January 11, 2006

Gay Cowboy Eating Pudding Critical of West Virginians, Mormons

I wonder what former Grand Kleagle Robert Byrd has to say about this? Via Dan Riehl: Heath Ledger slams West Virginians, Mormons:

"I heard a while ago that West Virginia was going to ban it. But that's a state that was lynching people only 25 years ago, so that's to be expected," Ledger said.

"Personally, I don't think the movie is (controversial) but I think maybe the Mormons in Utah do. I think it's hilarious and very immature of a society.

Yeah, nothing says 'mature' like two guys having sex on the open range. File under: bad gay.

Posted by: Rusty at 11:58 AM | Comments (34) | Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Ya know, if some idiots want to make a movie about queer cowboys, then hey, it's a free country, right? But by the same token, if the vast majority of We the People are disgusted, repulsed, and sickened by the thought, and choose not to see it, then hey, it's a free country, right? Personally, I'm only glad John Wayne isn't around to see the depths to which we've sunken.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 11, 2006 12:03 PM (0yYS2)

2 John Madden on the subject: "When you think about fag cowboys, you think about Heath Leger, and when you think about Heath Leger, you think about fag cowboys. You take the fag cowboys and Mormons and they just dont go together the way they do with Heath Leger. I mean Heath Leger and fag cowboys go together like Brett Favre and Lambeau Field and cold weather, and what was the question?"

Posted by: Steve Sharon at January 11, 2006 12:16 PM (e/IFH)

3 Words like "Fag" and "Queer" aside. I saw the movie. It's an excellent story of two men, who fall in love. Let's not confuse sex with love. [They find a bond that in another time would be wonderful]. The movie isn't graphic; you donÂ’t see their erect penises, you see them embrace and be tender towards each other. They were forced to remain inside the confines of society. Go see the movie. It wonÂ’t make you gay by watching it, it may even give you something to think about.

Posted by: Chevy at January 11, 2006 12:50 PM (TJt6I)

4 Nicely said Rusty.

Posted by: thirdee at January 11, 2006 12:56 PM (S0mC1)

5 Chevy: what proof do you have that seeing the movie won't make you gay?

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at January 11, 2006 01:07 PM (RHG+K)

6 I think I'll pass, a movie that is based on the premise of: Homo's, Homo's on the range, where the deer and the antelope play Just isn't my speed. Thanks for the feedback Chevy, I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Posted by: dave at January 11, 2006 01:26 PM (CcXvt)

7 Chevy, First of all, queers call themselves queers, so what's good for the goose is good for the gander, especially if the gander's queer. Second, I know what love is, and I know the perfectly natural, asexual, bond that men can form, espcially under trying circumstances; it's called "brotherhood", and it's quite common among soldiers, and yes, cowboys. Wanting to give your buddy a Dirty Sanchez is not the natural expression of amity between men, which is why it's called "queer". Third, I'm not afraid of becoming queer just by watching a movie, though you might have trouble wrapping your simplistic liberal mind around the idea. I just find the whole concept repulsive, and want nothing to do with it, and I damned sure won't support such degeneracy with my money. If you like watching gay cowboy porn, then by all means go ahead, because as I said, it's a free country, but don't expect normal, red-blooded men to go for that shit, 'cause it ain't gonna happen.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 11, 2006 01:32 PM (0yYS2)

8 Chevy, I watched the movie and immediately felt the urge to sodomize my half brother Heath.

Posted by: Nick Barclay at January 11, 2006 01:37 PM (3OPZt)

9 well said Maximus! I personally don't hate queers, just don't want to see the homo mafia in everything that is natural, because it is not! They want rights, give them their rights.........15% off Vaseline now get the *uck back in the Closet(Dice Man was right)

Posted by: Andy at January 11, 2006 02:56 PM (tMU4W)

10 That's it Andy. I have two gay neighbors that are just plain nice guys, and I wouldn't let anyone cause them any trouble, but they know how to keep private matters private, as all people should. I don't really care what consenting adults do with one another, I just don't want to know about it.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 11, 2006 03:22 PM (0yYS2)

11 Stop saying gay cowboys! They're gay sheep herders! Big difference...

Posted by: Chad at January 11, 2006 03:30 PM (E2GpM)

12 Let's just pray this thread doesn't get linked to one of the pro-homo sites. IM, as usual, you cut through the BS and got to the point. Well said, my friend!

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 11, 2006 03:32 PM (rUyw4)

13 Yeah they are sheepherders nobody ever liked them in the old westerns either: the sheep crop the grass to short not like cattle. So if they are to be hung they should be hung as sheepherders not as queers.

Posted by: john Ryan at January 11, 2006 04:18 PM (TcoRJ)

14 Good point on the technicalities, they're damn sure not cowboys. Thanks JJ.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 11, 2006 05:31 PM (0yYS2)

15 They are not gay, they are homosexual. I am not ruining the english language to satisfy a bunch of faggots. Sorry if you do not like my opinion but I think they are disgusting, especially bisexual men who do not tell their wives or girlfriends about their boyfriends. At least Suha Arafag knew about Yasser.

