September 28, 2005

Jail Time for Beheading Video

Wow. I'd really like to know more about the context of this. Context is everything.

UPDATE: After giving this some thought, let me clarify what I mean by 'context'.

Two films, the exact same footage, but different voice overs. Both show holocaust images. The first film praises 'the final solution' with commentary on Jews meeting their just end. The second film comments on the evil nature of antisemetism and the inhumanity of the Nazi regime.

Images, alone, convey no meaning. Meaning is conveyed by context. Context matters.

So, should this person go to jail? Not for 'shocking' some one else. Not if the context was, "look at what the bastards we are fighting in Iraq, you know, Cindy Sheehan's freedom fighters, are really doing." Give Younis a medal.

But, if the context of the conversation was 'look at this infidel pig getting his head cut off, praise Allah" then, yes, the person should go to jail. For a long time. Not for 'shocking' someone else, but for treason. This London:


A hotel guest who showed an "abhorrent and shocking" video of an Iraqi hostage beheading to an appalled worker has been jailed for 60 days.

Subhaan Younis, 23, showed Charlotte McClay the footage on his mobile phone while chatting to her in the shop where she worked at the Moat House Hotel in Glasgow...

Younis had shown Ms Clay the footage during a conversation about the Iraq war after offering to let her see something that would "cause her a sleepless night", said Mr Sellar. The shop worker replied: "Aye, right," the court heard.

The solicitor said his client thought Ms Clay realised she was about to see a video of a hostage beheading.

Posted by: Rusty at 10:11 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 294 words, total size 2 kb.

1 60 days seems like a lot of time for a politically incorrect act.But he does have a suspect name so he probably deserved the sentence.

Posted by: john Ryan at September 28, 2005 10:40 AM (ads7K)

2 It wasn't a "politically incorrect" act, but it was an act of terrorism. Terrorism is a method of psychological warfare, meant to attain victory through low-level conflict by forcing enemies to capitulate without having to fight them. His act of showing her a video for the purpose of causing her a "sleepless night" was nothing less than a terrorist act.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 28, 2005 11:11 AM (0yYS2)

3 Well, there's certainly something not quite right with a person who carries a beheading video around in his phone and just shows it to strangers.

Posted by: Oyster at September 28, 2005 12:01 PM (fl6E1)

4 OK i guess thaqn it was an act of terrorism. He does have a name like a terrorist

Posted by: john Ryan at September 28, 2005 12:38 PM (ads7K)

5 John Ryan, Why do you want to go around taking up for those jihadi bastards?

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 28, 2005 03:39 PM (rUyw4)

6 HIS NAME TELLS THE ENTIRE STORY!

Posted by: greyrooster at September 28, 2005 04:36 PM (M7kiy)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.0178, elapsed 0.1393 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1304 seconds, 255 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.