October 18, 2005

Egypt Builds Anti-Terror Fence

(Cairo) As a result of being a target for terrorists, the popular tourist destination of Sharm El-Sheikh will be a city surrounded by a security fence.

From ArabNews.com:

Egypt has started building a wire fence around Sharm El-Sheikh's tourist spots in a bid to prevent attackers from crossing into the Red Sea resort that was hit by deadly bombings in July, a security official said yesterday. "The fence aims to block cars from entering tourist areas except from four designated points and thus prevent possible terror attacks," the official said on condition of anonymity.

The fence would span 20 kilometers, stand one-and-a-half meters high, and be patrolled by security forces, the official said. He said work started on Saturday but did not say when it would end. Once the fence is complete, access to the city will be restricted to police-monitored entry points, equipped with state-of-the-art explosive detection equipment, he said.

Obviously, the question has to be pondered of how the Egyptian fence is any different from the wall being constructed by the Israelis for the same reason. And, the last I checked, every group that can sniff a goat from the European Union to the Arab League and to the United Nations has denounced the Israeli wall as the inhumane "Apartheid Wall."

Will these groups now also denounce the Egyptian fence? I think not. The opposition newspaper Al-Wafd in Egypt, however, did ask the question and remarked that the fence would only attract terrorists. We'll just have to wait to see how the rest of the critics respond.


[Update 10/20/05]

(From Ritzy) It seems that news of the fence was incorrect or plans have changed. According to this report, Governor Mustafa Afifi of South Sinai said that 80cm concrete walls are being constructed to keep out the camels and prevent accidents. Evidently, terrorists will continue to be allowed access to Sharm El-Sheikh as long as they don't travel by camel.

Companion post at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 05:27 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 329 words, total size 3 kb.

1 The only difference is that the Israelis did it to protect the very lives of all their people. Egypt is doing it to protect tourists because they spend money there. And they call us capitalistic pigs?

Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 06:14 AM (YudAC)

2 Sharm is popular with foreign tourists, but it's even more popular with people from the region. So I think this boils down to another case of it being okay for muslims to repel attacks from other muslims, while when it's non-muslims doing the repelling, well that's just islamophobic and down right wrong. I'm no border security expert, but I'm not all that certain about how effective a fence just 5 feet in height will be.

Posted by: Graeme at October 18, 2005 10:50 AM (N5vCl)

3 Any tourist spending money is still a tourist. If they cared about Muslims killing Muslims, they'd erect fences all over the Middle East. They're protecting a major source of income. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. I AM saying there's a pot and kettle analogy here.

Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 11:44 AM (fl6E1)

4 APARTHEID!!!!

Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at October 18, 2005 11:44 AM (8e/V4)

5 Most upset would Sinai's Bedouin boys be, who no longer can watch the Italian ladies when they're swimming in thongs. Outrage! And the land actually belongs to them. Seriously guys, you seem to forget sometimes that this country has been deeling with Muslim terrorists longer than most other countries. Indeed so effectively that the big terror brains are now fighting in other countries, BUT, the people of Egypt are AT LEAST as bothered by the terrorists as you are. I know it is easier for you to grasp it if you make a dualims out of it; e.g. Muslim vs. Non-Muslim, but that's not what it is about; it's bastards against decent people and the bastards happen to have hijacked a religion. You ought to check my latest posts also: http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/professor-of-death.html http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/egypts-mujahideen-and-pig-priests.html thanks / ritzy

Posted by: Ritzy Mabrouk at October 18, 2005 12:46 PM (DI4Qj)

6 I agree Oyster, the pot and kettle analogy is there and there are several reasons behind the double standard. Bottomline is, the double standard is glaringly obvious.

Posted by: Graeme at October 18, 2005 02:16 PM (N5vCl)

7 "Indeed so effectively that the big terror brains are now fighting in other countries,..." Indeed so effectively that only government approved and sponsored terror is allowed. Yes, I believe that the people of Egypt are tired of it, but it seems a majority of the people in Egypt are only tired of it in Egypt. Not nearly as much concern for it when it happens to infidels.

Posted by: Oyster at October 18, 2005 02:56 PM (fl6E1)

8 Should we build a fence on our borders to keep out illegal aleins?

Posted by: sandpiper at October 18, 2005 08:42 PM (swaoX)

9 Don't forget the little apartheid fence Spain has constructed around its colony in North Africa.

Posted by: babs at October 19, 2005 09:17 AM (fAmiP)

10 Now the governor of South Sinai says it's not a fence, just something to keep the Camels out! http://missmabrouk.blogspot.com/2005/10/fence-around-sharm-not-true.html

Posted by: Ritzy Mabrouk at October 19, 2005 10:00 PM (VFYHW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
22kb generated in CPU 0.0643, elapsed 0.1733 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.1649 seconds, 259 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.