother answering) You've gone way too far. I suggest you apologise and remove those pics if you want any of your more moderate & tolerant visitors to bother coming back.

9 Hey Rusty, just call it art, and apply for an NEA grant and all these whiners will think you're some kind of a genius.

10 If Martin is lurking to see the responses to his post, I've got one for him... Hey Martin, this is man-talk, so go back to knitting or whatever.

11 Idiots! First you complain that a Newsweek article has endangered our troops and then you engage in the very activity that you attributed to Newsweek. Your inconsitency is a sign of insincerity. Phony posers!

12 greg, don't be a moron. What bloggers do for fun has nothing to do with U.S. policy vis a vis muslims.

13 Greg, I never ascerted Newsweek put our troops in danger... the Islamofacists did. Hence, flush & burn.

14 I never want to hear another word about Kevin Sites or Abu Ghraib after this nonsense. All your credibility has gone down the drain, literally. Hypocrites. I still want to see you do that for real though. If you are going to brag about desecrating a holy book you might as well do it for real. This photoshop bullshit is pretty sad. From here on out I am going to take everything you say with a grain of salt....well, more than I already have.

15 >What bloggers do for fun has nothing to do with U.S. policy >vis a vis muslims. So? The point is this: when Islamic terrorists see the American public defiling a book that's sacred to around one fifth of the world's population... it gives them the PERFECT opportunity for launching a recruitment drive. I.E. the reckless stupidity of the American public is directly proportional to the increase in global terrorist attacks. If you provoke them - they will strike. >I never ascerted Newsweek put our troops in danger... the >Islamofacists did Actually your Government did!!! White House spokesman Scott McClellan: "This allegation....was contrary to everything that we value and all that our military works to uphold... People lost their lives. The image of the United States abroad has been damaged. It will take work to undo what can be undone". Why do you hate Islam so much? Don't you understand that ANY religion can be exploited by fascists? Hitler thought he was being a good Christian by killing all the Jews.

16 Who is the loser "Sc10" who can't type?

17 Hey Martin, I do not condone US soldiers doing this. because they represent the US government, in the same way I do not support taxpayer money to support anti-Christian art. On the other hand, I do support the right of an artist to make anti-Christian art or a fictional character named 'Rusty Shackleford' defacing the Koran. I don't care if Muslims are offended. I am much more concerned with a 'holy book' that condones the murder of non-believers than I am abaout anybody being 'offended'. Further, if the Koran is so holy and peaceful, etc, then the worst this should do is cause protests. On the other hand if such actions, like this, lead to violence then what we have engaged in is a moment of clarity.

18 I actually went to Borders yesterday to purchase the Leftists Holy Book and they didn't have one. It is not a book that they stock even with the recent flap about the desecration. By the way, I live in Mississippi.

19 Two Dogs, you'll find their Holy Books listed under "Chomsky".

20 My cat pooped on the koo-ran! (see post) My bird pooped on the koo-ran! (see post) OMG, my neighbors pot bellied pig pooped on the koo-ran! Here's a link to get a free koo-ran. Hey, if they're giving, I'm a takin'! So many ways to show my disrespect! http://www.freekoran.com/about.php

21 I miss Collin Baber

22 Folks, this is serious business. We need to rally against the terrorists and not get side-tracked by stuff like this, which, I believe, makes us look really bad. Why piss off those who might read the thing but who have not yet taken up arms against Americans? You will not convert non-violent Moslems to the U.S.' side this way.

23 They should all be caught and brought to justice in a court of law. Eric, did that help?

24 photoshopped desecrations probably aren't a good idea. I'm not saying "apologize" or anything stupid like that, but why give ammo to Leftists and jihadists.

25 Close, Carlos, but it's missing that certain Essence of Baber. I can't quite put my finger on it, but your post was, well, far too sensical.

26 You know I wonder what your advertisers think of your toilet fun Rusty. Didn't conservatives make a big deal when Kos said that he didn't feel sorry for mercenaries dying in Iraq? You made sure all of his advertisers knew about his controversial statements.

