May 16, 2006

Indonesia Anti Porn Law Dripping with Islamlofascism


The Islamic fascists are hijacking the intended purpose of the law, changing it into a thinly veiled version of Sharia law for women. Even this modest traditional garment would violate the law as “bare shoulders” are forbidden and can carry stiff fines and prison sentences. Even being a bit late getting home after sundown can be construed as prostitution.

NPR (more audio at link) :Indonesia's controversial new anti-pornography bill is drawing some criticism in the moderate Muslim nation. In its current form, the bill cracks down on adult books and films. But it also targets many forms of social behavior, such as kissing in public and how women dress.
More here from The Standard:
Fauzia Damayanti stands to spend 10 years in prison unless she mends her wicked ways. Her possible crime? The Jakarta housewife wears miniskirts.

Under a draft anti-pornography bill being considered by Indonesian lawmakers, women who wear clothes deemed to be revealing may be jailed or fined as much as $111,000. Couples who kiss in public may face a five-year sentence or a $55,000 fine.

Indonesia is a huge collection of cultures. Grandpa's stories of New Guinnea are fun. The WAC nurses gave one young lady a brand new brazier to wear in the humid 120 degree conditions. She loved wearing it around her waist to hold fruit and other items she would buy at the market.
Bloomberg :The issue has ignited unprecedented debate in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, over the role of Islam in public life. While 85 percent of the nation's 228 million people say they are Muslims, traditional dress codes among more than 400 ethnic groups range from bare breasts in West Papua to naked shoulders in Java. Indonesia's archipelago straddles the equator and mostly has a tropical climate.

``Indonesia has no tradition of covering all of the body; it's a tradition of the Middle East,'' said Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, a law professor at the University of Indonesia in Jakarta and chairwoman of the university's Human Rights Study Center. ``We have hundreds and hundreds of customs, so why should we have a single type of clothing for every citizen?''

Conservatives are trying to introduce elements of Islamic law, or Shariah, through the bill, Harkrisnowo said. Several regencies, or local governments, have introduced similar bylaws.

Well, there is always Tahiti/Moorea.

Posted by: Howie at 11:23 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 4 kb.

1 They are so f**ked up they can't decide what to wear!

Posted by: Last gasp Larry at May 16, 2006 12:57 PM (FCC6c)

2 Thats what you get when you decide that "indecency" is a standard by which you can prohibit people from doing or wearing things. Perhaps a warning for us here in the USA?

Posted by: MiB at May 16, 2006 01:59 PM (Uesws)

3 When the New England's christian whalers first arrived in Tahiti dressed in their black wool they were horrified at the behavior and customs of the heathen pagans. There were mass desertions as sailors jumped ship and voted with their feet. Religions change with cultural change. Have you ever seen what passed as proper beach and swimming attire in the Christian USA in 1920 ? I am sure that the Tahitians might snicker at that ! http://history.amusement-parks.com/coneybeaches2.html social conservatives are by definition slow to accept cultural change.

Posted by: john Ryan at May 16, 2006 02:00 PM (TcoRJ)

4 Your a funny guy john ryan! A tangent commentary masquerading as enlightened intellect that appears to both rationalize the topic, as well as distance yourself from it ... all without committing yourself one way or the other. Bravo! That is talent (kinda). So, did you walk Snoopy today over by the Westside Drive, Charlie?

Posted by: hondo at May 16, 2006 02:59 PM (SeBrl)

5 The dark blanket of islam has attempted to cover the vibrant cultures of Indonesia but often comes unstuck. East Timor is an example where the islamic government of Indonesia was halted, if the rest of them fought for freedom I'm sure the islamist tide would be halted.

Posted by: Jester at May 16, 2006 03:25 PM (TuAMG)

6 Poor little Jester before you speak you better learn more, East Timor(ET) is not about religion its about colony, you see Indonesia is a colony of Dutch, while ET is Portugal's, Indonesia then invaded ET. If it was about religion NTT, the neighbouring province would be more than happy to join them. About the bill, it's still being discussed in the government, besides what we wear is our own bussiness, so F**K OFF!

Posted by: Doraemon at May 17, 2006 12:24 AM (klUYo)

7 Doraemon: That's just it. We think what you wear should be your own business. Not the business of those who would impose something different on you. It doesn't matter if it comes from an extreme religious group or a secular, totalitarian group. In this case it comes from the former. And our opinion of that group will be spoken aloud no matter how many times you tell us to "F**K OFF".

Posted by: Oyster at May 17, 2006 09:36 AM (ASk6Y)

8 East Timor is also predominantly Christian. It may not be obviously about religion but why do Christians in Indonesia get targeted...note the recent beheadings of school girls. Personally I don't care what you wear suffer as much as you like with your islamic BS but don't enforce your rules on us enlightened ones.

Posted by: Jester at May 17, 2006 09:17 PM (TuAMG)

9 Yes I ran across that image doing this post. Nasty nasty.

Posted by: Howie at May 18, 2006 07:33 AM (D3+20)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0447, elapsed 0.1618 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1527 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.