August 23, 2005
I've Decided We Need An Exit Date
We need to establish an absolute exit date for leaving Iraq in order to resolve any uncertaintly that might be lurking in the minds of the "insurgents" and Americans, like Chuck Hagel, fretting over whether to learn the Iraqi dialect of Islam or stick with the classical Q'oranic dialect. So I propose that if things aren't getting better by, say... Jan. 1, 3001 we get the heck out. I know it's something of a concession to the moonbats, and it's giving the enemy far more information than we ought to, but it's time we made up our minds that we just can't stay there forever. And we also ought to tell the jihadis, just for the sake of clarity, that their alternative to surrender is to go the way of the Thugs.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Posted by: Demosophist at
12:28 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hmmm... an exit date, eh?
Time taken to get every last terrorist in Iraq:
(terrorist estimate) / (amount of soldiers in millions) = (days)
so 273 years, therefore exit date is 23rd of August in the year 2278.
Posted by: A Finn at August 23, 2005 03:39 AM (cWMi4)
2
Oh yeah, someone not me gets prosecuted (well, at least a fundamentalist district attourney or whatever is trying to prosecute) for breaking the freedom of religion by constantly mocking believers on a churches web site. XD
Posted by: A Finn at August 23, 2005 04:16 AM (cWMi4)
3
A link to info, which you won't understand due to it being in Finnish:
www.kvaak.fi/keskustelu/index.php?topic=4017.msg65070
Posted by: A Finn at August 23, 2005 04:21 AM (cWMi4)
4
If my memory serves me right, Rustys father-in-law could probably translate =P
Posted by: A Finn at August 23, 2005 04:22 AM (cWMi4)
5
3001! What's the rush? My grandmother alwasy said (among many other things) "Haste makes waste!"
Posted by: Rod Stanton at August 23, 2005 06:55 AM (03F0I)
6
While 3001 is a hilarious first answer, I think that to take the moonbats out of play the answer given by Bush et al should be thus:
"Six months after the last act of terrorism in Iraq we will start to draw down the troops. One year after the last terrorist act in Iraq we will bring all the troops home."
It gets the point across that we need to stay the course, yet it does not _appear_ to be the open-ended-until-0eternity date that the American public is hearing constantly.
Posted by: Steve at August 23, 2005 08:37 AM (1JPcp)
7
What makes you think that the Millitary and the President don't already have an exit date? Just because it has'nt been made public, does'nt mean it has'nt been part of logistal and strategic planning...just as hunting and killing folks on the hit list is a planned indeavor, so too would be the enventual pull-out of troops...I dissagree whole heartedly that this date need be made public...it does no-one any good whatsoever, and in fact creates nothing but negative-contradictive signals all the way down to the troop level (even though they are the most deserving to know when the job is done), and would ripple outward into the international political world...it's not a gesture of strength, but rather capitulation.
Posted by: Grim at August 23, 2005 10:19 AM (ywZa8)
8
How about we leave about the time that Baghdad has more strip joints than mosques?
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 23, 2005 04:39 PM (0yYS2)
19kb generated in CPU 0.1221, elapsed 0.1884 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1812 seconds, 257 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
119 queries taking 0.1812 seconds, 257 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