27 What the hell is the matter with people like Jim? To these radical left wing kooks "Piss Christ" was just fine, the Virgin Mary smeared with elephant dung is oke doke, and burning the American flag is just peachy. But they get all sensitive about the Koran in a toilet? Man, has this world turned upside down!

28 This is absolutley disgraceful. I can't even put it into words. I cannot speak to all of you, but any of you who call yourselves Christians (you know who you are) should take a good long look in the mirror and ask themselves if this is representative of the Lord's teachings. I more than expect someone to say "Yea, BUT...! What about such-and-such or so-and-so and how those Islamofascists did this to us etc..." It doesn't matter. This is not the way.

29 kyer's right. Only Libs are allowed to desecrate religious symbols.

30 All superstition is beneath contempt. Defecation on a book of lies is fine with me.

31 Hey Cap Infedil, if you read my first reaction to Rusty's bullshit you would know that I would react the same way if he did that to any holy book whether it be christian, jewish or islam. So stop assuming shit idiot. Hey Carlos, stop with your Lib this Lib that whining. Its getting boring. Did a Lib run off with your wife or something? Its refreshing to see people like Martin and kyer who realize how fucked up this is. The rest of you are typical Rusty drones. Just nod your head and laugh at the "jokes".

32 Is it any wonder that a large proportion of the muslim world thinks that America has little or no respect of their religion, not to mention understanding? This kind of thing will just lead to putting the troops in even more danger since it will fuel hatred and help legitimise insurgents actions, free PR for recruiting. It is ridiculous to start citing the Koran's so-called message of 'death to infidels', have any of you taken the time out to read the Koran and learn about Islam? There is a lot in the bible that if taken word for word is pretty extreme, but the vast majority of people don't follow it word for word. Your ignorance is shown by your generalisations of Muslims and i'd be surprised if you've even met any. Keep on acting the way you do and the problem is only going to get worse.

33 Ben, Why don't you share your so-called knowledge of what is "pretty extreme" in the Bible? --Jesus replied, " 'Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, honor your father and mother,'[a] and 'love your neighbor as yourself.'"--- Matthew 19:19 Yea, I'd say that's pretty "extreme"...even radical at that. Nowhere in the Bible does it talk about putting others under servitude or enslavement (dhimmitude anyone?) or to kill anyone who does not agree with their faith, rather God asks us to LOVE them, and PRAY for them. Yea, pretty extreme.

34 I even blogged about this myself, trying to add something funny to it. And I believe Wizbang has a picture themselves. But I like Carlos's idea of flushing all these muslims down the toilet. we bad. Cindy

35 Leviticus 25:44-46 "Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour." -"However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way." Exodus 21:7 states you can sell your daughter. People quote leviticus as being plain evidence that homosexuality is wrong, yet in exodus (35:2) it states you may kill your neighbour if he works on a sabbath. So its ok to enforce one but not the other?

36 I don't believe this, won't let me post if anyone wants the rest (which i'd prefer), email me

37 Yes, Ben, you caught me in my haste by my setting the parameters too broadly by saying "nowhere in the Bible"--- but the mistake most non-Christians make is failing to differentiate between the Old Testament laws and convenants (the Hebrew Scriptures) and the New Testament. You are quoting laws which no longer apply because sacrificial/priestly law is no longer needed because of Christ's perfect sacrifice. The Mosaic covenant established the law and the priesthood, however, through Christ's death and resurrection, the New Covenant was established which abolished the need for the priesthood. Therefore, making the Levitical (Mosaic) law (which includes those things you mentioned regarding the holding/owning of slaves, etc.), unnecessary for followers of Christ. Therefore, Christians are not held to the Levitical law, like Muslims are held to the laws of the Koran. The laws and the "extremism" quoted from the Old Testament (the Hebrew Scriptures) are not relevant to today's followers of the Way (Christ Jesus)--subsequently rendering your arguement null and void. In order to efficiently argue "extremism"--quotes about Christian practices/"laws" need to be cited ONLY from the New Testament. To Christians, the Old Testament (Hebrew Scriptures) serve as a historical set of events leading up to the fulfillment of the prophecies which would culminate in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

38 I don't know if my TrackBack image thingie worked, so I'll do it here as well. http://img167.echo.cx/img167/4599/quran080sq.jpg No Photoshop here. Just a secret Koran-Cam™ the Delta Force installed in a secret Lebanese terrorist training camp 146 km SSW of Baghdad.

