April 01, 2006

Jill Carroll Says Video Interviews Taken Under Duress.

You might say? Good job Jill and weÂ’re glad you are safe.

AP via Yahoo : "During my last night in captivity, my captors forced me to participate in a propaganda video. They told me I would be released if I cooperated. I was living in a threatening environment, under their control, and wanted to go home alive. So I agreed," she said in a statement read by her editor in Boston.

"Things that I was forced to say while captive are now being taken by some as an accurate reflection of my personal views. They are not."... ...In the statement, Carroll also disavowed an interview she gave to the party shortly after her release. She said the party had promised her the interview would not be aired "and broke their word."... ..."At any rate, fearing retribution from my captors, I did not speak freely. Out of fear, I said I wasn't threatened. In fact, I was threatened many times," she said. "Also, at least two false statements about me have been widely aired: One — that I refused to travel and cooperate with the U.S. military, and two — that I refused to discuss my captivity with U.S. officials. Again, neither statement is true."

I can certainly understand why Jill might have said those things. We all would too most likely. She did the right thing remember they said they would kill her it she said this after her release. Brave statement.

Another Yahoo link.

More here at the Christian Science Monitor.

Also see LGF no fooling around, In The bullpen and Captain Ed.

Posted by: Howie at 09:34 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 279 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Party pooper.

Posted by: Vinnie at April 01, 2006 09:56 PM (/qy9A)

2 Rusty, You called it guy! Thanks for putting the breaks on our cynacism. It's difficult to avoid an instinctive reaction of suspicion, after so many recent deceptions.

Posted by: Mirra at April 01, 2006 11:26 PM (F9FUD)

3 Its so easy to keep a bad taste in the mouth, especially after the previous hostages. Its still important for me to know her priorities when going there. I thought she was there to report on Iraqis suffering, ultimately because of coalition forces? I hope I'm wrong and she was just doing her job as an objective reporter but is it nuts to think that? I'm not ready to judge her a person of integrity, yet. I'm glad she's free. At least, unlike previous hostages she's beginning to set the record straight and call the bad guys (with her) for what they are.

Posted by: Javapuke at April 02, 2006 12:08 AM (NQkft)

4 I don't see why her original motives, if they were indeed motives we wouldn't approve of, should dictate whether or not people crash down upon her now. If in a couple of months she starts writing on how good the terrorists are and how bad Coalition soldiers are, and I doubt she will, then we can crash down upon. As Howie said, now isn't the time and most of us would have said the same things if we thought that would be our ticket out of a box and back to freedom. There have been questionable hostage cases in the past, some that Rusty and I have disagreed upon. This case though, at least in my opinion, was legitimate and from the onset it was clear it was a ransom case. Why are more of the "peace sells" kind taken hostage? I don't know, but I assume it is largely because they are the type that seem to think their opinions are better protection than Marines. Sadly they continue to learn the hard way that our enemies don't care if they agree with them or not, they hate them because they are American and not Muslims. The CPT hostage ordeal is a prime example of that. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think I'd go around Iraq without protection speaking the word of Jesus Christ. And what gives with all the open threads? Has Rusty turned Duncan Black on us?

Posted by: Chad Evans at April 02, 2006 12:50 AM (uimQk)

5 Well, apparently you can fool some of the people all of the time. So her pre-kidnapping diatribes against America were caused by duress too, then? She just realized that nobody gave a shit about her when the world didn't cry over that Christian Peacekeeper dude when he got the chop, so she decided to de-camp while the opportunity was viable. She'll do a book deal, and possibly a made-for-TV movie, and her captors will be freedom fighters while the soldiers who were looking for her will be scum-of-the-earth types. Moonbat is as moonbat does.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 02, 2006 01:30 AM (0yYS2)

6 Dr Rusty, You were right, I was wrong. Sorry, Jill; based on years of conditioning by your fellow Ann Arbor America haters, I was willing to sell you out in a heartbeat. IM: join me in reserving all other judgment until she has had a Bud or two...

