March 18, 2006

Documents Confirm No Saddam Link to Terrorism

If the NY Times can get away with misleading headlines, why can't I? Newly released documents confirm that the Saddam Hussein regime actively funded al Qaeda linked terror organizations. Abu Sayyaf is al Qaeda's Southeast Asia wing--all emphasis mineWeekly Standard:

SADDAM HUSSEIN'S REGIME PROVIDED FINANCIAL support to Abu Sayyaf, the al Qaeda-linked jihadist group founded by Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law in the Philippines in the late 1990s, according to documents captured in postwar Iraq. An eight-page fax dated June 6, 2001, and sent from the Iraqi ambassador in Manila to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Baghdad, provides an update on Abu Sayyaf kidnappings and indicates that the Iraqi regime was providing the group with money to purchase weapons. The Iraqi regime suspended its support--temporarily, it seems--after high-profile kidnappings, including of Americans, focused international attention on the terrorist group.
Okay, so there seems to be a relationship with an al Qaeda linked organization, but not al Qaeda, right? More:
A SECOND internal Iraqi file obtained by The Weekly Standard concerns relations between Iraqi Intelligence and Saudi opposition groups. The document was apparently compiled at some point after January 1997, judging by the most recent date in the text, and discusses four Saudi opposition groups: the Committee for Defense of Legitimate Rights, the Reform and Advice Committee (Osama bin Laden), People of al Jazeera Union Organization, and the Saudi Hezbollah.

The New York Times first reported on the existence of this file on June 25, 2004. "American officials described the document as an internal report by the Iraqi intelligence service detailing efforts to seek cooperation with several Saudi opposition groups, including Mr. bin Laden's organization, before al Qaeda had become a full-fledged terrorist organization." According to the Times, a Pentagon task force "concluded that the document 'appeared authentic,' and that it 'corroborates and expands on previous reporting' about contacts between Iraqi intelligence and Mr. bin Laden in Sudan, according to the task force's analysis."

The most provocative aspect of the document is the discussion of efforts to seek cooperation between Iraqi Intelligence and the Saudi opposition group run by bin Laden, known to the Iraqis as the "Reform and Advice Committee." The translation of that section appears below.

We moved towards the committee by doing the following:

A. During the visit of the Sudanese Dr. Ibrahim al-Sanusi to Iraq and his meeting with Mr. Uday Saddam Hussein, on December 13, 1994, in the presence of the respectable, Mr. Director of the Intelligence Service, he [Dr. al-Sanusi] pointed out that the opposing Osama bin Laden, residing in Sudan, is reserved and afraid to be depicted by his enemies as an agent of Iraq. We prepared to meet him in Sudan (The Honorable Presidency was informed of the results of the meeting in our letter 782 on December 17, 1994).

B. An approval to meet with opposer Osama bin Laden by the Intelligence Services was given by the Honorable Presidency in its letter 138, dated January 11, 1995 (attachment 6). He [bin Laden] was met by the previous general director of M4 in Sudan and in the presence of the Sudanese, Ibrahim al-Sanusi, on February 19, 1995. We discussed with him his organization. He requested the broadcast of the speeches of Sheikh Sulayman al-Uda (who has influence within Saudi Arabia and outside due to being a well known religious and influential personality) and to designate a program for them through the broadcast directed inside Iraq, and to perform joint operations against the foreign forces in the land of Hijaz. (The Honorable Presidency was informed of the details of the meeting in our letter 370 on March 4, 1995, attachment 7.)

C. The approval was received from the Leader, Mr. President, may God keep him, to designate a program for them through the directed broadcast. We were left to develop the relationship and the cooperation between the two sides to see what other doors of cooperation and agreement open up. The Sudanese side was informed of the Honorable Presidency's agreement above, through the representative of the Respectable Director of Intelligence Services, our Ambassador in Khartoum.

D. Due to the recent situation of Sudan and being accused of supporting and embracing of terrorism, an agreement with the opposing Saudi Osama bin Laden was reached. The agreement required him to leave Sudan to another area. He left Khartoum in July 1996. The information we have indicates that he is currently in Afghanistan. The relationship with him is ongoing through the Sudanese side. Currently we are working to invigorate this relationship through a new channel in light of his present location.

In light of this, how is it possible that the Left continues to insist President Bush mislead the American people about Saddam Hussein's link to terrorism? While not a slam dunk case, it's certainly disengenious to argue that the White House knew there were no links between Iraq and al Qaeda when the Iraqi's themselves believed such a link existed. More evidence here.

Hat tip: Captain Ed and The Commissar.

Posted by: Rusty at 03:25 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 842 words, total size 6 kb.

1 Because it sounds good Rusty and it's not about hat just like the Clinton thing was not about the BJ. the sad thing is that quite a few most people, like you said, will just hear it so many times and not look into it and start to believe it. I heard em NPR Friday all last week. NO WMD. Actuall I thought the was was actually because Sadam would not comply with the UN for twelve years and we knew he would seek WMD as soon as he had bucked the UN off if he did not already have some. so it was Sadams lack of cooperation for twelve years and flat refusal to stand down that was the actual trigger for the war. He was trying to squirm out of the inspections and all the resolutions. He played to win or loose it all NOW and lost.

Posted by: Howie at March 18, 2006 05:28 PM (D3+20)

2 How is the RNC going to keep the MSM from spiking this? Are they even going to try? How is Bush going to use this information to finally answer his most vocal critics? Is he even going to try? Or is this going to be something that never sees life outside the 'Sphere and FoxNews? Is our side going to sit here and let it be spiked? --Taq

Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at March 19, 2006 12:06 AM (j8OrO)

3 Also of interest, USS Neverdock has an ABC news recording from 1999 reporting that Saddam had ties to bin Laden and harboured terrorists. How the mainstream media's tone has changed.

Posted by: Grumpy Troll at March 19, 2006 03:28 AM (6wE5R)

4 I expected this post to be flooded with the ususal moonbat tripe, and liberally, (pun intended), peppered with words such as "wingnut", "lockstep", and "Bushitlerburton", used as magic phrases to banish foes to the nether realm.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 19, 2006 07:07 AM (0yYS2)

5 Maxie, it's Sunday. They're all in church.

Posted by: Oyster at March 19, 2006 09:53 AM (YudAC)

6 I thought they were all at work. You know, busing tables and delivering pizzas.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at March 19, 2006 04:27 PM (0yYS2)

7 Did I say "church"? I meant Pizza Hut.

Posted by: Oyster at March 19, 2006 05:30 PM (YudAC)

8 Is this all you've got? 2000 Americans dead over an agreement to broadcast some frigging speeches? You've got to be kidding.

Posted by: jim collins at March 20, 2006 03:13 PM (mGpJR)

9 If you had been reading The Jawa Report all along you would not be so ignorant. So just what do you think we should have done with a state that sponsors palestinian terrorists, Al-Qaeda, Lies, thumbs his nose at the US and all international authority for 12 years. Harbors Abu Musab A-Zarqawi,etc, etc... on and on. Give him a freaking medal? If you say states that sponsor terror are just as guilty as the terrorist and will be held accountable (libs are always talking about holding someone accountable) then you had best do it.

Posted by: Howie at March 20, 2006 03:31 PM (D3+20)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
25kb generated in CPU 0.0177, elapsed 0.2322 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.2229 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.