39 I'm a sensitive tolerant person, and I just loved the pictures. To all the dhimmis who complained: your attitude will only bring you subjugation at the hands of the Meccamorons.

40 Kyler, I'll further your remark with a comparison of the Bible to the Koran: The only thing that can save Islam at this point is if they, too, come out with a new and revised edition of the Koran like the Christians did with the New Testament. You could have the Old Koran which preaches hell fire and damnation and the New Koran which teaches temperance and tolerance. Of course Mohammed would have to be ressurected and the first time he married a 6 year old he'd go to jail and maybe see that he did his people a real disservice. It's really a shame because since Islam is Christianity's younger sibling, by around 600 or 700 years, and Christianity hasn't killed anyone for "the faith" in almost two hundred years, I figure we have about 400 or 500 years more to wait for their murderous ideals to fade or evolve. The problem with Islam is that it hasn't evolved like Christianity has. Still, even in this modern day, their tenets are designed to keep that from happening; to keep their people in the dark ages and completely refute anything resembling progress and equality even among their own. Why people still insist that this idea be "respected" is beyond me. "Servitude" vs "dhimmitude". "Selling your daughter" vs "killing your daughter". Old Testament vs The Koran. The Koran and Mohammed were nothing more than an attempt to restore things the way they were before Christ. They desperately need a new prophet to set things straight. I don't subscribe to either religion, but I sure can see the difference and if I had to choose, guess which one I'd go for? Muslims don't have that choice for fear of death.

41 How about everyone switching to Hare Krishna? Imagine the whole world full of anemic bald people dressed in orange flowercurtains shouting the message of love and peace. This would also solve the world overpopulation problem, since that is a really gaaaaaaaaaaay cult.

42 Coming soon: Al-Ählämi el-Bimbo flushes Bible!

43 >>>"Hey Carlos, stop with your Lib this Lib that whining." LMAO!!! c'mon dude, that's what we ex-Libs do. That's why you hate us so much!

44 Ben, The OT shows us the wages of sin is death. But the NT shows us Jesus paid the penalty for us. That's why we no longer had to go around chopping people's head off for stealing a loaf of bread like they do in Islam.

45 Hey, let's bring back Hammorabis law. It's not as bloody as some of Islamic countries' current law systems, and since it is from a pre-Jeesus age, it also has freedom of religion, just not freedom to be a Jew, since they thought it was lazy doing nothing at all on Saturdays. Fine, eye for eye, but it had death sentences only for people who repeatedly do crime or murder someone important, like a caliphs friend or relative.

46 historical correction for martin, hitler was a pagan bent on bringing back the old norse gods, he hated christians. christian ethics interfered with his homicidal genocidal beliefs. and that is the facts.

47 >>>"Hitler thought he was being a good Christian by killing all the Jews." How come Liberals are so stupid?

48 Well, Hitler was inbred, so he might've had some issues that made him think like that, so it's reasonable to think he did. Still, true Liberals are indeed stupid for seriously thinking white mans societies can exist without Fascist pigs covering stuff up, collecting big taxes to fund charade wars and telling people what they can and can't do. Liberal ideal society is for hippies.

49 As if Jihadis need an excuse to kill Americans and Jews...I mean come on. This might be in bad taste but so is a lot of other things that is called "art". Rumcrook: Hitler may have not been a Christian but he sure as hell used Christian dislike of Jews for his owns. Hitler used the hatred of Jews that was common (and still is) in the Catholic countries of Europe to his own advantage. A couple of thousand years of Jew bashing from the pulpit made it a bit easier to turn the Germans and others against Jews in such an extreme way. And it is not exactly like it was the first time there were pogroms against Jews in continental Europe. Any reading of the Jewish experience in Europe will demonstrate that. The only thing that made the Nazis ususual was the fact they did on such a large scale and mechanised it. In fact, Hitler and the Nazis were not pagans but in fact just Nazis. Nazism was suppose to take the place of religion as well as political parties. Most of their myths were made up on the spot losely based on Norse and Germanic pagan ideology.

