1 It is time for all arabs and muslims to be "eliminated by one storm." these filthy creatures make me sick to my stomach

2 Ok victory warning #1 and don't feel picked on IM gets warned once in a while too. We know IM and he does at least contribute once in a while in between rants.

3 Victory, FYI, the Iranians aren't arabs.

4 I've never been warned, but I wouldn't give a damn if I was or not. If it weren't for me, this blog would be about as spicy as oatmeal.

5 Amadinnerjacket is just begging for a BFH upside the head.

6 The inbred Bush half brother surely will not curry any favor from the international community by continuing in that vein of remarks!

7 The Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, propose to the international community that the state of israel is moved to Europe, particularly in Germany and Austria, continent and countries where from originates the majority of the inhabitants of israel, rather than the middle east, its current location, where obviously, it never has been integrated with the local populations. This proposal stands to reason and contrasts with the insane idea to establish a Jewish state in the middle of Arab populations. One would have liked that it was considered a few tens of years behind, at the time where the situation with the middle East was not as degraded as it is it now and where the plan of occupation of the Palestinian territories (colonization) was less advanced. It would have been possible to organize the return of the Jews in their countries of origin as returned the other deportees of Europe there. One cannot sees indeed why the Arab populations of Palestine must support the Israeli occupation whereas the persons who caused Jewish persecutions are not originating in these regions! It is completely absurd and unjust and the argument of the Iranian president is from this point of view, unstoppable. Now, the conclusions he draws from that are debatable, to wish the end of israel is not the solution, as to wish the end of Palestinian by colonizing them is not either. His remarks have the merit to draw the attention on the slow genocide of the Palestinian people. The occident believed it could get rid of the Jewish problem by putting it on the back of arab populations. What a historical error! Even if arabs living after the war were more flexible than those nowadays, it were certainly the worst idea of the century to establish them in an environment which was to them in all points foreign. Then, is it possible to put things in order and to put an end to this population transplant against nature? Undoubtedly, one will need a voluntarist policy of the international community which must act confronted to the failure of the state of israel. Counting on the deterioration of the situation does not lead to anything, one does not make people bend when they defend their territory, the Israelis learned it at their expense and American in Iraq too. The Israelis are in front of a wall, they created places of concentration for the Palestinian population to control the one they could not deport, and donÂ’t know what to do now. A situation which should be familiar for them but that they seem to discover each day so much the improvisation of their actions is striking, without pun. They cannot from now on live any more without their enemy. The enemy is necessary. He justifies the use of the force, he legitimates the expansion of the colonies, he replaces any discussion. There never was negotiation between israel and Palestine, only confrontation, the invasion of Palestine carried in germ a final tragedy, and it will be tragic.

8 Who wants to to bet this turd won't nuke Isreal?

9 There we go again reciting history inserting our own "start date" and working from there. The history in Palestinian lands did not begin with the Jewish "invasion" after the war. It did not begin with the Muslim invasion in the 7th century and it did not begin with the Christian presence in the first century. But the fact still remains that the Christians and the Jews there (or anywhere in the ME for that matter) are the only ones willing to "get along". Yes, the European's resettling of the Jews in Israel was two-fold; to protect the Jews from the deadly anti-semitism in Europe and to also rid themselves of their presence. But that is not where the Palestinian's history of conflict began. Funny how no one ever brings up the centuries of despotic outside rule over Palestinian land before the creation of Israel. I suppose that was okay? Because they weren't Jews?

10 Perhaps Ahmadinejad doesn't know that there is no such thing as a "palestinian". "There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity, because it is in the interest of the Arabs to encourage a separate Palestinian identity in contrast to Zionism. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity is there only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a new expedient to continue the fight against Zionism and for Arab unity." ~~Zuheir Mohsein, Member of the Supreme Council of the PLO, Trouw (Dutch newspaper) March 31, 1977 Ahmadinejad should be informed that the jews, on the other hand. have been in palestine continuously for the last 3,000 years. Jerusalem has been majority Jewish for most of that history, including recent history. and "One always finds in Palestine Arabs who have been in the country only a few weeks or a few months...Since they are themselves strangers in a strange land, they are the loudest to cry: 'Out with the Jews!...Amongst them are to be found representatives of every Arab country: Arabs from Transjordan, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Egypt, the Sudan and Iraq." (Ladislas Farago, Palestine at the Crossroads (New York: Putnam 1937) p17 Most of today's palestinians (including the refugees) are descendants of those recent arab immigrants. Palestinian claim to the Holy land "since time immemorial" is not historical, it's political. It is a lie. The term "palestinian" in reference to Arabs goes back only to the 1960s (before that, during the British mandate, the term applied to both jews and arabs living in palestine). That's because there is no such thing as a "palestinian" nation. According to Turkish census numbers, Palestine was a sparsely populated, remote backwater of the Ottoman Empire when the first zionists began arriving in the late 19th century (Jerusalem numbered only 15,000 souls in the early 20th century. And it was a majority jewish city). Only then did Trans-Jordanian arabs begin to arrive in greater numbers to take advantage of the economic opportunities the Jews brought with them (same as today!). The concept of arab palestinian "nationhood" goes back only to the 1960s. It is a political fabrication. Statement by Ahmed Shuqeiri, to the UN Security Council in 1949 "It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria." ~~Statement by Ahmed Shuqeiri, to the UN Security Council in 1949

11 Patrick, your words of bulls**t won't work here either....

12 Time to turn TERRAN into a smoking crater

13 Time to TEAR INto TERRAN!