September 22, 2005

Iraqi Journalist Murdered

(Mosul, Iraq) Another Iraqi journalist has been killed, bringing the total number of murdered journalists to over 40 since counting began in March 2003.

From AlertNet.org:

A journalist from Radio Nineveh was gunned down on Wednesday night in Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad. Hospital and police sources said Ahlam Younnis was driving in a car with her husband, who was also killed, and her son, who was wounded in the attack.
In the past week, two other journalists were also killed in Mosul. Firas Maadidi, Mosul bureau chief for As-Saffir newspaper and chief editor of the daily Al-Masar was gunned down, and Hind Ismail, As-Saffir reporter, was found with a single gun shot to her head.

These were brave people murdered by criminals. Yet the mainstream media (MSM) continue to characterize these heinous crimes as valueless deaths by sanitized 'insurgents.' Where's the outrage? These people were journalists! Civilians doing their jobs! And, all along, the MSM ignore the horrible crimes and avoid attaching responsibility to any group other than the nebulous ill-defined 'insurgency.' For the love of all that's sacred, give us all a break and start calling murderers murderers. A duck will always be a duck, despite what the MSM call it. The problem is that, if the MSM doesn't call the terrorists murderers, the terrorists think they are doing okay. They're fortified to commit more murders.

Celebrate your legacy for the first decade of the 21st Century, MSM. It comes dripping with the blood of unreported murders committed by thug criminals. Thug criminal gangs can be called insurgents, or ducks for that matter, but they're still thug criminal gangs. To my knowledge, the MSM has not yet reported any crimes being committed by these gangs.

Murdering innocents can never be classified as anything but a crime.

Companion post at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 10:15 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.

1 An excellent point. Van Gogh redux. From another chattering class. Where are those journos who were decrying U.S. "assassinations" of journalists? What is the principle they stand for? Evidently it is not press freedom. The principle is opposition to the U.S.

Posted by: slickdpdx at September 22, 2005 11:22 AM (MjGRu)

2 Oh dear, you are just raging to the choir... It reminds me of the part of the book Watership Downs when the intrepid band of rabbits come across a very healthy and well fed colony of fellow rabbits. Only problem was that some left the hutch and never came back but, they never speak of it because, after all, the ones that remain are still healthy and well fed...

Posted by: babs at September 22, 2005 11:44 AM (hrGMt)

3 Yep

Posted by: Howie at September 22, 2005 03:54 PM (D3+20)

4 That's just how them rabbits are.

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 04:01 PM (rUyw4)

5 Well over here in blighty it made the news. As mike said "These people were jounalists. Civillians doing their job" However when two Reuters journalists were killed by US troops their deaths were almost lauded. In fact they were lauded. Double standards, dont you just love them.

Posted by: conor at September 23, 2005 03:39 AM (4PPsx)

6 Conor, "Over here in blighty it made the news". Well, ok, how much criticism was evoked at the "Michael Moore Minutemen" for the murder of these two journalists. Hmm...I can see it now. It was all the fault of Chimpy McBushhalihitlerBurton. That's what I thought. Yep, them double standards are hell!

Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 04:11 PM (rUyw4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
20kb generated in CPU 0.0153, elapsed 0.1276 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1198 seconds, 255 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.