50 The truth about Hitler Hitler's hatred of the Jews had nothing to do with religion, and his fascination with the Norse gods was solely in the interest of using them as mind control devices. Hitler was a liberal of his day, i.e. he saw the suffering of the world as the fault of the Jews, just like the French did, just like the Russians did, and just like modern liberals do today. Only difference is that back then, they weren't liberals, they were "progressives", exactly the same as liberals call themselves today. I mean, come on, what else could you call Hitler but a liberal? He was a vegetarian, an artist, he had no useful education but lots in the way of "intellectualism", he had delusions of grandeur, saw plots and conspiracies everywhere, and hated Jews. Oh, and he was probably part Jewish. As was Lenin. As was Marx. As were many so-called "revolutionaries" of their day. They were atheistic Jews and they hated the Jews who practiced their faith. Now, I'm not slamming atheism here, as I am an atheist, and have no personal desire to exterminate the Jews, but I'm also not a "progressive" or any other type of sociopath, I'm a libertarian, but this isn't about me. Hitler was the archetypal liberal, and if he were alive today, he would probably be a regular Democratic candidate for president.

51 John 3:16: For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. John 3:17: For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world but that the world through Him might be saved.

52 Those pictures probably (I hope) won't amount to a hill of beans of difference considering the enourmous glut the world has to digest in info overload on a daily basis. However, it is nice to think that those of us who consider ourselves to be cultured and somewhat mature - hahaha - would consider these images at the very least the kind of thing that our mothers taught us in 1st grade were juvenile and potty humor. That's the best take on this baloney. The worst take is that they make it onto a jihadi website to be used (however fakey they are) as a recruitment tool. I for one am for using all means - psychological warfare, the economic carrot & stick, military superiority (espcially technologically), philisohpical, political and religious sophistication and argumentation, etc. etc. to win this war against those within Islam who are pushing the edges of that religion toward a Cult of Death. Now some would say Islam cannot be redeemed - and perhaps that may be true. But at the very least we should encourage the finer impulses of Islam (say discipline, morality and sense of right and wrong). Meantime, if you want a good laugh at someone else's expense why don't you stick it in the eye of people that can "take it" - like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton or President Bush (whatever is your fancy for humor or caricature - Dana Carvey and Will Farrel come to mind). The radical Muslims, however, have proven to have very little in way of a sense of humor. That is something we just need to accept, imho, and not provoke this rather juvenile mindset. If Islam ever grows up and decides to be a fully functioning religion like all the other great religions then they will open themselves up to public scrutiny and indeed to humor, critique and occasional derision. Until then we're fighting insane and deadly juvenile delinquent 'theologians' (I'm talking about the Salafi Wahabi Sunnis here I suppose primarily) who are DEADLY SERIOUS about killing our young, brave men and women and innocents all around. I for one do not wish to give them any more ammunition then they already seem to have.

53 Stifle yurselves, high and mighties! http://www.sondrak.com/archive/007000.php

54 Condemning Islam via citations from the Koran, and then defending Christianity from Bible citations by saying, essentially, "you're taking it out of context" is not reasonable. Condemning Islam by citing examples of extremists outside of the mainstream of Islamic belief while not acknowledging extremists like the Hitler and the KKK is not reasonable. Extremist elements of the Muslim world and out of context quotes from the Koran are as relevant to Islam as extremist elements of the the Christian world and out of context quotes from the Bible are relevant to Christianity.

