February 08, 2006

Four More Churches Burn in Alabama: Domestic Terrorism Watch and MSM Hypocrisy

When I first heard that four Baptist churches had been burned in rural Alabama in a single night, I had my suspicions. I e-mailed a few other online publishers about this to ask them if I was crazy or paranoid, and each of them said that their initial response was the same. Nevertheless, we bit our collective tongues.

Now, I learn that four more churches were burned in Alabama two nights ago. That's eight Baptist churches gone in rural areas of a single state within a week.

Dare we call this what it really is? Domestic terrorism.

Dare we speculate who might wish to burn down the churches belonging to Bush-Hitler-Neocon-Zionist-Crusader-Pigs? No, we dare not.

Although no evidence existed, the media were free to speculate about the Klan members and various Nazi thugs who were accused of plotting a spate of church's with black congregations being burnned in the South in the 1990s.

We, however, are not free to speculate that there might be a connection between global unrest over a series of cartoons depicting Muhammed and a series of arson attacks against churches attended by people that might be seen as sympathetic to those who blaspheme the Prophet (sawt), on the heels of that unrest. Nor to connect the dots between the actual murder of Christians, the bombing of Christian churches, and death fatwas against blasphemers over a cartoon and the torching of Christian churches here.

No, we will not say what is on our minds. The Left and their allies in the MSM are free to speculate as to who the likely suspects are whenever an alleged hate crime is committed. We, on the other hand, are not for fear of being called an Islamaphobe. Even when incidents of Islam inspired terror are hundreds of times greater than any other ideology or phobia.

Like I say, it is only a suspicion of who the suspect might be. The deranged person might have been motivated by any number of hatreds--our speculation over Joel Henry Hinrichs III seemed to come to mind as an example of an initial speculation based on some very good circumstantial evidence, but where we turned out to be wrong. But our initial objection to that incident was that Islamic domestic terror was ruled out by so many before the investigation even really began.

Are we making the same mistake again by ruling out that which we fear the most? Only time will tell.

CNN via Stephen Taylor:

Four churches caught fire and two were destroyed in the southern state of Alabama, just days after another five burned in what authorities suspect was arson, local officials said.

State and federal officials were investigating the four rural west Alabama fires as intentional, the state fire marshal's office said in a statement.

All four churches torched were Baptist, like the five churches burned in the central part of the state late Thursday, three of which were completely destroyed.

"The fires are being investigated as suspected arson," Ray Zicarelli, spokesman for the Birmingham, Alabama office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, told CNN television.

Posted by: Rusty at 12:47 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 539 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I had the same suspicion. Local islamoterrorists don't wish to be left out of the protest. Just human nature.

Posted by: Moz at February 08, 2006 01:56 PM (3MpX4)

2 It probably wasn't a buddhist. Well probably not a good buddhist, it could have been a bad buddhist. In the Christian Science Monitor article Buddhists were not mentioned as suspects http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0208/p02s01-ussc.html Since my coreligionists were responsible for the deaths of more Americans in the last 50 years than any other religion I feel it necessary to speak up for them in the matter of church burnings.

Posted by: john ryan at February 08, 2006 01:57 PM (TcoRJ)

3 Occam's razor! Historically, there has been serious rivalry between Christian denominations, especially in the south. It has been confined to bake sales and door-to-door recruiting in the past. But I think it has been ratcheted up lately. I think we need to take a long hard look at the Methodists.

Posted by: Lew Clark at February 08, 2006 02:21 PM (lTB5R)

4 Lew, you may have a point, but I blame the Mormons, who are the most aggravating, doorbell-ringing sons-o'-bitches you ever met since the Adventists and Witnesses ran out of steam when the Millenium came and went without Jesus putting in an appearance.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 08, 2006 02:34 PM (0yYS2)

5 There is a university with a Muslim association in close proximity to the area the church burnings are occuring. They should check that out. And, if we find out that it is Muslims doing this, I am sure there will be a huge backlash from all the American citizens who are tired of the Bush Administration "noble religion of peace" lying mantra.