Posted by: Jaibones at April 02, 2006 02:35 AM (wes5d)

7 I must admit that I was one of the cynics. I think I was just tired of these hostage frauds. For instance, in the Sgrena case, Italian magistrates are investigating a US soldier for murder, in the case where the Italian agent was killed. And, get this, attempted murder for the wounding of terrorist fundraiser Sgrena. In my opinion, she should be the one on trial. I thought there were some parallels between Sgrena and Carroll. That clearly is not the case. Carroll is not Sgrena.

Posted by: Kate at April 02, 2006 04:19 AM (QKJeY)

8 She was on their side before she got kidnapped, so I don't give a good flying rat's ass about her one way or another. She slept with the enemy, so in my book she's a traitor, and it's too bad they didn't give her the chop too.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 02, 2006 07:37 AM (0yYS2)

9 But IM people fuck up. Could be a life changing experience maybe? She has value. Not let's see what she does with it now.

Posted by: Howie at April 02, 2006 09:29 AM (D3+20)

10 IM, yes, she's a moonbat, but a conservative is nothing but a moonbat who got mugged by reality. Jill Carroll got mugged by reality. There may be hope for her yet.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at April 02, 2006 10:13 AM (8e/V4)

11 Perhaps we should send a list to the terrorists of whom we all agree should have there heads chopped off.

Posted by: john Ryan at April 02, 2006 12:20 PM (N+r4D)

12 No probably we shoul dnot advocatebeheading anyone no matter how much they might deserve it. Like he guy that confessed to what was it 116? He deserves it but being civilized he should probably just be hanged or shot after a fair and speedy trial of course.

Posted by: Howie at April 02, 2006 08:44 PM (D3+20)

13 Jesus H., I can't believe this. You guys are falling all over yourselves to apologize for a traitor. I have no hope anymore, so I'm preparing myself for the downfall of our nation, which shouldn't be long when even "evil neocons" refuse to call a spade a spade. The moonbats have won the propaganda battle, but it will be a Phyrric victory, because when the muslims and illegals take over, then even their most aredent apologists will be rounded up and killed off. At least that's some small consolation.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 03, 2006 06:43 AM (0yYS2)

14 I would have rather Jill said war’s not my thing I’ll help in the effort in my own way.. Caring for the Iraqi people is good. We need people like Jill and CPT in a way. You can’t win just by war along you have to work with the people. While is with they had not been so naïve and said silly things before hand. She kind of had just who is the bad juys mixed up. No liberals have a place in this war if they want it. What better example of the evil as a liberal like her comes along and they turn on her too. Bad bad press for the enemy this time. I’m sure a lot of people would rather she did not go and cost the man power and intelligence to look for her. But surely some things were learned in the process and when she is debriefed even more will/was learned to tie in with that. I would rather Jill not have got herself into that but like Vinnie says we fight for her right to be a fool too. If she feels she must, she must. Let’s just hope she doesn’t get a wild hair again and the rest learn a good lesson. I don't agree with what she said before but whqat happened sure pust one hell of a dent in that line of thought.

Posted by: Howie at April 03, 2006 07:57 AM (D3+20)

15 I don't agree with everything you said, IM, but you are right about the lack of courage of convictions I see developing on the conservative side. You see, you can't be popular with the press, the Hollywood types, the CofC types, the soft liberal and conservative stooges, or even the hard Left. I see this all the time with parents now trying to be friends with their kids rather than being a parent, which requires control and guidance for children. I think that our country may be lost. I see very few even willing to fight these illegals who come into our country and then proceed to tell us what to do. Between the Democrats, who wish to use this horde to gain power, and the lazy ass Republicans who use this illegal labor for ill gains, I believe this to be an alliance that destroys our nation.

Posted by: jesusland joe at April 03, 2006 08:55 AM (rUyw4)

16 As usual JJ, you're right on the money. You're welcome to join me in my fortress in the mountains when the time comes, but apologists shouldn't bother, because food, shelter, and ammo will only be for those with the guts to fight.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at April 04, 2006 08:33 PM (0yYS2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
27kb generated in CPU 0.0266, elapsed 0.1689 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1526 seconds, 265 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.