55 Little do they know, but all those books pictured above are in fact Christian Bibles.

56 We Shall Prevail!...Or Will We? by: Ali Sina 2005/07/07 "We shall prevail and they shall not," was the reassuring statement read by the shaken British Prime Minster Tony Blair, flanked by fellow G-8 leaders in response to four terrorist attacks against civilians in London today, July 7, 2005, that killed at least 40 people and injured 700. Among them, at least 45 are in serious or critical condition, including amputations, fractures and burns. These are only preliminary numbers. The count of casualties will certainly rise. Blair added: "Whatever they do, it is our determination that they will never succeed in destroying what we hold dear in this country and in other civilized nations throughout the world," That is a heartening promise and it this time that the Great Britain is hit by the worst attack since Hitler, it is most welcomed. But is there any substance to it, or is it just a pep talk? Unfortunately the promise that we shall prevail is an empty promise. The question is how we can prevail when we are not even fighting against the enemy? Billions of dollars are being spent and wars are being waged yet the enemy is not even identified let alone targeted. If anyone thinks the war against Islamic terrorism can be won the way our politicians are waging it, he is deluding himself. We are fighting this war defensively. No war was ever won fighting it defensively. Even that is an overstatement. The truth is we are just sitting ducks for the terrorists to hit us at anytime they want. The truth is that we are helpless. Each one of us can become the target of some sort of terrorist attack and there is nothing we can do about it. We are like frogs with a snake in the pond. As long as the snake is loose, anyone of us can be hit at anytime and all the assurances and hazard alerts have no other value than making us feel better. To fight this war, first we have to identify snake. The snake is an ideology. It is an ideology that promotes hate and incites violence. This ideology is called Islam. One commuter evacuated from a subway train at King’s Cross station reported: “It was chaos. The one haunting image was someone whose face was totally black and pouring with blood." A doctor rushing to the scene of one of the blasts said: “The front of BMA house was completely splattered with blood and not much of the bus was left,” A surviving passenger who was sitting in front of the bus that exploded killing ten people, said: " The roof flew off and went up about 10 meters (30 feet). It then floated back down," he said. "There were obviously people badly injured. A parking attendant said he thought a piece of human flesh had landed on his arm." As the city's transportation system ground to a near-halt, buses were used as ambulances and an emergency medical station was set up at a hotel. Rescue workers, police and ordinary citizens streamed into the streets to help. The Associated Press writer Jane Wardell wrote: "Some central London streets emptied of traffic. Groups of commuters who had been on their way to work gathered around corner shops with televisions, watching in silence. The mood was somber and subdued". This is all in accordance with the teachings of Islam. Muhammad ordered his followers to instill terror in the hearts of those who did not believe in him (8:12). He exhorted them to fight against unbelievers (8:65), slay them (9:5), Punish them by their hands (9:14), and subdue them (9:29) . This is exactly what is happening. The terrorists are not a misguided Muslims. They are the real Muslims doing what their prophet instructed them to do. Not all Muslims are terrorists. But the fact is that the Islamic terrorists hide among the Muslims, who in turn either protect them or are sympathetic to their cause. Islamic community is the breeding ground of Islamic terrorism. We can’t find the terrorists to eliminate them before they strike, but we can eliminate their breading ground. Leaving the summit of G-8 behind and returning to London , Mr. Blair said he knew most Muslims worldwide "deplore this act of terrorism." This could be true. But what good it makes when they support the ideology of terrorism at the same time? These Muslims who deplore acts of terrorism must ask themselves why they support Islam that advocates terrorism. There is an inconsistency between what they profess (their faith) and what they proclaim (their word). More terrorist attacks will occur. More people will die and if we do nothing, Islamic terrorists will eventually win. Islam has won through terrorism ever since it began. Islam may not win to become the world religion, but it will win burning the world into ashes and for Islam that would be a victory. There is only one way to fight Islamic terrorism and that is to fight Islam itself. Islam IS terrorism. All we have to do is read the Quran and familiarize ourselves with the life of its author to see this fact. In the Quran, the incitement to kill and to instill terror is spelled out in clear language in hundreds of verses. The first step that we have to take is to identify the supporters of Islamic terrorism, those who hate the West and kick them out. It is not difficult to identify these goons. They are very vocal on the Internet spewing their venom against the West. They can be easily identified and thrown out. Mosques must be shut down and mosque goers should also be kicked out. Mosques are