Posted by: Abby at February 08, 2006 02:44 PM (xfRm+)

6 Kids - dope-smokin', maggot invested, wannbes out to make their "Beau Gueste". Probably no SUVs to vadalize in town. John - we all know your a self-proclaimed budhist (you tell us often enough). You one of those tri-chic converts? Kind of a socio-fashion assessory thing? In about 5 years, what are you going to be - any ideas?

Posted by: hondo at February 08, 2006 02:58 PM (3aakz)

7 No hondo I lived in a monastery for about a year in Thailand about 30 years ago. Probably will still a buddist in another 5 years, it is a comfort for me. The article, Feb 8th LA Times, quotes the senior special agent of ATFE as saying that local residents reported seeing "two white males deiving a dark SUV possibly a pathfinder" near 2 of the fires. So I guess it still leaves open the possibility that they were buddists, they were driving an asian vehicle.

Posted by: john ryan at February 08, 2006 03:52 PM (TcoRJ)

8 Actually, out of curiosity, I took one of those religion tests to see what I would be if I was a religious person and apparently, I'm Mahayana Buddhist. Who'da thunk it?

Posted by: Oyster at February 08, 2006 04:08 PM (sMLtC)

9 Mahayana is the way to go !!! Easy for all to use and enjoy. No being walled up into a cave or prolonged staring at one's navel. And more chicks too

Posted by: john ryan at February 08, 2006 04:36 PM (TcoRJ)

10 I read the story about the SUV. So if they were driving a SUV, we know they're environment hating Republicans. All we need now is religious affiliation. Anyone know if they were able to get any bumper sticker info from the vehicle.

Posted by: Lew Clark at February 08, 2006 04:44 PM (zzOPq)

11 >>>"The Left and their allies in the MSM are free to speculate as to who the likely suspects are whenever an alleged hate crime is committed. We, on the other hand, are not for fear of being called an Islamaphobe." Holy crap, Rusty. You are a sage. Preach it.

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 08, 2006 04:54 PM (8e/V4)

12 From a law enforcement point of view it is best to not try to focus on any group or faction until there is actual evidence. Focusing too early has the potential to lead to missed clues.

Posted by: mhw at February 08, 2006 05:43 PM (qZq+D)

13 I'll be shocked if it isn't muslims or liberals.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at February 08, 2006 07:56 PM (0yYS2)

14 John If so, then I apologize. I would not have made that statement if I had known you were serious serious. It was in reference to converts of fashionability - there is a lot of that going around.

Posted by: hondo at February 09, 2006 12:34 AM (3aakz)

15 As often as not, church burners just like to see the pretty flames. They choose churches because they expect them to be empty six nights a week, and don't want to risk hurting anyone. A few years back, there was a big flap over a "hate crime" when a black church burned down south. Then the arsonist turned out to be a black girl who attended that church.

Posted by: Paul Moore at February 09, 2006 05:41 AM (/4/ss)

16 Who knows who is doing this but its a ctime nonetheless so why dont they keep a eye out for suspcous persons

Posted by: sandpiper at February 10, 2006 09:50 AM (U+eLg)

17 The first cluster of burnings was done on a Friday - that should be prima facie evidence that this was the work of the followers of the religion of peace. Legendary they are for getting whipped up into a frenzy from their Friday gatherings, so a little such action on their sabbath is likely viewed as noble service indeed...

Posted by: quiberon bay at February 10, 2006 07:45 PM (WFQX5)

18 You're all wrong...IT's ZIONIST thugs. Bad Baptists, taking your money away from the building of the Zionist state of terror/israel.

Posted by: Jack T. Ripper at March 21, 2006 09:58 AM (S1mQS)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
27kb generated in CPU 0.0141, elapsed 0.1383 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1297 seconds, 267 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.