August 12, 2005

How "Able Danger" Will Be Played

This is the money quote from the New York Times Thursday article about the 9/11 Commission/"Able Danger" scandal [emphasis added]:

Mr. Felzenberg said the commission's staff remained convinced that the information provided by the military officer in the July 2004 briefing was inaccurate in a significant way.

"He wasn't brushed off," Mr. Felzenberg said of the officer. "I'm not aware of anybody being brushed off. The information that he provided us did not mesh with other conclusions that we were drawing" from the commission's investigation.

Felzenberg has, in effect, called the unidentified officer a liar or the dupe of a liar. In order for the information to be "inaccurate" it would have to have been faked in some way. The possibility of faked information being fed to the Commission should have, in and of itself, immediately raised alarm bells that a coverup or setup was taking place. Why would the commissioners simply dismiss, without investigation, an attempt to give them false information? The "Able Danger" revelations open up several cans of worms that partisan Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media do not want examined.

"Able Danger" puts Mohammed Atta in Prague, meeting with Saddam Hussein's security agents. This contradicts the liberal article of faith that the Bush administration had no reason to fear Saddam's regime. "Able Danger" also brings up questions about the Clinton administration's handling of terrorism and lack of wisdom in compartmentalizing national security information in the name of libertarianism. Most immediately, "Able Danger" could lead to an independent investigation of the actions of some of the more highly partisan members of the 9/11 Commission. The name Jamie Gorelick comes quickly to mind.

That's why it's likely that an effort will be made to convince the public that the "Able Danger" documents are fakes, created by a conspiracy probably masterminded by Karl Rove (who else?). The mainstream media trumpeted the 9/11 Commission's findings as if they were delivered from Mount Olympus, propelling the report into best-seller status. Remember the stampede to implement each and every one of the Commission's recommendations without bothering to debate them? If the MSM can't bury this one they'll try to play it as a conspiracy. Weldon had better have his ducks in a row.

Cross-posted at The Dread Pundit Bluto.

Posted by: Bluto at 01:14 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 388 words, total size 3 kb.

1 The 9-11 Commission, or as I refer to it, the Clinton Legacy Protection Cartel, had it's "conclusions" before it heard all of the testimony. Sounds about right. Did Commissioner Gorelick personally approve the final draft??

Posted by: MCPO Airdale at August 12, 2005 01:39 PM (WOQ34)

2 Horseshit. Politicians should never have been part of that group. The fact is that these guys were NAMED! Funny how it fit with who was in those planes but not with their "conclusions". They want the intelligence failure to be blamed on Bush, not where it really belongs. The blame belongs on a policy that was started many years ago and strengthened during the previous admininistration and simply carried on during the new one. They're ALL at fault. They ALL failed to protect us. Why can't they call a spade a spade?

Posted by: Oyster at August 12, 2005 01:41 PM (fl6E1)

3 Jaime Gorelick killed 3000 people. Liberals are traitors . What do we do with traitors? ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZAAAAAAAAP! Or at least we used to.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at August 12, 2005 03:38 PM (5ceWd)

4 Where are Woodward and Bernstien now? Would they have the same ambition to get to the bottom of this the same way they went after tricky Dick? And where is the Deep Throat to back this up from within the intelligence Dept? They are all cowards and I don't blame Zell Miller for getting out while he is still clean. Somebody help me with track backs through Yahoo. My site is cmunkeypunky.com, and I want to link to Rusty.

Posted by: kstumpf at August 12, 2005 04:53 PM (Kv4B9)

5 Fox, meet the hens. Hens, fox. Fox is in charge now, he'll take good care of you hens. Ta ta!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at August 12, 2005 05:07 PM (0yYS2)

6 And they continue to shout that Bush lied. Well, who lied to Bush?

Posted by: greyrooster at August 12, 2005 07:58 PM (CBNGy)

7 Fridays My word by John Gibson is almost exactly online with this thread.

Posted by: kstumpf at August 13, 2005 11:13 AM (Kv4B9)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
21kb generated in CPU 0.1474, elapsed 0.2468 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.2088 seconds, 256 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.