Posted by: Steve Sharon at January 11, 2006 05:32 PM (e/IFH)

16 Faggot traditionally meant a stick of wood, and gay meant happy. Don't know how they got converted to mean polesmoking rump rangers, but that's their current context.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 11, 2006 07:34 PM (0yYS2)

17 >>>I saw the movie. It's an excellent story of two men, who fall in love. So if the two cowboys in question turned out to be long-lost brothers, would it still be an "excellent" and touching story about two men who fall in love? After all, they don't show any erect penises, and they really really love each other.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at January 11, 2006 11:55 PM (8e/V4)

18 They are sheepherders - shepherds! Not cowboys! What's the matter Hollywood? - so out of it you missed that obvious detail? what next - a pickup is a car? Boots are shoes (or just footwear)? Want to make gay love story movies - fine. But please play at least a lil' bit attention to detail! I mean - what next - a gay love story about two sailors filmed against the backdrop of the Arizona desert?

Posted by: hondo at January 12, 2006 07:52 AM (3aakz)

19 So ... they are NOT gay cowboys, but gay shepherds. .... Does this mean they ran out of ewes?

Posted by: charlie at January 12, 2006 09:24 AM (2ZhL/)

20 Their gay cowboys because someone in Hollywood realized that pointing out their actually shepherds opens them up to a lot of old jokes - AND THEY WANT TO BE TAKEN OH SO SERIOUSLY!

Posted by: hondo at January 12, 2006 09:49 AM (3aakz)

21 So two gay sheepherders walk into a bar... Let's have a contest to finish that joke. Howzabowtit?

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 12, 2006 10:29 AM (0yYS2)

22 No, hondo, the people who do these things and write these scripts are ignorant. Not stupid, but ignorant of anything that is not in their little circle. That is the reason they cannot understand how anyone could vote for Bush. They really have no idea about how the vast majority of the people in the US live and think. And honestly, they probably think a cowboy herds sheep. Any three-year old here in Texas would know that not to be true.

Posted by: jesusland joe at January 12, 2006 10:30 AM (rUyw4)

23 They know the difference between herding cattle (cowboys) and herding (is that the word?) sheep (shepherds). I know they do - I'm surrounded by them here in NYC. Ang Lee might not know - but they do.

Posted by: hondo at January 12, 2006 12:47 PM (3aakz)

24 two gay sheepherders walk into a bar..... one turns to the other and says, hey ya wanna get shitfaced ? How's that IM ?

Posted by: memphis761 at January 12, 2006 02:03 PM (D3+20)

25 Sometimes you just have to push the sheep through the fence...

Posted by: George at January 12, 2006 02:07 PM (SyfL7)

26 Sorry, but no. Thanks for playing though, and please try again! How about this: Two gay sheepherders walk into a bar, and the bartender says, "We don't allow you people in here." One of the sheepers responds, "It's okay, we're into rams."

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 12, 2006 04:34 PM (0yYS2)

27 As they sit down at the bar, one says to the other” Mind if I push in your stool?"

Posted by: Brad at January 12, 2006 04:35 PM (3OPZt)

28 Good try Brad, but it's been done, and we need a whole joke. C'mon peeepul!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at January 12, 2006 07:27 PM (0yYS2)

29 So far the only movie reviewer I know who really loved the movie was Mr.Slave of the South Park Daily who gave it two schmeckels up.

Posted by: Steve Sharon at January 13, 2006 09:58 AM (9H6fQ)

30 What's the big deal about their being sheepherders rather than cowboys? You guys keep saying they are sheepherders like that was some kind of bad thing. Fact is sheepherders lived as rugged and difficult life as any cowboy. You ever read anything about the Basque sheepherders of the American west? They were tough guys! Anyway, Jesus portrays himself as a shepherd too! The "Good Shepherd." So how can being a shepherd be a bad thing? btw, it's a pretty good flick. Seems to me a lot of the people here are trashing it without even having seen it!

Posted by: ed jay at January 26, 2006 11:59 AM (11Y2B)

31 Saw the movie. Liked it. Live in Salt Lake City. Larry Miller and his Mormon counterparts can't cram their religion down our throats.

Posted by: Dennis at January 29, 2006 12:12 AM (6Dcjp)

32 Saw the movie. Excellent acting. Story not that believable. Live in Salt Lake City. Larry Miller and his Mormon counterparts can't force their strange religion down the throats of all Utahans.

Posted by: Dennis at January 29, 2006 12:18 AM (6Dcjp)

33 Brokeback Mountain will not get my money. This movie was done because sissy hollywood fags like the idea of big tough butch fags pushing them around (somebody has to be the girl). I mean, look at the village people! So far this movie has grossed 66million dollars. Sounds like a lot. Compare it to the last star wars movie. 108million on its 1st weekend alone. Real Americans know what they want, and this liberal fag cowboy shit is not it. It is being force fed to us.

Posted by: bobby at February 15, 2006 10:26 AM (v53kJ)

34 I grew around sheepherders. I know a little bit about sheepherders. They are hygenically challenged. They spend months at a time out in the wild, not bathing and doing their business in the bushes. They hang around camp fires and get all smokey. Also, they tend to take on the aroma of their charges. The only thing that could be worse would be a pig farmer. Kiss a sheepherder, not on your life, especially after I saw them castrate lambs with their teeth. Yetch! And about knocking Mormans, if the religion works for you, fine, if not, maybe you ought to be a Methodist or something else.

Posted by: Bob Gill at February 21, 2006 04:40 PM (t3jdx)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
32kb generated in CPU 0.164, elapsed 0.2872 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.2749 seconds, 283 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.