Okay, so it's not a fatwa, but the fact that Google has found in necessary to put a content warning page on my
leaves me all warm and tingly in a funny place. A
or something.....
Posted by: Howie at March 29, 2006 12:34 PM (D3+20)
2
Content warning? Hey, it's a step in the right direction. I think this calls for a cocktail.
Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 01:26 PM (rGS2g)
3
What's wrong with the content?
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 29, 2006 02:52 PM (D2g/j)
4
Hey -- they list my site as being part of Jawa Report.
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at March 29, 2006 02:52 PM (LECsA)
5
Wow! cocktails on me! It's a slippery slope from content warning to fatwa. You're on your way, Rusty!
Posted by: Heroic Dreamer at March 29, 2006 03:00 PM (aH6Zf)
6
Where how? linky linky?
Posted by: Howie at March 29, 2006 03:01 PM (D3+20)
7
Heroic D, I'll have a Captain and Coke.
Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 03:12 PM (rGS2g)
8
You know, now that I think about this a little more, will they put a content warning on all websites now that show the piss Christ? Or the elephant dung Virgin mary? Or the Joooo cartoons from just about every site from the Middle East?
Leatherneck, the content warning is on Rusty's Flush the Koran blog.
Posted by: Oyster at March 29, 2006 03:19 PM (rGS2g)
9
The offensive thing is that everyone is oh-so-quick to photoshop the Koran in the toilet, but no one is willing to do the heavy lifting to actually order one and give it the appropriate watery burial.
Posted by: a4g at March 29, 2006 03:30 PM (X/md9)
10
Congratulations Rusty! Started out my day being called an assinine, ultra-conservative freak in the Nevada Appeal (or the Appall as we lovingly call it here locally)... Time for a cocktail indeed - only one more thing would perfect my day and that is an actual fatwa... Bring it on...
Posted by: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton at March 29, 2006 06:14 PM (ytltE)
11
I was kidding. However, I don't think there is anything wrong with it. There is so much crazy stuff going on in the world.
Posted by: Leatherneck at March 29, 2006 08:02 PM (D2g/j)
12
let's see: hate-inciting images leading to violence versus arousal-inciting images possibly leading to love.
where is the hypocrisy?
Posted by: cum on the bible at March 31, 2006 03:41 PM (hu96W)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