not places of worship as churches, synagogues and other temples are. The only deity worshiped there is Allah the god of death and bloodshed. Ayatollah Komeini said, "Mehraab (the main hall of the mosque) means the place from which war (harb) proceeds". If they hate the West this much, why they should be allowed to live here? The terrorists are them. We should not wait until they strike, but rather kick them out for the very fact that they do not like us and our way of life. The second step is to launch a massive ideological war against Islam. It is Islam that is inciting hate and is goading Muslims to become terrorists. How can we overlook this clear connection? Ironically, the British Parliament is debating a law to declare criticism of Islam, "incitement to religious hatred" and make it a crime. This is insanity. How can we fight our enemy and protect it at the same time? In Italy, Oriana Fallaci the author of the best selling book "La Forza della Ragione" is sued for denouncing Islam. Amazingly the Italian Judge, Armando Grasso, of the city of Bergamo, instead of throwing out the suit has ordered Fallaci to stand trial. Islam must not be protected by passing laws making illegal its criticism. On the contrary, Muslims must be forced to justify their terrorist faith and prove that it merits the status of religion. Do we give the hate spewing Creativity Movement the status of religion just because its followers claim it is? Would anyone in his right mind ban the criticism of cults such as the Satanism, Branch Davidian or the Solar temple or even the cult of Charles Manson? Why in a country that even the criticism of Christianity is not banned, the criticism of a dangerous cult such as Islam must be outlawed? More lives have been lost today and more will be lost in future but those who want to remain politically correct and the appeasers are not going to wake up. They will continue defending Islam, the very doctrine that calls for their heads. They will continue fighting for the right of Muslims to believe and promote their ideology of hate. It seems the non-Muslims are on a suicidal course. One day, when they have had enough of it, perhaps after hundreds of terrorist attacks have left virtually everyone mourning for the loss of a loved one, or perhaps when a few atomic bombs have been blasted in their countries and a few million of them are incinerated; when their economies are totally destroyed and their cities have become wastelands, the Westerners will rise and slaughter their Muslim neighbors. Under pressure insanity prevails. The inability of the governments and the unwillingness of the public to denounce Islam as evil and ban it, will inevitably strengthen fascism, racism and vigilantism. White supremacists will find a receptive audience and in the name of saving their countries from foreigners they will launch their genocidal campaign against non-Whites. The silent masses will remain ever more silent. Tired of incessant Islamic terrorism and wary of their governments' inability to deal with the threat of Islam, they will receive the fascists as their saviors and will rely on them to cleanse their countries from Muslim immigrants and non-Whites. Fascism could come back with vengeance and everyone would lose their freedom. Yet many would welcome it because the threat of Islam seems to be far more greater than the home grown fascism. Why take the route of insanity when we still have time to eliminate our enemy by words alone? And yet the British Parliament wants to suffocate even this word. This law would only make fascism to come back as it would be the only alternative. We can’t win Islamic terrorism unless we demolish its ideology. Islam must be demolished or more lives will be lost, more body parts will fly in the air and more innocent blood will dye the streets. At the end Islam will lose; but at what cost? The longer we wait, the heavier will be the price to pay. Instead of passing foolish laws banning criticism of Islam, Islam must be discussed freely in schools, universities and in the mainstream media. Public debates must take place between the proponents and the opponents of Islam so the hidden facts about Islam come to surface. Muslims living among us must be brought to accountability. They must either leave Islam or forced to leave non-Muslim countries. Islam is terrorism. It must be banned. We are not talking about religious persecution. Islam is not a personal religion. It is a fascistic anti human ideology with a very temporal goal in the guise of religion and promises of afterlife. It is an ideology that wants to instill terror, to destroy democracies, take away our freedoms and dominate the world. Like Nazism and communism, Islam harbors ambition of world of domination and yet demands protection under religious status. We must not tolerate this ideology of hate masked as religion. It must be destroyed and its proponents must be kicked out. If Islam wants to conquer the world it is political, and criticizing it cannot be classified and "incitement to religious hatred". If we do the same that we were doing, we will reap the same that we have been reaping. More lives will be lost and despite Mr. Blair's assurances, we shall not prevail. In fact we will lose and that means the end of the world as we know it. It is not good to lose hope but false hopes can be just as deadly.

57 nice... lol the pig one was a huge dis... lol

58 hahahha...nice pictures and videos...Allah Hu Akbar!